Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Knowledge and Skills of University Students in Chemistry-Related Departments as Expressed in a Specially Designed Escape-Room

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Learning through games in general and educational escape-rooms in particular requires participants to be creative and critical thinkers, work in collaboration with others, formulate an array of thinking strategies, and be familiar with media and technology. A specially designed chemistry-themed escape-room was built as an alternative learning and assessment environment. The goal of this research was to examine students’ game-based experience and identify and characterize the skills and knowledge students experienced they used while in the escape-room. The study included 58 participants from chemistry-related departments who were either undergraduate or graduate students. The study applied the one-group posttest design, in which the learning outcomes are measured after a non-randomized group of participants is exposed to intervention. A questionnaire with closed-ended and open-ended questions was used to collect data. The findings indicated positive results regarding students’ application of communication, collaboration, and high thinking abilities (21st-century skills). Students enjoyed the activity and felt motivated to learn chemistry. Although they found the activity challenging, the degree of enjoyment and motivation to learn chemistry was high. Our study contributes to the growing body of knowledge on game-based learning by addressing some of the gaps related to the use of escape-room environments in educational settings. It shows how students benefit from these environments, which foster their content knowledge in chemistry and develop their collaboration, communication, and higher-order thinking skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Azawi, R., Al-Faliti, F., & Al-Blushi, M. (2016). Educational gamification vs. game based learning: Comparative study. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 7(4), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijimt.2016.7.4.659

  • Ang, J. W. J., Ng, Y. N. A., & Liew, R. S. (2020). Physical and digital educational escape room for teaching chemical bonding. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2849–2856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antunes, M., Pacheco, M. A. R., & Giovanela, M. (2012). Design and implementation of an educational game for teaching chemistry in higher education. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(4), 517–521. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed2003077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asakle, S., & Barak, M. (2019). AugmentedWorld: A location-based question-generating platform as a means of promoting 21st-century skills. In E. Manalo (Ed.), Deeper learning, dialogic learning, and critical thinking: Research-based strategies for the classroom (pp. 141–159). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Avargil, S. (2019). Learning chemistry: self-efficacy, chemical understanding, and graphing skills. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(4), 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avargil, S., Bruce, M., Francois, A., & Bruce, A. (2015). Students’ understanding of analogy in a CORE (Chemical Observations, Representations, Experimentation) learning cycle, general chemistry experiment. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(10), 1626–1638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avargil, S., Huttner-Shwartz, G. P., & Zemel, Y. L. E. (2021). Educational escape room: identify Dalton’s symbols and open the door. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(7), 2313–2322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2005). Enhancing undergraduate students’ chemistry understanding through project-based learning in an IT environment. Science Education, 89(1), 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biasutti, M., & Frate, S. (2018). Group metacognition in online collaborative learning: Validity and reliability of the group metacognition scale (GMS). Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(6), 1321–1338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9583-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2014). Defining twenty-first century skills. In E. Care, P. Griffin, & B. McGaw (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackie, M. A. L. (2022). Knowledge building in chemistry education. Foundations of Chemistry, 24(1), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-022-09419-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodaker, L., & Rosenberg-Kima, R. B. (2022). Online pair-programming: Elementary school children learning scratch together online. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2036653

  • Brady, S. C., & Andersen, E. C. (2019). An escape-room inspired game for genetics review. Journal of Biological Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1703784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N., Darby, W., & Coronel, H. (2019). An escape room as a simulation teaching strategy. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 30, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, M. R. M., Bruce, A. E., Avargil, S., Amar, F. G., Wemyss, T., & Flood, V. J. (2016). Polymers and cross-linking: a CORE experiment to help students think on the atomic scale. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(9), 1599–1605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byusa, E., Kampire, E., & Mwesigye, A. R. (2022). Game-based learning approach on students’ motivation and understanding of chemistry concepts: A systematic review of literature. Heliyon, 8(5), 9541–9550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Houghton Mifflin Company.

  • Carrión, S. C., Ureta, R. L., Sánchez, C. J., Bruton, L., Palomares, S. P., Pilar, M., & Royo, L. (2018). Room Escape: a transversal gamification strategy for physiotherapy students. In Proceedings of the 18th conference of EDULEARN (pp. 4149–4154).

  • Carrithers, M. D., Chatterjee, G., Carrithers, L. M., Offoha, R., Iheagwara, U., Chan, K. K. H., Xu, L., Cooper, R., Berry, A., & van Driel, J. H. (2021). Teacher noticing in science education: do you see what I see? Studies in Science Education, 57(1), 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casler, K. (2022). Escape passive learning: 10 steps to building an escape room. Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 18(5), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2022.01.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, H.-P. (2022). Playful and social interaction in physical game: A quantitative and qualitative study of real-life escape room. Trames. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 26(2), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2022.2.06

  • Clapson, M. L., Gilbert, B., Mozol, V. J., Schechtel, S., Tran, J., & White, S. (2019). ChemEscape: Educational battle box puzzle activities for engaging outreach and active learning in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(1), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S., Arnab, S., Keegan, H., Morini, L., & Wood, O. (2016). Escaped: Adapting live-action, interactive games to support higher education teaching and learning practices. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10056 LNCS, 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50182-6_13

  • Clauson, A., Hahn, L., Frame, T., Hagan, A., Bynum, L. A., Thompson, M. E., & Kiningham, K. (2019). An innovative escape room activity to assess student readiness for advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs). Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 11(7), 723–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2019.03.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J., Clark, J., Gutmann, V., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). An expanded typology for classifying mixed methods research into designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://www.corwin.com/upm-data/19291_Chapter_7.pdf

  • Derman, A., & Ebenezer, J. (2020). The effect of multiple representations of physical and chemical changes on the development of primary pre-service teachers cognitive structures. Research in Science Education, 50(4), 1575–1601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9744-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickmann, T., Opfermann, M., Dammann, E., Lang, M., & Rumann, S. (2019). What you see is what you learn? The role of visual model comprehension for academic success in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(4), 804–820. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00016j

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimeo, S. P., Astemborksi, C., Smart, J., & Jones, E. L. (2022). A virtual escape room versus lecture on infectious disease content: Effect on resident knowledge and motivation. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 23(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.12.54010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dori, Y. J., Avargil, S., Kohen, Z., & Saar, L. (2018). Context-based learning and metacognitive prompts for enhancing scientific text comprehension. International Journal of Science Education, 40(10), 1198–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2012). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Sage Publication.

  • Fotaris, P., & Mastoras, T. (2019). Escape rooms for learning: A systematic review. Proceedings of the European Conference on Games-Based Learning, 2019-Octob, 235–243. https://doi.org/10.34190/GBL.19.179

  • Franco, P. F., & DeLuca, D. A. (2019). Learning through action: Creating and implementing a strategy game to foster innovative thinking in higher education. Simulation and Gaming, 50(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878118820892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giang, C., Chevalier, M., Negrini, L., Peleg, R., Bonnet, E., Piatti, A., & Mondada, F. (2020). Exploring escape games as a teaching tool in educational robotics. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 946 AISC, 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18141-3_8

  • Gordon, S. K., Trovinger, S., & DeLellis, T. (2019). Escape from the usual: Development and implementation of an ‘escape room’ activity to assess team dynamics. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 11(8), 818–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2019.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinio, A. E., Dufresne, L., Brandys, T., & Jetty, P. (2019). Break out of the classroom: The use of escape rooms as an alternative teaching strategy in surgical education. Journal of Surgical Education, 76(1), 134–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohen, Z., Herscovitz, O., & Dori, Y. J. (2020). How to promote chemical literacy? On-line question posing and communicating with scientists. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 250–266. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00134D

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, L., & Campbell, N. (2021). Effectiveness of an escape room for undergraduate interprofessional learning: A mixed methods single group pre-post evaluation. BMC Medical Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S12909-021-02666-Z

  • National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. In Committee on Defining Deeper Learning and 21st Century Skills, J. W. Pellegrino & M. L. Hilton (Eds.). Board on Testing and Assessment and Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

  • Peleg, R., Yayon, M., Katchevich, D., Moria-Shipony, M., & Blonder, R. (2019). A lab-based chemical escape room: Educational, mobile, and fun! Journal of Chemical Education, 96(5), 955–960. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, M., & Clark, K. R. (2016). Game-based learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shemwell, J. T., Avargil, S., & Capps, D. K. (2015). Grappling with long-term learning in science: a qualitative study of teachers’ views of developmentally oriented instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(8), 1163–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sipos, Y., Battisti, B., & Grimm, K. (2008). Achieving transformative sustainability learning: engaging head, hands and heart. International journal of sustainability in higher education.

  • Srisawasdi, N., & Panjaburee, P. (2019). Implementation of game-transformed inquiry-based learning to promote the understanding of and motivation to learn chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(2), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9754-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringfield, T. W., & Kramer, E. F. (2014). Benefits of a game-based review module in chemistry courses for nonmajors. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(1), 56–58. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed300678f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2013). Revisiting the chemistry triplet: Drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledge and the psychology of learning to inform chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(2), 156. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3rp00012e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsybulsky, D. (2020). Digital curation for promoting personalized learning: A study of secondary-school science students’ learning experiences. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 429–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Es, E. A., Tunney, J., Goldsmith, L. T., & Seago, N. (2014). A framework for the facilitation of teachers’ analysis of video. Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 340–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watermeier, D., & Salzameda, B. (2019). Escaping boredom in first semester general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(5), 961–964. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yachin, T., & Barak, M. (2019). Promoting healthy nutrition through educational escape games. Proceedings of the 2019 InSITE Conference, 217–226. https://doi.org/10.28945/4362

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Young Faculty Funding, the Technion, Israel Institute of Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shirly Avargil.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

This study is approved by the Technion’s IRB, approval number 2021–083. All participants were above 18 years old and signed a consent form.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Avargil, S. Knowledge and Skills of University Students in Chemistry-Related Departments as Expressed in a Specially Designed Escape-Room. J Sci Educ Technol 31, 680–690 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09986-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09986-9

Keywords

Navigation