Abstract
We obtain the rate function for the level 2.5 of large deviations for pure jump and diffusion processes. This result is proved by two methods: tilting, for which a tilted process with an appropriate typical behavior is considered, and a spectral method, for which the scaled cumulant generating function is used. We also briefly discuss fluctuation relations, pointing out their connection with large deviations at the level 2.5.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The expression \(\rho _{inv}\circ L\circ \rho _{inv}^{-1}\) must be understood as the composition of three operators, first the operator multiplication by \(\rho _{inv}^{-1},\) second the operator \(L\) and last the operator multiplication by \(\rho _{inv}\). This type of notation is recurrently used in the article.
In operational notation \(L_{V_{1},V_{2}}=W\exp \left( V_{2}\right) -W\left[ 1\right] +V_{1}\).
Rigorously, we should instead define the empirical measure \(\mu _{T}^{e}=\frac{1}{T}\int _{0}^{T}\delta _{X_{t}}dt\).
- $$\begin{aligned} \int _{\mathcal {E}}dxg(x)\nabla \cdot j_{T}^{e}(x)= & {} -\int _{\mathcal {E}}dxj_{T}^{e}(x) \cdot \nabla g(x)=-\frac{1}{T}\int _{0\text { }}^{T}\nabla g(X_{t})\circ dX_{t}\\= & {} \frac{1}{T}\left( g(X_{0})-g(Xt)\right) ,\qquad \text {for all functions g}. \end{aligned}$$
Here, we do not consider the case where the time inversion acts non-trivially on the space \(\mathcal {E}\). For example, such a situation takes place for the non-over-damped Kramers equation [10].
A better upper bound has been obtained in [11] using the classical Martingale inequality.
\(X_{t}\) does not need to be Markovian here.
For a theoretical Physicist point of view, this theorem is a functional Laplace transform followed by a saddle point approximation.
These properties follow from the Krein–Rutman theorem [35], which, however, requires that the operator \(L_{V_{1},V_{2}}\) is compact. For a uniformly elliptic operator in divergent form as the generator of a diffusion process, a version of the Krein–Rutman theorem is proven, for example, in [27], Chap. 6.5.2], where the hypothesis are: \(\mathcal {E}\) is bounded, open and connected; \(\partial \mathcal {E}\) is smooth; \(D\) and \(\widehat{A_{0}}\) are smooth; \(L_{V_{1},V_{2}}\left[ 1\right] \ge 0\) on \(\mathcal {E}\). Strictly speaking, the theorem is not valid if, for example, \(\mathcal {E}\) is not bounded, with the extension for an unbounded \(\mathcal {E}\) being a difficult and contemporary problem [4]. Even though we are not aware of proof for unbounded \(\mathcal {E}\) in the mathematics literature, more sophisticated related results do exist, as for example in [43], Chap. 4.11]. From a physicist perspective, if the drift of the process is sufficiently confining then the result for bounded \(\mathcal {E}\) case should also be true for unbounded \(\mathcal {E}\).
References
Barato, A.C., Chetrite, R., Hinrichsen, H., Mukamel, D.: Entropy production and fluctuation relations for a KPZ interface. J. Stat. Mech.: Theor. Exp. P10008 (2010)
Barato, A.C., Chetrite, R., Hinrichsen, H., Mukamel, D.: A Gallavotti–Cohen–Evans–Morriss like symmetry for a class of Markov jump processes. J. Stat. Phys. 146, 294 (2012)
Barato, A.C., Chetrite, R.: On the symmetry of current probability distributions in jump processes. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45, 485002 (2012)
Berestycki, H., Rossi, L.: Generalization and properties of the principal eigeinvalue of elliptic operators in unbounded domains. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 68, 1014 (2015)
Bertini, L., Gabrielli, D., Faggionnato, A.: Large deviations of the empirical flow for continuous time Markov chains. arXiv:1210.2004 (2012)
Bertini, L., Faggionato, A., Gabrielli, D.: From level 2.5 to level 2 large deviations for continuous time Markov chains. Markov Process. Relat. Fields 20, 545 (2014)
Bertini, L., Chetrite, R., Faggionato, A., Gabrielli, D.: Large deviation of the empirical flow for Markov chain with time-periodic rates (in preparation)
Boltzmann, L.: Über die Beziehung zwischen dem zweiten Hauptsatze der mechanischen Wärmetheorie und der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung respecktive den Sätzen über das Wärmegleichgewicht. Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien, II 75, 67 (1877)
Chernyak, V., Chertkov, M., Malinin, S., Teodorescu, R.: Non-equilibrium thermodynamics and topology of currents. J. Stat. Phys. 137, 109–147 (2009)
Chetrite, R., Gawedzki, K.: Fluctuation relations for diffusion processes. Commun. Math. Phys. 282, 469–518 (2008)
Chetrite, R., Gupta, S.: Two refreshing views of fluctuation theorems through kinematics elements and exponential martingale. J. Stat. Phys. 143, 543–584 (2011)
Chetrite, R., Faggionato, A., Gabrielli, D.: Large deviation principle for the m-order empirical measure and flow of continuous time Markov chain (in preparation)
Chung, K.L., Walsh, J.B.: Markov Processes, Brownian Motion, and Time Symmetry, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2005)
Crooks, G.E.: Path ensembles averages in systems driven far from equilibrium. Phys. Rev. E 61, 2361 (2000)
de la Fortelle, A.: Large deviation principle for Markov chains in continuous time. Prob. Inf. Transm. 37, 120 (2001)
den Hollander, F.: Large Deviations. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2009)
Dembo, A., Zeitouni, O.: Large Deviations Techniques and Applications, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (1998)
Deuschel, J.D., Stroock, D.: Large Deviations. Academic Press, Boston (1989)
Donsker, M.D., Varadhan, S.R.S.: Asymptotic evaluation of certain Markov process expectation for large time, I. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 28, 1 (1975)
Donsker, M.D., Varadhan, S.R.S.: Asymptotic evaluation of certain Markov process expectation for large time, II. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 28, 279 (1975)
Donsker, M.D., Varadhan, S.R.S.: Asymptotic evaluation of certain Markov process expectation for large time, III. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 29, 389 (1976)
Donsker, M.D., Varadhan, S.R.S.: Asymptotic evaluation of certain Markov process expectation for large time, IV. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 36, 183 (1983)
Ellis, R.S.: Entropy, Large Deviations, and Statistical Mechanics. Springer, New York (1985)
Ethier, S.N., Kurtz, T.G.: Markov Processes: Characterization and Convergence. Wiley, New York (2009)
Evans, D.J., Cohen, E.G.D., Morriss, G.P.: Probability of second law violations in shearing steady states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2401 (1993)
Evans, D.J., Searles, D.J.: Equilibrium microstates which generates the second law violating steady state. Phys. Rev. E 50, 1645 (1994)
Evans, L.C.: Partial Differential Equation. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2010)
Flandoli, F., Giaquinta, M., Gubinelli, M., Tortorelli, V.M.: Stochastic currents. Stoch. Process. Appl. 155, 1583 (2005)
Gallavotti, G., Cohen, E.G.D.: Dynamical ensemble in a stationary state. J. Stat. Phys. 80, 931–970 (1995)
Hormander, L.: Hypoelliptic second ordrer differential equations. Acta Math. 119, 147 (1967)
Jarzynski, C.: A nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2690 (1997)
Kesidis, G., Walrand, J.: Relative entropy between Markov transition rate matrices. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 39, 10561057 (1993)
Kirchkoff, G.: Über die Auflosung der Gleichungen, auf welche man bei der Untersuchungder der linearen Vertheilung galvanischer Strome gefuhrt wird. Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 148, 497 (1847)
Kipnis, C., Landim, C.: Scaling Limits of Interacting Particle Systems. Springer, Berlin (1999)
Krein, M.G., Rutman, M.A.: Linear operators leaving a cone in a Banach space. Uspekhi Matematicheskikh Nauk 3, 3 (1948)
Kusuoka, S., Kuwada, K., Tamura, Y.: Large deviation for stochastic line integrals as L\(^p\)-currents. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 147, 649 (2010)
Lebowitz, J., Spohn, H.: A Gallavotti–Cohen type symmetry in the large deviation functional for stochastic dynamics. J. Stat. Phys. 95, 333 (1999)
Maes, C.: The fluctuation theorem as a Gibbs property. J. Stat. Phys. 95, 367 (1999)
Maes, C., Netocny, K., Wynants, B.: Steady state statistics of driven diffusions. Physica A 387, 2675 (2008)
Maes, C., Netocny, K.: The canonical structure of dynamical fluctuations in mesoscopic nonequilibrium steady states. Europhys. Lett. 82, 30003 (2008)
Malliavin, P.: Stochastic calculus of variations and hypoelliptic operators. In: Proc. Intern. Symp. SDE (Kyoto), Wiley, New York (1978)
Oono, Y.: Large deviation and statistical physics. Prog. Theoret. Phys. Suppl. 99, 165 (1989)
Pinsky, R.G.: Positive Harmonic Functions and Diffusion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)
Revuz, D., Yor, M.: Continuous Martingles and Brownian Motion, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin (1999)
Risken, H.: The Fokker–Planck Equation: Methods of Solution and Applications. Springer, New York (1996)
Rogers, L.C.G., Williams, D.: Diffusions, Markov Processes, and Martingales. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)
Seifert, U.: Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems, and molecular machines. Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 126001 (2012)
Stroock, D., Varadhan, S.R.S.: Multidimensional Diffusion Processes. Springer, Berlin (1979)
Touchette, H.: The large deviation approach to statistical mechanics. Phys. Rep. 478, 1 (2009)
Varadhan, S.R.S.: Large Deviations and Applications. SIAM, Philadelphia (1984)
Acknowledgments
We thank Krzysztof Gawedzki for helping in the proof presented in Sect. 4.2.4 and Hugo Touchette for carefully reading the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
“I would like to offer some remarks about the word “formal”. For the mathematician, it usually means “according to the standard of formal rigor, of formal logic”. For the physicists, it is more or less synonymous with “heuristic” as opposed to “rigorous””. Pierre Cartier. Mathemagics (A Tribute to L. Euler and R. Feynman). Seminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire 44 (2000), Article B44d.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Proof of (82)
We prove relation (82) from relation (81). Writing
we obtain
With this last equation (81) becomes
where \(V_1'= \ln r(V_1,V_2)\).
Appendix 2: Proof of (83)
The goal here is to prove relation (83) from (82). From a direct calculation we obtain
Relation (82) then becomes
We obtain the final relation (83) with \(L_{0,V'_{2}}[1] = \widehat{A_{0}} \cdot V'_{2}+V'_{2} \cdot \frac{D}{2} \cdot V'_{2}+\nabla \cdot \left( \frac{D}{2} \cdot V'_{2}\right) \) and the algebraic manipulation
which included formal integration by parts.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barato, A.C., Chetrite, R. A Formal View on Level 2.5 Large Deviations and Fluctuation Relations. J Stat Phys 160, 1154–1172 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-015-1283-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-015-1283-0