Abstract
We introduce a toy model, which represents a simplified version of the problem of the depinning transition in the limit of strong disorder. This toy model can be formulated as a simple renormalization transformation for the probability distribution of a single real variable. For this toy model, the critical line is known exactly in one particular case and it can be calculated perturbatively in the general case. One can also show that, at the transition, there is no fixed distribution accessible by renormalization which corresponds to a disordered fixed point. Instead, both our numerical and analytic approaches indicate a transition of infinite order (of the Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless type). We give numerical evidence that this infinite order transition persists for the problem of the depinning transition with disorder on the hierarchical lattice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aizenman, M., Wehr, J.: Rounding effects of quenched randomness on 1st-order phase transition. Commun. Math. Phys. 130, 489–528 (1990)
Alexander, K.S.: The effect of disorder on polymer depinning transitions. Commun. Math. Phys. 279, 117–146 (2008)
Alexander, K.S., Sidoravicius, V.: Pinning of polymers and interfaces by random potentials. Ann. Appl. Prob. 16, 636–669 (2006)
Alexander, K.S., Zygouras, N.: Quenched and annealed critical points in polymer pinning models. Commun Math. Phys. 291, 659–689 (2009)
Ares, S., Sanchez, A.: Modelling disorder: the cases of wetting and DNA denaturation. Eur. Phys. J. B 56, 253–258 (2007)
Azbel, M.Y.: Long-range interaction and heterogeneity yield a different kind of critical phenomenon. Phys. Rev. E 68, 050901 (2003)
Azbel, M.Y.: Giant non-universal critical index and fluctuations in DNA phase transition. Physica A - Stat. Mech. Appl. 321, 571–576 (2003)
Berger, Q., Toninelli, F.L.: Hierarchical pinning model in correlated random environment. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Prob. Stat. 49, 781–816 (2013)
Bhattacharjee, S.M., Mukherji, S.: Directed polymers with random interaction—marginal relevance and novel criticality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 49–52 (1993)
Bhattacharjee, S.M., Mukherji, S.: Directed polymers with random interaction—An exactly solvable case. Phys. Rev. E 48, 3483–3496 (1993)
Bolthausen, E., Caravenna, E., de Tiliere, B.: The quenched critical point of a diluted disordered polymer model. Stoch. Process. Appl. 119, 1479–1504 (2009)
Bolthausen, E., Funaki, T., Otobe, T.: Concentration under scaling limits for weakly pinned Gaussian random walks. Prob. Theory Relat. Fields 143, 441–480 (2009)
Caravenna, F., Giacomin, G.: On constrained annealed bounds for pinning and wetting models. Electron. Commun. Prob. 10, 179–189 (2005)
Collet, P., Eckmann, J.P., Glaser, V., Martin, A.: Study of the iterations of a mapping associated to a spin-glass model. Commun. Math. Phys. 94, 353–370 (1984)
Cule, D., Hwa, T.: Denaturation of heterogeneous DNA. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2375–2378 (1997)
Coluzzi, B., Yeramian, E.: Numerical evidence for relevance of disorder in a Poland–Scheraga DNA denaturation model with self-avoidance: scaling behavior of average quantities. Eur. Phys. J. B 56, 349–365 (2007)
Derrida, B., Giacomin, G., Lacoin, H., Toninelli, F.L.: Fractional moment bounds and disorder relevance for pinning models. Commun. Math. Phys. 287, 867–887 (2009)
Derrida, B., Hakim, V., Vannimenus, J.: Effect of disorder on 2-dimensional wetting. J. Stat. Phys. 66, 1189–1213 (1992)
Fisher, M.E.: Walks, walls, wetting and melting. J. Stat. Phys. 34, 684–689 (1984)
Flajolet, P., Sedgewick, R.: Analytic Combinatorics. Cambridge University Press, New York (2009)
Forgacs, G., Luck, J.M., Nieuwenhuizen, T.M., Orland, H.: Wetting of a disordered substrate—Exact critical behavior in 2 dimension. Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2184–2187 (1986)
Forgacs, G., Luck, J.M., Nieuwenhuizen, T.M., Orland, H.: Exact critical behavior of two dimensional wetting problems with quenched disorder. J. Stat. Phys. 51, 29–56 (1988)
Gangardt, D.M., Nechaev, S.K.: Wetting transition on a one-dimensional disorder. J. Stat. Phys. 130, 483–502 (2008)
Garel, T., Monthus, C., Orland, H.: A simple model for DNA denaturation. EuroPhys. Lett. 55, 132–138 (2001)
Garel, T., Monthus, C.: Two-dimensional wetting with binary disorder: a numerical study of the loop statistics. Eur. Phys. J. B 46, 117–125 (2005)
Giacomin, G.: Random Polymer Models. Imperial College Press, World Scientific, London (2007)
Giacomin, G., Lacoin, H., Toninelli, F.L.: Disorder relevance at marginality and critical point shift. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré—Prob. Stat. 47, 148–175 (2011)
Giacomin, G., Toninelli, F.L.: On the irrelevant disorder regime of pinning models. Ann. Prob. 37, 1841–1875 (2009)
Giacomin, G., Lacoin, H., Toninelli, F.L.: Marginal relevance of disorder for pinning models. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 63, 233–265 (2010)
Giacomin, G., Lacoin, H., Toninelli, F.L.: Hierarchical pinning models, quadratic maps and quenched disorder. Prob. Theory Relat. Fields 147, 185–216 (2010)
Giacomin, G., Toninelli, F.L.: Smoothing of depinning transitions for directed polymers with quenched disorder. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 070602 (2006)
Giacomin, G., Toninelli, F.L.: Smoothing effect of quenched disorder on polymer depinning transitions. Commun. Math. Phys. 266, 1–16 (2006)
Harris, A.B.: Effect of random defects on critical behavior of Ising model. J. Phys. C - Solid State Phys. 7, 1671–1692 (1974)
Igloi, F., Monthus, C.: Strong disorder RG approach of random systems. Phys. Rep-Rev. Sect. Phys. Lett. 412, 277–431 (2005)
Kafri, Y., Mukamel, D., Peliti, L.: Why is the DNA denaturation transition first order? Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4988–4991 (2000)
Kafri, Y., Mukamel, D.: Griffiths singularities in unbinding of strongly disordered polymers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 038103 (2003)
Kosterlitz, J.M., Thouless, D.J.: Ordering, metastability and phase-transitions in 2 dimensional systems. J. Phys. C 6, 1181–1203 (1973)
Kosterlitz, J.M., Thouless, D.J.: Early work on defect driven phase transitions. In: Jose Jorge, V. (ed.) 40 Years of Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless Theory, pp. 1–67. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore (2013)
Kunz, H., Livi, R.: DNA denaturation and wetting in the presence of disorder. Eur. Phys. Lett. 99, 30001 (2012)
Lacoin, H.: Hierarchical pinning model with site disorder: disorder is marginally relevant. Prob. Theory Relat. Fields 148, 159–175 (2010)
Lacoin, H.: The martingale approach to disorder irrelevance for pinning models. Electron. Commun. Prob. 15, 418–427 (2010)
Lacoin, H., Moreno, G.: Directed polymers on hierarchical lattices with site disorder. Stoch. Process. Appl. 120, 467–493 (2010)
Lacoin, H., Toninelli, F.L.: A smoothing inequality for hierarchical pinning models. Prog. Prob. 62, 271–278 (2009)
Lubensky, D.K., Nelson, D.R.: Single molecule statistics and the polynucleotide unzipping transition. Phys. Rev. E 65, 031917 (2002)
Monthus, C.: Random walks and polymers in the presence of quenched disorder. Lett. Math. Phys. 78, 207–233 (2006)
Monthus, C., Garel, T.: Distribution of pseudo-critical temperatures and lack of self-averaging in disordered Poland–Scheraga models with different loop exponents. Eur. Phys. J. B 48, 393–403 (2005)
Monthus, C., Garel, T.: Multifractal statistics of the local order parameter at random critical points: application to wetting transitions with disorder. Phys. Rev. E 76, 021114 (2007)
Monthus, C., Garel, T.: Critical points of quadratic renormalizations of random variables and phase transitions of disordered polymer models on diamond lattices. Phys. Rev. E 77, 021132 (2008)
Poland, D., Scheraga, H.A.: Occurrence of a phase transition in nucleic acid models. J. Chem. Phys. 45, 1464–1469 (1966)
Richard, C., Guttmann, A.J.: Poland–Scheraga models and the DNA denaturation transition. J. Stat. Phys. 115, 943–965 (2004)
Tang, L.H., Chaté, H.: Rare-event induced binding transition of heteropolymers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 830–833 (2001)
Toninelli, F.L.: A replica-coupling approach to disordered pinning models. Commun. Math. Phys. 280, 389–401 (2008)
Toninelli, F.L.: Disordered pinning models and copolymers: beyond annealed bounds. Ann. Appl. Prob. 18, 1569–1587 (2008)
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank J.P. Eckmann, G. Giacomin, L.H. Tang and F. Werner for useful and stimulating discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: The Large \(a\) Limit of the Toy Model (6)
In this appendix we try to explain the \(1/a\) dependence of \(\lambda _c\) that we observed for large \(a\) in Table 1.
Consider a distribution \(P_0(X)\) characterized by its first two moments
The parameters \(\mu \) and \(\sigma \) change if one varies the initial distribution \(P_0(X)\). Let us call \(\mu _c(a, \sigma )\) the critical value of \(\mu \) at the depinning transition (8).
By the simple change of scale \( a\rightarrow a', \mu \rightarrow a' \mu / a, \sigma \rightarrow a'^2 \sigma / a^2\) it is clear that \(\mu _c(a,\sigma )\) should be of the form
On the other hand, if \(a\) is very large compared to \(\mu \) and \(\sqrt{\sigma }\), for many iterations of the renormalization, the distribution is renormalized as if \(a\) was infinite: after \(n\) steps, one has \(\mu _n \simeq 2^n \mu \) and \(\sigma _n \simeq 2^n \sigma \). Therefore for \(\mu \ll a\) and \(\sigma \ll a^2\) one has
Combining these two equations leads to the result that
For the particular case of the binary distribution (9) one has \(\mu = 2 \lambda -1\) and therefore \(\lambda _c -1/2 \sim 1/a\) as observed in Table 1.
Appendix 2: Absence of Critical Fixed Distributions of the Map (22)
In this appendix, we show for \(a\) an integer, that the only fixed distributions accessible by the renormalization group (19) are \(H(z)=0\) (which corresponds to the pinned phase), \(H(z)=1\) (which corresponds to the unpinned phase) and \(H(z)=z^a\) (which corresponds to the critical point of the pure system).
We have seen that in terms of the generating function \(H_n(z)\), the renormalization transformation (6) can be written as
where \(Q_n(z)\) is the polynomial of degree \(a-1\) obtained by keeping the first \(a\) coefficients of the expansion of \(H_n^2(z)\) around \(z=0\) :
It is clear that if the \(p_n^{(k)}\)’s in (19, 21) are non-negative then the \(\beta ^{(k)}\)’s are also non-negative. If one looks for a fixed distribution (i.e. for a fixed point \(H_*(z)\) of the map (22)) one gets
with
Let us first observe that \(\Delta (z)\) cannot vanish on the positive real axis:
-
For \(z \le 1\), by writing
$$\begin{aligned} \Delta (z) = z^{2 a} + 4 \sum _{k=0}^{a-1} \beta _*^{(k)} (z^k - z^a) \end{aligned}$$it is obvious that \(\Delta (z) >0\) .
-
For \( z \ge 1\), using the fact that
$$\begin{aligned} \sum _{k=-a}^\infty p^{(k]}=1= \sum _{k=0}^\infty \beta ^{(k)} \end{aligned}$$one can rewrite \(\Delta (z)\) as
$$\begin{aligned} \Delta (z)= z^{2 a} \sum _{k=a}^\infty \beta _*^{(k)} + \sum _{k=0}^{a-1} \beta _*^{(k)}(z^a-2)^2 + 4 \sum _{k=0}^{a-1} \beta _*^{(k)}( z^k - 1) \end{aligned}$$
and in this case too, \(\Delta (z)\) is strictly positive on the whole positive axis. We are now going to prove that \(\sqrt{\Delta (z)}\) has to be a polynomial.
If \(\sqrt{\Delta (z)}\) was not a polynomial, then, because \(\Delta (z)\) does not vanish on the positive real axis, the singularity of \(H_*(z)\) closest to \(z=0\) would not be on the positive real axis. It is however known (Pringsheim’s theorem [20]) that a series with positive coefficients has a singularity at the intersection of the positive real axis and its circle of convergence of the series. Therefore, the coefficients of \(H_*(z)\) would not be all positive.
Therefore \(\sqrt{\Delta (z)}\) has to be a polynomial. From (52) and the fact that \(Q_*(z)\) is of degree \(a-1\), the only possibilities are \(Q_*(z)=Q_*(1)^2\) which implies either \(Q_*(z)=0\) or \(Q_*(z)=1\). Thus (52) implies that \(\Delta (z) = z^{2 a} \) or \(\Delta (z) = (z^{ a}-2)^2\) which gives \(H_*(z)=0\), \(z^a\) or \(1\).
Appendix 3: The Extra Critical Fixed Point of the Truncated Transformation (27)
In this appendix we show that if one truncates the transformation as in (6) by (27), there appears a new critical fixed distribution. This new fixed point disappears in the \(a' \rightarrow \infty \) limit.
For the sake of simplicity, let us limit the discussion to the case \(a=1\) and to a large integer value of \(a'\). For integer \(a \) and \(a'\) the transformation (19) remains the same for \(k < a'\). The only change is for \(k=a'\) where it becomes
Because the transformation for \( k < a'\) does not depend on \(a'\), the recursion relation of the generating function \(H_n(z)\)
is the same as (24) up to terms of order \(z^{a+a'-1}\)
Therefore a fixed point of (55) should be of the form
For \(k < a+a'-1\) (here \(a=1\)) one gets for the weights of the fixed distribution
where the integration contour is a small circle around the origin.
For \(H(0)\) close to \(1\) this gives
If \(q\) is the first zero of \( \int \limits _0^1 dy \sqrt{1 - y^2} \ \cos ( q y )\) all the \(p_*^{(k)}\) are positive as long as \(k < q/\sqrt{2 (1- H(0)}\). Adjusting the boundary condition at \(k=a'\) selects one particular value \(H(0)\) which should be such that
In the limit \(a' \rightarrow \infty \), obviously \(H(0) \rightarrow 1\) and this extra fixed point merges with the fixed point \(H_*(z)=1\).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Derrida, B., Retaux, M. The Depinning Transition in Presence of Disorder: A Toy Model. J Stat Phys 156, 268–290 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-014-1006-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-014-1006-y