Abstract
Although seismic activity in Brazil is low to moderate, some earthquakes with damage potential occurred in the past. Engineering structures located along the coast and those installed in deep waters need to comply with safety requirements. In addition, there is a need to address the public interest regarding the effects of seismically-induced landslides. Therefore, a probabilistic seismic hazard assessment was carried out for the offshore south/southeast regions of Brazil, in order to estimate potential levels of ground motion. A historical and recent instrumental seismicity catalog for this region has been compiled. A stochastic attenuation relation with different seismic source models and recurrence parameters was used in a hazard analysis with the CRISIS 2012 software. To capture the epistemic and aleatoric uncertainties in the hazard calculations, a logic tree approach was adopted, considering different seismic zone models, seismic activity parameters, and scaling factors in the Ground Motion Prediction Equation. It was verified that the Peak Ground Accelerations are mostly less than 2.0% g in the continental portion of the region (for 10% exceedance probability in 50 years). At a particular point of interest located offshore in the continental slope of the study area, the seismic hazard is also low, with the maximum acceleration for the probability of exceedance of 10% and 2% in 50 years reaching mean values of 3.2% and 19.1% g, respectively, for very hard rock conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahamson NA (2000) State of the practice of seismic hazard evaluation. In: Paper presented at the International Society for Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Symposium, Melbourne, Australia, November 19–24
Abrahamson NA, Bommer JJ (2005) Probability and uncertainty in seismic hazard analysis. Earthquake Spectra 21(2):603–607. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1899158
Al Atik L, Abrahamson N, Bommer JJ, Scherbaum F, Cotton F, Kuehn N (2010) The variability of ground-motion prediction models and its components. Seismol Res Lett 81(5):794–801. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.81.5.794
Almeida MCF (1997) Seismic analysis in Southeast Brazil: application to pipelines of the oil industry. Thesis, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. In Portuguese
Almeida AAD, Assumpção M, Bommer JJ, Drouet S, Riccomini C, Prates CLM (2019) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for a nuclear power plant site in southeast Brazil. J Seismol 23:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-018-9755-8
Anderson JG (1997) Benefits of scenario ground motion maps. Eng Geol 48(1–2):43–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(97)81913-8
Assumpção M (1983) A regional magnitude scale for Brazil. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73(1):237–246
Assumpção M (1998a) Seismicity and stresses in the Brazilian passive margin. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88(1):160–169
Assumpção M (1998b) Focal mechanisms of small earthquakes in the south Brazilian shield: a test of stress models of the South American plate. Geophys J Int 133(2):490–498. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.1998.00532.x
Assumpção M, Dias Neto, CM, Ortega R, França H (1979) The São Paulo earthquake of 1922. In: Paper presented at the 2nd Geology Regional Symposium, Rio Claro, São Paulo, November 15-18. In Portuguese
Assumpção M, Dourado JC, Ribotta LC, Mohriak WU, Dias FL, Barbosa JR (2011) The São Vicente earthquake of 2008 April and seismicity in the continental shelf off SE Brazil: further evidence for flexural stresses. Geophys J Int 187(3):1076–1088. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05198.x
Assumpção M, Ferreira J, Barros L, Bezerra H, França GS, Barbosa JR, Menezes E, Ribotta LC, Pirchiner M, Nascimento A, Dourado JC (2014) Intraplate seismicity in Brazil. In: Talwani P (ed) Intraplate earthquakes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 50–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139628921.004
Assumpção M, Pirchiner M, Dourado JC, Barros LV (2016) Earthquakes in Brazil: preparing for rare events. Bull Braz Soc Geophys 96:25–29 In Portuguese
Atkinson GM, Bommer JJ, Abrahamson NA (2014) Alternative approaches to modeling epistemic uncertainty in ground motions in probabilistic seismic-hazard analysis. Seismol Res Lett 85(6):1141–1144. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220140120
Bazzurro P, Cornell CA (1999) Disaggregation of seismic hazard. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89(2):501–520
Berrocal J, Assumpção M, Antezana R, Dias Neto CM, Ortega R, França H, Veloso JAV (1984) Seismicity of Brazil. Astronomical and Geophysical Institute of the University of São Paulo and Nuclear Energy National Committee, São Paulo In Portuguese
Berrocal J, Fernandes C, Bueno A, Seixas N, Bassini A (1993) Seismic activity in Monsuaba (state of Rio de Janeiro), Brazil, between 1988 December and 1989 February. Geophysical J Int 113(1):73–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1993.tb02529.x
Bianchi MB, Assumpção M, Rocha MP, Carvalho JM, Azevedo PA, Fontes SL, Dias FL, Ferreira JM, Nascimento AF, Ferreira MV, Costa ISL (2018) The Brazilian seismographic network (RSBR): improving seismic monitoring in Brazil. Seismol Res Lett 89(2A):452–457. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170227
Bommer JJ, Scherbaum F (2008) The use and misuse of logic trees in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Earthquake Spectra 24(4):997–1009. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2977755
Bommer JJ, Scherbaum F, Bungum H, Cotton F, Sabetta F, Abrahamson NA (2005) On the use of logic trees for ground-motion prediction equations in seismic-hazard analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95(2):377–389. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120040073
Ciardelli C, Assumpção M (2019) Rupture lengths of intraplate earthquakes in Brazil determined by relative location of aftershocks: evidence for depth dependence of stress drops. J S Am Earth Sci 89:246–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2018.11.017
Cobbold PR, Meisling KE, Mount VS (2001) Reactivation of an obliquely rifted margin, Campos and Santos basins, southeastern Brazil. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 85(11):1925–1944
Dourado JC, Assumpção M, Nery M (2019) Seismic hazard evaluation for a site near Cubatão, Serra Do Mar, SE Brazil: comparison with the preliminary PSHA map for Brazil. In: Paper presented at the 3rd Brazilian Seismology Symposium, Vinhedo, São Paulo, Brazil, April 15-17. Abstract
Fine IV, Rabinovich AB, Bornhold BD, Thomson RE, Kulikov EA (2005) The Grand Banks landslide-generated tsunami of November 18, 1929: preliminary analysis and numerical modeling. Mar Geol 215(1–2):45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2004.11.007
Giardini D (1999) The global seismic hazard assessment program (GSHAP) – 1992/1999. Ann Geophys 42(6):957–974. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-3780
Giardini D, Grünthal G, Shedlock KM, Zhang P (1999) The GSHAP global seismic hazard map. Ann Geophys-Italy 42(6):1225–1230. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-3784
Hanks TC, Kanamori H (1979) A moment magnitude scale. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 84(B5):2348–2350. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB084iB05p02348
Hayashi T, Yashiro H (2019) Proposal of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for disaster prevention of the local area. In: Silvestri F, Moraci N (eds) Earthquake geotechnical engineering for protection and development of environment and constructions. Associazione Geotecnica Italiana, Rome, pp 2827–2834
Johnston AC (1989) The seismicity of ‘stable continental interiors’. In: Gregersen S, Basham PW (eds) Earthquakes at North-Atlantic passive margins: neotectonics and postglacial rebound. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 299–327
Joyner WB, Boore DM (1981) Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong-motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71(6):2011–2038
Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey
Krinitzsky EL (2002) How to obtain earthquake ground motions for engineering design. Eng Geol 65(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00098-9
Lima Neto FF, Beneduzi C (1998). Using leakoff tests and acoustic logging to estimate in-situ stresses at deep waters – Campos Basin. In: Paper presented at The American Association of Petroleum Geologists International Conference and Exhibition, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, November 8–11
McGuire RK (2004) Seismic hazard and risk analysis. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland
Neves FA, Assumpção M, Dourado JC, Le Diagon F, Ortolan A (2018) Improved epicentral relocation in the offshore Campos Basin, SE Brazil, with the RSTT 3D model. J S Am Earth Sci 85:121–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2018.05.002
Ordaz M, Martinelli F, Meletti C, D’Amico V (2013) CRISIS2012: an updated tool to compute seismic hazard. In: Paper presented at the Spring Meeting 2013 of the American Geophysical Union, San Francisco, California, December 9–13
Petersen M, Harmsen S, Haller K, Mueller C, Luco N, Hayes G, Dewey J, Rukstales K (2010) Preliminary seismic hazard model for South America. In: Huaco D (ed) La Sismología en Sudamérica y los mecanismos de prevención y mitigación del peligro sísmico. Lima, Peru
Petersen MD, Harmsen SC, Jaiswal KS, Rukstales KS, Luco N, Haller KM, Mueller CS, Shumway AM (2018) Seismic hazard, risk and design for South America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 108(2):781–800. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170002
Pirchiner M, Collaço B, Calhau J, Assumpção M, Dourado JC (2011) The Brazilian Seismographic Integrated Systems (BRASIS): infrastructure and data management. Ann Geophys 54(1):17–22. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-4865
Reasenberg P (1985) Second-order moment of central California seismicity, 1969-1982. J Geophys Res 90(B7):5479–5495. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB090iB07p05479
Reiter L (1990) Earthquake hazard analysis: issues and insights. Columbia University Press, New York
Riccomini C, Assumpção MS (1999) Quaternary tectonics in Brazil. Episodes 22(3):221–225
Stepp JC (1972) Analysis of completeness of the earthquake sample in the Puget Sound area and its effects on statistical estimates of earthquake hazard. In: Paper presented at the international conference on microzonation for safer construction research and application, University of Seattle, WA, USA, October 30-November 3
Thenhaus PC, Campbell KW (2003) Seismic hazard analysis. In: Scawthorn C, Chen W-F (eds) Earthquake engineering handbook, 1st edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton chapter 8
Toro GR (2002) Modification of the Toro et al. (1997) attenuation equations for large magnitudes and short distances. Risk Engineering, Inc.
Toro GR, Abrahamson NA, Schneider JF (1997) Model of strong ground motions from earthquakes in central and eastern North America: best estimates and uncertainties. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):41–57. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.68.1.41
Weichert DH (1980) Estimation of the earthquake recurrence parameters for unequal observation periods for different magnitudes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 70(4):1337–1346
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Stéphane Drouet (Geoter/Fugro Group) for providing valuable guidelines, discussions, and useful comments during the development of the study. This work was a collaborative and cooperative effort combining the seismic hazard experience available at the National Observatory (ON) and IAG/USP, and involved a transparent exchange of knowledge, information, and specialized judgment criteria. The authors would also like to thank the Associate Editor and an anonymous reviewer for the valuable suggestions that helped them to improve the work.
Funding
Marcelo Assumpção and Márcio Almeida received grants from the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) (grant numbers 30.1284/2017-2 and 30.3836/2016-4, respectively. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 1619 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Borges, R.G., de Assumpção, M.S., de Almeida, M.C.F. et al. Seismicity and seismic hazard in the continental margin of southeastern Brazil. J Seismol 24, 1205–1224 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-020-09941-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-020-09941-4