Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Forward induced seismic hazard assessment: application to a synthetic seismicity catalogue from hydraulic stimulation modelling

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Seismology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The M w 3.2-induced seismic event in 2006 due to fluid injection at the Basel geothermal site in Switzerland was the starting point for an ongoing discussion in Europe on the potential risk of hydraulic stimulation in general. In particular, further development of mitigation strategies of induced seismic events of economic concern became a hot topic in geosciences and geoengineering. Here, we present a workflow to assess the hazard of induced seismicity in terms of occurrence rate of induced seismic events. The workflow is called Forward Induced Seismic Hazard Assessment (FISHA) as it combines the results of forward hydromechanical-numerical models with methods of time-dependent probabilistic seismic hazard assessment. To exemplify FISHA, we use simulations of four different fluid injection types with various injection parameters, i.e. injection rate, duration and style of injection. The hydromechanical-numerical model applied in this study represents a geothermal reservoir with preexisting fractures where a routine of viscous fluid flow in porous media is implemented from which flow and pressure driven failures of rock matrix and preexisting fractures are simulated, and corresponding seismic moment magnitudes are computed. The resulting synthetic catalogues of induced seismicity, including event location, occurrence time and magnitude, are used to calibrate the magnitude completeness M c and the parameters a and b of the frequency-magnitude relation. These are used to estimate the time-dependent occurrence rate of induced seismic events for each fluid injection scenario. In contrast to other mitigation strategies that rely on real-time data or already obtained catalogues, we can perform various synthetic experiments with the same initial conditions. Thus, the advantage of FISHA is that it can quantify hazard from numerical experiments and recommend a priori a stimulation type that lowers the occurrence rate of induced seismic events. The FISHA workflow is rather general and not limited to the hydromechanical-numerical model used in this study and can therefore be applied to other fluid injection models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann J, Müller T, Müller B, Tingay M, Heidbach O (2010) Poroelastic contribution to the reservoir stress path. Int J Rock Mech Min 47(7):1104–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baisch S, Voros R, Rothert E, Stang H, Jung R, Schellschmidt R (2010) A numerical model for fluid injection induced seismicity at Soultz-sous-Forêts. Int J Rock Mech Min 47(3):405–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth A, Wenzel F, Langenbruch C (2013) Probability of earthquake occurrence and magnitude estimation in the post shut-in phase of geothermal projects. J Seismol 17(1):5–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bommer JJ, Oates S, Cepeda JM, Lindholm C, Bird J, Torres R, Marroquin G, Rivas J (2006) Control of hazard due to seismicity induced by a hot fractured rock geothermal project. Eng Geol 83:287–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruel D (2007) Using the migration of induced seismicity as a constraint for fractured hot dry rock reservoir modeling. Int J Rock Mech Min 44:1106–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornet FH, Bèrard Th, Bourouis S (2007) How close to failure is a granite rock mass at a 5 km depth? Int J Rock Mech Min 44(1):47–66

  • Deichmann N, Ernst J (2009) Earthquake focal mechanisms of the induced seismicity in 2006 and 2007 below Basel (Switzerland). Swiss J Geosci 102:457–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deichmann N, Giardini D (2009) Earthquakes induced by the stimulation of an enhanced geothermal system below Basel (Switzerland). Seismol Res Lett 80(5):784–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieterich J (1994) A constitutive law for rate of earthquake production and its application to earthquake clustering. J Geophys Res 99(B2):2601–2618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinske C, Shapiro S (2013) Seismotectonic state of reservoirs inferred from magnitude distributions of fluid-induced seismicity. J Seismol 17(1):13–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans KF, Zappone A, Kraft T, Deichmann N, Moia F (2012) A survey of the induced seismic response to fluid injection in geothermal and CO2 reservoirs in Europe. Geothermics 41:30–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grünthal G (2013) Induced seismicity related to geothermal projects versus natural tectonic earthquakes and other types of induced seismic events in central Europe. Geothermics. doi:10.1016/j.geothermics.2013.09.009

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1956) Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy and acceleration (second paper). Bull Seismol Soc Am 46(2):105–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakimhashemi AH, Schoenball M, Heidbach O, Zang A, Grünthal G (2014) Forward modelling of seismicity rate changes in georeservoirs with a hybrid geomechanical-statistical prototype model. Geothermics. doi:10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.01.001

    Google Scholar 

  • Häring MO, Schanz U, Ladner F, Dyer BC (2008) Characterisation of the Basel 1 enhanced geothermal system. Geothermics 37(5):469–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazzard JF, Young RP (2002) Moment tensors and micromechanical models. Tectonophysics 356:181–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazzard JF, Young RP (2004) Dynamic modelling of induced seismicity. Int J Rock Mech Min 41(8):1365–1376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbert MK, Willis DG (1957) Mechanics of hydraulic fracturing. Trans AIME 210:153–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohl T, Megel T (2007) Predictive modeling of reservoir response to hydraulic stimulations at the European EGS site Soultz-sous-Forets. Int J Rock Mech Min 44(8):1118–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labuz JF, Zang A (2012) Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45:975–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majer EL, Baria R, Stark M, Oates S, Bommer J, Smith B, Asanuma H (2007) Induced seismicity associated with enhanced geothermal systems. Geothermics 36:185–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majer E, Nelson J, Robertson-Tait A, Savy J, Wong I (2012) Protocol for addressing induced seismicity associated with enhanced geothermal systems. U.S. Department of Energy, DOE/EE-0662

  • Marzocchi W, Sandri L (2003) A review and new insights on the estimation of the b-value and its uncertainty. Annals of Geophysics 46(6):1271–1282

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure MW, Horne HN (2011) Investigation of injection-induced seismicity using a coupled fluid flow and rate and state friction model. Geophysics 76(6):WC183–WC200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuannin P, Kulhanek O, Persson L (2005) Spatial and temporal b value anomalies preceding the devastating off coast of NW Sumatra earthquake of December 26, 2004. Geophys Res Lett 32(L11307)

  • Page R (1968) Aftershocks and microaftershocks of the Great Alaska earthquake of 1964. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58(3):1131–1168

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutqvist J, Birkholzer J, Cappa F, Tsang C-F (2007) Estimating maximum sustainable injection pressure during geological sequestration of co2 using coupled fluid flow and geomechanical fault-slip analysis. Energy Conversion and Management 48:1798–1807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenball M, Müller TM, Müller B, Heidbach O (2010) Fluid-induced microseismicity in pre-stressed rock masses. Geophys J Int 180:113–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao J, Tu D (1995) The jackknife and bootstrap. Springer Series in Statistics

  • Shapiro S, Dinske C, Langenbruch C, Wenzel F (2010) Seismogenic index and magnitude probability of earthquakes induced during reservoir fluid stimulations. Leading Edge 29(3):304–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler SM (2007) The epic story of maximum likelihood. Statistical Science 22(4):598–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suckale J (2009) Induced seismicity in hydrocarbon fields. Adv Geophys 51:55–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suckale J (2010) Moderate-to-large seismicity induced hydrocarbon production. The Leading Edge 310–317

  • Yoon JS, Zang A, Stephansson O (2013) Simulation of hydraulic stimulation of fractured reservoir and induced seismicity using discrete element-fracture network model. Proceedings of Thirty-Eighth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, February 11–13, 2013, SGP-TR-198

  • Yoon JS, Zang A, Stephansson O (2014) Numerical investigation of optimized stimulation of intact and naturally fracture deep geothermal reservoirs using hydro-mechanical coupled discrete particles joints model. Geothermics. doi:10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.01.009

  • Zang A, Yoon JS, Stephansson O, Heidbach O (2013) Fatigue hydraulic fracturing by cyclic reservoir treatment enhances permeability and reduces induced seismicity. Geophys J Int 195:1282–1287

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work presented was funded by the European Commission within the FP7 project GEISER, grant agreement no. 241321, by the Department of Energy Geothermal Technologies Program under Award Number DE-EE0002756-002 as well as by AonBenfield, London. We appreciate the comments from two anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 2.6 Seismic Hazard and Stress Field, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam, 14473, Germany

    Amir Hossein Hakimhashemi, Jeoung Seok Yoon, Oliver Heidbach, Arno Zang & Gottfried Grünthal

Authors
  1. Amir Hossein Hakimhashemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeoung Seok Yoon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Oliver Heidbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Arno Zang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gottfried Grünthal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Heidbach.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hakimhashemi, A.H., Yoon, J.S., Heidbach, O. et al. Forward induced seismic hazard assessment: application to a synthetic seismicity catalogue from hydraulic stimulation modelling. J Seismol 18, 671–680 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-014-9439-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-014-9439-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation