Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Validation of a Scale of Religious and Spiritual Coping (RCOPE) for the Portuguese Population

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The scale of religious and spiritual coping (RCOPE) is one of the most used measures in the evaluation of coping strategies based on faith. Despite being validated for the Portuguese language in the Brazilian context, there was still no validation for European Portuguese, which seems important considering the cultural differences. We aimed at examining the validity and reliability of the RCOPE with a Portuguese sample. The present study used cross-sectional data from 1103 volunteers that completed the online survey. After randomly splitting the sample (1:1) for cross-validation purposes, an ordinal exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were performed. McDonald’s omega, Cronbach’s alpha and mean inter-item correlations were used to determine the internal consistency and homogeneity of the RCOPE. The convergent and discriminant validity of the scale was assessed using standardized factor loadings, the average variance extracted and the squared correlation between latent factors, respectively. In the current study, the final structure of the scale included 17 items aggregated into two correlated latent factors. The Portuguese version of the RCOPE showed acceptable psychometric proprieties, which will be an advantageous instrument for the practice and research of psychology in religion and spirituality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belavich, T. G., & Pargament, K. I. (2002). The role of attachment in predicting spiritual coping with a loved one in surgery. Journal of Adult Development, 9, 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013873100466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (1993). The Maslach Burnout Inventory: Testing for factorial validity and invariance across elementary, intermediate, and secondary teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 197–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, G., Rye, E., Brant, M. S., Emery, C. R. E., Pargament, K. I., & Riessinger, C. A. (1999). Religious coping with chronic pain. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 24(4), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022234913899.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caporossi, J., Trouillet, R., & Brouillet, D. (2018). Validation de la version française d’une échelle abrégée de coping religieux: Brief-RCOPE. Psychologie francaise, 63(2), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2011.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. P., Laney, T., & Mezulis, A. (2012). Religious coping, stress, and depressive symptoms among adolescents: A prospective study. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassibba, R., Granqvist, P., Costantini, A., & Gatto, S. (2008). Attachment and god representations among lay Catholics, priests, and religious: A matched comparison study based on the adult attachment interview. Developmental Psychology, 44(6), 1753–1763. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013772.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research. (pp. 295–336). Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, C., Tyner, K., Rosa, P. J., Sousa, C., & Henriques, S. (2018). Desenvolvimento e Validação da Escala de Literacia Mediática e Informacional para Alunos dos 2° e 3° Ciclos do Ensino Básico em Portugal. Revista Lusófona de Educação, 41, 11–28. https://doi.org/10.24140/issn.1645-7250.rle41.01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, J., & Pargament, K. I. (2010). Medicine for the spirit: religious coping in individuals with medical conditions. Religions, 1, 28–53. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel1010028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Applied social research methods series, Scale development: Theory and applications. (Vol. 26). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esperandio, M. R. G., Escudero, F. T., Fernandes, M. L., & Pargament, K. I. (2018). Brazilian validation of the brief scale for spiritual/religious coping—SRCOPE-14. Religions. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9010031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faria, J. & Seidl, E. (2006). Religiosidade, enfrentamento e bem-estar subjectivo em pessoas vivendo com HIV/AIDS. Psicologia em Estudo, 11(1), pp. 155–164. ISSN 1807-0329. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-73722006000100018

  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gall, T. L., & Guirguis-Younger, M. (2013). Religious and spiritual coping: Current theory and research. In Pargament, K. I., Exline, J. J. & Jones, J. W. (eds.) APA handbooks in psychology. APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality: Context, theory, and research, vol. 1, pp. 349–364. American Psychological Association

  • Giaquinto, S., Cipolla, F., Giachetti, I., & Onorati, D. (2011). Italian validation of the Brief Rcope scale for religious coping. Journal of Medicine and the Person, 9, 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12682-011-0087-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobatto, C., & Araujo, T. (2010). Coping religioso-espiritual: reflexões e perspectivas para a atuação do psicólogo em oncologia. Revista Brasileira de Psicologia Hospitalar, 13(1), 52–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. (6th ed.). Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, G. M., Allen, R. S., Dunn, L., & Parmelee, P. (2013). “Trouble won’t last always”: religious coping and meaning in the stress process. Qualitative Health Research, 23(6), 773–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732313482590.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert, R., Zdaniuk, B., Schulz, R., & Scheier, M. (2009). Positive and negative religious coping and well-being in women with breast cancer. Journal of palliative medicine, 12(6), 537–545. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2008.0250.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. M., & Hill, A. (2009). Investigação por questionário. Edições Sílabo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hvidtjørn, D., Hjelmborg, J., Skytthe, A., Christensen, K., & Hvidt, N. C. (2014). Religiousness and religious coping in a secular society: the gender perspective. Journal of religion and health, 53(5), 1329–1341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-013-9724-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). "Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Nacional de Estatística (2012). Censos 2011: Resultados Definitivos: Portugal. Lisboa: INE.

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications

  • Koenig, H. G. (1998). Handbook of religion and mental health. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo-Seva, U. (1999). Promin: A method for oblique factor rotation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34(3), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3403_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, D., Poulin, M. J., Silver, R. C., & Holman, E. A. (2011). The distinct roles of spirituality and religion in physical and mental health after collective trauma: a national longitudinal study of responses to the 9/11 attacks. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 34, 497–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-011-9331-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrotra, S., & Tripathi, R. (2017). Spirituality and resilience: explored pathways and unexplored territories. In U. Kumar (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of psychosocial resilience. (pp. 214–229). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezzadra, J., & Simkin, H. (2017). Validación de la Escala Abreviada de Afrontamiento Religioso Brief-RCOPE en el Contexto Argentino en estudiantes de confesión católica. Revista Evaluar. https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v17.n1.17071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus User’s Guide. (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. (2009). Psychology, religion, spirituality. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oliden, P. E., & Zumbo, B. D. (2008). Coeficientes de fiabilidad para escalas de respuesta categórica ordenada. Psicothema, 20(4), 896–901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paika, V., Andreoulakis, E., Ntountoulaki, E., Papaioannou, D., Kotsis, K., Siafaka, V., Fountoulakis, K., Pargament, K., Carvalho, A., & Hyphantis, T. (2017). The Greek-Orthodox version of the Brief Religious Coping (B-RCOPE) instrument: psychometric properties in three samples and associations with mental disorders, suicidality, illness perceptions, and quality of life. Annals of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-017-0136-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping. The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K., Koenig, H., & Perez, L. (2000). The many methods of religious coping: Development and initial validation of the RCOPE. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(4), 519–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(200004)56:4%3c519::AID-JCLP%3e3.0.CO;2-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K., Feuille, M., & Burdzy, D. (2011). The Brief RCOPE: Current Psychometric Status of a Short Measure of Religious Coping. Religions, 2(1), 51–76. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel2010051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. I., Falb, K., Ano, G., & Wachholtz, A. B. (2013). The religious dimension of coping: Advances in theory, research, and practice. In R. Paloutzian & C. Park (Eds.), The handbook of the psychology of religion. (pp. 560–580). Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. (2007). Spiritually integrated psychotherapy: understanding and addressing the sacred. The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K., & Abu-Raya, H. (2007). A decade of research on the psychology of religion and coping: Things we assumed and lessons we learned. Psyke and Logos, 28, 742–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. (2011). Religion and coping: the current state of knowledge. In S. Folkman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of stress, health and coping. (pp. 269–288). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center (2018). Being Christian in Western Europe. https://www.pewforum.org/2018/05/29/being-christian-in-western-europe/

  • Phillips, R. E., III., Pargament, K. I., Lynn, Q. K., & Crossley, C. D. (2004). Self-directing religious coping: A deistic god, abandoning god, or no god at all? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 43, 409–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2004.00243.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piedmont, R.L. (2014). Inter-item correlations. In: Michalos, A.C. (ed) Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 3303–3304). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1493

  • Pires, C., Rosa, P. J., Vigário, M., & Cavaco, A. (2018). Short Assessment of Health Literacy (SAHL) in Portugal: development and validation of a self-administered tool. Journal of Health Communication, 15, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423618000087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponterotto, J., & Ruckdeschel, D. (2007). An overview of coefficient alpha and a reliability matrix for estimating adequacy of internal consistency coefficients with psychological research measures. Perceptual and Motor Skills. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.105.3.997-1014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prioste, A., Lugar, A., Paulino, P., Jongenelen, I., & Rosa, P. J. (2018). Escala das dimensões do desenvolvimento da identidade: Estudos psicométricos iniciais. Psicologia, 32(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v32i2.1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reise, S. P., Moore, T. M., & Haviland, M. G. (2010). Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92(6), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.496477.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindskopf, D. (1984). Using phantom and imaginary latent variables to parameterize constraints in linear structural models. Psychometrika, 49(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosmarin, D., Bigda-Peyton, J., Ongur, D., Pargament, K., & Throstur, B. (2013). Religious coping among psychotic patients: relevance to suicidality and treatment outcomes. Psychiatry Research, 210(1), 182–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2013.03.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saad, M. & Medeiros, R. (2012). Spiritual-religious coping–health services empowering patients’ resources. (e-book). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/50443.

  • Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4

  • Streiner, D. L. (1994). Figuring out factors: The use and misuse of factor analysis. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 39(3), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674379403900303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Berge, J. M. F., & Kiers, H. A. L. (1991). A numerical approach to the exact and the approximate minimum rank of a covariance matrix. Psychometrika, 56, 309–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2013) Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson

  • Veit, C. & Castro, E. (2013). Coping religioso/espiritual e cancêr da mama: uma revisão sistemática da literatura. Psicologia, Saúde & Doenças, 14(1), 1–22.

  • Volker, M. A., Dua, E. H., Lopata, C., Thomeer, M. L., Toomey, J. A., Smerbeck, A. M., ... Lee, G. K. (2016). Factor structure, internal consistency, and screening sensitivity of the GARS-2 in a developmental disabilities sample. Autism Research and Treatment, 2016(8243079), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4

  • Wong-McDonald, A., & Gorsuch, R. L. (2004). A multivariate theory of God concept, religious motivation, locus of control, coping, and spiritual wellbeing. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 32(4), 318–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/009164710403200404

  • Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There was no funding for this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, Instituto Superior Manuel Teixeira Gomes (ISMAT), R. Dr. Estêvão de Vasconcelos 33 A, 8500-656, Portimão, Portugal

    Carla Tomás & Pedro J. Rosa

  2. Human Environment Interaction Lab (HEI-Lab), Lusophone University of Humanities and Technologies (ULHT), Lisbon, Portugal

    Pedro J. Rosa

  3. Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), CIS-IUL, Lisbon, Portugal

    Pedro J. Rosa

Authors
  1. Carla Tomás
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pedro J. Rosa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carla Tomás.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tomás, C., Rosa, P.J. Validation of a Scale of Religious and Spiritual Coping (RCOPE) for the Portuguese Population. J Relig Health 60, 3510–3529 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01248-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01248-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation