Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validation of the Chinese Version of the Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire

  • Published:
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Repetitive negative thinking (RNT) contributes significantly to anxiety and depression. The Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire (PTQ) was developed as a measure of the content-independent form of RNT. The current study aimed to validate a Chinese version of the PTQ and to examine a transdiagnostic model of anxiety and depression with a focus on the effects of RNT and intolerance of uncertainty (IU).

Methods

We first validated a Chinese version of the PTQ in two Chinese-speaking samples recruited using a web-based data collection method. We then examined the mediating effect of RNT in the relationship between IU and symptoms of anxiety and depression in these two samples.

Results

The results provided evidence of reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the PTQ. A modified second-order model of the PTQ (Chinese version) was supported. Mediation analysis demonstrated that RNT partially mediated the association between IU and symptoms of anxiety and depression.

Conclusions

The validation of the Chinese version of the PTQ enables assessment of content-independent RNT in Chinese-speaking samples. Further, the current findings showed that IU and RNT together contributed to greater severity of anxiety and depression, providing implications for potential treatment avenues for emotional disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data of the current study are included in supplementary materials.

Notes

  1. A total of 640 participants completed the test, while 40 participants failed to pass the attention check and thus were excluded.

  2. A total of 415 participants completed the test, while 15 participants failed to pass the attention check and thus were excluded.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dong., H. and Kishimoto., T. for their assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nisha Yao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yao, N., Yang, Y. & Huang, S. Validation of the Chinese Version of the Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire. J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther 41, 552–567 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-022-00470-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-022-00470-2

Keywords

Navigation