Abstract
The aim of the study is to analyse contemporary postmodern literary works of Kazakhstan through the conceptual prism of Freudian and Jungian psychoanalysis. To achieve research goals, the following methods were used: axiomatic, content analysis, and comparative. The results of the study determined that contemporary Kazakh writers characterise a large field of motives and ideas that are revealed through text, symbols, and characters. Strong tools for their interpretation were the psychological approaches of Freud and Jung, which are the standards of psychoanalysis and have their own specific features of semantic content. Content analysis of postmodern materials has established that Kazakh stories trace the motives of mythology, religion, relationships and inner spiritual development, which consider the mental differences of the heroes of the storylines. During the psychoanalysis of the works, it was emphasised that postmodernism in the literature of Kazakhstan reflects the rejection of absolute truths, blurring the boundaries between genres, playing with traditional forms and content. Many of the characters in the stories are experiencing an identity crisis, which has been analysed through the Freudian triad and Jung’s archetypal images. Kazakh literature, being woven into the cultural and historical heritage of the nation, reflects the features of mentality, socio-cultural transformations, identity and spiritual quest of heroes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data is accessible through request to the author corresponding to this work.
References
Abisheva, S., Polyak, Z., Serikova, S., Kermeshova, Z., & Sabirova, D. (2018). Poetics of modern literature of Kazakhstan. Opcion, 34(85), 344–361.
Ambat, M. C. (2019). Literary tools in the analysis of characters’ behaviors in contemporary fiction: A psychoanalytic approach. Ascendens Asia Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, 3(2F), 118–119.
Berdibayeva, S., Sakhiyeva, F., Akbembetov, B., Yelubayeva, M., Atakhanova, S., Orazbayeva, A., & Abirova, M. (2015). The title ethnos in Kazakhstan: Psychological aspects of value sphere. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 190, 485–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.031.
Bertens, H. (2021). The post in literary Postmodernism: A history. In P. Herman, & van A. Veldhuizen (Eds.), Post-everything: An intellectual history of post-concepts (pp. 135–154). Manchester University.
Binswanger, R., & Wittmann, L. (2019). Reconsidering Freud’s dream theory. International Journal of Dream Research, 12(1), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.11588/ijodr.2019.1.59178.
Cieri, F., & Esposito, R. (2019). Psychoanalysis and neuroscience: The bridge between mind and brain. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1983. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01983.
de Souza, P. F. (2022). The position of poetry within Freudian theorization: The poet’s act between the particular and the universal. Ágora, 25(3), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-44142022003006.
Demeyer, H., Ieven, B., & Pardoe, L. (2023). Worlding modern literature in the low countries. Dutch Crossing, 47(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/03096564.2022.2144596.
Dillon, J. J. (2021). Reassembling the real person: A jungian and mythical-dramatistic approach to human development. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 61(5), 786–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167819853072.
Dossanova, A., Zh., Ismakova, B. S., Tapanova, S. E., Ayupova, G. K., Gotting, V. V., & Kaltayeva, G. K. (2016). Interdisciplinary approach to understanding literary texts. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(10), 3615–3629.
Falzeder, E. (2020). Freud and Jung on Freud and Jung. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 65(1), 116–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5922.12569.
Freer, A. (2019). Poetics contra psychoanalysis. Poetics Today, 40(4), 619–643. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-7739057.
Kalaus, L. (2018). Call of the Sun. Tome.
Koblanov, Z. T., Akberdieva, B. K., Erubaeva, A. R., Bautygul, A. K., & Konarshaeva, A. A. (2022). Psychologism in modern prose. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(5), 3682–3685.
Kowalik, G. (2023). Post-postmodernism, the affective turn, and inauthenticity. Humanities, 12(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/h12010007.
Laubender, C. (2022). Getting into character: On psychoanalysis and literature in the classroom. Psychoanalysis Culture & Society, 27, 386–390. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41282-022-00300-5.
Li, J. (2022). Emotion expression in modern literary appreciation: An emotion-based analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 923482. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.923482.
Lo Dico, G. (2018). Freud’s psychoanalysis, contemporary cognitive/social psychology, and the case against introspection. Theory & Psychology, 28(4), 510–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318774854.
Millán, J. D., Cudina, J. N., & Ossa, J. C. (2020). Criticism and psychology: The understanding with a postmodern psychology. Human Arenas, 3, 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-019-00083-9.
Moi, T. (2020). Real characters: Literary criticism and the existential turn. The Point Magazine, 21.
Naurzbayeva, Z., & Kalaus, L. (2021). Adventures of Batu and his Friends in the Starry Land of Aydala. Meloman.
Newsome, R. (2022). Walking with shadows: Writing trauma, short fiction and jungian psychoanalysis. Short Fiction in Theory & Practice, 12(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1386/fict_00049_1.
Niaz, A., Stanikzai, S. M., & Sahibzada, J. (2019). Review of Freud’s psychoanalysis approach to literary studies. American International Journal of Social Science Research, 4(2), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.46281/aijssr.v4i2.339.
Odegov, I. (2012). Purusha. Magazine Friendship of Peoples, 3, 47–49.
Omarov, B. Z., Salkynbayev, M. B., Kydyr, T. E., Kuldeyeva, G. I., Yeskindirova, M. Z., & Alshinbayeva, Z. K. (2020). Reflection of ideas about native land in poetic and prose works using narrative literature technique. Media Watch, 11(2), 408–418. https://doi.org/10.15655/mw/2020/v11i2/195664.
Palmer, M. (2023). Freud and Jung on religion. Routledge.
Pandit, G. L. (2022). Freudian frontiers of psychoanalytic theory and therapy: A case of improvement of scientific knowledge? Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 35(2), 537–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2020.1728118.
Raimov, M. (2020). Prayer. Book Club.
Rakymzhan, O., Shalabay, B., Zhumagulova, O., Kazhibayeva, G., & Kairbekova, I. (2022). Existential loneliness in Kazakh literature and modern world literature: Insights from metaphors and frame-based analysis. International Journal of Society Culture & Language, 10(3), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijscl.2022.543086.2468.
Rank, O. (2015). The myth of the birth of the hero: A psychological exploration of myth (expanded and updated). Johns Hopkins University.
Roesler, C. (2019). Theoretical foundations of analytical psychology: Recent developments and controversies. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 64(5), 658–681. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5922.12540.
Safronova, L. (2019). Psychoanalysis in literature and literary criticism: A study guide. Kazakh University.
Sandbaek, L. (2021). The relationship between literature and psychoanalysis: Reflections on object relations theory, researcher’s subjectivity, and transference in psychoanalytic literary criticism. The Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 44(1–2), 27–37.
Shuash, R. A., Said, M., Al-Maliki, S., M. O. J., & AliMhoodar, R. (2021). Postmodernism: Concepts and techniques. Multicultural Education, 7(7), 18–23.
Souter, K. T. (2000). The products of the imagination: Psychoanalytic theory and postmodern literary criticism. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 60(4), 341–359. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1002042814341.
Staude, J. R. (1976). From depth psychology to depth sociology: Freud, Jung, and Levi-Strauss. Theory and Society, 3, 303–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00159490.
Temirbolat, A. B., Kozhashev, M. M., Ospanova, G. T., Yerzhanova, S. B., & Tleubayev, S. B. (2020). Cognitive aspects of a poetic work. Opcion, 36(91), 1006–1025.
Voina, M., & Vorobei, O. (2021). Jungian approach to individuation of personality in the short story empty rooms by can Xue. The World of the Orient, 112(3), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.15407/orientw2021.03.055.
Waugaman, R. M. (2023). Prologue: Fictional characters: Psychoanalytic and literary perspectives. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 43(5), 311–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2023.2221623.
Yeung, A. W. K. (2021). Is the influence of Freud declining in psychology and psychiatry? A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 631516. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631516.
Yimer, D. M. (2019). On the interaction between literature and psychology. IEEE-SEM Publications, 7(8), 155–167.
Zhang, S. (2020). Psychoanalysis: The influence of Freud’s theory in personality psychology. Advances in Social Science Education and Humanities Research, 433, 229–232. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200425.051.
Zhu, L. (2020). A critical review of the research on translation psychology: Theoretical and methodological approaches. Linguistica Antverpiensia New Series: Themes in Translation Studies, 19, 53–79. https://doi.org/10.52034/lanstts.v19i0.559.
Funding
No funding was obtained for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Informed Consent
Not applicable.
Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals
Not applicable.
Competing Interest
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Altynbek, A., Mussabekova, A. Psychological Approach in the Interpretation of 20th Century Kazakh Postmodern Literature. J Psycholinguist Res 53, 40 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-024-10080-x
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-024-10080-x