Abstract
Drawing on sociocultural theory, and multiple empirical studies conducted on the effectiveness of scaffolding on second or foreign language learning, the authors investigated the application of various forms of scaffolding (i.e., teacher versus peer-scaffolding) on EFL learners’ incidental vocabulary learning and reading comprehension performance through a sociocultural perspective. To this end, 60 EFL learners out of one-hundred were selected through the administration of an Oxford Placement Test from three language institutes and divided into 3 groups (two experimental and one control group) each including 20 intermediate EFL learners. The first experimental group received teacher-scaffolding instruction, the second experimental group received peer-scaffolding instruction and the control group received traditional instruction with no scaffolding. The vocabulary and reading comprehension pre-tests were administered to the three groups. At the end of the experiment, the vocabulary and reading comprehension post-tests were administered. The descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and the inferential statistics (a One-way ANOVA) were run to analyze the collected data. The results showed that both experimental groups had better performance than the control group and there was a significant difference between teacher-scaffolding and peer-scaffolding in both vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension performance and the peer-scaffolding group had a better performance than the teacher-scaffolding group. This research provided some implications about different types of scaffolding for language teachers and syllabus designers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
19 August 2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09808-w
References
Afzali, K., Tavangar, M., Amouzadeh, M., & Rasekh, A. E. (2011). The strategic needs of Iranian students in reading literary and non-literary texts: A dialogic approach. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 13(3), 153.
Ahmadi Safa, M., & Rozati, F. (2016). The impact of scaffolding and non-scaffolding strategies on EFL learners’ listening comprehension development. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(5), 447–456.
Ahmadi Safa, M., & Rozati, F. (2017). The impact of scaffolding and non-scaffolding strategies on the EFL learners’ listening comprehension development. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(5), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2015.1118004
Alexander, P. A. (1996). The past, present, and future of knowledge research: A reexamination of the role of knowledge in learning and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 89–92.
Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 471–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064
Amerian, M., & Mehri, E. (2014). Scaffolding in sociocultural theory: Definition, steps, features, conditions, tools, and effective consideration. Scientific Journal of Review, 3(7), 756–765.
AmiriSamani, E., & Khazayie, S. (2017). Scaffolding low-intermediate adult EFL learners to write. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(2), 216–230.
Baleghizadeh, S. (2011). The impact of two instructional techniques on EFL learners’ vocabulary knowledge: Flash cards versus word-Lists. MEXTESOL Journal, 35(2), 1–9.
Baradaran, A., & Sarfarazi, B. (2011). The impact of scaffolding on the Iranian EFL learners’ English academic writing. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(12), 2265–2273.
Barker, D., Quennerstedt, M., & Annerstedt, C. (2015). Inter-student interactions and student learning in health and physical education: A post-Vygotskian analysis. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 20(4), 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2013.868875
Benson, P. (1997). The philosophy and politics of learner autonomy Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 18–34). Longman.
Boyer, K. (2017). The relationship between vocabulary and reading comprehension in third grade students who are English language learners and reading below grade level. Mdsoar.org. Retrieved 4 July 2017, from https://mdsoar.org/handle/11603/3895
Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.). Heinle & Heinle.
Clark, K., & Graves, M. (2004). Scaffolding students’ comprehension of text. International Reading Association, 58(6), 570–580.
de Oliveira, L. C., Jones, L., & Smith, S. L. (2021). A language-based approach to content instruction (LACI) for multilingual learners: Six cs of scaffolding in first grade. Journal of Language, Identity & Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2021.1885409
Duffy, G. G. (2002). The case for direct explanation of strategies. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension Instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 28–41). New York.
Elleman, A. M., Lindo, E. J., Morphy, P., & Compton, D. L. (2009). The impact of vocabulary instruction on passage-level comprehension of school-age children: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(1), 1–44.
Ellis, E. S., Worthington, L. A., & Larkin, M. J. (1994). Effective teaching principles and the design of quality tools for educators. Unpublished Paper Commissioned by the Center for Advancing the Quality of Technology, Media, and Material, University of Oregon, pp 3–108.
Farhady, H. (2005). Language assessment: A linguametric perspective. Language Assessment Quarterly, 2(2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15434311laq0202_3
Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A., & Gilmore, A. (2018). Expert-novice interaction as the basis for L2 developmental activity: A SCT perspective. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 5(1), 21–45. https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.33621
Ghafar Samar, R., & Dehqan, M. (2013). Sociocultural theory and reading comprehension: The scaffolding of readers in an EFL context. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 2(3), 67–80.
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Ernst Klett Sprachen.
Guilford Dreyer, C. (1998). Improving learners’ reading comprehension by means of strategy instruction. Journal for Language Teaching, 31/(1), 18–29.
Haghparast, S., & Mall-Amiri, B. (2015). The comparative effect of two scaffolding strategies on intermediate EFL learners’ reading comprehension. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 8(2), 217–231.
Hamidi, E., & Bagherzadeh, R. (2018). The logical problem of scaffolding in second language acquisition. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-018-0059-x
Harraqi, M. (2017). Review of Aida Walqui’s scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. American Journal of Arts and Design, 2(3), 84–88.
Hartman, H. (2002). Scaffolding & cooperative learning. Human learning and instruction (pp. 23–69). City College of City University of New York.
Haruehansawasin, S., & Kiattikomol, P. (2018). Scaffolding in problem-based learning for low-achieving learners. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(3), 363–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1287045
Hedges, T. (2008). Helping students develop thinking skills through the problem-solving approach to teaching. The Ohio State University, Dr.
Hogan, K. E., & Pressley, M. E. (1997). Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues. Brookline Books.
Izanlu, M., & Feyli, M. (2015). The effects of symmetrical and asymmetrical scaffolding on university students’ grammar acquisition. Journal of Advances in English Language Teaching, 3(6), 106–115.
Jafari, S. (2019). The effect of scaffolding on the vocabulary improvement of EFL Iranian language learner. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences (IJELS), 4(2), 206–210.
Karasakaloglu, N. (2010). Prospective teachers’ usage of reading strategies. European Journal of Social Sciences, 2(16), 221–230.
Kasper, G. (2000). Four perspectives on L2 pragmatic development (NFLRC Net Work #19) [ HTMLdocument]. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. http://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW19/.
Khajeh Khosravi, S. (2017). The effect of symmetrical scaffolding on the reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Psychological and Brain Sciences, 2(4), 95–99.
Khodamoradi, A., Iravani, H., & Jafarigohar, M. (2013a). The effect of teacher’s scaffolding and peers’ collaborative dialogue on the acquisition of English tenses in the zone of proximal development: A sociocultural perspective. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(2s), 336.
Khodamoradi, A., Iravani, H., & Jafarigohar, M. (2013b). The effect of teacher’s scaffolding and peers’ collaborative dialogue on the acquisition of English tenses in the zone of proximal development: A socio-cultural perspective. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(2), 22–49.
Khosravi, S. K. (2017). The effect of symmetrical scaffolding on the reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Psychological and Brain Sciences, 2(4), 95. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijpbs.20170204.12
Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. Cambridge University Press.
Kumar, R., Rosé, C. P., Wang, Y. C., Joshi, M., & Robinson, A. (2007). Tutorial dialogue as adaptive collaborative learning support. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 158, 383.
Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Second language learning as a mediated process. Language Teaching, 33(2), 79–96.
Larson, J., & Marsh, J. (2005). Making literacy real: Theories and practices for learning and teaching. Sage.
Maibodi, A. H. (2008). Learning English through short stories. Iranian Journal of Language Studies (IJLS), 2(1), 41–72.
Mansouri, S., & Mashhadi Heidar, D. (2019). Peer/teacher technology-enhanced scaffolding through process approach and Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary knowledge: A probe into self-regulation. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 38(3), 189–223. https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2020.34379.2717
Mansouri, S., & Mashhadi Heidar, D. (2020). The sociological effects of peer/ teacher technology-enhanced scaffolding through process approach on young male vs female EFL learners’ vocabulary knowledge. Sociological Studies of Youth, 11(38), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.22034/ssyj.2020.676245
Maybin, J., Mercer, N., & Stierer, B. (1992). Scaffolding’ learning in the classroom. In K. Norman (Ed.), Thinking vVoices: The work of the national curriculum project (pp. 186–195). Hodder & Stoughton.
McKenzie, J. (2000). Scaffolding for success. [Electronic version] beyond technology, questioning, research and the information literate school community. Retrieved October 12, 2002, from http://fno.org/dec99/scaffold.html
Namaziandost, E., Rahimi Esfahani, F., & Ahmadi, S. (2019). Varying levels of difficulty in L2 reading materials in the EFL classroom: Impact on comprehension and motivation. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1615740
Namaziandost, E., Razmi, M. H., Tilwani, S. A., & Pourhosein Gilakjani, A. (2021). The impact of authentic materials on reading comprehension, motivation, and anxiety among Iranian male EFL learners. Reading & Writing Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2021.1892001
Nassaji, H., & Cumming, A. (2000). What’s in a ZPD? A case study of a young ESL student and teacher interacting through dialogue journals. Language Teaching Research, 4(2), 95–121.
Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1996). Enhancing vocabulary acquisition through reading: A hierarchy of text-related exercise types. Canadian Modern Language Review, 52(1), 155–178.
Poorahmadi, M. (2009). The effect of employing scaffolding strategies and classroom tasks in teaching reading comprehension. Journal of Teaching English as a Foreign Language and Literature, 1(3), 87–106.
Pressley, M. (2002). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Riazi, M., & Rezaii, M. (2011). Teacher-and peer-scaffolding behaviors: Effects on EFL students’ writing improvement. In Clesol 2010: Proceedings of the 12th national conference for community languages and ESOL (pp. 55–63).
Rose Mahan, K. (2020). The comprehending teacher: Scaffolding in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). The Language Learning Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1705879
Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1992). The use of scaffolds for teaching higher-level cognitive strategies. Educational Leadership, 49(7), 26–33.
Shabani, K., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development: Instructional implications and teachers’ professional development. English Language Teaching, 3(4), 237–248.
Shoari, E., & Farrokhi, F. (2014). The effect of graphic organizer strategy on improving Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. Iranian Journal of Research in ELT, 1, 71–83.
Shoebottom, P. (2013). The importance of vocabulary. Retrieved from http://esl.fis.edu/parent/advice/vocab.htm .
Singhal, D. (2001). Reading proficiency, reading strategies metacognitive awareness and L2 readers. The Reading Matrix, 1(1), 1–23.
Sotiriadou, P., & Hill, B. (2015). Using scaffolding to promote sport management graduates’ critical thinking. Annals of Leisure Research, 18(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2014.925406
Talebinejad, M. R., & Akhgar, F. (2015). The impact of teacher scaffolding on Iranian intermediate EFL learner’s listening comprehension achievement. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(5), 110–125.
Turuk, M. C. (2008). The relevance and implications of Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory in the second language classroom. Annual Review of Education, Communication, and Language Sciences (ARECLS) 5(1): 244–262.
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296.
Van Wyk, A. L. (2001). The development and implementation of an English language and literature programme for low-proficiency tertiary learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of the Free State).
Van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N. (2013). Lexical coverage in L1 and L2 listening comprehension: The same or different from reading comprehension? Applied Linguistics, 34(4), 457–479.
Verenikina, I. (2003). Understanding scaffolding and the ZPD in educational research. Retrived from file:///D:/!A% 20Mami/AMy%20jobs/My%20job%2010/Jammaqale/Understanding_Scaffolding_and_the_ZPD_in_Education.pdf
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.
Yongqi, G. P. (2003). Vocabulary learning in a second language: Person, task, context and strategies. TESL-EJ, 7(2), 1–26.
Zheng, L. (2016). The effectiveness of self-regulated learning scaffolds on academic performance in computer-based learning environments: A meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education, 17(22), 187–202.
Funding
This study received no funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethics Approval
This study was approved by the Ethical Board of Iranian English language Institutions.
Consent to Participate
All participants provided written informed consent and they were fully understood the study purpose.
Informed Consent:
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in.the study.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original article has been revised due to 1st affiliation change.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jamali Kivi, P., Namaziandost, E., Fakhri Alamdari, E. et al. The Comparative Effects of Teacher Versus Peer-Scaffolding on EFL Learners’ Incidental Vocabulary Learning and Reading Comprehension: A Socio-Cultural Perspective. J Psycholinguist Res 50, 1031–1047 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09800-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09800-4