Abstract
Second language writing researchers have examined the affordances of Automated Writing Evaluation programs in providing immediate feedback that helps improve students’ writing outputs. However, a little is known about tracking learners’ process during writing essays and whether much/less pauses made by learners could predict good/poor quality of students’ writing output. This article aims to address this issue by recording a case study of 8 postgraduate students’ pauses during writing two types of text genre; descriptive and argumentative essays. Their pauses have been recorded using Keystroke logging program—Input Log 7.0 (Leijten and Van Waes in Writ Commun 30:358–392, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313491692) and their screen activities were captured by Active Presenter program. Findings revealed that the students’ pauses were significantly higher in word boundary than in sentence and/or paragraph boundaries. Moreover, on word boundary, pauses before words were significantly higher than that after words for both types of text genre. Concerning pauses across text genre, students’ pauses were significantly higher in the argumentative essay than that of the descriptive essay. Multiple regression revealed negative correlation between much pauses and poor quality of students’ product in the descriptive essay while there was no correlation found in the argumentative essay.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barkaoui, K. (2016). What and when second-language learners revise when responding to timed writing tasks on the computer: The roles of task type, second language proficiency, and keyboarding skills. The Modern Language Journal,100(1), 320–340.
Chan, S. (2017). Using keystroke logging to understand writers’ processes on a reading-into-writing test. Language Testing in Asia. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-017-0040-5.
Chenoweth, N., & Hayes, J. (2001). Fluency in Writing. Written Communication,18(1), 80–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088301018001004.
Deane, P., Odendahl, N., Quinlan, T., Fowles, M., Welsh, C., & Bivens-Tatum, J. (2008). Cognitive models of writing: Writing proficiency as a complex integrated skill. ETS Research Report Series,2, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2008.tb02141.x.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1980). The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication,31(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.2307/356630.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication,32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600.
Gebhardt, R., & Rodrigues, D. (1989). Writing: Processes and intentions. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath.
Hayes, J. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affecting writing. In M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1–27). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hayes, J. R., & Chenoweth, N. A. (2006). Is working memory involved in the transcribing and editing of texts? Written Communication,23(2), 135–149.
Jakobsen, A. (2016). Are gaze shifts a key to a translator’s text segmentation? Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics,52(2), 149–172.
Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model working memory in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 57–71). Mahwah: Lawrence Erbaum Associates, Publishers.
Koss Torkildson, J., Morken, F., Helland, W., & Helland, T. (2016). The dynamics of narrative writing in primary grade children: Writing process factors predict story quality. Reading and Writing,29(3), 529–554.
Leijten, M., Van Harenbeeck, E., & Van Wies, L. (2019). Analysing keystroke logging data from a linguistic perspective. In E. Lindgren & K. P. H. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging handwriting (pp. 71–98). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2013). Keystroke logging in writing research: Using Inputlog to analyze and visualize writing processes. Written Communication,30, 358–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313491692.
Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2015). Fluency in writing: A multidimensional perspective on writing fluency applied to L1 and L2. Computers and Composition,38, 79–95.
Li, R., Meng, Z., Tian, M., Zhang, Z., Ni, C., & Xiao, W. (2019). Examining EFL learners’ individual antecedents on the adoption of automated writing evaluation in China. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1540433.
Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. (2006a). Analysing online revision. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer keystroke logging: Methods and applications (pp. 157–188). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. (2006b). Writing and the analysis of revision: An overview. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer key-stroke logging: Methods and applications (pp. 31–44). Oxford: Elsevier.
McCutchen, D. (1994). The magical number three plus or minus two: Working memory in writing. In J.S. Carlson & E.C. Butterfly (Eds.), Advances in cognition and educational practice, Vol. 2: Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing (pp. 1–30). Greenwich, CT: J.A.I. Press.
McCutchen, D., Teske, P., & Bankston, C. (2008). Writing and cognition: Implications of the cognitive architecture for learning to write and writing to learn. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, text (pp. 451–470). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
Medimorec, S., & Risko, E. F. (2017). Pauses in written composition: On the importance of where writers pause. Reading and Writing,30, 1267–1285.
Mohsen, M. A., & Alsherani, A. (2019). The effectiveness of using a hybrid mode of automated writing evaluation system on EFL students’ writing. Teaching English with Technology,19(1), 118–131.
Piolat, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2005). Cognitive Effort during Note Taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology,19, 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1086.
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning,64, 878–912.
Révész, A., Kourtali, N., & Mazgutova, D. (2017). Effects of task complexity on L2 writing behaviors and linguistic complexity. Language Learning,67, 208–241.
Révész, A., Michel M, & Lee, M. (2019). Exploring second language writers’ pausing and revision behaviours: A mixed methods study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition (in press).
Spelman Miller, K., Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2008). The psycholinguistic dimension in second language writing: Opportunities for research and pedagogy using computer keystroke logging. TESOL Quarterly,42, 433–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00140.x.
Stapleton, P., & Wu, Y. (2015). Assessing the quality of arguments in students’ persuasive writing: A case study analyzing the relationship between surface structure and substance. Journal of English for Academic Purposes,17, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2014.11.006.
Stevenson, M., & Phakiti, A. (2014). The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing. Assessing Writing,15, 51–65.
Torrance, M., & Galbraith, D. (2006). The processing demands of writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 67–80). New York: Guilford.
Van Waes, L., & Leijten, M. (2015). Fluency in writing: A multidimensional perspective on writing fluency applied to L1 and L2. Computers and Composition,38, 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.012.
Van Waes, L., Lelten, M., Wengelin, A., & Lindgren, E. (2012). Logging tools to study digital writing processes. In V. Wise (Ed.), Past present and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology (pp. 507–533). New York/Sussex: Taylor & Francis.
Wengelin, A. (2006). Examining pauses in writing: Theory, methods and empirical data. In K. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer keystroke logging and writing: Methods and applications (pp. 107–130). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
Williams, J. (2003). Preparing to teach writing. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Xu, C. (2018). Understanding online revisions in L2 writing: A computer keystroke-log perspective. System,78, 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.08.007.
Xu, C., & Ding, Y. (2014). An exploratory study of pauses in computer-assisted EFL writing. Language Learning & Technology,18(3), 80–96.
Acknowledgement
This research has been made possible through a grant (No.NU/SHED/15/122) supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research, Najran University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mohsen, M.A., Qassem, M. Analyses of L2 Learners’ Text Writing Strategy: Process-Oriented Perspective. J Psycholinguist Res 49, 435–451 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09693-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09693-9