Skip to main content
Log in

The Meeting Point: Where Language Production and Working Memory Share Resources

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interaction between working memory and language processing is widely discussed in cognitive research. However, those studies often explore the relationship between language comprehension and working memory (WM). The role of WM is rarely considered in language production, despite some evidence suggesting a relationship between the two cognitive systems. This study attempts to fill that gap by using a complex span task during language production. We make our predictions based on the reorganization of elementary functions neurocognitive model, a usage based theory about grammatical status, and language production models. In accordance with these theories, we expect an overlap between language production and WM at one or more levels of language planning. Our results show that WM is involved at the phonological encoding level of language production and that adding WM load facilitates language production, which leads us to suggest that an extra task-specific storage is being created while the task is performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Verbal working memory and language production: Common approaches to the serial ordering of verbal information. Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R., & Hulme, C. (2006). Speech and language processing mechanisms in verbal serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(1), 64–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachoud-Lévi, A. C., Dupoux, E., Cohen, L., & Mehler, J. (1998). Where is the length effect? A cross-linguistic study of speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(3), 331–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. (1986). Oxford psychology series, No. 11. Working memory.

  • Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829–839.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 8, 47–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2012). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R Package Version, 1(7), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, K., & Levelt, W. (2002). Language production. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Psycholinguistics: Critical concepts in psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 945–984). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boersma, P. P. G. (2002). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5, 341–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boye, K., & Harder, P. (2012). A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language, 88(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(01), 77–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, K. E., & Park, D. C. (1993). Individual difference and contextual variables influence spatial memory in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8(4), 517.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, R., & Hull, A. J. (1964). Information, acoustic confusion and memory span. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 132–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, A. R., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12(5), 769–786.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corsi, P. (1972). Human memory and the medial temporal region of the brain. In Doctoral dissertation, Montreal, QC: McGill University. Diss. Abstr. Int, 34.

  • Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104(2), 163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (Vol. 20, p. 506). Cambridge: Campridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N. (2008). What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? Progress in Brain Research, 169, 323–338.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., & Green, I. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3(4), 422–433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fedorenko, E., Gibson, E., & Rohde, D. (2006). The nature of working memory capacity in sentence comprehension: Evidence against domain-specific working memory resources. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(4), 541–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, F. (1991). Effects of length and syntactic complexity on initiation times for prepared utterances. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(2), 210–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, F., & Swets, B. (2002). How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(1), 57–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, N., & Gvion, A. (2003). Sentence comprehension and working memory limitation in aphasia: A dissociation between semantic-syntactic and phonological reactivation. Brain and Language, 86(1), 23–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 9, 133–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Levine, W. H. (2002). Memory-load interference in syntactic processing. Psychological Science, 13(5), 425–430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartsuiker, R. J., & Barkhuysen, P. N. (2006). Language production and working memory: The case of subject-verb agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(1–3), 181–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, C., Maughan, S., & Brown, G. D. (1991). Memory for familiar and unfamiliar words: Evidence for a long-term memory contribution to short-term memory span. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(6), 685–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishkhanyan, B., Sahraoui, H., Harder, P., Mogensen, J., & Boye, K. (2017). Grammatical and lexical pronoun dissociation in French speakers with agrammatic aphasia: a usage-based account and REF-based hypothesis. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 44, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanova, M. V., & Hallowell, B. (2014). A new modified listening span task to enhance validity of working memory assessment for people with and without aphasia. Journal of Communication Disorders, 52, 78–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., Conway, A. R., Miura, T. K., & Colflesh, G. J. (2007). Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: A question of construct validity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 615.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner, W. K. (1958). Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55(4), 352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klapp, S. T., Greim, D. M., & Marshburn, E. A. (1981). Buffer storage of programmed articulation and articulatory loop: Two names for the same mechanism or two distinct components of short-term memory. In J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 459–472). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Elbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaus, J., Mädebach, A., Oppermann, F., & Jescheniak, J. D. (2017). Planning sentences while doing other things at the same time: Effects of concurrent verbal and visuospatial working memory load. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(4), 811–831.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, M. C. (2016). Speak, act, remember the language-production basis of serial order and maintenance in Verbal Memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(1), 47–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A. S., Roelofs, A., & Levelt, W. J. (2003). Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 131–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel Lange, V., Messerschmidt, M., & Boye, K. (2017a). Contrasting grammatical and lexical determiners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47(3), 467–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel Lange, V., Messerschmidt, M., Harder, P., Siebner, H. R., & Boye, K. (2017b). Planning and production of grammatical and lexical verbs in multi-word messages. PLoS ONE, 12(11), e0186685.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Rettinger, D. A., Shah, P., & Hegarty, M. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 621–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogensen, J. (2011). Reorganization in the injured brain: implications for studies of the neural substrate of cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(7), 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogensen, J. (2014). Reorganization of elementary functions (REF) after brain injury and in the intact brain. In A. Costa & E. Villalbe (Eds.), Horizons in neuroscience research (pp. 99–140). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy—psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1), 8–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. J. (1985). Sentence production and working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37(3), 367–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. (2012). Vienna. Austria: R foundation for statistical computing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L., Cochran, K. F., & Ewers, C. A. (1989). Working memory in skilled and less skilled readers. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 17(2), 145–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, H. H., Downey, R. A., Gravier, M., Love, T., & Shapiro, L. P. (2007). Processing distinct linguistic information types in working memory in aphasia. Aphasiology, 21(6–8), 802–813.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byurakn Ishkhanyan.

Appendices

Appendix 1

The list of nouns used in the production task

Noun

Gender

Syllables

Translation

bold

en

one

ball

pil

en

one

arrow

skål

ens

one

bowl

hat

en

one

hat

terning

en

two

cube

cirkel

en

two

circle

firkant

en

two

square

bælte

en

two

belt

trekant

en

two

triangle

plus

et

one

plus

hus

et

one

house

brev

et

one

letter

glas

et

one

glass

minus

et

two

minus

vindue

et

two

window

hjerte

et

two

heart

bælte

et

two

belt

Appendix 2

The list of nouns used for WM load

Noun

Gender

Noun

Gender

Noun

Gender

sjal

et

dæk

et

træ

et

føl

et

løg

et

sol

en

fjæs

et

kors

et

ben

et

kridt

et

kop

en

bord

et

torn

et

mus

en

krop

en

krebs

en

skab

et

doer

en

krans

en

fad

et

dyr

et

fjeld

et

stik

et

bil

en

snegl

en

ko

en

bog

en

hjelm

en

bånd

et

kort

et

saks

en

kind

en

hånd

en

ar

et

ring

en

mund

en

lås

en

kniv

en

hjul

et

boks

en

frugt

en

fjord

en

hjort

en

får

et

bænk

en

kvist

en

brød

et

ryg

en

hvalp

en

kat

en

fod

en

bær

et

sky

en

seng

en

ark

et

knæ

et

kryds

et

bur

et

sko

en

bad

et

slips

et

bjerg

et

skæg

et

ravn

en

aeg

et

blad

et

nål

en

bus

en

hest

en

spand

en

en

hul

et

sejl

et

bryst

et

gris

en

hegn

et

bro

en

lår

et

lam

et

fly

et

flag

et

negl

en

bjørn

en

gulv

et

brat

et

stol

en

skib

et

ur

et

fugl

en

tag

et

søm

et

tog

et

frø

et

bål

et

fisk

en

væg

en

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ishkhanyan, B., Boye, K. & Mogensen, J. The Meeting Point: Where Language Production and Working Memory Share Resources. J Psycholinguist Res 48, 61–79 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9589-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-018-9589-0

Keywords

Navigation