Skip to main content
Log in

Morphological Decomposition in Reading Hebrew Homographs

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present work investigates whether and how morphological decomposition processes bias the reading of Hebrew heterophonic homographs, i.e., unique orthographic patterns that are associated with two separate phonological, semantic entities depicted by means of two morphological structures (linear and nonlinear). In order to reveal the nature of morphological processes involved in the reading of Hebrew homographs, we tested 146 university students with three computerized experiments, each experiment focusing on a different level of processing. Participants were divided into three experimental groups given that the three experiments used the same stimulus lists. Evidence obtained from the analysis of the participants’ processing time and processing accuracy points to a propensity to process heterophonic homographs by default as morpho-syntactically simple rather than complex words. Findings are discussed with reference to assumptions made by Dual-Route models regarding the importance of morphological knowledge in fast and accurate access of written words’ representations which mediate the retrieval of their meanings with direct reference to the context in which they occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The letter ‘C’ depicts the consonants of the root morpheme whereas the letter ‘e’ represents the word’s vocalic (vowel) pattern.

References

  • Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentin, S., Bargai, N., & Katz, L. (1984). Orthographic and phonemic coding for lexical access: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory & Cognition, 10, 353–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentin, S., & Feldman, L. B. (1990). The contribution of morphological and semantic relatedness to repetition effect at short and long lags: Evidence from Hebrew. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 693–711.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentin, S., & Frost, R. (1987). Processing lexical ambiguity and visual word recognition in a deep orthography. Memory & Cognition, 15, 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berent, I., Vaknin, V., & Marcus, G. (2007). Roots, stems, and the universality of lexical representations: Evidence from Hebrew. Cognition, 104, 254–286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beyersmann, E., Andoni-Dunabeitia, J., Carreiras, M., Coltheart, M., & Castles, A. (2013). Early morphological decomposition of suffixed words: Masked priming evidence with transposed-letter nonword primes. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 869–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyersmann, E., Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (2011). Early morphological decomposition during visual word recognition: Evidence from masked transposed-letter priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 937–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bick, A. S., Frost, R., & Goelman, G. (2009). Imaging implicit morphological processing: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1955–1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297–332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: A commentary. Reading Psychology: Education Study and Teaching Periodicals, 24, 291–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F., & Stone, C. A. (2003). The effects of morphological structure of children’s reading of derived words in English. In E. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-language studies (pp. 27–49). New York: Plenum Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F., & Stone, C. A. (2005). Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 428–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, A., Frost, R., & Forster, K. (1998). Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 1238–1255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2000). Early morphological effects in word recognition in Hebrew: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 487–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2005). Morphological parafoveal preview benefit effects in reading: Evidence from Hebrew. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 341–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2009). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words. Memory & Cognition, 37, 895–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez, A., De-Vega, M., & Barber, H. (2004). Event-related brain potentials elicited by morphological, homographic, orthographic, and semantic priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 598–608.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, L. B., Frost, R., & Pnini, T. (1995). Decomposing words into their constituent morphemes: Evidence from English and Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 947–960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorentino, R., & Poeppel, D. (2007). Compound words and structure in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 953–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frauenfelder, U. H., & Schreuder, R. (1992). Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. In G. Booij & J. Van-Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology, (part 2) (pp. 165–183). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R., & Bentin, S. (1992). Processing phonological and semantic ambiguity—Evidence from semantic priming at different SOAs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 58–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 829–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonnerman, L. M., Seidenberg, M. S., & Andersen, E. S. (2007). Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: Evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 136, 323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goral, M., & Obler, K. (2003). Root-morpheme processing during word recognition in Hebrew speakers across the adult life-span. In J. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and language acquisition in root-based, semitic, morphology (pp. 223–242). Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlob, L. R., Goldinger, S. D., Stone, G. O., & Van-Orden, G. C. (1999). Reading Homographs: Orthographic, Phonologic and Semantic Dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 561–574.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hino, Y., Lupker, S. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2002). Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: Interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 686–713.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A., Greenberg, S. N., & Goldshmid, Y. (1991). The missing letter effect in Hebrew: Word frequency or word function? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 66–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavric, A., Clapp, A., & Rastle, K. (2007). ERP evidence of morphological analysis from orthography: A masked priming study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 866–877.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, P. D., & McBride-Chang, C. (2010a). Morphological processing of Chinese compounds from a grammatical view. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 605–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longtin, C. M., & Meunier, F. (2005). Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 26–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahony, M., Singson, M., & Mann, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 191–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, V. A., & Singson, M. (2003). Linking morphological knowledge to English decoding ability: Large effects of little suffixes. In E. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-language studies (pp. 1–26). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, S. F., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Is there a ‘fete’ in ‘fetish’? Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, S. F., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2009). Adore-able not adorable? Orthographic underspecification studied with masked repetition priming. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 813–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meunier, F., & Longtin, C. M. (2007). Morphological decomposition and semantic integration in word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 457–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (2006). Processing of unpointed Hebrew: What can be learned from determining the identicalness of monosyllabic and bisyllabic nouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 267–283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W. E., Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. C. (2006). Contribution of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nievas, F., & Mari-Beffa, P. (2002). Negative priming from the non-selected meaning of the homograph. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 47–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niswander-Klement, E., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). The effects of root frequency, word frequency, and length on the processing of prefixed English words during reading. Memory & Cognition, 34, 685–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacht, J. M., & Rayner, K. (1993). The processing of homophonic homographs during reading: Evidence from eye movement studies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 251–271.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rastle, K., & Davis, M. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 942–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D. (2006). Word-level morphology—A psycholinguistic perspective on linear formation in Hebrew nominal’s. Morphology, 16, 127–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131–154). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimron, Y. (2006). Reading Hebrew: The language and the psychology of reading it. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomyak, O., & Marantz, A. (2010). Evidence for early morphological decomposition in visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2042–2057.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. (2003). Morphological representation as a correlation between form and meaning. In E. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words (pp. 113–137). Amsterdam: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 745–765.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M., & Ardasinski, S. (2006). Obligatory decomposition in reading prefixed words. The Mental Lexicon, 1, 183–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M., & Nguyen-Hoan, M. (2010). A sticky stick? The locus of morphological representation in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 277–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaknin, V., & Shimron, J. (2011). Hebrew plural inflection: Linear processing in a semitic language. The Mental Lexicon, 6, 197–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Ethical standard

The university students participating in the study were tested only after providing them with information regarding the nature of the study and getting their explicit consent. In sum, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, the research reported in the manuscript adheres to principles of ethical responsibilities and is in compliance with the ethical standards outlaid by COPE.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Miller.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Experimental Stimuli Naming Task

figure au

Appendix 2: Experimental Stimuli for Primed Naming and Semantic Decision Tasks

Rotation 1

figure av

Rotation 2

figure aw

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miller, P., Liran-Hazan, B. & Vaknin, V. Morphological Decomposition in Reading Hebrew Homographs. J Psycholinguist Res 45, 717–738 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9364-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9364-4

Keywords

Navigation