Abstract
The present work investigates whether and how morphological decomposition processes bias the reading of Hebrew heterophonic homographs, i.e., unique orthographic patterns that are associated with two separate phonological, semantic entities depicted by means of two morphological structures (linear and nonlinear). In order to reveal the nature of morphological processes involved in the reading of Hebrew homographs, we tested 146 university students with three computerized experiments, each experiment focusing on a different level of processing. Participants were divided into three experimental groups given that the three experiments used the same stimulus lists. Evidence obtained from the analysis of the participants’ processing time and processing accuracy points to a propensity to process heterophonic homographs by default as morpho-syntactically simple rather than complex words. Findings are discussed with reference to assumptions made by Dual-Route models regarding the importance of morphological knowledge in fast and accurate access of written words’ representations which mediate the retrieval of their meanings with direct reference to the context in which they occur.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The letter ‘C’ depicts the consonants of the root morpheme whereas the letter ‘e’ represents the word’s vocalic (vowel) pattern.
References
Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94–117.
Bentin, S., Bargai, N., & Katz, L. (1984). Orthographic and phonemic coding for lexical access: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory & Cognition, 10, 353–368.
Bentin, S., & Feldman, L. B. (1990). The contribution of morphological and semantic relatedness to repetition effect at short and long lags: Evidence from Hebrew. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 693–711.
Bentin, S., & Frost, R. (1987). Processing lexical ambiguity and visual word recognition in a deep orthography. Memory & Cognition, 15, 13–23.
Berent, I., Vaknin, V., & Marcus, G. (2007). Roots, stems, and the universality of lexical representations: Evidence from Hebrew. Cognition, 104, 254–286.
Beyersmann, E., Andoni-Dunabeitia, J., Carreiras, M., Coltheart, M., & Castles, A. (2013). Early morphological decomposition of suffixed words: Masked priming evidence with transposed-letter nonword primes. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 869–892.
Beyersmann, E., Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (2011). Early morphological decomposition during visual word recognition: Evidence from masked transposed-letter priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 937–942.
Bick, A. S., Frost, R., & Goelman, G. (2009). Imaging implicit morphological processing: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1955–1969.
Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297–332.
Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190.
Carlisle, J. F. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: A commentary. Reading Psychology: Education Study and Teaching Periodicals, 24, 291–322.
Carlisle, J. F., & Stone, C. A. (2003). The effects of morphological structure of children’s reading of derived words in English. In E. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-language studies (pp. 27–49). New York: Plenum Publishers.
Carlisle, J. F., & Stone, C. A. (2005). Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 428–449.
Deutsch, A., Frost, R., & Forster, K. (1998). Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 1238–1255.
Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2000). Early morphological effects in word recognition in Hebrew: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 487–506.
Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2005). Morphological parafoveal preview benefit effects in reading: Evidence from Hebrew. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 341–371.
Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2009). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words. Memory & Cognition, 37, 895–908.
Dominguez, A., De-Vega, M., & Barber, H. (2004). Event-related brain potentials elicited by morphological, homographic, orthographic, and semantic priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 598–608.
Feldman, L. B., Frost, R., & Pnini, T. (1995). Decomposing words into their constituent morphemes: Evidence from English and Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 947–960.
Fiorentino, R., & Poeppel, D. (2007). Compound words and structure in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 953–1000.
Frauenfelder, U. H., & Schreuder, R. (1992). Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. In G. Booij & J. Van-Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology, (part 2) (pp. 165–183). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Frost, R., & Bentin, S. (1992). Processing phonological and semantic ambiguity—Evidence from semantic priming at different SOAs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 58–68.
Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 829–856.
Gonnerman, L. M., Seidenberg, M. S., & Andersen, E. S. (2007). Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: Evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 136, 323.
Goral, M., & Obler, K. (2003). Root-morpheme processing during word recognition in Hebrew speakers across the adult life-span. In J. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and language acquisition in root-based, semitic, morphology (pp. 223–242). Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s.
Gottlob, L. R., Goldinger, S. D., Stone, G. O., & Van-Orden, G. C. (1999). Reading Homographs: Orthographic, Phonologic and Semantic Dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 561–574.
Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–13.
Hino, Y., Lupker, S. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2002). Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: Interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 686–713.
Koriat, A., Greenberg, S. N., & Goldshmid, Y. (1991). The missing letter effect in Hebrew: Word frequency or word function? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 66–80.
Lavric, A., Clapp, A., & Rastle, K. (2007). ERP evidence of morphological analysis from orthography: A masked priming study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 866–877.
Liu, P. D., & McBride-Chang, C. (2010a). Morphological processing of Chinese compounds from a grammatical view. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 605–617.
Longtin, C. M., & Meunier, F. (2005). Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 26–41.
Mahony, M., Singson, M., & Mann, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 191–218.
Mann, V. A., & Singson, M. (2003). Linking morphological knowledge to English decoding ability: Large effects of little suffixes. In E. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-language studies (pp. 1–26). New York: Plenum.
McCormick, S. F., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Is there a ‘fete’ in ‘fetish’? Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 307–326.
McCormick, S. F., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2009). Adore-able not adorable? Orthographic underspecification studied with masked repetition priming. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 813–836.
Meunier, F., & Longtin, C. M. (2007). Morphological decomposition and semantic integration in word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 457–471.
Miller, P. (2006). Processing of unpointed Hebrew: What can be learned from determining the identicalness of monosyllabic and bisyllabic nouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 267–283.
Nagy, W. E., Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. C. (2006). Contribution of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134–147.
Nievas, F., & Mari-Beffa, P. (2002). Negative priming from the non-selected meaning of the homograph. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 47–66.
Niswander-Klement, E., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). The effects of root frequency, word frequency, and length on the processing of prefixed English words during reading. Memory & Cognition, 34, 685–702.
Pacht, J. M., & Rayner, K. (1993). The processing of homophonic homographs during reading: Evidence from eye movement studies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 251–271.
Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: Basic Books.
Rastle, K., & Davis, M. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 942–971.
Ravid, D. (2006). Word-level morphology—A psycholinguistic perspective on linear formation in Hebrew nominal’s. Morphology, 16, 127–148.
Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131–154). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Shimron, Y. (2006). Reading Hebrew: The language and the psychology of reading it. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Solomyak, O., & Marantz, A. (2010). Evidence for early morphological decomposition in visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2042–2057.
Taft, M. (2003). Morphological representation as a correlation between form and meaning. In E. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words (pp. 113–137). Amsterdam: Kluwer.
Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 745–765.
Taft, M., & Ardasinski, S. (2006). Obligatory decomposition in reading prefixed words. The Mental Lexicon, 1, 183–199.
Taft, M., & Nguyen-Hoan, M. (2010). A sticky stick? The locus of morphological representation in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 277–296.
Vaknin, V., & Shimron, J. (2011). Hebrew plural inflection: Linear processing in a semitic language. The Mental Lexicon, 6, 197–244.
Ethical standard
The university students participating in the study were tested only after providing them with information regarding the nature of the study and getting their explicit consent. In sum, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, the research reported in the manuscript adheres to principles of ethical responsibilities and is in compliance with the ethical standards outlaid by COPE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: Experimental Stimuli Naming Task
Appendix 2: Experimental Stimuli for Primed Naming and Semantic Decision Tasks
Rotation 1
Rotation 2
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miller, P., Liran-Hazan, B. & Vaknin, V. Morphological Decomposition in Reading Hebrew Homographs. J Psycholinguist Res 45, 717–738 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9364-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9364-4