Skip to main content
Log in

Image Schemas in Verb–Particle Constructions: Evidence from a Behavioral Experiment

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cognitive linguists claim that verb–particle constructions are compositional and analyzable, and that the particles contribute to the overall meaning in the form of image schemas. This article examined this claim with a behavioral experiment, in which participants were asked to judge the sensibility of short sentences primed by image-schematic pictures. Results showed that for sentences containing spatial VP constructions, the latency followed the order of “agreement primes \(<\) neutral primes \(<\) disagreement primes”, while for sentences of non-spatial VP constructions, the order was “neutral primes \(<\) agreement primes \(<\) disagreement primes”. This suggests that the activation of the corresponding image schemas influences both types of VP constructions, providing new evidence for the embodied account of language and thought. The different processing patterns between the spatial and non-spatial VP constructions are also discussed in the theoretical framework of Construction Grammar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bolinger, D. (1971). The phrasal verb in English. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P. (1988). The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Language and Memory, 27, 668–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehe, N., Jackendoff, R., McIntyre, A., & Urban, S. (Eds.). (2002). Verb-particle explorations. Berlin: Mounton de Gruyter.

  • Galinsky, A. D., & Glucksberg, S. (2000). Inhibition of the literal: Metaphors and idioms as judgmental primes [J]. Social Cognition, 18(1), 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3/4), 455–479.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gernbacher, M. A., Keysar, B., & Robertson, R. R. (1995). The role of suppression in metaphor comprehension. Paper presented at the 36th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles, CA.

  • Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind, figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R. W. (2005). The psychological status of image schemas. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meanings: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 137–164). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. (1995). The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics, 6, 347–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R. W., Nayak, N. P., & Cutting, C. (1989). How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 576–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glucksberg, S. (1993). Idiom meanings and allusional content. In C. Cacciari & P. Tabossi (Eds.), Idioms: Processing, structure, and interpretation (pp. 3–26). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Glucksberg, S., Newsome, M. R., & Goldvarg, Y. (1997). Filtering out irrelevant material during metaphor comprehension. In Proceedings of the nineteenth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. E. (2005). Argument realization: the role of constructions, lexical semantics and discourse factors. In J. O. Ostman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extentions (pp. 17–43). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, R. F. Perfetti, & Schneider, (2006). Perceptual knowledge retrieval activates sensory brain regions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26(18), 4917–4921.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin, J. L., & Gibbs, R. W. (1999). Why you can’t kick the bucket as you slowly die: Verbs in idiom comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(1), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa, K. (1999). English verb-particle constructions and a v0-internal structure. English Linguistics, 16, 329–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmerer, D., et al. (2008). Neuroanatomical distribution of five semantic components of verbs: Evidence from FMRI. Brain & Language, 107, 16–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindner, S. (1981). A Lexico-semantic analysis of English verb particle constructions with OUT and UP. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Indiana at Bloomington. Distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.

  • Mandler, J. M. (2005). How to build a baby. III: Image schemas and the transition to verbal thought. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meanings: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 137–164). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, P. S. (1997). Figuring out figure out: Metaphor and the semantics of the English verb–particle construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(4), 327–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, D. C., Spivey, M. J., Edelman, S., & Naples, A. D. (2001). Language is spatial: Experimental evidence for image schemas of concrete and abstract verbs. Proceedings of the 23rd annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 873–878). Mawhah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, D. C., et al. (2003). Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 27, 767–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context of picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12(2), 153–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Voort, M. E. C., & Vonk, W. (1995). You don’t die immediately when you kick an empty bucket: A processing view on semantic and syntactic characteristics of idioms. In M. Everaert, E. van der Linden, A. Schenk, & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Idioms: Structural and psychological perspectives (pp. 283–299). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, T. F. (2012). Image schema in verb–particle constructions: Theoretical assumptions and empirical evidence. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai.

  • Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13(2), 168–171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2003). Spatial iconicity affects semantic relatedness judements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(4), 954–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan, R. A., Madden, C. J., Yaxley, R. H., & Aveyard, M. E. (2004). Moving words: Dynamic representations in language comprehension. Cognitive Science, 28, 611–619.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Social Science Young Scholar Program of the Education Ministry of China (Number 13YJC740123).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tangfeng Yang.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Sentences Used in the Experiment

Meaningful Sentences (48 in Total)

Spatial sense

Non-spatial sense

1

Five strong men crowded in

1

Panic started to set in

2

They tried to squeeze in

2

The teacher’s words sank in

3

The police were called in

3

Please do count me in

4

He’s going to fly in

4

The new boss dropped in

5

Ask him to come in

5

Letters of thanks flooded in

6

The guard let him in

6

They had to give in

7

The children happily ran out

7

Your time is running out

8

The rubbish was thrown out

8

Many rare species died out

9

The man quietly slipped out

9

The lights were turned out

10

Some bats suddenly flew out

10

The runner was worn out

11

The car slowly pulled out

11

The fire was put out

12

The lady has gone out

12

The plan was carried out

13

The man suddenly jumped up

13

He tore the papers up

14

The slim girl stood up

14

His aunt brought him up

15

The picture was hung up

15

The girl’s face lit up

16

They gently lifted him up

16

The student soon caught up

17

The boxes were piled up

17

The station was blown up

18

The balloon slowly rose up

18

He decided to give up

19

The house was knocked down

19

The train has slowed down

20

The trees were cut down

20

The car has broken down

21

The plane has touched down

21

Our offer was turned down

22

The poor man knelt down

22

The batteries are running down

23

Rain started to pour down

23

His father let him down

24

The bridge has fallen down

24

The factory was closed down

Meaningless Sentences (48 in Total)

1

He felt like branching up

29

Her eyes sparkled with shoes

2

The small plane touched up

30

They peeled off their advice

3

The police gunned him up

31

The mud stained my cold

4

The angry man cooled up

32

They arose from the up

5

The paper was handed water

33

He walked very fast dresses

6

She cried her eyes up

34

He borrowed some direction

7

The boss gave him down

35

She bought a new storm

8

He read a story down

36

They drove in wrong kitchen

9

She exerted her ideas down

37

He was charged with bread

10

The dark sky cleared down

38

He bit off a chunk of thirsty

11

Mary picked the coin down

39

The girls split off color

12

The excited crowd cheered down

40

They battled up the dress

13

The civil war broke in

41

Bed was a place for face

14

This section was ruled in

42

Problems fell into three water

15

The truth is dug in

43

Thieves made away with long

16

I can work the problem in

44

The house was painted book

17

I decided to wake him in

45

He worked in small flowers

18

They laughed at a in

46

The maid watered the song

19

The watch has sold in

47

His friend smiled the desk

20

The meaning was pinned out

48

They all tasted the door

21

The girls were dressed think

  

22

The milk was drunk door

  

23

The fire destroyed the out

  

24

He handed me the out

  

25

He was charged with up

  

26

The food was left write

  

27

The football game is clothes

  

28

The river was severely door

  

Appendix 2: The Experiment Data

Mean Latency of 44 Participants

Subject

Spatial VPC

Non-spatial VPC

Agree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Disagree

Neutral

1

496.63

622.57

608.63

538.13

599.17

548.43

2

691.63

527.5

586.63

450.63

602.83

535.13

3

600.43

619.5

536.14

465.29

738.71

677.38

4

588.14

601.83

665.38

523.88

604.14

631

5

913.43

951.88

906.5

926.17

849.5

752.6

6

571

601.13

562.38

585.67

633.25

578.29

7

548.25

599.5

516.71

509.17

556.88

446.71

8

617.71

737.57

668.14

788

674.33

717.63

9

756.17

937

811

767.17

814.14

825

10

551

531.86

503.38

468.43

562.88

519

11

609.13

633.86

654.25

686

593.17

608.57

12

601.63

758.14

558.75

465.29

769

606.5

13

714

635.63

609.38

588.33

530.14

516.75

14

455.57

642.83

516.29

562.57

560

578.43

15

694.75

565

636.5

531.29

574.29

505.25

16

839.88

901.75

931.33

852.14

825.6

775.67

17

810.38

708.83

769.25

766.88

895.13

734.63

18

735.43

636

644.86

712

633.86

611.38

19

756.43

734.33

925.63

897

869

782.25

20

610.13

522.14

677.57

586.75

839.29

605

21

505

546.63

540.75

567.13

575.33

527.78

22

507.57

596.75

612.63

498.5

611.86

587.5

23

592.75

600.43

477.13

507.5

761.29

499.56

24

450.43

458.5

358

469.75

467.71

389.29

25

618.43

887.17

698.71

619.14

887.8

602.2

26

636.38

649.25

701.17

608.88

753.5

632.38

27

450.71

421.25

554

383.71

493

402.5

28

760.25

861.14

778

670.57

585

744.83

29

578

722.4

639.38

709.25

612.25

517.5

30

687.57

776.14

741.63

757.2

664.5

767.86

31

459.14

638.33

432

502

492

452.33

32

1034

1138.33

960.25

1013.6

1110.8

1021.25

33

570.63

537.75

569.25

643.5

733.5

597.13

34

477.14

481.75

511

432.25

450.5

423.63

35

748

797.17

892.43

835.43

762.83

886.6

36

654.63

815.13

777

789

758.5

700.88

37

484.88

620.5

580.38

531

524.33

610.57

38

609.88

606.5

570.88

681

542.38

553.29

39

598.71

535.63

590.63

468.86

511

475

40

913.14

883.88

757.75

800.38

787.57

674

41

621.63

610

637.75

776.67

612.29

550.5

42

569.71

539.38

659.88

567.29

583.25

733.2

43

533.86

640.13

530.43

682.33

525.75

533.88

44

513.71

665.25

648.75

552

660.25

536

Mean

630.41

670.41

647.92

630.4

663.47

613.07

Unit: ms

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, T. Image Schemas in Verb–Particle Constructions: Evidence from a Behavioral Experiment. J Psycholinguist Res 45, 379–393 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9354-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9354-6

Keywords

Navigation