Abstract
Cognitive linguists claim that verb–particle constructions are compositional and analyzable, and that the particles contribute to the overall meaning in the form of image schemas. This article examined this claim with a behavioral experiment, in which participants were asked to judge the sensibility of short sentences primed by image-schematic pictures. Results showed that for sentences containing spatial VP constructions, the latency followed the order of “agreement primes \(<\) neutral primes \(<\) disagreement primes”, while for sentences of non-spatial VP constructions, the order was “neutral primes \(<\) agreement primes \(<\) disagreement primes”. This suggests that the activation of the corresponding image schemas influences both types of VP constructions, providing new evidence for the embodied account of language and thought. The different processing patterns between the spatial and non-spatial VP constructions are also discussed in the theoretical framework of Construction Grammar.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bolinger, D. (1971). The phrasal verb in English. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P. (1988). The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Language and Memory, 27, 668–683.
Dehe, N., Jackendoff, R., McIntyre, A., & Urban, S. (Eds.). (2002). Verb-particle explorations. Berlin: Mounton de Gruyter.
Galinsky, A. D., & Glucksberg, S. (2000). Inhibition of the literal: Metaphors and idioms as judgmental primes [J]. Social Cognition, 18(1), 35–54.
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3/4), 455–479.
Gernbacher, M. A., Keysar, B., & Robertson, R. R. (1995). The role of suppression in metaphor comprehension. Paper presented at the 36th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles, CA.
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind, figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. W. (2005). The psychological status of image schemas. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meanings: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 137–164). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. (1995). The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics, 6, 347–378.
Gibbs, R. W., Nayak, N. P., & Cutting, C. (1989). How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 576–593.
Glucksberg, S. (1993). Idiom meanings and allusional content. In C. Cacciari & P. Tabossi (Eds.), Idioms: Processing, structure, and interpretation (pp. 3–26). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
Glucksberg, S., Newsome, M. R., & Goldvarg, Y. (1997). Filtering out irrelevant material during metaphor comprehension. In Proceedings of the nineteenth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (2005). Argument realization: the role of constructions, lexical semantics and discourse factors. In J. O. Ostman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extentions (pp. 17–43). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, R. F. Perfetti, & Schneider, (2006). Perceptual knowledge retrieval activates sensory brain regions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26(18), 4917–4921.
Hamblin, J. L., & Gibbs, R. W. (1999). Why you can’t kick the bucket as you slowly die: Verbs in idiom comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(1), 25–39.
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301–307.
Ishikawa, K. (1999). English verb-particle constructions and a v0-internal structure. English Linguistics, 16, 329–352.
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kemmerer, D., et al. (2008). Neuroanatomical distribution of five semantic components of verbs: Evidence from FMRI. Brain & Language, 107, 16–43.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lindner, S. (1981). A Lexico-semantic analysis of English verb particle constructions with OUT and UP. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Indiana at Bloomington. Distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Mandler, J. M. (2005). How to build a baby. III: Image schemas and the transition to verbal thought. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meanings: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 137–164). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Morgan, P. S. (1997). Figuring out figure out: Metaphor and the semantics of the English verb–particle construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(4), 327–357.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.
Richardson, D. C., Spivey, M. J., Edelman, S., & Naples, A. D. (2001). Language is spatial: Experimental evidence for image schemas of concrete and abstract verbs. Proceedings of the 23rd annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 873–878). Mawhah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Richardson, D. C., et al. (2003). Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 27, 767–780.
Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context of picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12(2), 153–156.
Van de Voort, M. E. C., & Vonk, W. (1995). You don’t die immediately when you kick an empty bucket: A processing view on semantic and syntactic characteristics of idioms. In M. Everaert, E. van der Linden, A. Schenk, & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Idioms: Structural and psychological perspectives (pp. 283–299). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Yang, T. F. (2012). Image schema in verb–particle constructions: Theoretical assumptions and empirical evidence. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai.
Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13(2), 168–171.
Zwaan, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2003). Spatial iconicity affects semantic relatedness judements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(4), 954–958.
Zwaan, R. A., Madden, C. J., Yaxley, R. H., & Aveyard, M. E. (2004). Moving words: Dynamic representations in language comprehension. Cognitive Science, 28, 611–619.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Social Science Young Scholar Program of the Education Ministry of China (Number 13YJC740123).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: Sentences Used in the Experiment
Meaningful Sentences (48 in Total)
Spatial sense | Non-spatial sense | ||
---|---|---|---|
1 | Five strong men crowded in | 1 | Panic started to set in |
2 | They tried to squeeze in | 2 | The teacher’s words sank in |
3 | The police were called in | 3 | Please do count me in |
4 | He’s going to fly in | 4 | The new boss dropped in |
5 | Ask him to come in | 5 | Letters of thanks flooded in |
6 | The guard let him in | 6 | They had to give in |
7 | The children happily ran out | 7 | Your time is running out |
8 | The rubbish was thrown out | 8 | Many rare species died out |
9 | The man quietly slipped out | 9 | The lights were turned out |
10 | Some bats suddenly flew out | 10 | The runner was worn out |
11 | The car slowly pulled out | 11 | The fire was put out |
12 | The lady has gone out | 12 | The plan was carried out |
13 | The man suddenly jumped up | 13 | He tore the papers up |
14 | The slim girl stood up | 14 | His aunt brought him up |
15 | The picture was hung up | 15 | The girl’s face lit up |
16 | They gently lifted him up | 16 | The student soon caught up |
17 | The boxes were piled up | 17 | The station was blown up |
18 | The balloon slowly rose up | 18 | He decided to give up |
19 | The house was knocked down | 19 | The train has slowed down |
20 | The trees were cut down | 20 | The car has broken down |
21 | The plane has touched down | 21 | Our offer was turned down |
22 | The poor man knelt down | 22 | The batteries are running down |
23 | Rain started to pour down | 23 | His father let him down |
24 | The bridge has fallen down | 24 | The factory was closed down |
Meaningless Sentences (48 in Total)
1 | He felt like branching up | 29 | Her eyes sparkled with shoes |
2 | The small plane touched up | 30 | They peeled off their advice |
3 | The police gunned him up | 31 | The mud stained my cold |
4 | The angry man cooled up | 32 | They arose from the up |
5 | The paper was handed water | 33 | He walked very fast dresses |
6 | She cried her eyes up | 34 | He borrowed some direction |
7 | The boss gave him down | 35 | She bought a new storm |
8 | He read a story down | 36 | They drove in wrong kitchen |
9 | She exerted her ideas down | 37 | He was charged with bread |
10 | The dark sky cleared down | 38 | He bit off a chunk of thirsty |
11 | Mary picked the coin down | 39 | The girls split off color |
12 | The excited crowd cheered down | 40 | They battled up the dress |
13 | The civil war broke in | 41 | Bed was a place for face |
14 | This section was ruled in | 42 | Problems fell into three water |
15 | The truth is dug in | 43 | Thieves made away with long |
16 | I can work the problem in | 44 | The house was painted book |
17 | I decided to wake him in | 45 | He worked in small flowers |
18 | They laughed at a in | 46 | The maid watered the song |
19 | The watch has sold in | 47 | His friend smiled the desk |
20 | The meaning was pinned out | 48 | They all tasted the door |
21 | The girls were dressed think | ||
22 | The milk was drunk door | ||
23 | The fire destroyed the out | ||
24 | He handed me the out | ||
25 | He was charged with up | ||
26 | The food was left write | ||
27 | The football game is clothes | ||
28 | The river was severely door |
Appendix 2: The Experiment Data
Mean Latency of 44 Participants
Subject | Spatial VPC | Non-spatial VPC | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Disagree | Neutral | |
1 | 496.63 | 622.57 | 608.63 | 538.13 | 599.17 | 548.43 |
2 | 691.63 | 527.5 | 586.63 | 450.63 | 602.83 | 535.13 |
3 | 600.43 | 619.5 | 536.14 | 465.29 | 738.71 | 677.38 |
4 | 588.14 | 601.83 | 665.38 | 523.88 | 604.14 | 631 |
5 | 913.43 | 951.88 | 906.5 | 926.17 | 849.5 | 752.6 |
6 | 571 | 601.13 | 562.38 | 585.67 | 633.25 | 578.29 |
7 | 548.25 | 599.5 | 516.71 | 509.17 | 556.88 | 446.71 |
8 | 617.71 | 737.57 | 668.14 | 788 | 674.33 | 717.63 |
9 | 756.17 | 937 | 811 | 767.17 | 814.14 | 825 |
10 | 551 | 531.86 | 503.38 | 468.43 | 562.88 | 519 |
11 | 609.13 | 633.86 | 654.25 | 686 | 593.17 | 608.57 |
12 | 601.63 | 758.14 | 558.75 | 465.29 | 769 | 606.5 |
13 | 714 | 635.63 | 609.38 | 588.33 | 530.14 | 516.75 |
14 | 455.57 | 642.83 | 516.29 | 562.57 | 560 | 578.43 |
15 | 694.75 | 565 | 636.5 | 531.29 | 574.29 | 505.25 |
16 | 839.88 | 901.75 | 931.33 | 852.14 | 825.6 | 775.67 |
17 | 810.38 | 708.83 | 769.25 | 766.88 | 895.13 | 734.63 |
18 | 735.43 | 636 | 644.86 | 712 | 633.86 | 611.38 |
19 | 756.43 | 734.33 | 925.63 | 897 | 869 | 782.25 |
20 | 610.13 | 522.14 | 677.57 | 586.75 | 839.29 | 605 |
21 | 505 | 546.63 | 540.75 | 567.13 | 575.33 | 527.78 |
22 | 507.57 | 596.75 | 612.63 | 498.5 | 611.86 | 587.5 |
23 | 592.75 | 600.43 | 477.13 | 507.5 | 761.29 | 499.56 |
24 | 450.43 | 458.5 | 358 | 469.75 | 467.71 | 389.29 |
25 | 618.43 | 887.17 | 698.71 | 619.14 | 887.8 | 602.2 |
26 | 636.38 | 649.25 | 701.17 | 608.88 | 753.5 | 632.38 |
27 | 450.71 | 421.25 | 554 | 383.71 | 493 | 402.5 |
28 | 760.25 | 861.14 | 778 | 670.57 | 585 | 744.83 |
29 | 578 | 722.4 | 639.38 | 709.25 | 612.25 | 517.5 |
30 | 687.57 | 776.14 | 741.63 | 757.2 | 664.5 | 767.86 |
31 | 459.14 | 638.33 | 432 | 502 | 492 | 452.33 |
32 | 1034 | 1138.33 | 960.25 | 1013.6 | 1110.8 | 1021.25 |
33 | 570.63 | 537.75 | 569.25 | 643.5 | 733.5 | 597.13 |
34 | 477.14 | 481.75 | 511 | 432.25 | 450.5 | 423.63 |
35 | 748 | 797.17 | 892.43 | 835.43 | 762.83 | 886.6 |
36 | 654.63 | 815.13 | 777 | 789 | 758.5 | 700.88 |
37 | 484.88 | 620.5 | 580.38 | 531 | 524.33 | 610.57 |
38 | 609.88 | 606.5 | 570.88 | 681 | 542.38 | 553.29 |
39 | 598.71 | 535.63 | 590.63 | 468.86 | 511 | 475 |
40 | 913.14 | 883.88 | 757.75 | 800.38 | 787.57 | 674 |
41 | 621.63 | 610 | 637.75 | 776.67 | 612.29 | 550.5 |
42 | 569.71 | 539.38 | 659.88 | 567.29 | 583.25 | 733.2 |
43 | 533.86 | 640.13 | 530.43 | 682.33 | 525.75 | 533.88 |
44 | 513.71 | 665.25 | 648.75 | 552 | 660.25 | 536 |
Mean | 630.41 | 670.41 | 647.92 | 630.4 | 663.47 | 613.07 |
Unit: ms
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, T. Image Schemas in Verb–Particle Constructions: Evidence from a Behavioral Experiment. J Psycholinguist Res 45, 379–393 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9354-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9354-6