Skip to main content
Log in

Reconciling Adaptation and Fidelity: Implications for Scaling Up High Quality Youth Programs

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Journal of Primary Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the field of prevention science, some consider fidelity to manualized protocols to be a hallmark of successful implementation. A growing number of scholars agree that high-quality implementation should also include some adaptations to local context, particularly as prevention programs are scaled up, in order to strengthen their relevance and increase participant engagement. From this perspective, fidelity and adaptation can both be seen as necessary, albeit mutually exclusive, dimensions of implementation quality. In this article, we propose that the relationship between these two constructs may be more complex, particularly when adaptations are consistent with the key principles underlying the program model. Our argument draws on examples from the implementation of a manualized youth voice program (YVP) in two different organizations serving six distinct communities. Through a series of retreats, implementers identified examples of modifications made and grouped them into themes. Results suggest that some adaptations were actually indicators of fidelity to the key principles of YVPs: power-sharing, youth ownership, and engagement in social change. We therefore offer suggestions for re-conceptualizing the fidelity-adaptation debate, highlight implications for measurement and assessment, and illustrate that the de facto treatment of adaptation and fidelity as opposing constructs may limit the diffusion or scaling up of these types of youth programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anyon, Y., Brink, K., Crawford, M., Fernandez, M., Hofstedt, M., Osberg, J., et al. (Eds.). (2007). Youth engaged in leadership and learning: A handbook for program staff, teachers, and community leaders. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University, John W. Gardner Center for Youth and Their Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernal, G., Bonilla, J., & Bellido, C. (1995). Ecological validity and cultural sensitivity for outcome research: Issues for the cultural adaptation and development of psychosocial treatments with Hispanics. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23, 67–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, B. K., Vernberg, E. M., Twemlow, S. W., Fonagy, P., & Dill, E. J. (2008). Teacher adherence and its relation to teacher attitudes and student outcomes in an elementary school-based violence prevention program. School Psychology Review, 37, 533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bragg, S. (2007). “Student voice” and governmentality: The production of enterprising subjects? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(3), 343–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cammarota, J., & Romero, A. F. (2009). A social justice epistemology and pedagogy for Latina/o students: Transforming public education with participatory action research. New Directions for Youth Development, 2009(123), 53–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, F. G., Barrera, M., Jr., & Martinez, C. R., Jr. (2004). The cultural adaptation of prevention interventions: Resolving tensions between fidelity and fit. Prevention Science, 5, 41–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, J. O., & Strobel, K. (2007). Leadership development: An examination of individual and programmatic growth. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22(3), 275–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupuis, J., & Mann-Feder, V. (2013). Moving towards emancipatory practice: Conditions for meaningful youth empowerment in child welfare. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 4(3), 371–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durlak, J., & Dupre, E. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., & Pachan, M. (2010). A meta-analysis of after-school programs that seek to promote personal and social skills in children and adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3–4), 294–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., Johnson, N. A., & McGillicuddy, K. (2003). An emerging model for working with youth. New York: Funders’ Collaborative on Youth Organizing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. S., & Mihalic, S. (2004). Issues in disseminating and replicating effective prevention programs. Prevention Science, 5(1), 47–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., & Friedman, R. M. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).

  • Forgatch, M. S., Patterson, G. R., & DeGarmo, D. S. (2005). Evaluating fidelity: Predictive validity for a measure of competent adherence to the Oregon model of parent management training. Behavior Therapy, 36(1), 3–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ginwright, S., & James, T. (2002). From assets to agents of change: Social justice, organizing, and youth development. New Directions for Youth Development, 96, 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, D. M., & Larson, R. W. (2007). Amplifiers of developmental and negative experiences in organized activities: Dosage, motivation, lead roles, and adult-youth ratios. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28, 360–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harden, T., Kenemore, T., Mann, K., Edwards, M., List, C., & Martinson, K. J. (2015). The Truth N’Trauma Project: Addressing community violence through a youth-led, trauma-informed and restorative framework. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 32(1), 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (1983). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Some techniques of data reduction and display. Quality and Quantity, 17, 281–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirshner, B. (2008). Guided participation in three youth activism organizations: Facilitation, apprenticeship, and joint work. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 60–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohfeldt, D., Chhun, L., Grace, S., & Langhout, R. D. (2011). Youth empowerment in context: Exploring tensions in school-based YPAR. American Journal of Community Psychology, 47(1–2), 28–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. W., & Angus, R. M. (2011). Adolescents’ development of skills for agency in youth programs: Learning to think strategically. Child Development, 82, 277–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. W., & Walker, K. C. (2010). Dilemmas of practice: Challenges to program quality encountered by youth program leaders. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3–4), 338–349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, L. L., Gresham, F. M., DiGennaro, F. D., & Reed, D. D. (2007). Treatment integrity of school-based interventions with children in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1991–2005. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 659–672.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mihalic, S. F., & Elliott, D. S. (2015). Evidence-based programs registry: Blueprints for healthy youth development. Evaluation and Program Planning, 48, 124–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. E., Bumbarger, B. K., & Cooper, B. R. (2013). Examining adaptations of evidence-based programs in natural nontexts. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 34(3), 147–161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ozer, E. J., & Douglas, L. (2013). The impact of participatory research on urban teens: An experimental evaluation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51(1–2), 66–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ozer, E. J., & Douglas, L. (2015). Assessing the key processes of youth-led participatory research: Psychometric analysis and application of an observational rating scale. Youth and Society, 47(1), 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozer, E. J., Newlan, S., Douglas, L., & Hubbard, E. (2013). “Bounded” empowerment: Analyzing tensions in the practice of youth-led participatory research in urban public schools. American Journal of Community Psychology, 52(1–2), 13–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ozer, E. J., Ritterman, M. L., & Wanis, M. G. (2010). Participatory action research (PAR) in middle school: Opportunities, constraints, and key processes. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46(1–2), 152–166.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, E. N., Berg, M. J., Rodriguez, C., & Morgan, D. (2010). A case study of participatory action research in a public New England middle school: Empowerment, constraints and challenges. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46(1–2), 179–194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, L. F., & Brown, T. M. (2009). From voice to agency: Guiding principles for participatory action research with youth. New Directions for Youth Development, 123, 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe, J., Anyon, Y. & Jenson, J. (2016). Fidelity and adaptation of youth empowerment programming in community practice. In Poster presented at the annual conference of the Society for Social Work Research, Washington, D.C.

  • Soleimanpour, S., Brindis, C., Geierstanger, S., Kandawalla, S., & Kurlaender, T. (2008). Incorporating youth-led community participatory research into school health center programs and policies. Public health reports, 123(6), 709–716.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stirman, S. W., Miller, C. J., Toder, K., & Calloway, A. (2013). Development of a framework and coding system for modifications and adaptations of evidence-based interventions. Implementation Science, 8, 65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration. (2002). Finding the balance: Program fidelity and adaptation in substance abuse prevention. A state-of-the-art review [and] executive summary. 2002 conference edition. Retrieved on April 16, 2016 from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED469354&site=eds-live.

  • Tilton, J. (2013). Rethinking youth voice and institutional power: Reflections from inside a service learning partnership in a California juvenile hall. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(8), 1189–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travis, R., & Leech, T. G. (2014). Empowerment-based positive youth development: A new understanding of healthy development for African American youth. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24(1), 93–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagaman, M. A. (2015). Changing ourselves, changing the world: Assessing the value of participatory action research as an empowerment-based research and service approach with LGBTQ young people. Child and Youth Services, 36(2), 124–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, B., Stanton, B., Deveaux, L., Poitier, M., Lunn, S., Koci, V., et al. (2015). Factors influencing implementation dose and fidelity thereof and related student outcomes of an evidence-based national HIV prevention program. Implementation Science, 10(1), 44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, N. T., Zimmerman, M. A., & Parker, E. A. (2010). A typology of youth participation and empowerment for child and adolescent health promotion. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46(1–2), 100–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yohalem, N., & Wilson-Ahlstrom, A. (2010). Inside the black box: Assessing and improving quality in youth programs. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3–4), 350–357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by Public Good Grants to Dr. Anyon and Dr. Bender by the Center for Community Engagement to Advance Scholarship and Learning at the University of Denver.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yolanda Anyon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anyon, Y., Roscoe, J., Bender, K. et al. Reconciling Adaptation and Fidelity: Implications for Scaling Up High Quality Youth Programs. J Primary Prevent 40, 35–49 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-019-00535-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-019-00535-6

Keywords

Navigation