Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Psychosocial Adaptation to Chronic Illness and Disability: A Virtue Based Model

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose Psychosocial adaptation to chronic illness and disability (CID) is an area of study where a positive psychology perspective, especially the study of virtues and character strengths, can be implemented within the rehabilitation framework. A carefully developed theory to guide future interdisciplinary research is now timely. Methods A traditional literature review between philosophy and rehabilitation psychology was conducted in order to develop a virtue-based psychosocial adaptation theory, merging important perspectives from the fields of rehabilitation and positive psychology. Results The virtue-based psychosocial adaptation model (V-PAM) to CID is proposed in the present study. Conclusions The model involves five qualities or constructs: courage, practical wisdom, commitment to action, integrity and emotional transcendence. Each of these components of virtue contributes to an understanding of psychosocial adaptation. The present study addresses the implications and applications of V-PAM that will advance this understanding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gandy GL, Martin ED, Hardy RE, Cull JG. Rehabilitation counseling and services: profession and process. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas Publisher; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kim JH, Keck PS, Miller D, Gonzalez R. Introduction to positive psychology: overview and controversies. J Asia Pac Couns. 2012;2(1):45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fredrickson BL. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Am Psychol. 2001;56(3):218–26.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peterson C, Seligman MEP. Character strengths and virtues: a classification and handbook. New York: Oxford University Press/Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2004.

  5. Fowers BJ. Virtue and psychology: pursuing excellence in ordinary practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Adams RM. A theory of virtue: excellence in being for the good. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Shimai S, Otake K, Park N, Peterson C, Seligman MEP. Convergence of character strengths in American and Japanese young adults. J Happiness Stud. 2006;7:311–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Biswas-Diener R. From the equator to the North Pole: a study of character strengths. J Happiness Stud. 2006;7:293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Linley PA, Maltby J, Wood AM, Joseph S, Harrington S, Peterson C, Park NS, Seligman MEP. Character strengths in the United Kingdom: the VIA Inventory of strengths. Personal Individ Differ. 2007;43:341–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Matthews MD, Eid J, Kelly D, Bailey JK, Peterson C. Character strengths and virtues of developing military leaders: an international comparison. Mil Psychol. 2006;18(Suppl.):s57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Park NS, Peterson C, Seligman MEP. Strengths of character and well-being. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2004;23:603–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Peterson C, Park NS, Seligman MEP. Greater strengths of character and recovery from illness. J Posit Psychol. 2006;1(1):17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Linley PA. Positive adaptation to trauma: wisdom as both process and outcome. J Trauma Stress. 2003;16(6):601–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kitchener KS, Brenner H. Wisdom and reflective judgment: knowing in the face of uncertainty. In: Sternberg R, editor. Wisdom: its nature, origins and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990. p. 212–29.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Arlin PK. Wisdom: the art of problem finding. In: Sternberg RJ, editor. Wisdom: its nature, origins, and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990. p. 230–43.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Ehlers A, Clark DM. A cognitive model of post-traumatic stress disorder. Behav Res Ther. 2000;28:319–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller WI. The mystery of courage. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ramsden EL, Taylor LJ. Stress and anxiety in the disabled patient. Phys Ther. 1988;68:992–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Waddel G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main CJ. A fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain. 1993;52:157–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vlaeyen JWS, Kole-Snijders AMJ, Boeren RGB, Van Eek H. Fear of movement (re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance. Pain. 1995;62:363–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Asmundson GJ, Norton GR, Allerdings MD. Fear and avoidance in dysfunctional chronic back pain patients. Pain. 1997;69:231–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Crombez G, Vlaeyen JWDS, Heuts PHTG, Lysens R. Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself: evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain disability. Pain. 1999;80:329–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vlaeyen JWS, Crombez G. Fear of movement (re) injury, avoidance and pain disability in chronic low back pain patients. Man Ther. 1999;4:187–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Severeijns R, van den Hout MA, Vlaeyen JW, Picavet HS. Pain catastrophizing and general health status in a large Dutch community sample. Pain. 2002;99:367–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Grotle M, Vollestad NK, Veierod MB, Brox JI. Fear-avoidance beliefs and distress in relation to disability in acute and chronic low back pain. Pain. 2004;112:343–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Baumeister RF, Exline JJ. Self-control, morality, and human strength. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2000;19:29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chan F, Gleman JS, Ditchman N, Kim JH, Chiu CY. The World Health Organization ICF Model as a conceptual framework of disability. In: Chan F, Da Silva Cardoso E, Chronister JA, editors. Understanding psychosocial adjustment to chronic illness and disability. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 23–50.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hursh NC. Essential competencies in industrial rehabilitation and disability management practice: a skills-based training model. In: Shrey DE, Lacerte M, editors. Principles and practices of disability management in industry. Winter Park: GR Press; 1995. p. 303–52.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chung-Park A. Achievement motivation: from the perspective of learned hopelessness. 1995. http://cranepsych2.edublogs.org/files/2009/08/Learned_hopelessness.pdf. Accessed Feb 2015.

  30. Graham S, Weiner B. Theories and principles of motivation. In: Berliner DC, Calfee R, editors. Handbook of educational psychology. New York: Macmillan; 1996. p. 63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bundy C. Changing behavior: using motivational interviewing techniques. J R Soc Med. 2004;97:43–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Prosen H. Physical disability and motivation. Can Med Assoc J. 1965;92(24):1261–5.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wright JH, Basco MR, Thase ME. Learning cognitive behavior therapy: an illustrated guide. Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lee EJ, Chan F, Chronister J, Chan JYC, Romero M. Models, research, and treatment of coexisting depression for people with disability. In: Chan F, Da Silva Cardoso E, Chronister JA, editors. Understanding psychosocial adjustment to chronic illness and disability. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 75–107.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hayes SC, Pistorello J, Levin ME. Acceptance and commitment therapy as a unified model of behavioral change. Couns Psychol. 2012;. doi:10.1177/0011000012460836.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Woodruff P. Reverence: renewing a forgotten virtue. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Baumeister RF, Vohs KD, Zhang L. How emotion shapes behavior: feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2007;. doi:10.1177/1088868307301033.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Watson D. The dictionary of mind and spirit. New York: Avon Books; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Reed P. Theory of self-transcendence. In: Smith MJ, Liehr PR, editors. Middle range theory for nursing. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 109–39.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Vash C, Crewe NC. The psychology of disability. New York: Springer; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Shostrom EL. An inventory for the measurement of self-actualization. Educ Psychol Measur. 1964;24(2):207–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lofquist LH, Dawis RV. Adjustment to work. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Powers MB, Zum Vorde Sive Vording MB, Emmelkamp MP. Acceptance and commitment therapy: a meta-analytic review. Psychother Psychosom. 2009;78:73–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ruiz FJ. A review of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) empirical evidence: correlational, experimental psychopathology, component and outcome studies. Int J Psychol Psychol Ther. 2010;10:125–62.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Groeschel BJ. The virtue driven life. Huntington: Our Sunday Visitor; 2006.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Rehabilitation Counseling, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA

    Jeong Han Kim, Brian T. McMahon & Carolyn Hawley

  2. Rehabilitation Counseling Program, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA, USA

    Dana Brickham

  3. School of Rehabilitation Services and Counseling, The University of Texas – Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX, USA

    Rene Gonzalez

  4. Counseling Psychology Program, Department of Education, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea

    Dong-Hun Lee

Authors
  1. Jeong Han Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brian T. McMahon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carolyn Hawley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dana Brickham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rene Gonzalez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dong-Hun Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jeong Han Kim or Dong-Hun Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, J.H., McMahon, B.T., Hawley, C. et al. Psychosocial Adaptation to Chronic Illness and Disability: A Virtue Based Model. J Occup Rehabil 26, 45–55 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-015-9622-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-015-9622-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation