Abstract
X-rays and gamma rays are used in industrial radiography to detect internal defects and different structures of the test object. The radiography interpreters must be able to evaluate and interpret the radiography images as accurately as possible. To improve the operator’s image perception and interpretation, the quality of radiographs can be enhanced by different image processing methods. In this study, the sparse representation method with a nonlocal autoregressive model (NAM) based on a sparse representation model (SRM) algorithm was implemented to improve the defect detection capabilities. The technique relies on generating a regularized and smoothed image, which is then subtracted from the original image to reconstruct the high contrast image. The algorithm was successfully applied to different radiography images. Improved defect detection was achieved while preserving the fine details and the main information of the images. For the enhanced images of samples in this study, figures of merits were found between 83 and 98% for the different defects and regions of interests in the reconstructed radiographs by the NAM–SRM algorithms. These figures of merit were between 67 and 89% in the original radiographs, respectively. The results show that the reconstructed images by NARM–SRM algorithms have better visualization and also the defect regions are very clear to the original radiographs. Regarding computing time, the proposed method is faster than the other four chosen iterative methods.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10921-020-00704-2/MediaObjects/10921_2020_704_Fig1_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10921-020-00704-2/MediaObjects/10921_2020_704_Fig2_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10921-020-00704-2/MediaObjects/10921_2020_704_Fig3_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10921-020-00704-2/MediaObjects/10921_2020_704_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10921-020-00704-2/MediaObjects/10921_2020_704_Fig5_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10921-020-00704-2/MediaObjects/10921_2020_704_Fig6_HTML.jpg)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Vilar, R., Zapata, J., Ruiz, R.: An automatic system of classification of weld defects in radiographic images. NDT&E Int. 42, 467–476 (2009)
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA): Radiation Safety in Industrial Radiography: Specific Safety Guide, p. 104. IAEA, Vienna (2011)
Mgonja, C.T.: Evaluation on use of industrial radiography for weld joints inspection in Tanzania. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol. 8(5), 65–74 (2017)
Mery, D.: Computer Vision for X-ray Testing. Springer, New York (2015)
Harara, W.: Low cost digital radiography system for weld joints and castings testing. Russ. J. Nondestruct. Test. 46(8), 618–625 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830910080115
Martz, H.E., Logan, C.M., Schneberk, D.J., Shull, P.J.: X-ray Imaging: Fundamentals, Industrial Techniques and Applications. CRC Press, London (2016)
Michael, K.T.: The application of quantitative data analysis for the assessment of flat panel x-ray detectors in digital radiography as part of a quality assurance program. Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express 3(3), 035004 (2017)
Mumford, D., Shah, J.: Optimal approximation by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 42, 577–685 (1989)
Keller, W.J., Pessiki, S.: Enhancing radiographic imaging of cementitious materials in composite structures with photon attenuating inclusions. Res. Nondestruct. Eval. 30(4), 231–251 (2019)
Movafeghi, A.: Using empirical mode decomposition and a fuzzy algorithm for the analysis of weld defect images. Insight 57(1), 35–39 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.2014.57.1.35
Movafeghi, A., Yahaghi, E., Mohammadzadeh, N.: Defect detection improvement of digitised radiographs by principal component analysis with local pixel grouping. J. Nondestruct. Eval. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-015-0290-z
Yang, J., Wright, J., Huang, T., Ma, Y.: Image super-resolution via sparse representation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 19, 2861–2873 (2010)
Li, X., Orchard, M.T.: New edge-directed interpolation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 10(10), 1521–1527 (2001)
Zhang, X., Wu, X.: Image interpolation by adaptive 2-d autoregressive modeling and soft-decision estimation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 17(6), 887–896 (2008)
Mallat, S., Yu, G.: Super-resolution with sparse mixing estimators. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 19(11), 2889–2900 (2010)
Dong, W., Zhang, L., Lukac, R., Shi, G.: Sparse representation based image interpolation with nonlocal autoregressive modeling. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 22(4), 1382–1394 (2013)
Trefethen, L.N., Bau III, D.: Numerical Linear Algebra, vol. 50. SIAM, Philadelphia (1997)
Saad, Y.: Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems, vol. 82. SIAM, Philadelphia (2003)
Dong, W., Zhang, L., Shi, G., Wu, X.: Image deblurring and super-resolution by adaptive sparse domain selection and adaptive regularization. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 20(7), 1838–1857 (2011)
Wang, Y., Yang, J., Yin, W., Zhang, Y.: A new alternating minimization algorithm for total variation image reconstruction. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 1(3), 248–272 (2008)
Lin, Z., Chen, M., Ma, Y.: The augmented Lagrange multiplier method for exact recovery of corrupted low-rank matrices. arXiv (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2012.10.010
Mairal, J., Bach, F., Ponce, J., Sapiro, G., Zisserman, A.: Non-local sparse models for image restoration. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Tokyo, Japan (2009)
Buades, A., Coll, B., Morel, J.M.: A non-local algorithm for image denoising. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2005)
Mery, D., Riffo, V., Zscherpel, U., Mondragón, G., Lillo, I., Zuccar, I., Lobel, H., Carrasco, M.: GDXray: the database of X-ray images for nondestructive testing. J Nondestruct Eval 34, 42 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-015-0315-7
ISO 17636-1: Non-destructive Testing of Welds—Radiographic Testing—Part 1: X- and Gamma-Ray Techniques with Film. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (2013)
ISO 14096-2: Non-destructive Testing—Qualification of Radiographic Film Digitisation Systems—Part 2: Minimum Requirement. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (2005)
Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assessment: from error measurement to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 3(4), 600–612 (2004)
Mirzapour, M., Yahaghi, E., Movafeghi, A.: Comparison of four iterative methods for improving the contrast of the radiography images. Phys. Scr. 94, 035001 (2019)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Movafeghi, A., Mirzapour, M. & Yahaghi, E. Using Interpolation with Nonlocal Autoregressive Modeling for Defect Detection in Welded Objects. J Nondestruct Eval 39, 60 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-020-00704-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-020-00704-2