Skip to main content
Log in

Using and Seeing Co-speech Gesture in a Spatial Task

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Visibility of speakers’ conversational hand gestures has been shown to facilitate listeners’ comprehension. Is this true for all types of gestures? In Experiment 1, speakers were videotaped describing apartment layouts from memory. When describing complex compared to simple layouts, speakers used more representational gestures. In particular, they used more iconic–deictic gestures, or hand movements that represent both an object or action, and direction or location. This suggests that the frequency of complex representational gestures increases as a function of task difficulty. To assess the extent to which these gestures facilitate speech comprehension, in Experiment 2 a new group of participants either watched the videos of the apartment descriptions (audio + video condition) or only heard the descriptions (audio-only condition) and drew each corresponding layout. Although drawing accuracy did not differ as a function of condition, the more iconic–deictic gestures produced during the apartment descriptions, the less accurate listeners’ drawings were. Together, findings from Experiments 1 and 2 suggest that iconic–deictic gestures reflect task difficulty for the speaker and do not necessarily facilitate comprehension for the listener.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The study was designed to additionally explore differences in first and second language production (English and Spanish), though this is not the focus of this paper: For the purpose of this paper, we will only describe results of the apartments that were described in English. Order of language (first or second) was counterbalanced across participants. A native English speaker gave all instructions in English.

  2. We are grateful for this suggestion by an anonymous reviewer of our manuscript.

  3. The model summarized in Table 5 reveals that the overall use of speakers’ other gestures during a given description, after accounting for the use of iconic-deictic gestures, was positive, b = 0.31(0.12), F(1, 151) = 6.13, p < 0.02 (95 % CI 0.062; 0.55). This positive association in overall gesture rate is driven by the positive association between beat gestures and apartment drawing accuracy revealed in Table 6. As can be seen in Table 6, when accounting for beat gestures, the association between total gestures used and accuracy is not significant.

References

  • Alibali, M. W. (2005). Gesture in spatial cognition: Expressing, communicating and thinking about spatial information. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5, 307–331. doi:10.1207/s15427633scc0504_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alibali, M. W., Heath, D. C., & Myers, H. J. (2001). Effects of visibility between speaker and listener on gesture production: Some gestures are meant to be seen. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 169–188. doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alibali, M. W., Kita, S., & Young, A. (2000). Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 593–613. doi:10.1080/016909600750040571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, L. Q. (2000). Nonverbal accommodations in foreign language teacher talk. Applied Language Learning, 11, 155–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavelas, J. B., Black, B., Chovil, N., Lemery, C. R., & Mullett, J. (1988). Form and function in motor mimicry. Topographic evidence that the primary function is communicative. Human Communication Research, 14, 275–299. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1988.tb00158.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bavelas, J. B., Gerwing, J., Sutton, C., & Prevost, D. (2008). Gesturing on the telephone: Independent effects of dialogue and visibility. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 495–520. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.02.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, G. W., & Shovelton, H. K. (1999). Do iconic hand gestures really contribute anything to the semantic information conveyed by speech? An experimental investigation. Semiotica, 123, 1–2. doi:10.1515/semi.1999.123.1-2.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, B., & Hadar, U. (1989). Gesture, speech, and computational stages: A reply to McNeill. Psychological Review, 96, 168–174. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casasanto, D. (2013). Gesture and language processing. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the mind (Vol. 7, pp. 373–375). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H., & Krych, M. A. (2004). Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 62–81. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and psychological measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46. doi:10.1177/001316446002000104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Ruiter, J. P. (1998). Gesture and speech production. Doctoral dissertation at Catholic University of Nijmegen, Netherlands.

  • Drolet, A. L., & Morris, M. W. (2000). Rapport in conflict resolution: Accounting for how face-to-face contact fosters mutual cooperation in mixed-motive conflicts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 26–50. doi:10.1006/jesp.1999.1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, S. (2002). Gesture, verb aspect, and the nature of iconic imagery in natural discourse. Gesture, 2, 183–206. doi:10.1075/gest.2.2.04dun.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin-Meadow, S., & Alibali, M. W. (2013). Gesture’s role in speaking, learning, and creating language. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 257–283. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143802.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hadar, U., Dar, R., & Teitelman, A. (2001). Gesture during speech in first and second language: Implications for lexical retrieval. Gesture, 1, 151–165. doi:10.1075/gest.1.2.04had.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hostetter, A. B. (2011). When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 297–315. doi:10.1037/a0022128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2007). Raise your hand if you’re spatial: Relations between verbal and spatial skills and gesture production. Gesture, 7, 73–95. doi:10.1075/gest.7.1.05hos.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hostetter, A. B., Alibali, M. W., & Kita, S. (2007). I see it in my hand’s eye: Representational gestures are sensitive to conceptual demands. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 313–336. doi:10.1080/01690960600632812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, J., Capirici, O., Longobardi, E., & Caselli, M. (1999). Gesturing in mother–child interactions. Cognitive Development, 14, 57–75. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(99)80018-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, N., & Garnham, A. (2007). The role of conversational hand gestures in a narrative task. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 291–303. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.07.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jesse, A., & Massaro, D. W. (2010). Seeing a singer helps comprehension of the song’s lyrics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 323–328. doi:10.3758/PBR.17.3.323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendon, A. (1983). Gesture and speech: How they interact. In J. M. Weimann & R. P. Harrison (Eds.), Nonverbal interaction. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimbara, I. (2006). On gestural mimicry. Gesture, 6, 39–61. doi:10.1075/gest.6.1.03kim.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kita, S. (2000). How representational gestures help speaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 162–185). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krahmer, E., & Swerts, M. (2007). Effects of visual beats on prosodic prominence: Acoustic analyses, auditory perception and visual perception. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 396–414. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, R. M. (1998). Why do we gesture when we speak? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 54–59. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep13175642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, R. M., & Hadar, U. (1999). The role of speech-related arm/hand gestures in word retrieval. In L. S. Messing & R. Campbell (Eds.), Gesture, speech, and sign (pp. 93–116). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melinger, A., & Kita, S. (2007). Conceptualisation load triggers gesture production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 473–500. doi:10.1080/01690960600696916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, L., Krahmer, E., Maes, A., & Swerts, M. (2011). Seeing and being seen: The effects on gesture production. Journal of Computer Mediated Communications, 17, 77–100. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01558.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsella, E., & Krauss, R. M. (2004). The role of gestures in spatial working memory and speech. American Journal of Psychology, 117, 411–424. doi:10.2307/4149008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pardo, J. S. (2006). On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 2382–2393. doi:10.1121/1.2178720.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–226. doi:10.1017/S0140525X04000056.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pine, K. J., Bird, H., & Kirk, E. (2007). The effects of prohibiting gestures on children’s lexical retrieval ability. Developmental Science, 10, 747–754. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00610.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Purdy, J. M., Ney, P., & Balakrishnan, P. V. (2000). The impact of communication media on negotiation outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11, 162–187. doi:10.1108/eb022839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauscher, F. B., Krauss, R. M., & Chen, Y. (1996). Gesture, speech and lexical access: The role of lexical movements in speech production. Psychological Science, 7, 226–231. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00364.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravizza, S. (2003). Movement and lexical access: Do noniconic gestures aid in retrieval? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 610–615. doi:10.3758/BF03196522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute. (2001). SAS system for Microsoft Windows. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallbott, H. G. (1995). Congruence, contagion, and motor mimicry: Mutualities in nonverbal exchange. In J. Markova, C. F. Graumann, & K. Foppa (Eds.), Mutualities in dialogue (pp. 82–98). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesp, R., Hesse, J., Keutmann, D., & Wheaton, K. (2001). Gestures maintain spatial imagery. American Journal of Psychology, 114, 591–600. doi:10.2307/1423612.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandra Suppes.

Appendix

Appendix

See Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Sample of a simple and a complex apartment layout

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suppes, A., Tzeng, C.Y. & Galguera, L. Using and Seeing Co-speech Gesture in a Spatial Task. J Nonverbal Behav 39, 241–257 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-015-0207-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-015-0207-7

Keywords

Navigation