Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development of a 3D Motion Tracking System for the Analysis of Skills in Microsurgery

  • Education & Training
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microsurgical skills of trainee surgeons have been subjectively evaluated due to the lack of technological tools. The objective of this investigation is to present the construct validity of the mitracks3D, which is a system designed to help in the objective evaluation of microsurgery trainees. To achieve this, a stereoscopic vision system records the 3D motion of two tweezers manipulated by surgeons during microsurgery training. Using motion analysis parameters (MAPs), quantitative information about their microsurgical skills and performance is obtained. For validation, 14 participants were enrolled and divided into two groups: expert microsurgeons (3 female, 2 male) and trainee surgeons (4 female, 5 male). The 3D motion tracking was acquired while the surgeons practiced with two training models: transferring objects and suture. Twelve MAPs were used to objective assessment the skill levels of each participant. Subsequent, statistical analysis was computed to compare the scores of both groups. Validation results showed statistically significant differences in 8 of the 12 MAPs and in 10 of the 12 MAPs using the transferring and the suturing models, respectively. The capability of mitracks3D to differentiate the performance of microsurgeons by analyzing their movements was shown. The mitracks3D system was successfully validated. With this system was possible to differentiate the psychomotor microsurgical skills between the two groups of surgeons. The mitracks3D system is a suitable device for the evaluation of microsurgical skills in a variety of surgical specialties that require it during the training of their residents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The materials and cameras used in this work are available worldwide.

Code availability

The authors agreed that the codes can be requested via e-mail.

References

  1. Tamai S, Sasauchi N, Hori Y, Tatsumi Y, Okuda H (1972) Microvascular surgery in orthopaedics and traumatology. J Bone Joint Surg Br 54(4):637-647.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Steffens K, Koob E, Hong G (1992) Training in basic microsurgical techniques without experiments involving animals. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 111(4):198-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim TS, O’Brien M, Zafar S, Hager GD, Sikder S, Vedula SS (2019) Objective assessment of intraoperative technical skill in capsulorhexis using videos of cataract surgery. Int J CARS 14:1097–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-019-01956-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Knox ADC, Gilardino MS, Kasten SJ, Warren RJ, Anastakis DJ (2014) Competency-based medical education for plastic surgery: where do we begin?. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(5):702e-710e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000082. PMID: 24776573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Satterwhite T, Son J, Carey J, Echo A, Spurling T, Paro J, Gurtner G, Chang J, Lee GK (2014) The Stanford Microsurgery and Resident Training (SMaRT) Scale: validation of an on-line global rating scale for technical assessment. Annals of plastic surgery, 72 Suppl 1, S84–S88. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000139. PMID: 24691332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Selber JC, Chang EI, Liu J, Suami H, Adelman DM, Garvey P, Hanasono MM, Butler CE (2012) Tracking the learning curve in microsurgical skill acquisition. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(4):550e-7e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318262f14a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Dumestre D, Yeung JK, Temple-Oberle C (2014) Evidence-based microsurgical skill-acquisition series part 1: Validated microsurgical models - A systematic review. J Surg Educ 71(3):329-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.09.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Reznick RK, Matsumoto ED, Sidhu RS, Jarvi KA (2003) Validation of novel and objective measures of microsurgical skill: Hand-motion analysis and stereoscopic visual acuity. Microsurgery 23(4):317-322. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.10152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wood TC, Maqsood S, Nanavaty MA, Rajak S (2021) Validity of scoring systems for the assessment of technical and non-technical skills in ophthalmic surgery-a systematic review. Eye (Lond). 35(7):1833-1849. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01463-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wass V, Van der Vleuten C, Shatzer J, Jones R (2001) Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet 357(9260):945-949. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04221-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Coulson CJ, Slack PS, Ma X (2010) The effect on wrist rest on hand tremor. Microsurgery 30(7):565–568. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Óvári A, Neményi D, Just T, Schuldt T, Buhr A, Mlynski R, Csókay A, Pau HW, Valálik I (2016) Positioning Accuracy in Otosurgery Measured with Optical Tracking. PLOS ONE 11(3): e0152623. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152623. PMID 27027500

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Harada K, Morita A, Minakawa Y, Baek YM, Sora S, Sugita N, Kimura T, Tanikawa R, Ishikawa T, Mitsuishi M (2015) Assessing Microneurosurgical Skill with Medico-Engineering Technology. World Neurosurgery 84(4):964-971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.05.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Applebaum MA, Doren EL, Ghanem AM, Myers SR, Harrington M, Smith DJ (2018) Microsurgery competency during plastic surgery residency: An objective skills assessment of an integrated residency training program. Eplasty 18:e25. PMID: 30338013; PMCID: PMC6162644.

  15. McGoldrick RB, Davis CR, Paro J, Hui K, Nguyen D, Lee GK (2015) Motion Analysis for Microsurgical Training. Plast Reconstr Surg 136(2):231e-240e. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000001469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hotraphinyo LF, Riviere CN (2001) Precision measurement for microsurgical instrument evaluation. 2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 4:3454–3457. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2001.1019573

  17. Wei GQ, Arbter K, Hirzinger G (1997) Automatic tracking of laparoscopic instruments by color coding. In: Troccaz J, Grimson E, Mösges R (eds) CVRMed-MRCAS'97. CVRMed 1997, MRCAS 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1205. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0029257

  18. Prokop RJ, Reeves AP (1992) A survey of moment-based techniques for unoccluded object representation and recognition. CVGIP: Graphical Models and Image Processing 54(5):438–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/1049-9652(92)90027-U

  19. Kaehler A, Bradski G (2016) Learning OpenCV 3: Computer Vision in C++ with the OpenCV Library, 1st edn. O'Reilly Media, Inc

  20. Azzie G, Gerstle JT, Nasr A, Lasko D, Green J, Henao O, Farcas M, Okrainec A (2011) Development and validation of a pediatric laparoscopic surgery simulator. J Pediatr Surg 46(5):897-903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.02.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pérez-Escamirosa F, Chousleb-Kalach A, Hernández-Baro MD, Sánchez-Margallo JA, Lorias-Espinoza D, Minor-Martínez A (2016) Construct validity of a video-tracking system based on orthogonal cameras approach for objective assessment of laparoscopic skills. Int J CARS 11:2283–2293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1388-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Starkes JL, Payk I, Hodges NJ (1998) Developing a standardized test for the assessment of suturing skill in novice microsurgeons. Microsurgery 18(1):19-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2752(1998)18:1/19::aid-micr5/3.0.co;2-p

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Oropesa I, Sánchez-González P, Chmarra MK, Lamata P, Fernández A, Sánchez-Margallo JA, Jansen FW, Dankelman J, Sánchez-Margallo FM, Gómez EJ (2013) EVA: laparoscopic instrument tracking based on endoscopic video analysis for psychomotor skills assessment. Surg Endosc 27:1029–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2513-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hofstad EF, Våpenstad C, Chmarra MK, Langø T, Kuhry E, Mårvik R (2013) A study of psychomotor skills in minimally invasive surgery: what differentiates expert and nonexpert performance. Surg Endosc 27:854–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2524-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Saleh GM, Voyazis Y, Hance J, Ratnasothy J, Darzi A (2006) Evaluating Surgical Dexterity During Corneal Suturing. Arch Ophthalmol 124(9):1263–1266. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.124.9.1263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Saleh GM, Gauba V, Sim D, Lindfield D, Borhani M, Ghoussayni S (2008) Motion Analysis as a Tool for the Evaluation of Oculoplastic Surgical Skill: Evaluation of Oculoplastic Surgical Skill. Arch Ophthalmol 126(2):213–216. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2007.62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the surgeons and residents of the ophthalmology, neurosurgery and plastic surgery specialties who participated in this project. Similarly, the authors thank to the Hospital Regional ‘1° de Octubre’ of the ISSSTE in Mexico City. Authors also thank to Eng. José Rodolfo Rosas-Ortíz, for his technical assistance in the design and manufacture of this tracking system.

Funding

The authors declare that no grants or funding sources were received for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iván Tlacaélel Franco-González.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This is an observational study. The Hospital and CINVESTAV-IPN Ethics Committees confirmed that no ethical approval is required.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

The authors and participants agreed that the data in this work can be published.

Conflicts of interest/competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Education & Training

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Franco-González, I.T., Pérez-Escamirosa, F., Minor-Martínez, A. et al. Development of a 3D Motion Tracking System for the Analysis of Skills in Microsurgery. J Med Syst 45, 106 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-021-01787-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-021-01787-8

Keywords

Navigation