Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validation of a Nurses’ Views on Electronic Medical Record Systems (EMR) Questionnaire in Turkish Health System

  • Education & Training
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using of EMR in health services and organizations is steadily increasing for quality improvement, cost effectiveness and performance development. However, no validated national and international instruments (scale, questionnaire, index, and inventory) have assessed the effectiveness, satisfaction, health care savings, patient safety and cost minimization of electronic medical and health systems from the viewpoint and perceptions of nurses in Turkish health services. The perceptions of health care professionals especially physicians and nurses can contribute important information that may predict their acceptance of EMR and desired mode of use for EMR, evaluation performance of EMR thus guiding EMR implementation in hospitals. This article is a report of validation of the instrument to measure nurses’ views on the use, quality and user satisfaction with EMR in Turkish health system. Items in the questionnaire were designed and obtained following O.G. Otieno, H. Toyama, M. Asonuma, M. Kanai-Pak, K. Naitoh’s questionnaire about Use, Quality and User Satisfaction with EMR systems. Reliability and validity were examined and investigated in terms of responses from 487 nurses from one education hospital in Ankara, Turkey. This study was planned and conducted at a university hospital. The validation process was based on construct validity in this study. The response rate was 74.92 %. Cronbach’s alphas of three factors (use, quality and satisfaction of EMR) ranged from 0.78 to 0.94. Goodness-of-fit indices from the confirmatory factor analysis showed a reasonable model fit. Results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that χ2 statistic indicated significant result (p < 0.001) and model fit was acceptable according to relative χ2 statistic (χ2/df = 2.8 < 5). Further validation of the instrument could yield positive results in health systems in the different countries. Also further validation and reliability studies could be planned on physicians and other health professionals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Top, M., and Gider, Ö., Nurses’ views on electronic medical records (EMR) in Turkey: An analysis according to use, quality and user satisfaction. J. Med. Syst. 36:1979–1988, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lærum, H., Ellingsen, G., and Faxvaag, A., Doctors’ use of electronic medical records systems in hospitals: cross sectional survey. Br. Med. J. 323:1344–1348, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Howard, R., Nurse acceptance and perception of electronic medical record. Unpublished Master of Science dissertation. Kentucky: Department of Advanced Nursing Studies, Northern Kentucky University, 2009.

  4. Barnette, M. T., Lived experiences of registered nurses: impact of the electronic medical record. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. School of Human Services, Capella University, USA. 2008.

  5. Top, M., Yilmaz, A., and Gider, Ö., Electronic medical records (EMR) and nurses in Turkish hospitals. Syst. Pract. Action Res. 26:281–297, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Holanda, A. A., Sá, H., Vieira, A. P., and Catrib, A. M. F., Use and satisfaction with electronic health record by primary care physicians in a health district in Brazil. J. Med. Syst. 36:3141–3149, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Win, K. T., and Fulcher, J. A., Consent mechanisms for electronic health record systems: A simple yet unresolved issue. J. Med. Syst. 31:91–96, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chaudhry, B., Wang, J., Maglione, M., Mojica, W., Roth, E., Morton, S. C., et al., Systematic review: Impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and cost of medical care. Ann. Intern. Med. 144:742–752, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fung, C. H., Woods, J. N., Asch, S. M., Glassman, P., and Doebeling, B. N., Variation in implementation and use of computerized clinical reminders in an integrated healthcare system. Am. J. Manage Care 10(2):878–885, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Likourezos, A., Chalfin, D. B., Murphy, D. G., Sommer, B., Darcy, K., and Davidson, S. J., Physician and nurse satisfaction with an electronic medical record system. J. Emerg. Med. 27(4):419–424, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, T., Chung, Y., and Lin, F. Y. S., A study on agent-based secure scheme for electronic medical record system. J. Med. Syst. 36(3):1345–1357, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dick, R. E., and Steen, E., The computer based patient record: an essential technology for health care. National Academy Press, Washington D.C., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goorman, E., and Berg, M., Modelling nursing activities: Electronic patient records and their discontents. Nurs. Inq. 7:3–9, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li, K., Naganawa, S., Wang, K., Li, P., Kato, K., Li, X., Zhang, J., and Yamauchi, K., Study of the cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical record systems in general hospital in China. J. Med. Syst. 36(5):3283–3291, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Robles, J., The effect of the electronic medical record on nurses’ work. Creat. Nurs. 15(1):31–35, 2009.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Mekhijian, H. S., Kumar, R. R., Kuehn, L., Bentley, T. D., Teater, P., Thomas, A., Payne, B., and Ahmad, A., Immediate benefits realized following implementation of physician order entry at an academic centre. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 9(5):529–539, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pizzi, L. T., Suh, D. C., Barone, J., and Nash, D. B., Factors related to physicians’ adoption of electronic prescribing: results from a national survey. Am. J. Med. Qual. 20:22–32, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Neill, L., and Klepack, W., Electronic medical records for a rural family practice: A case study in systems development. J. Med. Syst. 31(1):25–33, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Otieno, O. G., Toyama, H., Asonuma, M., Kanai-Pak, M., and Naitoh, K., Nurses’ views on the use, quality and user satisfaction with electronic medical records: Questionnaire development. J. Adv. Nurs. 60(2):209–219, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Clifford, G. D., Blaya, J. A., Hall-Cliffor, R., and Fraser, H. S. F., Medical information systems: A foundation for healthcare technologies in developing countries. Biomed. Eng. Online 7:18, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Burkle, T., Ammenwerth, E., Prokosch, H. U., and Dudeck, J., Evaluation of clinical information systems. What can be evaluated and what cannot? J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 7:373–385, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Goossen, W. T. F., Nursing information management and processing: A framework and definition for system analysis, design and evaluation. Int. J. Biomed. Comput. 40:187–195, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ngin, P., Simms, L. M., and Erbin-Roesemann, M., Work excitement among computer users in nursing. Comput. Nurs. 11:127–133, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Axford, R. I., and Carter, B. E. L., Impact of clinical information systems on nursing practice/nurses’ perspectives. Comput. Nurs. 14:156–163, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kossman, S., and Scheidenhelm, S., Nurses’ perceptions of the impact of electronic health records on work and patient outcomes. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 26(2):69–77, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Boyer, L., Baumstarck-Barrau, K., Belzeaux, R., Azorin, J. M., Chabannes, J. M., Dassa, D., Lancon, C., Naudin, J., Poinso, F., Rufo, M., Samuelian, J. C., Loundou, A., Fieschi, M., and Auquier, P., Validation of a professionals’ satisfaction questionnaire with electronic medical records (PSQ-EMR) in psychiatry. Eur. Psychiatry 26(2):78–84, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Laerum, H., Faxvaag, A., Task-oriented evaluation of electronic medical records systems: Development and validation of a questionnaire for physicians. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 4, 1. Available at http://www.biomedcentralcom/content/pdf/1472-6947-4-1.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2010, 2004.

  28. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., and Mullen, M. R., Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electron. J. Bus. Res. Methods 6(1):53–60, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Raykov, T., and Marcoulides, G.A., A First course in structural equation modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., 2006.

  30. Field, A., Discovering statistics using SPSS for windows. Sage Publications, London, 2000.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Kirshbaum, M. N., Are we ready for the electronic patient record? Attitude and perceptions of staff from two NHS trust hospitals. Health Informatics J. 10(4):265–276, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Otieno, G. O., and Hosoi, R., Factors influencing diffusion of electronic medical records: a case study in three healthcare institutions in Japan. Health Inf. Manag. J. 34(4):120–129, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ben-Assuli, O., Leshno, M., and Shabtai, I., Using electronic medical record systems for admission decisions in emergency departments: Examining the crowdedness effect. J. Med. Syst. 36:3795–3803, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Palacio, C., Harrison, J. P., and Garets, D., Benchmarking electronic medical records initiatives in the US: A conceptual model. J. Med. Syst. 34(3):273–279, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chao, W. C., Hu, H., Ung, C. O. L., and Cai, Y., Benefits and challenges of electronic health record system on stakeholders: A qualitative study of outpatient physicians. J. Med. Syst. 37:9960, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Farsi, A. L., and West, D. J., Use of electronic medical records in Oman and physician satisfaction. J. Med. Syst. 30(1):17–22, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Top.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Education & Training

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Top, M., Yilmaz, A., Karabulut, E. et al. Validation of a Nurses’ Views on Electronic Medical Record Systems (EMR) Questionnaire in Turkish Health System. J Med Syst 39, 67 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-015-0250-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-015-0250-2

Keywords

Navigation