Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Adaptive Hidden Markov Model for Activity Recognition Based on a Wearable Multi-Sensor Device

  • Mobile Systems
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human activity recognition is important in the study of personal health, wellness and lifestyle. In order to acquire human activity information from the personal space, many wearable multi-sensor devices have been developed. In this paper, a novel technique for automatic activity recognition based on multi-sensor data is presented. In order to utilize these data efficiently and overcome the big data problem, an offline adaptive-Hidden Markov Model (HMM) is proposed. A sensor selection scheme is implemented based on an improved Viterbi algorithm. A new method is proposed that incorporates personal experience into the HMM model as a priori information. Experiments are conducted using a personal wearable computer eButton consisting of multiple sensors. Our comparative study with the standard HMM and other alternative methods in processing the eButton data have shown that our method is more robust and efficient, providing a useful tool to evaluate human activity and lifestyle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.who.int/chp/about/integrated_cd/en/

References

  1. Touati, F., and Tabish, R., U-healthcare system: state-of-the-art review and challenges. J. Med. Syst. 37:1–20, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gyllensten, I. C., and Bonomi, A. G., Identifying types of physical activity with a single accelerometer: evaluating laboratory-trained algorithms in daily life. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 58:2656–2663, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Khan, A. M., Lee, Y.-K. L. Y.-K., Lee, S. Y., and Kim, T.-S. K. T.-S., A triaxial accelerometer-based physical-activity recognition via augmented-signal features and a hierarchical recognizer. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 14:1166–1172, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gao, L., Bourke, A. K., Nelson, J., Activity recognition using dynamic multiple sensor fusion in body sensor networks. In: 2012 Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 49:1077–1080, 2012.

  5. Chang, S.-Y., Lai, C.-F., Chao, H.-C., et al., An environmental-adaptive fall detection system on mobile device. J. Med. Syst. 35:1299–1312, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jin, G. H., Lee, S. B., and Lee, T. S., Context awareness of human motion states using accelerometer. J. Med. Syst. 32:93–100, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arab, L., and Winter, A., Automated camera-phone experience with the frequency of imaging necessary to capture diet. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 110:1238–1241, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kwapisz, J. R., Weiss, G. M., and Moore, S. A., Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 12:74–82, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Doherty, A. R., Ó Conaire, C., Blighe, M., et al., Combining image descriptors to effectively retrieve events from visual lifelogs. In: Proc. 1st ACM Int. Conf. Multimed. Inf. Retr. 10–17, 2008.

  10. Chatzichristofis, S. A., Boutalis, Y. S., CEDD: color and edge directivity descriptor . A compact descriptor for image indexing and retrieval. In: Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. Syst. 312–322, 2008.

  11. Lowe, D. G., Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In: Proc. Seventh IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. 2:1150–1157, 1999.

  12. Duan, L., Xu, D., Tsang, I. W.-H., and Luo, J., Visual event recognition in videos by learning from Web data. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 34:1667–1680, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bebars, A. A., Hemayed, E. E., Comparative study for feature detectors in human activity recognition. In: 2013 9th Int. Comput. Eng. Conf. 19–24, 2013.

  14. Hassan, S. M., Al-Sadek, A. F., Hemayed, E. E., Rule-based approach for enhancing the motion trajectories in human activity recognition. In: 2010 10th Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Des. Appl. 829–834, 2010.

  15. Boutell, M., and Brown, C., Pictures are not taken in a vacuum - an overview of exploiting context for semantic scene content understanding. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 23:101–114, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Arif, M., Bilal, M., Kattan, A., and Ahamed, S. I., Better physical activity classification using smartphone acceleration sensor. J. Med. Syst. 38:1–10, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yin, J., Yang, Q., and Pan, J. J., Sensor-based abnormal human-activity detection. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 20:1082–1090, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Giansanti, D., Macellari, V., and Maccioni, G., New neural network classifier of fall-risk based on the Mahalanobis distance and kinematic parameters assessed by a wearable device. Physiol. Meas. 29:N11–N19, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cao, L. C. L., Luo, J. L. J., Kautz, H., and Huang, T. S., Image annotation within the context of personal photo collections using hierarchical event and scene models. IEEE Trans. Multimed. 11:208–219, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hughes, G., On the mean accuracy of statistical pattern recognizers. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 14:55–63, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, W., Jia, W., Sun, M., Segmentation for efficient browsing of chronical video recorded by a wearable device. In: Proc 2010 I.E. 36th Annu. Northeast. Bioeng. Conf. 1–2, 2010.

  22. Manjunath, B. S., Ohm, J.-R., Vasudevan, V. V., and Yamada, A., Color and texture descriptors. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Video Technol. 11:703–715, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Csurka, G., Dance, C., Fan, L., et al., Visual categorization with bags of keypoints. In: Work. Stat. Learn. Comput. Vision ECCV. 1–2, 2004.

  24. Peng, H., Long, F., and Ding, C., Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 27:1226–1238, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Powers, D. M., Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness & correlation. J. Mach. Learn. Technol. 2:37–63, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants No. R01CA165255, R21CA172864, and P30 AG024827 of the United States, and the National Natural Science Foundation No. 61402428 of China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingui Sun.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Mobile Systems.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Z., Wei, Z., Yue, Y. et al. An Adaptive Hidden Markov Model for Activity Recognition Based on a Wearable Multi-Sensor Device. J Med Syst 39, 57 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-015-0239-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-015-0239-x

Keywords

Navigation