Abstract
Wit explores modes of reading representations of death and dying, both through the play’s sustained engagement with Donne’s Holy Sonnets and through Vivian’s self-reflexive approach to her illness and death. I argue that the play dramatizes reparative readings, a term coined by Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick to describe an alternative to the paranoid reading practices that have come to dominate literary criticism. By analyzing the play’s reparative readings of death and dying (as well as its representation of the shortcomings of paranoid readings), I show how Wit provides lessons about knowledge-making and reading practices in the field of health humanities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Belling, Catherine. 2013. “Begin with a Text: Teaching the Poetics of Medicine.” Journal of Medical Humanities 34(4): 481–91.
Donne, John. 2001. The Complete Poetry and Selected Prose of John Donne. Edited by Charles M. Coffin. New York: Random House.
Eads, Martha Greene. 2002. “Unwitting Redemption in Margaret Edson’s Wit.” Christianity and Literature 51(2): 241-54.
Edson, Margaret. 1999. Wit: A Play. New York: Faber and Faber.
Felski, Rita. 2008. Uses of Literature. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing.
------. 2009. “After Suspicion.” Profession: 28-35.
Foster, Ellen A. 2007. “A Rigorous Mind Meets Her Yielding Body: Intellectual Life and Meaning-Making in Wit.” Annals of Internal Medicine 147(5): 353–56.
Jones, Therese. 2007. “Ending in Wonder: Replacing Technology with Revelation in Margaret Edson’s Wit.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 50(3): 395–409.
Jurecic, Ann. 2012. Illness as Narrative. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Knox, Sara L. 2006. “Death, Afterlife, and the Eschatology of Consciousness: Themes in Contemporary Cinema.” Mortality 11(3): 233–52.
Puchalski, Christina M., Benjamin Blatt, Mikhail Kogan, and Amy Butler. 2014. “Spirituality and Health: The Development of a Field.” Academic Medicine 89(1): 10–16.
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 2003. Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham: Duke University Press.
Spiegel, Maura. 2012. “Uses of Literature” (review). Literature and Medicine 30(1): 203–7.
Sulmasy, Daniel P. 2006. The Rebirth of the Clinic: An Introduction to Spirituality in Health Care. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Sykes, John D. 2003. “Wit, Pride, and the Resurrection: Margaret Edson’s Play and John Donne’s Poetry.” Renascence 55(2): 163–74.
Vanhoutte, Jacqueline. 2002. “Cancer and the Common Woman in Margaret Edson’s W;t.” Comparative Drama 36(3/4): 391–410.
Walton, Izaak. 1927. The Lives of John Donne, Sir Henry Wotton, Richard Hooker, George Herbert and Robert Sanderson. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wriglesworth, Chad. 2008. “Theological Humanism as Living Praxis: Reading Surfaces and Depth in Margaret Edson’s Wit.” Literature and Theology 22(2): 210–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gottlieb, C.M. Pedagogy and the Art of Death: Reparative Readings of Death and Dying in Margaret Edson’s Wit . J Med Humanit 39, 325–336 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-015-9365-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-015-9365-1