Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Length of Residence in the United States on Risk of Diabetes and Hypertension in Resettled Refugees

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between resettlement and development of chronic disease has yet to be elucidated in refugees. We aimed to assess the relationship between length of residence in the US and development of diabetes and hypertension utilizing multivariable logistic regression models in a sample of former refugee patients seeking primary care services. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for age, gender, and country of origin showed significantly increasing odds of type 2 diabetes (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03–1.22, p < 0.01) and hypertension (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00–1.14) with increasing length of stay in the US for resettled refugee adults. A significant proportion of diabetes (26.7%) and hypertension (36.9%) diagnoses were made within one year of arrival, highlighting the critical role of focusing diagnosis and prevention of chronic disease in newly resettled refugees, and continuing this focus throughout follow-up as these patients acculturate to their new homeland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Refugee Processing Center. http://www.wrapsnet.org/Reports/AdmissionsArrivals/tabid/211/Default.aspx. Accessed 24 October 2016.

  2. Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) Report to Congress on the Refugee Resettlement Program. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/orr/annual_orr_report_to_congress_2008.pdf. Accessed 5 November 2016.

  3. Ponterotto, J., Suzuki, LA., Casas, JM, Alexander CM, Counseling Immigrants and Refugees, 3rd Edition, in Handbook of Multicultural Counseling. 2010, Sage Publications. 201–212.

  4. Morris MD, et al., Healthcare barriers of refugees post-resettlement. J Community Health. 2009;34:529.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Hadley C, Zodhiates A, Sellen DW. Acculturation, economics and food insecurity among refugees resettled in the USA: a case study of West African refugees. Public Health Nutr. 2007;10(4):405–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hadley C, Sellen D. Food security and child hunger among recently resettled Liberian refugees and asylum seekers: a pilot study. J Immigr Minor Health. 2006;8(4):369–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Franzen L, Smith C. Differences in stature, BMI, and dietary practices between US born and newly immigrated Hmong children. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(3):442–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Franzen L, Smith C. Food system access, shopping behavior, and influences on purchasing groceries in adult Hmong living in Minnesota. Am J Health Promot. 2010;24(6):396–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Patil CL, Hadley C, Nahayo PD. Unpacking dietary acculturation among new Americans: results from formative research with African refugees. J Immigr Minor Health. 2009;11(5):342–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Renzaho AM, Burns C. More, more, more: food, fat and African refugee and migrant children. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2003;12(Suppl):S26.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Barnes DM, Harrison C, Heneghan R. Health risk and promotion behaviors in refugee populations. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2004;15(3):347–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Guerin PB, et al. Physical activity programs for refugee Somali women: working out in a new country. Women Health. 2003;38(1):83–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weiland ML, et al. Perspectives on physical activity among immigrants and refugees to a small urban community in Minnesota. J Immigr Minor Health. 2015;17(1):263–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wagner J, Berthold SM, Buckley T, Kong S, Kuoch T, Scully M. Diabetes among refugee populations: what newly arriving refugees can learn from resettled Cambodians. Curr Diab Rep. 2015 Aug;15(8):56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nguyen MT, Rehkopf DH. Prevalence of chronic disease and their risk factors among Iranian, Ukrainian, Vietnamese refugees in California, 2002–2011. J Immigr Minor Health. 2016;18(6):1274–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oza-Frank R, Cunningham SA. The weight of US residence among immigrants: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 11(4):271–80.

  17. Singh GK, Siahpush M. Ethnic-immigrant differentials in health behaviors, morbidity, and cause-specific mortality in the United States: an analysis of two national data bases. Hum Biol. 2002;74(1):83–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Oza-Frank R, Stephenson R, Narayan KM. Diabetes prevalence by length of residence among US immigrants. J Immigr Minor Health. 13(1):1–8.

  19. Yun K, Fuentes-Afflick E, Desai MM. Prevalence of chronic disease and insurance coverage among refugees in the United States. J Immigr Minor Health. 2012;14(6):933–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bo A, Zinckernagel L, Krasnik A, Petersen JH, Norredam M. Coronary heart disease incidence among non-Western immigrants compared to Danish-born people: effect of country of birth, migrant status, and income. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015;22(10):1281–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Diaz E, Kumar BN, Gimeno-Feliu LA, Calderón-Larrañaga A, Poblador-Pou B, Prados-Torres A. Multimorbidity among registered immigrants in Norway: the role of reason for migration and length of stay. Trop Med Int Health. 2015;20(12):1805–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Creatore, M.I. et al. Age- and sex-related prevalence of diabetes mellitus among immigrants to Ontario, Canada. CMAJ. 2010;182(8):781–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Berkowitz SA, et al. Risk of developing diabetes among refugees and immigrants: a longitudinal analysis. J Community Health. 2016;41(6):1274–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vaccarino V, et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder and incidence of type-2 diabetes: a prospective twin study. J Psychiatr Res. 2014;56:158–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lukaschek K, et al. Relationship between posttraumatic stress disorder and type 2 diabetes in a population-based cross-sectional study with 2970 participants. J Psychosom Res. 2013;74(4):340–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Levine AB, Levine LM, Levine TB. Posttraumatic stress disorder and cardiometabolic disease. Cardiology. 2014;127(1):1–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Paulus EJ, Argo TR, Egge JA. The impact of posttraumatic stress disorder on blood pressure and heart rate in a veteran population. J Trauma Stress. 2013;26(1):169–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Abouzeid M, et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder and hypertension in Australian veterans of the 1991 Gulf War. J Psychosom Res. 2012;72(1):33–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Golden SH. A review of the evidence for a neuroendocrine link between stress, depression and diabetes mellitus. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2007;3(4):252–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hamer M, Steptoe A. Cortisol responses to mental stress and incident hypertension in healthy men and women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(1):E29–E34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rosmond R, Björntorp P. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity as a predictor of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and stroke. J Intern Med. 2000;247(2):188–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Benoit SR, Gregg EW, Zhou W, Painter JA. Diabetes among United States-bound adult refugees, 2009–2014. J Immigr Minor Health. 2016;18(6):1357–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Geltman PL, et al., Chronic disease and its risk factors among refugees and asylees in Massachusetts, 2001–2005. Prev Chronic Dis. 7(3):A51.

  34. Njeru JW, et al. High rates of diabetes mellitus, pre-diabetes and obesity among somali immigrants and refugees in Minnesota: a retrospective chart review. J Immigr Minor Health. 2016;18(6):1343–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Renzaho AM, Bilal P, Marks GC. Obesity, type 2 diabetes and high blood pressure amongst recently arrived Sudanese refugees in Queensland, Australia. J Immigr Minor Health. 2014;16(1):86–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rhodes CM, Chang Y, Percac-Lima S. Development of obesity and related diseases in African refugees after resettlement to United States. J Immigr Minor Health. 2016;18(6):1386–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Norredam M, et al. Duration of residence and disease occurrence among refugees and family reunited immigrants: test of the ‘healthy migrant effect’ hypothesis. Trop Med Int Health. 2014;19(8):958–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Culhane-Pera KA, Moua M, DeFor TA, Desai J. Cardiovascular disease risks in Hmong refugees from Wat Tham Krabok, Thailand. J Immigr Minor Health. 2009;11(5):372–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Mortality and morbidity weekly report: health of resettled Iraqi refugees—San Diego County, California, October 2007–Septermber 2009. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5949a2.htm?s_cid=mm5949a2_w. Accessed 5 Nov 2016.

  40. Kinzie JD, et al. High prevalence rates of diabetes and hypertension among refugee psychiatric patients. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008;196(2):108–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hosler AS, Melnik TA, Spence MM. Diabetes and its related risk factors among Russian-speaking immigrants in New York State. Ethn Dis. 2004;14(3):372–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tanji JL, et al. Prevalence rate of hypertension among recent Southeast Asian refugees to northern California. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1994;7(2):105–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Her C, Mundt M. Risk prevalence for type 2 diabetes mellitus in adult Hmong in Wisconsin: a pilot study. WMJ. 2005;104(5):70–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kumar GS, Varma S, Saenger MS, Burleson M, Kohrt BA, Cantey P. Noninfectious disease among the Bhutanese refugee population at a United States urban clinic. J Immigr Minor Health. 2014;16(5):922–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bhatta MP, Shakya S, Assad L, Zullo MD. Chronic disease burden among Bhutanese refugee women aged 18–65 years resettled in Northeast Ohio, United States, 2008–2011. J Immigr Minor Health. 2015;17(4):1169–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. United Nations High Commissioner of Refugees (UNHCR), The 1951 Refugee Convention: Questions and Answers 2007.

  47. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2014. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/statsreport14/national-diabetes-report-web.pdf. Accessed 25 Oct 2016.

  48. National Diabetes Statistics Report. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/hypertension/jnc7full.pdf. Accessed 5 Nov 2016.

  49. Fazel M, Wheeler J, Danesh J. Prevalence of serious mental disorder in 7000 refugees resettled in western countries: a systematic review. Lancet. 2005;365(9467):1309–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Pham KL, Harrison GG, M. Kagawa-Singer, Perceptions of diet and physical activity among California Hmong adults and youths. Prev Chronic Dis. 2007;4(4):A93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Story M, Harris LJ. Food habits and dietary change of Southeast Asian refugee families living in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc. 1989;89(6):800–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Rondinelli AJ, et al., Under- and over-nutrition among refugees in San Diego County, California. J Immigr Minor Health.

  53. Vergara AE, et al. A survey of refugee health assessments in the United States. J Immigr Health. 2003;5(2):67–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Dicker S, et al. Initial refugee health assessments. New recommendations for Minnesota. Minn Med. 2010;93(4):45–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thank you to Ibrahima Bah and Anjalene Whittier for their invaluable technical assistance, and clinic staff for all of their dedication and hard work in this project.

Funding

This research was supported by the University of Rochester CTSA award number TL1 RR024135 and TL1 TR000096 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalia Golub.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Natalia Golub, Christopher Seplaki, Douglas Stockman, Kelly Thevenet-Morrison, Diana Fernandez and Susan Fisher declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

A waiver of informed consent was obtained as the study consisted of chart review of existing records.

Appendix

Appendix

Classification of Length of Stay (LOS) in the US

Information available on LOS in paper charts and the EMR ranged from exact date of arrival, to year of arrival, to no mention of arrival date, but presence of PPD and County Health Department (CHD) vaccination dates, or the date that an individual was registered as a patient at the clinic. The following criteria were used to determine arrival date:

  1. i)

    If exact date was present: entered exact date (MM/DD/YYYY).

  2. ii)

    If month/year of arrival was present: entered 1/month/year.

  3. iii)

    If year of arrival was present: entered 7/1/year.

  4. iv)

    If there was no arrival date, but PPD/CHD vaccine dates were present, and it was documented in the chart that the patient had arrived recently: entered PPD date if PPD clearly done at CHD, or entered first CHD vaccine date.

  5. v)

    If there was no arrival date, but family members had arrival date, the family member’s arrival date was used with caution (at least vaccines/PPD date had to be close to this date, and there was no note that the individual arrived before or after rest of family).

  6. vi)

    If family members who clearly arrived together had slightly differing arrival dates (ex 2/12/05 2/7/05 2/10/05), the earliest date was used.

  7. vii)

    If chart stated “arrived to US X months ago”, if X ≤ 12 months, then exactly X months was subtracted from the date the statement was made. Ex: “arrived to US 5 months ago on 7/23/12”. LOS was entered as 2/23/12. If X > 12 months, then subtract X, but put the 1st of that month. Ex “arrived 2 years ago on 5/15/02” was entered as 5/1/00.

  8. viii)

    If only the date of first clinic visit or registration at clinic was available (but it was clear that person arrived recently, for example “new refugee” or “just arrived”), then entered 1/month/year of clinic registration or clinic visit.

Classification of Diabetes and Hypertension

Type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosis was defined as health-care provider generated diagnosis (‘adult onset diabetes mellitus’, ‘AODM’, ‘diabetes mellitus type II’, ‘type 2 diabetes’, or ‘DM’, or ‘diabetes’) documented in the paper record. Cases of type 1 diabetes mellitus were clearly documented in the medical records, and were excluded from the study. In the EMR, type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosis was defined as follows: (1) any patient with ICD-9 codes for type 2 diabetes in their problem list (250.00 = Type II Diabetes Mellitus—Uncomplicated, Controlled; 250.02 = Diabetes Mellitus Poorly Controlled). (2) Some patients with type 2 diabetes did not have the diagnosis their problem list in the EMR. To identify these patients, their hemoglobin A1C, fasting, and random blood glucose values recorded during the time of the EMR were examined using SAS (statistical analysis software). The study investigator manually reviewed EMR records of all patients with a hemoglobin A1C value of ≥6.5, random glucose value of ≥200, or a fasting glucose value of ≥126, in order to determine if they had a diagnosis of diabetes in the EMR that was not documented in their problem list.

A patient was defined as having hypertension if a health-care provider documented in their paper chart: (i) ‘hypertension’ or ‘HTN’, AND patient was put on a blood pressure lowering medication, (ii) ‘high blood pressure’ AND patient was put on a blood pressure lowering medication, (iii) ‘HTN’, and recommended a blood pressure lowering medication, but patient refused medication, (iv) hypertension diagnosis from a previous healthcare provider. This definition was based on variability of how hypertension diagnosis was recorded in paper charts and difficulty in determining whether a hypertension diagnosis was made, as opposed to a notation of hypertension present at a particular clinic visit. This categorization errs on the side of having false negatives. In the EMR, diagnosis of hypertension was defined as: (1) ICD-9 codes: 401.1 = benign essential hypertension; 401.9 = hypertension. (2) Some patients with hypertension did not have the diagnosis in their problem list in the EMR. If an individual had three or more consecutive blood pressures in the hypertensive range, had three or more hypertensive readings in a period of less than a year, blood pressure greater than 160/100 on any visit, or had consistent hypertensive readings throughout their follow-up, their EMR chart notes were examined manually for a hypertension diagnosis. Date of diagnosis for diabetes and hypertension was recorded as initial date when healthcare provider made diagnosis, or estimate of date of diagnosis for patients who were diagnosed prior to their care at the clinic.

Classification of Traumatic Experiences Relating to Life as a Refugee Prior to Resettlement

Collecting trauma information was not an aim of the study and was added later as an exploratory survey, as it became evident that some patients had trauma experiences recorded in their charts. Given the documented effects of trauma on the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, and the postulated effects that this may have in chronic disease development, it was an opportunity to examine whether trauma experiences were associated with outcomes in the former refugee sample. Information on trauma experiences was extracted from the first few clinic visits a patient had, as this is usually when this information was discussed. Also, when electronic medical records were reviewed just for the purpose of extracting demographic information, it was not feasible to look through all patient notes for information about trauma experiences; notes from the first few clinic visits were examined.

Traumatic experiences defined as relating to life as a refugee were: rape, assault, beating, family members and/or friends killed, witnessing people raped, beaten and/or killed, torture, being a “walking boy” (male from Sudan who was part of the thousands of boys who were separated from their entire family and walked long distances and spent years in refugee camps), war injuries, participation in combat, and/or loved ones left behind. Information on trauma was collected in a subset of the study sample, as this was an exploratory aim added to the study as it became evident that some patients had records of traumatic experiences in their charts.

Individuals who did not have information on trauma in the initial visits were coded as not having experienced trauma. It is likely that the prevalence of trauma experienced by individuals in the sample was underestimated (Table 7).

Table 7 Basic demographic characteristics of adults in diabetes analysis

Assessment of Whether Multi-level Modeling was Necessary for Analysis of Length of Stay and Diabetes

A multilevel logistic intercept-only model (PROC GLIMMIX in SAS) was utilized to determine whether multilevel modeling should be conducted to take into account the effect of family membership on odds of diabetes. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) from the intercept-only model was 5.2%, which means that 5% of the variability in odds of diabetes was accounted for by family membership. The Chi square test for covariance parameters showed that the family-level variance of the intercept was not significant (p = 0.3668). As such, a random coefficient analysis (RCA) logistic model was not necessary to characterize the relationship between years in US and type 2 diabetes (Table 8).

Table 8 Basic demographic characteristics of adults in hypertension analysis

Assessment of Whether Multi-level Modeling was Necessary for Analysis of Length of Stay and Hypertension

A multilevel logistic intercept-only model (PROC GLIMMIX in SAS) was utilized to determine whether multilevel modeling should be utilized to take into account the effect of family membership on odds of hypertension. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) from the intercept-only model was 15.7%, meaning that almost 16% of the variability in odds of hypertension was accounted for by family membership. In addition, the Chi square test for covariance parameters showed that the family-level variance of the intercept was statistically significant (p = 0.04). Based on this, a multilevel logistic model with a random intercept for family membership was utilized to characterize the relationship between years in US and hypertension. However, multivariable logistic analyses were also conducted, because while the family variable appeared to significantly contribute to variance in odds of hypertension, the effect estimates between a multilevel model and a standard logistic model were very similar. In the multi-level model, length of stay in US was not significant at the α = 0.05 level, while in the logistic model it was. This is due to the fact that the multivariable logistic model does not account for the clustering of hypertension within families, which leads to a lower p-value for the association between years in the US and odds of hypertension. In contrast, the multi-level model with a random intercept takes the clustering of hypertension within families into account (Table 9).

Table 9 Demographic characteristics of individuals with and without diabetes and hypertension

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Golub, N., Seplaki, C., Stockman, D. et al. Impact of Length of Residence in the United States on Risk of Diabetes and Hypertension in Resettled Refugees. J Immigrant Minority Health 20, 296–306 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-017-0636-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-017-0636-y

Keywords

Navigation