Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Roots of Virtue: A Cross-Cultural Lexical Analysis

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the notion of virtue is increasingly prominent in psychology, the way it has been studied and conceptualised has been relatively Western-centric, and does not fully account for variations in how it has been understood cross-culturally. As such, an enquiry was conducted into ideas relating to virtue found across the world’s cultures, focusing specifically on so-called untranslatable words. Through a quasi-systematic search of academic and grey literature, together with conceptual snowballing and crowd-sourced suggestions, over 200 relevant terms were located. An adapted grounded theory analysis identified five themes which together provide an insight into the “roots” of virtue (i.e., the main sources from which it appears to spring): virtue itself (the concept of it); considerateness (caring about it); wisdom (knowing what it consists of); agency (managing to be/do it); and skill (mastery of the preceding elements). The results help shed further light on the potential dynamics of this important phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allinson, R. E. (2003). Hillel and Confucius: The prescriptive formulation of the golden rule in the Jewish and Chinese Confucian ethical traditions. Dao, 3(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02910339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azañedo, C. M., Fernández-Abascal, E. G., & Barraca, J. (2014). Character strengths in Spain: Validation of the values in action inventory of strengths (VIA-IS) in a Spanish sample. Clínica y Salud, 25(2), 123–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, B. J., & Olshanskaya, N. (2014). Russian writers on translation: An anthology. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Juola Exline, J. (1999). Virtue, personality, and social relations: Self-control as the moral muscle. Journal of Personality, 67(6), 1165–1194. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, D., & Marecek, J. (2008). Dreaming the American dream: Individualism and positive psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(5), 1767–1780. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00139.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H., & Dasen, P. R. (2011). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, S. H. (2006). To know before whom you stand: A philosophy for a spiritual and moral liberal Jewish education for the 21st century. In M. de Souza, K. Engebretson, G. Durka, R. Jackson, & A. McGrady (Eds.), International handbook of the religious, Moral and spiritual dimensions in education (pp. 717–729). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, A. L. (1975). A reappraisal of Wilhelm Wundt. American Psychologist, 30(11), 1081–1088. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.30.11.1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brdar, I., & Kashdan, T. B. (2010). Character strengths and well-being in Croatia: An empirical investigation of structure and correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 151–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buddharakkhita, A. (2008). The Dhammapada: The Buddha’s path of wisdom. London: Buddhist Publication Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J. R. (2005). Buddhist ethics? In W. Schweiker (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to religious ethics (pp. 278–285). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curren, R. (2008). Cardinal virtues of academic administration. Theory and Research in Education, 6, 337–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878508095588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutcliffe, J. R. (2005). Adapt or adopt: Developing and transgressing the methodological boundaries of grounded theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 51(4), 421–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03514.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlsgaard, K., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Shared virtue: The convergence of valued human strengths across culture and history. Review of General Psychology, 9(3), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.3.203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (2006). Universalism and indigenization in the history of modern psychology. In A. C. Brock (Ed.), Internationalizing the history of psychology (pp. 208–225). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Raad, B., & Van Oudenhoven, J. P. (2011). A psycholexical study of virtues in the Dutch language, and relations between virtues and personality. European Journal of Personality, 25(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfels, C. V. (1890/1988). On gestalt qualities (B. Smith, Trans.). Munich: Philosphia.

  • Fermor, S. (1998). Poetry in motion: Beauty in movement and the renaissance conception of ‘leggiadria’. In Concepts of Beauty in Renaissance Art (pp. 127–133). Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.

  • Finlay, F., & Gough, B. (2003). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. Oxford: Blackwell Science.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A. (2015). Wisdom-the answer to all the question really worth asking. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 5(9), 73–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frimer, J. A., Walker, L. J., Dunlop, W. L., Lee, B. H., & Riches, A. (2011). The integration of agency and communion in moral personality: Evidence of enlightened self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gander, F., Proyer, R., Ruch, W., & Wyss, T. (2012). The good character at work: An initial study on the contribution of character strengths in identifying healthy and unhealthy work-related behavior and experience patterns. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 85(8), 895–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-012-0736-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, J. L. (1995). The fundamental wisdom of the middle way: Nâgârjuna’s Mûlamadhyamakakârikâ. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2007). The moral mind: How 5 sets of innate moral intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind (pp. 367–391). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrow, S., & Unwin, T. A. (2009). Introduction. In S. Harrow & T. A. Unwin (Eds.), Joie de Vivre in french literature and culture: Essays in honour of Michael Freeman (pp. 17–33). Paris: Rodopi.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haspelmath, M. (2009). Lexical borrowing: Concepts and issues. In M. Haspelmath & U. Tadmor (Eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages: A comparative handbook (pp. 35–55). Berlin: De Gruyter Martin.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huta, V., & Ryan, R. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(6), 735–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9171-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivtzan, I., Lomas, T. (Eds.). (2016). Mindfulness in Positive Psychology: The Science of Meditation and Wellbeing. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, M., & Nordrum, L. (2016). Swedish hinna viewed through its English correspondences–have time or be able to? Nordic Journal of English Studies, 15(3), 171–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpg016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, C. (2009). Buddhist and Tantric perspectives on causality and society. Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 16, 69–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinneavy, J. L. (2002). Kairos in classical and modern rhetorical theory. In P. Sipiora & J. S. Baumlin (Eds.), Rhetoric and kairos: Essays in history, theory, and praxis (pp. 58–76). New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, A. (1974). Semantic fields and lexical structures. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littman-Ovadia, H., & Lavy, S. (2012). Character strengths in Israel: Hebrew adaptation of the VIA Inventory of Strengths. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28(1), 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomas, T. (2015a). Positive cross-cultural psychology: Exploring similarity and difference in constructions and experiences of wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 5(4), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v5i4.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomas, T. (2015b). Self-transcendence through shared suffering: A transpersonal theory of compassion. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 27(2), 168–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomas, T. (2016). Towards a positive cross-cultural lexicography: Enriching our emotional landscape through 216 ‘untranslatable’ words pertaining to wellbeing. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(5), 546–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1127993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomas, T. (2017a). Recontextualising mindfulness: Theravada Buddhist perspectives on the ethical and spiritual dimensions of awareness. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 9(2), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomas, T. (2017b). The spectrum of positive affect: A cross-cultural lexical analysis. International Journal of Wellbeing, 7(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v7i3.608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomas, T. (2018a). Experiential cartography, and the significance of untranslatable words. Theory & Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318772914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomas, T. (2018b). The dynamics of spirituality: A cross-cultural lexical analysis. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomas, T. (2018c). The flavours of love: A cross-cultural lexical analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 48(1), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomas, T. (2018d). The value of ambivalent emotions: A cross-cultural lexical analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2017.1400143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomas, T., Cartwright, T., Edginton, T., Ridge, D. (2014). A religion of wellbeing? The appeal of Buddhism to men in London, United Kingdom. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 6(3), 198–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomas, T., Etcoff, N., Gordon, W. V., & Shonin, E. (2017). Zen and the art of living mindfully: The health-enhancing potential of Zen aesthetics. Journal of Religion and Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-017-0446-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, K., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2004). Blue-collar work, career, and success: Occupational narratives of Sisu. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(4), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/0090988042000240167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucy, J. A. (1996). Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J. P., & Miles, G. B. (1980). In search of Thumos: Toward an understanding of a greek psychological term. Prudentia, 12(1), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, C., Bore, M., & Munro, D. (2008). Values in action scale and the big 5: An empirical indication of structure. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(4), 787–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makkreel, R. A. (1992). Dilthey: Philosopher of the human studies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. E. (2014). Scale-and item-level factor analyses of the VIA inventory of strengths. Assessment, 21(1), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. E. (2015a). Character strengths in 75 nations: An update. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.888580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. E. (2015b). Integrating psychological and cultural perspectives on virtue: The hierarchical structure of character strengths. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(5), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.994222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. E., Greenberg, M. J., & Hall-Simmonds, A. (2017). Scarecrow, Tin Woodsman, and Cowardly Lion: The three-factor model of virtue. The Journal of Positive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1326518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassar, H. (2011). Darwish and the need for a new poetry of resistance for the Arab Spring. Near East Quarterly, 4, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). The values in action inventory of character strengths for youth. In K. A. Moore & L. H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? (pp. 13–23). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Perls, F. (1969). Gestalt therapy verbatim. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. (2006). A primer in positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., & Park, N. (2009). Classifying and measuring strengths of character. In S. J. Lopez & G. R. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 25–33). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., Park, N., Pole, N., D’Andrea, W., & Seligman, M. E. (2008). Strengths of character and posttraumatic growth. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 21(2), 214–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrove, G. (2017). Alternatives to Neo-Aristotelian virtue ethics. In N. E. Snow (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of virtue (pp. 359–376). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (380 BCE/2000). The republic (T. Griffith, Trans. G. R. F. Ferrari Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Proctor, C., Tsukayama, E., Wood, A. M., Maltby, J., Eades, J. F., & Linley, P. A. (2011). Strengths gym: The impact of a character strengths-based intervention on the life satisfaction and well-being of adolescents. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(5), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2011.594079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pye, M. (2004). Skilful means: A concept in Mahayana Buddhism. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W., & Proyer, R. T. (2015). Mapping strengths into virtues: The relation of the 24 VIA-strengths to six ubiquitous virtues. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W., Proyer, R. T., Harzer, C., Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2010). Values in action inventory of strengths (VIA-IS): Adaptation and validation of the German version and the development of a peer-rating form. Journal of Individual Differences, 31(3), 138–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, E. (1929). The status of linguistics as a science. Language, 5(4), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.2307/409588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saraydar, S. C. (1990). No longer shall you kill: Peace, power and the Iroquois great law. Anthropology and Humanism Quarterly, 15(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1525/ahu.1990.15.1.20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sercu, L. (2002). Autonomous learning and the acquisition of intercultural communicative competence: Some implications for course development. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 15(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310208666633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shryack, J., Steger, M. F., Krueger, R. F., & Kallie, C. S. (2010). The structure of virtue: An empirical investigation of the dimensionality of the virtues in action inventory of strengths. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(6), 714–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, K., & Choubisa, R. (2010). Empirical validation of values in action-inventory of strengths (VIA-IS) in Indian context. Psychological Studies, 55(2), 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, N. E. (2017). The Oxford handbook of virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage, CA: Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadmor, U. (2009). Loanwords in the world’s languages: Findings and results. In M. Haspelmath & U. Tadmor (Eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages: A comparative handbook (pp. 55–75). Berlin: De Gruyter Martin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1985). Philosophy and the human sciences: Philosophical papers (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Telfer, E. (1989). The unity of the moral virtues in Aristotle’s “Nicomachean Ethics”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 90, 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallerand, R. J. (2012). The role of passion in sustainable psychological well-being. Psychology of Well-Being: Theory, Research and Practice, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2211-1522-2-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whorf, B. L. (1940). Science and linguistics. Technology Review, 42(6), 229–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka, A. (1997). Understanding cultures through their key words: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka, A. (1999). Emotions across languages and cultures: Diversity and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolvekamp, H. P. (1966). The concept of the organism as an integrated Whole. Dialectica, 20(2), 196–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto-Mitani, N., & Wallhagen, M. (2002). Pursuit of psychological well-being (Ikigai) and the evolution of self-understanding in the context of caregiving in Japan. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 26(4), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021747419204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoneoka, J. (2000). What is a kokusaijin? A 10 year study. The Language Teacher, 24(9), 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of East London, London, UK

    Tim Lomas

Authors
  1. Tim Lomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Lomas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lomas, T. The Roots of Virtue: A Cross-Cultural Lexical Analysis. J Happiness Stud 20, 1259–1279 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-9997-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-9997-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation