Abstract
The Korean government has codified a unique set of regulations that requires developers to provide certain types and sizes of community and commercial facilities in proportion to the number of housing units in an apartment complex, given the lack of public funds necessary to create a livable and self-sufficient environment. To answer the question of why large-scale apartment complexes have been popular in the Korean housing market, this study illuminates the agglomeration benefits resulting from the integration of community and commercial facilities in apartment complexes. Using hedonic regressions and causal mediation analysis, it concludes that the agglomeration benefits of apartment complexes associated with an increase in the size of both community and commercial facilities outweigh the congestion diseconomies caused by an increase in the number of housing units. This implies that the government’s intervention has made large-scale development of residential areas financially feasible without the use of public expenditure.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For example, by law, public agencies exercise its power of eminent domain to facilitate land acquisition at a massive scale and provide homebuilders with land for apartment developments at below market price (Hannah et al. 1993).
In the Housing Act, multi-family housing is composed of apartments and row houses. By the current definition, apartments are residential buildings of minimum five floors, and row houses are residential buildings below five floors. Meanwhile, apartments are generally developed with minimum 30 housing units, which are defined by housing estate by law, this paper will refer to apartments as ‘apartment complexes’ to emphasize the characteristics of housing estate defined and regulated by law.
Perry (1929) introduced the concept of the neighborhood unit, a planning model that prioritizes the ability of children and families to access school and community services on foot without encountering any foreseeable dangers, such as crossing a major thoroughfare.
Before 2010, it applied to the housing development projects with 20 housing units and over. RHCS in practice has affected only apartment complexes because developers of detached and row houses are able to avoid the regulation by constructing less than 20 housing units on the same estate (Kim and Kim 2000).
While pure public goods are characterized by non-rivalry and non-excludability in consumption, club goods are excludable through a certain type of mechanism such as a guard, a fence, or a toll booth.
Accounting that lease contracts in Korea are generally made for 2 years, this analysis includes all lease transactions of each housing unit in apartment complexes throughout this period.
In order for tenants and landlords to easily compare rents under the two different lease systems of Chonsei and Wolsei, the Korean Appraisal Board announces the Chonsei-Wolsei conversion rate every month, subject to the region and the housing type. For more information on the Korean rental housing market, refer to the papers by Son (1997) and Ryu and Kim (2018).
Regarding building age, Lee et al. (2005) highlighted the capital gain effect of the possibility of redevelopment as apartments depreciate. We also tested the redevelopment effect; however, the concave relationship of the capital gain effect was not discovered in the housing rent model.
Using a geocoding process in GIS, the addresses of 604 elementary schools provided by the Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education were mapped out. Then, each of the 2998 apartment complexes was examined to check whether there is a vehicle road of the width of 20 m or more between a complex and an elementary school.
Among 25 boroughs, 7 boroughs displayed higher than average ratios of the number of private cram schools to the students attending elementary, middle, and high schools. However, since 2 boroughs show relatively small number of students, implying that those private cram schools are not serviced for local students, the remaining 5 boroughs were selected.
Since this study utilized building registries that are not categorized by various types of facilities in detail, we infer the diversification effects from legal framework and the scale effects. Future research could shed light on the diversification effects by constructing the size by type of community and commercial facilities in a complex.
References
Arnott, R. J. (1979). Optimal city size in a spatial economy. Journal of Urban Economics, 6, 65–89.
Berglas, E. (1976). On the theory of clubs. The American Economic Review, 66(2), 116–121.
Buchanan, J. M. (1965). An economic theory of clubs. Economica, 32(125), 1–14.
Choi, M. J., & Kim, H. J. (2017). Effects of aircraft noise and building height restriction on multi-family housing prices: From a viewpoint of consumption and investment demand of housing. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 23(5), 103–111. (in Korean).
Choi, M. J., Lim, Y. R., & Park, K. J. (2014). Empirical evidence of Korean Urban development model for mass production housing. Journal of Korea Planning Association, 49(4), 141–153. (in Korean).
Chun, H. S. (2003). A study on rapid spread of apartment housing in Korea. The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 37, 65–81. (in Korean).
Cornes, R., & Sandler, T. (1986). The theory of externalities, public goods, and club goods. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dong-A-Il-Bo. (1966, December 10). Mang-gag-jidae-uisilib-doseogwan (Title in translation: Needs for public libraries ignored).
Duranton, G., & Puga, D. (2003). Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. In Henderson, V. & Thisse, F. (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. 4, Chap. 48). UK: North-Holland Publications.
Glazer, A., Gradstein, M., & Ranjan, P. (2003). Consumption variety and urban agglomeration. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 33, 653–661.
Graves, P. E., & Knapp, T. A. (1985). Hedonic analysis in a spatial context: Theoretical problems in valuing location-specific amenities. The Economic Record, 61(4), 737–743.
Hannah, L., Kim, K. H., & Mills, E. (1993). Land use controls and housing prices in Korea. Urban Studies, 30(1), 147–156.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: The Gilford Press.
Hicks, R., & Tingley, D. (2011). Causal mediation analysis. The Stata Journal, 11(4), 1–15.
Hidalgo, C. A., & Castaner, E. E. (2015). The amenity space and the evolution of neighborhoods. Cornell University. arXiv:1509.02868 [physics.soc-ph].
Jin, Y. N., & Son, J. Y. (2005). Education and housing prices: Evidence from Seoul apartment market. Housing Studies Review, 13(3), 125–148. (in Korean).
Kang, B. S., Kang, I. H., Park, G. J., Park, I. S., Parkt, C. S., Baek, H. S., et al. (1999). hangug gongdong jutaeg-gyehoeg-ui yeogsa (History of the Korean Housing Plan). Seoul: Sejinsa Publishing Company.
Kim, C.-H., & Kim, K.-H. (2000). The political economy of Korean government policies on real estate. Urban Studies, 37(7), 1157–1169.
Kim, Y. J., & Choi, M. J. (2015). Why have big construction companies replaced real estate developers in Korea? International Journal of Urban Sciences, 19(2), 206–223.
Knapp, T. A., & Graves, P. E. (1989). On the Role of amenities in models of migration and regional development. Journal of Regional Science, 29(1), 71–87.
Korea National Housing Corporation (KNHC). (1987). Daedanwe dansi gyebal sarae yeongu (Case studies on large-scale complex development). Seoul: KNHC.
Korea Statistical Information Service (KOSIS). (2015). Population and Housing Census 1970–2015. Retrieved December 6, 2017 from http://kosis.kr.
Kyung-Hyang-Sin-Moon. (1976, August 10). Pali mogitte geugseong geunbonjeog-in bagmyeol daechaeg-eul (Title in translation: It needs to seek ways to eradicate highly flourishing of flies and mosquito swarm).
Lee, B. S., Jung, E. C., & Kim, Y. H. (2005). Dwelling Age, redevelopment, and housing prices: The case of apartment complexes in Seoul. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 30(1), 55–80.
Li, H., Wei, Y. D., Yu, Z., & Tian, G. (2016). Amenity, accessibility, and housing values in metropolitan USA: A study of Salt Lake County, Utah. Cities, 59, 113–125.
McGuire, M. (1974). Group segregation and optimal jurisdictions. Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 112–132.
McLafferty, S. L., & Ghosh, A. (1986). Multipurpose shopping and the location of retail frims. Geographical Analysis, 18(3), 215–226.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport (MOLIT). (2016). Jugeo siltaejosa (Korea housing survey) 2016. Retrieved January 18, 2018 from http://www.hnuri.go.kr.
Ogawa, H. (1998). Preference for product variety and city size. Urban Studies, 35(1), 45–51.
Perry, C. A. (1929). City planning for neighborhood life. Oxford Journals, 8(1), 98–100.
Richardson, H. W. (1972). Optimality in city size, systems of cities and urban policy: A sceptic’s view. Urban Studies, 9(1), 29–48.
Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. The Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34–55.
Ryu, K. H., & Kim, J. A. (2018). Jeonse, will it be extinguished? Differentiation of Korean rental housing market. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 33, 409–427.
Sandler, T., & Tschirhart, J. (1997). Club theory: Thirty years later. Public Choice, 93(3), 335–355.
Schwab, R. M., & Oates, W. E. (1991). Community composition and the provision of local public goods: A normative analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 44, 217–237.
Seoul Statistical Yearbook (2010). Housing statistics. Retrieved January 18, 2018 from http://ebook.seoul.go.kr.
Son, J.-Y. (1997). A Review of the Korean housing market and related policies. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 9, 80–99.
Vreeker, R., Groot, H. L. F., & Verhoef, E. T. (2004). Urban mutifunctional land use: Theoretical and empirical insights on economies of scale, scope, and diversity. Built Environment, 30(4), 289–307.
Wen, H., Xiao, Y., & Zhang, L. (2017). School district, education quality, and housing price: Evidence from a natural experiment in Hangzhou, China. Cities, 66, 72–80.
Yang, H. J. (2017). Agglomeration economies in multi-family housing estate developments in Korea: Internalization and enlargement of public and commercial facilities. Ph.D. Dissertation, Seoul: Seoul National University (in Korean).
Yang, H. J., Song, J. H., & Choi, M. J. (2017). Measuring the Externality effects of commercial land use on residential land value: A case study of seoul. Sustainability, 8, 432.
Yoon, I. S. (1994). Housing in a newly industrialized economy: The case of South Korea. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Company.
Acknowledgements
This study was developed from the doctoral dissertation of Yang (2017), supervised by the late Professor Mack Joong Choi. The author expresses gratitude to two anonymous referees and the dissertation committee, Professor Seoung Hwan Suh, Euijune Kim, In Kwon Park, and Kyung-min Kim for their helpful and valuable comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 5.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, H.J., Choi, M.J. Apartment complexes in the Korean housing market: what are the benefits of agglomeration?. J Hous and the Built Environ 34, 987–1004 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-019-09652-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-019-09652-4