Skip to main content
Log in

Environmental Risk Perceptions and Community Health: Arsenic, Air Pollution, and Threats to Traditional Values of the Hopi Tribe

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

American Indian and Alaska Native populations experience chronic disparities in a wide range of health outcomes, many of which are associated with disproportionate exposures to environmental health hazards. In the American Southwest, many indigenous tribes experience challenges in securing access to sustainable and safe sources of drinking water, limiting air pollution emissions on and off tribal lands, and cleaning up hazardous contaminants left over from a legacy of natural resource extraction. To better understand how households perceive the risk of exposure to potential environmental health risks, we conducted six focus groups organized by age and geographic location on the Hopi reservation. Focus group participants (n = 41) were asked to reflect on changes in their natural and manmade environment and how their health might be influenced by any potential changes. By investigating these environmental risk perceptions, we were able to identify arsenic in drinking water and indoor air quality as significant exposures of concern. These risk perceptions were frequently anchored in personal and familial experiences with health problems such as cancer and asthma. Older focus group participants identified ongoing shifts away from tradition and cultural practices as increasing environmental health risks. Similar to other communities economically dependent on the extraction of natural resources, focus group participants described the need for behavioral modifications regarding environmental health risks rather than eliminating the sources of potential health risks entirely. Our results suggest the need for including traditional values and practices in future interventions to reduce environmental health risks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Castor, M. L., Smyser, M. S., Taualii, M. M., Park, A. N., Lawson, S. A., & Forquera, R. A. (2006). A nationwide population-based study identifying health disparities between American Indians/Alaska Natives and the general populations living in select urban counties. American Journal of Public Health, 96(8), 1478–1484.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Denny, C. H., Holtzman, D., Goins, R. T., & Croft, J. B. (2005). Disparities in chronic disease risk factors and health status between American Indian/Alaska Native and White elders: Findings from a telephone survey, 2001 and 2002. American Journal of Public Health, 95(5), 825–827.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hutchinson, R. N., & Shin, S. (2014). Systematic review of health disparities for cardiovascular diseases and associated factors among American Indian and Alaska Native populations. PLoS ONE, 9(1), e80973.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Gone, J. P., & Trimble, J. E. (2012). American Indian and Alaska Native mental health: Diverse perspectives on enduring disparities. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 131–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hofrichter, R. (Ed.) (2000). Reclaiming the environmental debate: The politics of health in a toxic culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harris, S., & Harper, B. (2011). A method for tribal environmental justice analysis. Environmental Justice, 4(4), 231–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vickery, J., & Hunter, L. M. (2016). Native Americans: Where in environmental justice research? Society and Natural Resources, 29(1), 36–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brugge, D., Benally, T., & Yazzie-Lewis, E. (Eds.). (2006). The Navajo people and uranium mining. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. LaDuke, W. (1999). All our relations: Native struggles for land and life. Cambridge: South End.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shriver, T. E., & Webb, G. R. (2009). Rethinking the scope of environmental injustice: Perceptions of health hazards in a rural Native American community exposed to carbon black. Rural Sociology, 74(2), 270–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kirmayer, L. J., Dandeneau, S., Marshall, E., Phillips, M. K., & Williamson, K. J. (2012). Toward an ecology of stories: Indigenous perspectives on resilience. In The social ecology of resilience (pp. 399–414). New York: Springer.

  12. Taylor, D. E. (2009). The environment and the people in American cities, 1600s–1900s: Disorder, inequality, and social change. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Brown, V. J. (2014). Risk perception: It’s personal. Environmental Health Perspectives, 122(10), A276.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280–285.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Laws, M. B., Yeh, Y., Reisner, E., Stone, K., Wang, T., & Brugge, D. (2015). Gender, ethnicity and environmental risk perception revisited: The importance of residential location. Journal of Community Health, 40(5), 948–955.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Adeola, F. O. (2004). Environmentalism and risk perception: Empirical analysis of black and white differentials and convergence. Society and Natural Resources, 17(10), 911–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Satterfield, T. A., Mertz, C. K., & Slovic, P. (2004). Discrimination, vulnerability, and justice in the face of risk. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 24(1), 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor-Clark, K., Koh, H., & Viswanath, K. (2007). Perceptions of environmental health risks and communication barriers among low-SEP and racial/ethnic minority communities. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 18(6), 165–183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mayer, A., Shelley, T. O. C., Chiricos, T., & Gertz, M. (2017). Environmental risk exposure, risk perception, political ideology and support for climate policy. Sociological Focus, 50(4), 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bell, S. E., & York, R. (2010). Community economic identity: The coal industry and ideology construction in West Virginia. Rural Sociology, 75(1), 111–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Malin, S. A. (2015). The price of nuclear power: Uranium communities and environmental justice. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Arizona Rural Policy Institute. (2015). Demographic analysis of the Hopi Tribe using 2010 Census and 2010 American Community Survey Estimates. Northern Arizona University.

  23. Anning, D. W., Paul, A. P., McKinney, T. S., Huntington, J. M., Bexfield, L. M., & Thiros, S. A. (2012). Predicted nitrate and arsenic concentrations in basin-fill aquifers of the southwestern United States. Scientific Investigations Report. U.S. Geological Survey.

  24. Lynam, R. (2018). ‘It eats you.’ Cancer-causing arsenic plagues Hopi Tribe. The Progressive, April 28. http://progressive.org/dispatches/it-eats-you-cancer-causing-arsenic-plagues-hopi-tribe-180428/.

  25. Macy, J. P., & Truini, M. (2015). Ground-water, surface-water, and water-chemistry data, Black Mesa Area, Northeastern Arizona 2012–2013. USGS Open File Report 2015-221 (p 33). US Department of the Interior.

  26. Chafe, Z., Brauer, M., Héroux, M. E., Klimont, Z., Lanki, T., Salonen, R. O., & Smith, K. R. (2015). Residential heating with wood and coal: Health impacts and policy options in Europe and North America. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was funded by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Grant No.: 1P50ES026089-01) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Grant No.: 83615101)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Mayer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mayer, B., Joshweseoma, L. & Sehongva, G. Environmental Risk Perceptions and Community Health: Arsenic, Air Pollution, and Threats to Traditional Values of the Hopi Tribe. J Community Health 44, 896–902 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-019-00627-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-019-00627-8

Keywords

Navigation