Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Examining Smoking Cessation in a Community-Based Versus Clinic-Based Intervention Using Community-Based Participatory Research

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tobacco use remains a major public health problem in the U.S. disproportionately affecting underserved communities. The Communities Engaged and Advocating for a Smoke-free Environment (CEASE) initiative is an intervention to address the problem using a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach. This study compares quit rates in a peer-led community-based intervention with those achieved in a clinical setting. The intervention consisted of three Phases. Phase I (n = 404) was a clinic-based trial comparing two types of counseling. Phase II (n = 398) and Phase III (n = 163) interventions were conducted in community venues by trained Peer Motivators. Quit rates at 12-week follow-up increased from 9.4 % in Phase I (clinic-based) to an average of 23.7 % in Phases II and III combined (community-based). The main predictor of smoking cessation was delivery of services in community settings (OR 2.6, 95 % CI 1.7–4.2) while controlling for possible confounders. A community-based approach can significantly guide and improve effectiveness and acceptability of smoking cessation services designed for low-income urban populations. In addition, CBPR can result in better recruitment and retention of the participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tobacco Use | Healthy People 2020 [Online]. Retrieved May 10, 2016, from https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/tobacco-use.

  2. CDC. (2015). Current Cigarette Smoking Among AdultsUnited States, 2005–2014, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [Online]. Retrieved March 7, 2016, from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6444a2.htm?s_cid=mm6444a2_w.

  3. Health, CDC’ s Office on Smoking and, (n.d.). Smoking and Tobacco Use; State and Community Resources. Smoking and Tobacco Use [Online]. Accessed May 10, 2016, from http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/stateandcommunity/best_practices/.

  4. Baltimore City Maryland, (County) QuickFacts from the US Census Bureau [Online]. Retrieved April 28, 2016, from http://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/SEX255214/24510.

  5. Baltimore City Health Department; Office of Epidemiologic Services (2014). Baltimore City Health Disparities Report Card 2013, Baltimore City Health Department; Office of Epidemiologic Services [Online]. http://health.baltimorecity.gov/sites/default/files/Health%20Disparities%20Report%20Card%20FINAL%2024-Apr-14.pdf.

  6. Wagner, F. A., Sheikhattari, P., Buccheri, J., & Gunning, M., et al. (2016). A community-based participatory research on smoking cessation intervention for urban communities. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 27(1), 35–50. 

  7. Sheikhattari, P., Zhu, S., Clubb, P., & Wagner, F. A. (2010). New insights on tobacco smoking among underserved and poor (pp. 400–405).

  8. Freshstart Program by American Cancer Society Workplace Solutions [Online]. Retrieved 5 February, 2016, from http://www.acsworkplacesolutions.com/freshstart.asp.

  9. Fagerstrom, K. O., Heatherton, T. F., & Kozlowski, L. T. (1990). Nicotine addiction and its assessment. Ear Nose Throat Journal, 69(11), 763–765.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ryter, S. W., & Choi, A. M. K. (2013). Carbon monoxide in exhaled breath testing and therapeutics. Journal of Breath Research, 7(1), 17111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. EpiData Software, Odense, Denmark, EpiData Association [online]. http://epidata.dk/.

  12. Stata Statistical Software 2011, College Station, TX: StataCorp LP., StataCorp [online]. http://www.stata.com/.

  13. Yancey, A. K., Ortega, A. N., & Kumanyika, S. K. (2006). Effective recruitment and retention of minority research participants. Annual Review of Public Health, 27(1), 1–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rhodes, S. D., Kelley, C., Simán, F., Cashman, R., et al. (2012). Using community-based participatory research (CBPR) to develop a community-level HIV prevention intervention for Latinas: A local response to a global challenge. Women’s Health Issues, 22(3), e293–e301.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Rhodes, S. D., Duck, S., Alonzo, J., Daniel-Ulloa, J., & Aronson, R. E. (2013). Using community-based participatory research to prevent HIV disparities: Assumptions and opportunities identified by the Latino partnership. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (1999), 63(0 1), S32–S35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Andrews, J. O., Newman, S. D., Heath, J., Williams, L. B., & Tingen, M. S. (2012). Community-based participatory research and smoking cessation interventions: A review of the evidence. The Nursing Clinics of North America, 47(1), 81–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wallen, J., Randolph, S., Carter-Pokras, O., Feldman, R., & Kanamori-Nishimura, M. (2014). Engaging African Americans in smoking cessation programs. American Journal of Health Education, 45(3), 151–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Spencer, M. S., Rosland, A. M., Kieffer, E. C., Sinco, B. R., et al. (2011). Effectiveness of a community health worker intervention among African American and Latino adults with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Public Health, 101(12), 2253–2260.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Amendola, M. G., Nazario, N., & Sanchez, V. (2015). Using CBPR to assess client needs at a social service agency. Public Health Nursing. doi:10.1111/phn.12204.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Andrews, J. O., Bentley, G., Crawford, S., Pretlow, L., & Tingen, M. S. (2007). Using community-based participatory research to develop a culturally sensitive smoking cessation intervention with public housing neighborhoods. Ethnicity & Disease, 17(2), 331–337.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Andrews, J. O., Tingen, M. S., Jarriel, S. C., Caleb, M., et al. (2012). Application of a CBPR framework to inform a multi-level tobacco cessation intervention in public housing neighborhoods. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50(1–2), 129–140.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hooper, M. W., Larry, R., Okuyemi, K., Resnicow, K., et al. (2013). Culturally specific versus standard group cognitive behavioral therapy for smoking cessation among African Americans: an RCT protocol. BMC psychology, 1(1), 15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Jarvis, M. J., Cohen, J. E., Delnevo, C. D., & Giovino, G. A. (2013). Dispelling myths about gender differences in smoking cessation: Population data from the USA, Canada and Britain. Tobacco Control, 22(5), 356–360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fidler, J., Ferguson, S. G., Brown, J., Stapleton, J., & West, R. (2013). How does rate of smoking cessation vary by age, gender and social grade? Findings from a population survey in England. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 108(9), 1680–1685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Klumbiene, J., Sakyte, E., Petkeviciene, J., Prattala, R., & Kunst, A. E. (2015). The effect of tobacco control policy on smoking cessation in relation to gender, age and education in Lithuania, 1994–2010. BMC Public Health, 15, 181.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Stewart, D. W., Adams, C. E., Cano, M. A., Correa-Fernández, V., et al. (2013). Associations between health literacy and established predictors of smoking cessation. American Journal of Public Health, 103(7), e43–e49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Bravin, J. I., Bunge, E. L., Evare, B., Wickham, R. E., et al. (2015). Socioeconomic predictors of smoking cessation in a worldwide online smoking cessation trial. Internet Interventions, 2(4), 410–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Walker, J. F., & Loprinzi, P. D. (2014). Longitudinal examination of predictors of smoking cessation in a national sample of U.S. adolescent and young adult smokers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 16(6), 820–827.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research received financial support from the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (Grant No’s MD000217, MD002803), the National Institute on Drug Abuse (Grant No’s DA012390, DA019805), and Pfizer Inc. In addition, we acknowledge members of the CEASE partnership including the members of the Community Action Board, Peer-Motivators, People’s Community Health Centers’ staff and administrators, and other community organizations and programs that hosted CEASE intervention and supported us.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Payam Sheikhattari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sheikhattari, P., Apata, J., Kamangar, F. et al. Examining Smoking Cessation in a Community-Based Versus Clinic-Based Intervention Using Community-Based Participatory Research. J Community Health 41, 1146–1152 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-016-0264-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-016-0264-9

Keywords

Navigation