Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Persons Who Failed to Obtain Colorectal Cancer Screening Despite Participation in an Evidence-Based Intervention

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a previous report, we demonstrated the efficacy of an educational intervention focused on increasing colorectal cancer screening rates among African Americans. Despite participating in the intervention, however, nearly two-thirds of participants did not seek and receive screening. Participants were African-Americans over age 49 (N = 257) who had not been screened for colorectal cancer according to guidelines. At baseline, participants completed tests measuring fatalism, perceived stress, self-esteem, attitudes/benefits/barriers, social support, and social network diversity. Those who completed the educational intervention were followed up by telephone to learn if they had been screened. We compared the scores on the psychometric tests of the participants who had been screened against the scores of those who had not. Only the mean scores on the attitudes, benefits, and barriers scale distinguished participants who had been screened from those who had not (p = 0.0816 on bivariate testing and p = 0.0276 in the logistic regression model). Social interaction among participants or social cognitive learning may have played a role in determining which participants were screened, but we were not able to demonstrate this. The major factor distinguishing participants who were not screened was their attitude toward screening at baseline. There is a subset of African Americans who are persistently resistant to screening, and their perspective in this regard must be addressed if colorectal cancer disparities are to be reduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CDC Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. http://nccd.cdc.gov/brfssprevalence/rdPage.aspx?rdReport=DPH_BRFSS.ExploreByLocation&islLocation=99&go=GO.

  2. Blumenthal, D. S., Smith, S. A., Majett, C. D., & Alema-Mensah, E. (2010). A trial of 3 interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening in African Americans. Cancer, 116(4), 922–929.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith, S., Johnson, L., Wesley, D., Turner, K. B., McCray, G., Sheats, J., et al. (2012). Translation to practice of an intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening among African Americans. Clinical and Translational Science, 5(5), 412–415.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Shen, L., Condit, C. M., & Wright, L. (2009). The psychometric property and validation of a fatalism scale. Psychology and Health, 24(5), 597–613.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenberg, Morris. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen, S., Doyle, W. J., Skoner, D. P., Rabin, B. S., & Gwaltney, J. M, Jr. (1997). Social ties and susceptibility to the common cold. JAMA, 277(24), 1940–1944.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Community Preventive Services Task Force. (2016). Cancer prevention and control. Accessed June 8, 2016, from www.thecommunityguide.org.

  9. Sabatino, S. A., Lawrence, B., Elder, R., Mercer, S. L., et al. (2012). Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers: Nine updated systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(1), 97–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development. Vol. 6. Six theories of child development (Vol. 6, pp. 1–60). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Grants 5R01CA166785 (Efficacy-to-Effectiveness of an Intervention) from the National Cancer Institute (NCI). U57CCU42068 (Community Cancer Control) from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 5U48DP000049 (Prevention Research Center) from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Selina A. Smith.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smith, S.A., Alema-Mensah, E., Yoo, W. et al. Persons Who Failed to Obtain Colorectal Cancer Screening Despite Participation in an Evidence-Based Intervention. J Community Health 42, 30–34 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-016-0221-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-016-0221-7

Keywords

Navigation