Skip to main content
Log in

Do the Consequences Experienced by the People in the Life of a Problem Gambler Differ Based on the Nature of Their Relationship with the Gambler?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consequences experienced by the partners of individuals with a gambling disorder are well documented. However, little is known about the deleterious effects experienced by other people than partners of gamblers. A better understanding of these consequences could help improve clinical practices. The goal of this paper is to compare the consequences experienced by partners of gamblers with those experienced by their close family members (parents, adult children, siblings) by using the categorization method proposed by Langham et al. (BMC Public Health, 2016). To achieve this goal, 46 semi-structured interviews were conducted. Results indicate that the extent and intensity of the consequences experienced vary widely based on their level of emotional and financial involvement with the gambler. Considering the specific elements involved for each type of person in a gambler’s life, future research should distinguish participants based on the nature of their relationship with the gambler.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that only the consequences are used for this project.

References

  • Abbott, M. W. (2001). Problem and non-problem gambling in New Zealand: A report on phase two of the 1999 national prevalence survey. Retrieved from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.617.3560&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  • Crisp, B. R., Thomas, S. A., Jackson, A. C., & Thomason, N. (2001). Partners of problem gamblers who present for counselling: Demographic profile and presenting problems. Journal of Family Studies, 7(2), 208–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darbyshire, P., Oster, C., & Carrig, H. (2001). The experience of pervasive loss: Children and young people living in a family where parental gambling is a problem. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17(1), 23–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson-Swift, V. A., James, E. L., & Kippen, S. (2005). The experience of living with a problem gambler: Spouses and partners speak out. Journal of Gambling Issues, 13, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, N. A., Rodda, S. N., Lubman, D. I., & Jackson, A. C. (2014). The impacts of problem gambling on concerned significant others accessing web-based counselling. Addictive Behaviors, 39(8), 1253–1257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.04.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferland, F., Blanchette-Martin, N., Kairouz, S., Tremblay, J., Nadeau, L., Savard, A.-C., & Guillemette, F. (2016). Atteintes au réseau social du joueur : Impacts et conséquences. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353339299_Ferland_2016_AtteintesAuReseauSocialDuJoueur

  • Ferland, F., Fournier, P.-M., Ladouceur, R., Brochu, P., Bouchard, M., & Pâquet, L. (2008). Consequences of pathological gambling on the gambler and his spouse. Journal of Gambling Issues. https://doi.org/10.4309/jgi.2008.22.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report

  • Franklin, J., & Thoms, D. R. (1989). Clinical observations of family members of compulsive gamblers. In H. Shaffer (Ed.), Compulsive gambling: Theory, research & practice (pp. 135–146). Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudia, R. (1987). Effects of compulsive gambling on the family. Social Work, 32(3), 254–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, B. C., Browne, M., Rockloff, M., & Rose, J. (2017). A typical problem gambler affects six others. International Gambling Studies, 17(2), 276–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2017.1331252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgins, D. C., Shead, N. W., & Makarchuk, K. (2007a). Relationship satisfaction and psychological distress among concerned significant others of pathological gamblers. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195(1), 65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgins, D. C., Toneatto, T., Makarchuk, K., Skinner, W., & Vincent, S. (2007b). Minimal treatment approaches for concerned significant others of problem gamblers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holdsworth, L., Nuske, E., Tiyce, M., & Hing, N. (2013). Impacts of gambling problems on partners: Partners’ interpretations. Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health, 3, 11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingle, P. J., Marotta, J., McMillan, G., & Wisdom, J. P. (2008). Significant others and gambling treatment outcomes. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(3), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-008-9092-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D. F., Marston, A. R., Singer, R. D., Widaman, K., Little, T., & Veizades, J. (1989). Children of problem gamblers. Journal of Gambling Behavior, Special Issue: Gambling and the Family, 5(4), 261–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalischuk, R. G., Nowatzki, N., Cardwell, K., Klein, K., & Solowoniuk, J. (2006). Problem gambling and its impact on families: A literature review. International Gambling Studies, 6(1), 31–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459790600644176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kourgiantakis, T., Saint-Jacques, M.-C., & Tremblay, J. (2013). Problem gambling and families: A systematic review. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 13(4), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533256X.2013.838130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landon, J., Grayson, E., & Roberts, A. (2018). An exploratory study of the impacts of gambling on affected Others accessing a social service. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 16(3), 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9785-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langham, E., Thorne, H., Browne, M., Donaldson, P., Rose, J., & Rockloff, M. (2016). Understanding gambling related harm: A proposed definition, conceptual framework, and taxonomy of harms. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2747-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lesieur, H. R., & Rothschild, J. (1989). Children of gamblers anonymous members. Journal of Gambling Behavior, Special Issue: Gambling and the Family, 5(4), 269–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, V. C., & Shuttlesworth, D. E. (1983). The impact of pathological gambling on the spouse of the gambler. Journal of Community Psychology, 11(1), 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, V. C., & Yaffee, R. A. (1988). Pathological gambling: Psychosomatic, emotional and marital difficulties as reported by the spouse. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 4(1), 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, M., & Volberg, R. (2013). Impact of problem gambling on financial, emotional and social well-being of Singaporean families. International Gambling Studies, 13(1), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2012.731422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orford, J. (2017). How does the common core to the harm experienced by affected family members vary by relationship, social and cultural factors? Drugs: Education Prevention and Policy, 24(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687637.2016.1189876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paillé, P., & Mucchielli, A. (2003). L’analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patford, J. L. (2007). The yoke of care: How parents and parents-in-law experience, understand and respond to adult children’s gambling problems. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 13(3), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1071/PY07039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patford, J. L. (2009). For worse, for poorer and in health: How women experience, understand and respond to a partner’s gambling problems. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7, 177–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, B. J., Harvey, P., Crisp, B. R., Battersby, M., & Lawn, S. (2018). Gambling-related harm as reported by concerned significant others: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of empirical studies. Journal of Family Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2018.1513856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salonen, A. H., Castern, S., Alho, H., & Lahti, T. (2014). Concerned significant others of people with gambling problems in Finland: A cross-sectional population study. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-398

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Suomi, A., Jackson, A. C., Dowling, N. A., Lavis, T., Patford, J., Thomas, S. A., Harvey, P., Abbott, M., Bellringer, M. E., Koziol-McLain, J., & Cockman, S. (2013). Problem gambling and family violence: family member reports of prevalence, family impacts and family coping. Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health, 3(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/2195-3007-3-13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, J., Romild, U., & Shepherdson, E. (2013). The concerned significant others of people with gambling problems in a national representative sample in Sweden: A 1 year follow-up study. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1087

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, G., & Hughes, K. (2010). Ripples in a pond: The disclosure to, and management of, problem Internet gambling with/in the family. Community, Work and Family, 13(3), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2010.488107

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Fonds de recherche québécois: Société et Culture under Grant [Number 164425]. The PI also received a grant from the Institut universitaire sur les dépendances to translate the manuscript in English.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francine Ferland.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

In the present article, the terms gambler, pathological gambler and PG all refer to the same member of the couple, namely the person with the pathological gambling problem. For the most part, this person was male, and thus, where required, masculine pronouns are used to refer to this person. Conversely, the term partner refers to the non-gambling member of the couple, for the most part female. Pronoun gender follows accordingly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferland, F., Blanchette-Martin, N., Côté, M. et al. Do the Consequences Experienced by the People in the Life of a Problem Gambler Differ Based on the Nature of Their Relationship with the Gambler?. J Gambl Stud 38, 1075–1092 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-021-10058-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-021-10058-7

Keywords

Navigation