Skip to main content
Log in

The Effects of Pop-up Harm Minimisation Messages on Electronic Gaming Machine Gambling Behaviour in New Zealand

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In New Zealand a simple pop-up message feature that provides gambling session information and forces a break in play is mandatory on all electronic gaming machines in all venues (EGMs). Previous research has demonstrated small effects of more sophisticated pop-up messages tested predominantly in laboratory environments. The present research examined gambler engagement with and views on the New Zealand pop-up messages and on the relationship between pop-up messages and EGM expenditure. A sample of gamblers was recruited at casino and non-casino (pub) EGM venues. Most participants were aware of pop-up messages (57 %) and many saw them often (38 %). Among gamblers who reported seeing pop-up messages, half read the message content, and a quarter believed that pop-up messages helped them control the amount of money they spend on gambling. Participants who reported being likely to stop gambling in response to pop-up messages spent significantly less money on gambling when variables that were independently associated with EGM expenditure were controlled for. A modest harm minimisation effect of the pop-up message feature that has been operating in New Zealand for 5 years was evident. Suggestions for improvement of the harm minimisation potential of the current pop-up message feature are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auer, M., & Griffiths, M. (2014). Personalised feedback in the promotion of responsible gambling: A brief overview. Responsible Gambling Review, 1, 27–36.

  • Auer, M. M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015). Testing normative and self-appraisal feedback in an online slot-machine pop-up in a real-world setting. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 339. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00339.

  • Auer, M., Malischnig, D., & Griffiths, M. D. (2014). Is “pop-up” messaging in online slot machine gambling effective as a responsible gambling strategy? Journal of Gambling Issues, 29, 1–10. doi:10.4309/jgi.2014.29.3.

  • Baron, J., & Ritov, I. (2004). Omission bias, individual differences, and normality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 94(2), 74–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaszczynski, A., Gainsbury, S., & Karlov, L. (2014). Blue Gum gaming machine: An evaluation of responsible gambling features. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(3), 697–712.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction, 97(5), 487–499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cloutier, M., Ladouceur, R., & Sévigny, S. (2006). Responsible gambling tools: Pop-up messages and pauses on video lottery terminals. The Journal of Psychology, 140(5), 434–438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Internal Affairs. (2013). Gambling fact sheet 6: Gambling harm prevention and minimisation. Retrieved from http://www.dia.govt.nz/diawebsite.nsf/Files/GamblingFactSheets-Feb2013/$file/FactSheet6-Feb2013.pdf.

  • Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gainsbury, S., & Blaszczynski, A. (2011). The appropriateness of using laboratories and student participants in gambling research. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(1), 83–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gambling (Harm Prevention and Minimisation) Regulations, New Zealand Legislation. (2004). Retrieved from http://www.legislation.govt.nz/regulation/public/2004/0276/latest/DLM283955.html.

  • Jardin, B., & Wulfert, E. (2009). The use of messages in altering risky gambling behavior in college students: An experimental analogue study. The American Journal on Addictions, 18(3), 243–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. S., Wohl, M. J. A., Stewart, M. J., Sztainert, T., & Gainsbury, S. M. (2014). Limit your time, gamble responsibly: Setting a time limit (via pop-up message) on an electronic gaming machine reduces time on device. International Gambling Studies, 14(2), 266–278.

  • Ladouceur, R., & Sevigny, S. (2003). Interactive messages on video lottery terminals and persistence in gambling. Gambling Research: Journal of the National Association for Gambling Studies, Australia, 15, 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landon, J., Palmer du Preez, K., Bellringer, M., Page, A., & Abbott, M. (2015). Pop-up messages on electronic gaming machines in New Zealand: Experiences and views of gamblers and venue staff. International Gambling Studies, 16(1), 49–66.

  • LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., & Gray, H. M. (2014). Breadth and depth involvement: Understanding Internet gambling involvement and its relationship to gambling problems. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 28(2), 396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matheson, K., Wohl, M. J., & Anisman, H. (2009). The interplay of appraisals, specific coping styles, and depressive symptoms among young male and female gamblers. Social Psychology, 40(4), 212–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan, S., & Blaszczynski, A. (2007). Recall of electronic gaming machine signs: A static versus a dynamic mode of presentation. Journal of Gambling Issues, 20, 253–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan, S., & Blaszczynski, A. (2010). Impact of mode of display and message content of responsible gambling signs for electronic gaming machines on regular gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(1), 67–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, Y., Chebat, J.-C., & Borges, A. (2013). Graphic gambling warnings: How they affect emotions, cognitive responses and attitude change. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29, 507–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Munoz, Y., Chebat, J.-C., & Suissa, J. A. (2010). Using fear appeals in warning labels to promote responsible gambling among VLT players: The key role of depth of information processing. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(4), 593–609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. G., Laughlin, A. L., Ogeil, R. P., & Blaszczynski, A. (2011). Effects of directional decisional support upon risk taking online. Ergonomics Open Journal, 4, 47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. G., & Ogeil, R. P. (2010). Alcohol influences the use of decisional support. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 208(4), 603–611.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. G., Ogeil, R. P., & Blaszczynski, A. (2012). Electronic interests and behaviours associated with gambling problems. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 10(4), 585–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regulations Review Committee. (2005). Complaints regarding Regulation 8 of the Gambling (Harm Prevention and Minimisation) Regulations 2004. Wellington: House of Representatives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), 7–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schellink, T., & Schrans, T. (2002). Atlantic Lottery Corporation video lottery responsible gaming feature research: Final report. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Focal Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitworth, B. (2005). Polite computing. Behaviour & Information Technology, 24(5), 353–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl, M. J., Gainsbury, S., Stewart, M. J., & Sztainert, T. (2013). Facilitating responsible gambling: The relative effectiveness of education-based animation and monetary limit setting pop-up messages among electronic gaming machine players. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29(4), 703–717.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katie Palmer du Preez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palmer du Preez, K., Landon, J., Bellringer, M. et al. The Effects of Pop-up Harm Minimisation Messages on Electronic Gaming Machine Gambling Behaviour in New Zealand. J Gambl Stud 32, 1115–1126 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-016-9603-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-016-9603-0

Keywords

Navigation