References
Finch, A., Beiner, M., Lubinski, J., Lynch, H. T., Moller, P., Rosen, B., et al. (2006). Salpingo-oophorectomy and the risk of ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancers in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Journal of American Medical Association, 296(2), 185–191.
Finch, A. P. M., Lubinsky, J., Moller, P., Singer, C. F., Karlan, B., Senter, L., et al. (2014). Impact of oophorectomy on cancer incidence and mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 32(15), 1547–1553. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.53.2820.
Gavaruzzi, T., Tasso, A., Franiuk, M., Varesco, L., & Lotto, L. (2017). A psychological perspective on factors predicting prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy in a sample of italian women from the general population. Results from a hypothetical study in the context of BRCA mutations. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 26, 1144–1152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0093-8.
Hallowell, N., Jacobs, I., Richards, M., Mackay, J., & Gore, M. (2001). Surveillance or surgery? A description of the factors that influence high risk premenopausal women’s decisions about prophylactic oophorectomy. Journal of Medical Genetics, 38, 683–726.
Hoffmann, T. C., & Del Mar, C. (2015). Patient’s expectations of the benefits and harms of treatments, screening and tests; a systemic review. JAMA Internal Medicine, 175(2), 274–286. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6016 [published online Dec 2014]
Mavaddat, N., Peock, S., Frost, D., Ellis, S., Platte, R., Fineberg, E., et al. (2013). Cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: Results from prospective analysis of EMBRACE. Journal National Cancer Institute, 105, 812–822. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djt095.
Olivier, R. I., van Beurden, M., Lubsen, M. A. C., Rookus, M. A., Mooij, T. M., van de Vijver, M. J., et al. (2004). Clinical outcome of prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and events during follow-up. British Journal of Cancer, 90, 1492–1497.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Devin M. Cox declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cox, D.M. Response to “A Psychological Perspective on Factors Predicting Prophylactic Salpingo-Oophorectomy in a Sample of Italian Women from the General Population. Results from a Hypothetical Study in the Context of BRCA Mutations”. J Genet Counsel 27, 1312–1313 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-018-0280-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-018-0280-2