Skip to main content
Log in

Response to “A Psychological Perspective on Factors Predicting Prophylactic Salpingo-Oophorectomy in a Sample of Italian Women from the General Population. Results from a Hypothetical Study in the Context of BRCA Mutations”

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Journal of Genetic Counseling

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Finch, A., Beiner, M., Lubinski, J., Lynch, H. T., Moller, P., Rosen, B., et al. (2006). Salpingo-oophorectomy and the risk of ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancers in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Journal of American Medical Association, 296(2), 185–191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finch, A. P. M., Lubinsky, J., Moller, P., Singer, C. F., Karlan, B., Senter, L., et al. (2014). Impact of oophorectomy on cancer incidence and mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 32(15), 1547–1553. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.53.2820.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gavaruzzi, T., Tasso, A., Franiuk, M., Varesco, L., & Lotto, L. (2017). A psychological perspective on factors predicting prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy in a sample of italian women from the general population. Results from a hypothetical study in the context of BRCA mutations. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 26, 1144–1152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0093-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hallowell, N., Jacobs, I., Richards, M., Mackay, J., & Gore, M. (2001). Surveillance or surgery? A description of the factors that influence high risk premenopausal women’s decisions about prophylactic oophorectomy. Journal of Medical Genetics, 38, 683–726.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, T. C., & Del Mar, C. (2015). Patient’s expectations of the benefits and harms of treatments, screening and tests; a systemic review. JAMA Internal Medicine, 175(2), 274–286. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6016 [published online Dec 2014]

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mavaddat, N., Peock, S., Frost, D., Ellis, S., Platte, R., Fineberg, E., et al. (2013). Cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: Results from prospective analysis of EMBRACE. Journal National Cancer Institute, 105, 812–822. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djt095.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olivier, R. I., van Beurden, M., Lubsen, M. A. C., Rookus, M. A., Mooij, T. M., van de Vijver, M. J., et al. (2004). Clinical outcome of prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and events during follow-up. British Journal of Cancer, 90, 1492–1497.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Devin M. Cox.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Devin M. Cox declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cox, D.M. Response to “A Psychological Perspective on Factors Predicting Prophylactic Salpingo-Oophorectomy in a Sample of Italian Women from the General Population. Results from a Hypothetical Study in the Context of BRCA Mutations”. J Genet Counsel 27, 1312–1313 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-018-0280-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-018-0280-2

Navigation