Skip to main content
Log in

Counselees’ Perspectives of Genomic Counseling Following Online Receipt of Multiple Actionable Complex Disease and Pharmacogenomic Results: a Qualitative Research Study

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Genetic Counseling

Abstract

Genomic applications raise multiple challenges including the optimization of genomic counseling (GC) services as part of the results delivery process. More information on patients’ motivations, preferences, and informational needs are essential to guide the development of new, more efficient practice delivery models that capitalize on the existing strengths of a limited genetic counseling workforce. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with a subset of counselees from the Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative following online receipt of multiple personalized genomic test reports. Participants previously had either in-person GC (chronic disease cohort, n = 20; mean age 60 years) or telephone GC (community cohort, n = 31; mean age 46.8 years). Transcripts were analyzed using a Grounded Theory framework. Major themes that emerged from the interviews include 1) primary reasons for seeking GC were to clarify results, put results into perspective relative to other health-related concerns, and to receive personalized recommendations; 2) there is need for a more participant driven approach in terms of mode of GC communication (in-person, phone, video), and refining the counseling agenda pre-session; and 3) there was strong interest in the option of follow up GC. By clarifying counselees’ expectations, views and desired outcomes, we have uncovered a need for a more participant-driven GC model when potentially actionable genomic results are received online.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashley, E. A. (2015). The precision medicine initiative: a new national effort. JAMA, 313(21), 2119–2120. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.3595.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. (2015). The effect of genetic test-based risk information on behavioral outcomes: a critical examination of failed trials and a call to action. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 167(12), 2913–2915. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.37289.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, H. D., Coleman, E. A., Parry, C., Bodenheimer, T., & Chen, E. H. (2010). Health coaching for patients with chronic illness. Family Practice Management, 17(5), 24–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, B. (2014). Genetic counselors and the future of clinical genomics. Genome Medicine, 6(7), 49. doi:10.1186/gm565.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bloss, C. S., Wineinger, N. E., Darst, B. F., Schork, N. J., & Topol, E. J. (2013). Impact of direct-to-consumer genomic testing at long term follow-up. Journal of Medical Genetics, 50(6), 393–400. doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A. H., Rahm, A. K., & Williams, J. L. (2016). Alternate service delivery models in cancer genetic counseling: a mini-review. Frontiers in Oncology, 6(120). doi:10.3389/fonc.2016.00120.

  • Chow, C. K., Redfern, J., Hillis, G. S., Thakkar, J., Santo, K., Hackett, M. L., et al. (2015). Effect of lifestyle-focused text messaging on risk factor modification in patients with coronary heart disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 314(12), 1255–1263. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.10945.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. A., Marvin, M. L., Riley, B. D., Vig, H. S., Rousseau, J. A., & Gustafson, S. L. (2013). Identification of genetic counseling service delivery models in practice: a report from the NSGC Service delivery model task force. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 22(4), 411–421. doi:10.1007/s10897-013-9588-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. A., Huziak, R. C., Gustafson, S., & Grubs, R. E. (2016). Analysis of advantages, limitations, and barriers of genetic counseling service delivery models. Journal of Genetic Counseling. doi:10.1007/s10897-016-9932-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, F. S., & Varmus, H. (2015). A new initiative on precision medicine. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372(9), 793–795. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1500523.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, C. f. D. C. a. P. (2015). Social ecological model. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/crccp/sem.htm.

  • Golden, S. D., McLeroy, K. R., Green, L. W., Earp, J. A., & Lieberman, L. D. (2015). Upending the social ecological model to guide health promotion efforts toward policy and environmental change. Health Education & Behavior, 42(1 Suppl), 8S–14S. doi:10.1177/1090198115575098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollust, S. E., Gordon, E. S., Zayac, C., Griffin, G., Christman, M. F., Pyeritz, R. E., & Bernhardt, B. A. (2012). Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: perspectives from research participants. Public Health Genomics, 15(1), 22–30. doi:10.1159/000327296.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, E. S., Griffin, G., Wawak, L., Pang, H., Gollust, S. E., & Bernhardt, B. A. (2012). It’s not like judgment day: public understanding of and reactions to personalized genomic risk information. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21(3), 423–432. doi:10.1007/s10897-011-9476-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haga, S. B., Barry, W. T., Mills, R., Svetkey, L., Suchindran, S., Willard, H. F., & Ginsburg, G. S. (2014). Impact of delivery models on understanding genomic risk for type 2 diabetes. Public Health Genomics, 17(2), 95–104. doi:10.1159/000358413.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hollands, G. J., French, D. P., Griffin, S. J., Prevost, A. T., Sutton, S., King, S., & Marteau, T. M. (2016). The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis. BMJ, 352, i1102. doi:10.1136/bmj.i1102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hovick, S. R., Wilkinson, A. V., Ashida, S., de Heer, H. D., & Koehly, L. M. (2014). The impact of personalized risk feedback on Mexican Americans’ perceived risk for heart disease and diabetes. Health Education Research, 29(2), 222–234. doi:10.1093/her/cyt151.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, A. S., Schwartz, M. D., Valdimarsdottir, H., Nusbaum, R. H., Hooker, G. W., DeMarco, T. A., & Peshkin, B. N. (2016). Patient and genetic counselor perceptions of in-person versus telephone genetic counseling for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. Familial Cancer. doi:10.1007/s10689-016-9900-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaphingst, K. A., McBride, C. M., Wade, C., Alford, S. H., Reid, R., Larson, E., & Brody, L. C. (2012). Patients’ understanding of and responses to multiplex genetic susceptibility test results. Genetics in Medicine, 14(7), 681–687. doi:10.1038/gim.2012.22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, D. J., Bollinger, J. M., Dvoskin, R. L., & Scott, J. A. (2012). Risky business: risk perception and the use of medical services among customers of DTC personal genetic testing. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21(3), 413–422. doi:10.1007/s10897-012-9483-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, M., Gordon, E., Stack, C., Gharani, N., Sill, C., Schmidlen, T., Mintzer, J., Pallies, J., Gerry, N. P., & Christman, M. (2010). The Coriell personalized medicine collaborative: a prospective study of the utility of personalized medicine. Personalized Medicine, 7, 301–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, S. (1981). Psychological aspects of genetic counseling: analysis of a transcript. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 8(2), 137–153. doi:10.1002/ajmg.1320080204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khoury, M. J., & Evans, J. P. (2015). A public health perspective on a national precision medicine cohort: balancing long-term knowledge generation with early health benefit. JAMA, 313(21), 2117–2118. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.3382.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Khoury, M. J., Janssens, A. C., & Ransohoff, D. F. (2013). How can polygenic inheritance be used in population screening for common diseases? Genetics in Medicine, 15(6), 437–443. doi:10.1038/gim.2012.182.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lautenbach, D. M., Christensen, K. D., Sparks, J. A., & Green, R. C. (2013). Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 14, 491–513. doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-092010-110722.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manolio, T. A., Abramowicz, M., Al-Mulla, F., Anderson, W., Balling, R., Berger, A. C., & Ginsburg, G. S. (2015). Global implementation of genomic medicine: We are not alone. Science Translational Medicine, 7(290), 290ps213. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aab0194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, R., & Haga, S. B. (2014). Genomic counseling: next generation counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(4), 689–692. doi:10.1007/s10897-013-9641-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, R., Powell, J., Barry, W., & Haga, S. B. (2014). Information-seeking and sharing behavior following genomic testing for diabetes risk. Journal of Genetic Counseling. doi:10.1007/s10897-014-9736-1.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, S. R., Neupane, D., Briffa, T. G., & Kallestrup, P. (2016). mHealth plus community health worker interventions: the future research agenda. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 4(5), 387–388. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30001-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Daniel, J. M. (2010). The prospect of genome-guided preventive medicine: a need and opportunity for genetic counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19(4), 315–327. doi:10.1007/s10897-010-9302-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ormond, K. E. (2013). From genetic counseling to “genomic counseling”. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine, 1(4), 189–193. doi:10.1002/mgg3.45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, T. N., Patrick, K., Eng, T. R., & Gustafson, D. (1998). An evidence-based approach to interactive health communication: a challenge to medicine in the information age. Science panel on interactive communication and health. JAMA, 280(14), 1264–1269.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roche, M. I. (2012). Moving toward NextGenetic counseling. Genetics in Medicine, 14(9), 777–778. doi:10.1038/gim.2012.84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidlen, T., Wawak, L., Kasper, R., Garcia-Espana, J. F., Christman, M. F., & Gordon, E. S. (2014). Personalized genomic results: analysis of informational needs. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(4), 578–587. doi:10.1007/s10897-014-9693-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidlen, T., Scheinfeldt, L., Zhaoyang, R., Kasper, R., Sweet, K., Gordon, E. S., Keller, M., Stack, C., Gharani, N., Daly, M. B., Jarvis, J., & Christman, M. (2016). Genetic knowledge among participants in the coriell personalized medicine collaborative. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 2, 385–394. doi:10.1007/s10897–015-9883-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Select Committee on Science and Technology, House of Lords, Second Report—Genomic Medicine (London, The Stationery Office, HL Paper 107-I, 2009), p.104

  • Shelton, C. A., & Whitcomb, D. C. (2015). Evolving roles for physicians and genetic counselors in managing complex genetic disorders. Clin Transl Gastroenterol, 6, e124. doi:10.1038/ctg.2015.46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, L. A., Wolever, R. Q., Bechard, E. M., & Snyderman, R. (2014). Patient engagement as a risk factor in personalized health care: a systematic review of the literature on chronic disease. Genome Medicine, 6(2), 16. doi:10.1186/gm533.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sweet, K., Gordon, E. S., Sturm, A. C., Schmidlen, T. J., Manickam, K., Toland, A. E., & Marsh, C. (2014). Design and implementation of a randomized controlled trial of genomic counseling for patients with chronic disease. J Pers Med, 4(1), 1–19. doi:10.3390/jpm4010001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sweet, K., Sturm, A. C., Schmidlen, T., Hovick, S., Peng, J., Manickam, K., et al. (2016). EMR documentation of physician-patient communication following genomic counseling for actionable complex disease and Pharmacogenomic results. Clinical Genetics. doi:10.1111/cge.12820.

  • Trepanier, A. M., & Allain, D. C. (2014). Models of service delivery for cancer genetic risk assessment and counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(2), 239–253. doi:10.1007/s10897-013-9655-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vassy, J. L., McLaughlin, H. L., MacRae, C. A., Seidman, C. E., Lautenbach, D., Krier, J. B., & Green, R. C. (2015). A one-page summary report of genome sequencing for the healthy adult. Public Health Genomics, 18(2), 123–129. doi:10.1159/000370102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Veach, P. M., Bartels, D. M., & Leroy, B. S. (2007). Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(6), 713–728. doi:10.1007/s10897-007-9113-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. F., Lewis, K. L., Fisher, T. C., Hooker, G. W., Emanuel, T. E., Biesecker, L. G., & Biesecker, B. B. (2014). Preferences for results delivery from exome sequencing/genome sequencing. Genetics in Medicine, 16(6), 442–447. doi:10.1038/gim.2013.170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Hannah Helbert for her assistance with this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Sweet.

Ethics declarations

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Human Genome Research Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R21HG006575. This work was also supported by the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative was funded by the William G. Rohrer Foundation, the RNR Foundation and a grant from the endowment of the Coriell Institute for Medical Research.

Conflict of Interest

EG is currently a paid employee of 23andMe. She worked for the Coriell Institute for Medical Research at the time that this study was developed and the majority of the data collection period. The authors have no additional conflicts of interest to disclose.

Human Studies and Informed Consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the local medical ethical boards of the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and the Coriell Institute for Medical Research and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Animal Studies

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sweet, K., Hovick, S., Sturm, A.C. et al. Counselees’ Perspectives of Genomic Counseling Following Online Receipt of Multiple Actionable Complex Disease and Pharmacogenomic Results: a Qualitative Research Study. J Genet Counsel 26, 738–751 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-0044-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-0044-9

Keywords

Navigation