Abstract
This is the first article in a two part series about utilizing the life course perspective (LCP) in genetic counseling. LCP can be a useful tool for genetic counselors when counseling people with a known genetic mutation. Previous theories such as Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) and Common Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSMSR) examine current reactions to a positive genetic test result. LCP extends beyond the current time to explore temporal and contextual elements of the experience. A review of research revealed, LCP has been used to study the perspective of caregivers of people with Alzheimer’s disease, referral for a family history of breast cancer, Mexican American caregivers of older adult, social class and cancer incidence and cancer and the sense of mastery. Incorporating LCP into a study explaining the experiences of people living with a positive test result for a genetic mutation such as the BRCA mutation provides a comprehensive exploration of this experience.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benjamin, C., Flynn, M., Hallett, C., Ellis, I., & Booth, K. (2008). The use of the life course paradigm and life course charts to explore referral for family history of breast cancer. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(1), 95–109. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.10.007.
Burke, W., Khoury, M. J., Stewart, A., Zimmern, R. L., & Bellagio, G. (2006). The path from genome-based research to population health: development of an international public health genomics network. Genetics in Medicine, 8(7), 451–458. doi:10.1097/01.gim.0000228213.72256.8c.
Carpentier, N., Bernard, P., Grenier, A., & Guberman, N. (2010). Using the life course perspective to study the entry into the illness trajectory: the perspective of caregivers of people with Alzheimer’s disease. Social Science & Medicine, 70(10), 1501–1508. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.038.
de Kok, I. M., van Lenthe, F. J., Avendano, M., Louwman, M., Coebergh, J. W., & Mackenbach, J. P. (2008). Childhood social class and cancer incidence: results of the globe study. Social Science & Medicine, 66(5), 1131–1139. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.035.
Elder, G. H., & Giele, J. Z. (2009). Life course studies: An evolving field. In G. H. Elder & J. Z. Geile (Eds.), The craft of life course research (pp. 1–25). New York: Guildford Press.
Evans, B. C., Crogan, N., Belyea, M., & Coon, D. (2009). Utility of the life course perspective in research with Mexican American caregivers of older adults. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 20(1), 5–14. doi:10.1177/1043659608325847.
Hamilton, J. G., Lobel, M., & Moyer, A. (2009). Emotional distress following genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a meta-analytic review. Health Psychology, 28(4), 510–518. doi:10.1037/a0014778.
Hamilton, R. J., Innella, N., & Bounds, D. (2015). Living with genetic vulnerability: a life course perspective. Journal of Genetic Counseling, xx(xx), xx.
Helmes, A. W. (2002). Application of protection motivation theory to genetic testing for breast cancer risk. Preventative Medicine, 35(5), 453–462.
Hutchinson, E. D. (2011). A life course perspective. In E. D. Hutchinson (Ed.), Dimensions in human behavior: The changing life course (4th ed., pp. 1–39). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Leventhal, H., Meyer, D., & Nerenz, D. (1980). The common sense representation of illness danger. In S. Rachman (Ed.), Contributions to medical psychology (pp. 7–30). New York: Pergamon Press.
Leventhal, H., Nerenz, D. R., & Steele, D. J. (1983). Illness representations and coping with health threats. In A. Baum & J. Singer (Eds.), A handbook of psychology and health (pp. 219–252). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
McFarland, M. J., Pudrovska, T., Schieman, S., Ellison, C. G., & Bierman, A. (2013). Does a cancer diagnosis influence religiosity? Integrating a life course perspective. Social Science Research, 42(2), 311–320. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.10.006.
O’Neill, S. M., Peters, J. A., Vogel, V. G., Feingold, E., & Rubinstein, W. S. (2006). Referral to cancer genetic counseling: are there stages of readiness? American Journal of Medical Genetics, 142C(4), 221–231.
Prochaska, J. O., Redding, C. A., & Evers, K. E. (1997). The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In K. Glanz, F. M. Lewis, & B. Rimer (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher.
Pudrovska, T. (2010). Cancer and mastery: do age and cohort matter? Social Science & Medicine, 71(7), 1285–1291. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.06.029.
Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and psychological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In J. T. Cacioppo, R. E. Petty, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Social psychophysiology: A sourcebook (pp. 153–176). New York: Guilford.
Schwartz, M. D., Lerman, C., Brogan, B. M., Peshkin, B. N., Hughes-Halbert, C., DeMarco, T. A., et al. (2004). Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 counseling and testing on newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(10), 1823–1829.
Shiloh, S., Drori, E., Orr-Urtreger, A., & Friedman, E. (2009). Being ‘at-risk’ for developing cancer: cognitive representations and psychological outcomes. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 32(2), 197–208. doi:10.1007/s10865-008-9178-z.
van Oostrom, I., Meijers-Heijboer, H., Duivenvoorden, H. J., Brocker-Vriends, A. H., van Asperen, C. J., Sijmons, R. H., et al. (2007). The common sense model of self-regulation and psychological adjustment to predictive genetic testing: a prospective study. Psycho-Oncology, 16(12), 1121–1129.
Vos, J., Oosterwijk, J. C., Gomez-Garcia, E., Menko, F. H., Collee, M. J., van Asperen, C. J., & Tibben, A. (2012). Exploring the short-term impact of DNA-testing in breast cancer patients: the counselees’ perception matters, but the actual BRCA1/2 result does not. Patient Education and Counseling, 86(2), 239–251. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.017.
Weinstein, N. D., Rothman, A. J., & Sutton, S. (1998). Stage theories of health behavior: conceptual and methodological issues. Health Psychology, 17(3), 290–299.
Acknowledgments
Research was supported by Rush College of Nursing Research Fund
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hamilton, R.J., Innella, N.A. & Bounds, D.T. The Life Course Perspective: a Guide for Genetic Counselors. J Genet Counsel 25, 44–48 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9878-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9878-9