Skip to main content
Log in

Sickle Cell Trait Screening of Collegiate Athletes: Ethical Reasons for Program Reform

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Journal of Genetic Counseling

Abstract

The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) requires all student-athletes have their sickle cell trait (SCT) status confirmed prior to athletic participation. The NCAA approved the screening program in 2010 for institutions participating in Division I athletics and extended it in subsequent years to institutions at Division II and III levels. Ethical concerns about the controversial policy focus on its mandatory nature and potential impact on student-athletes, particularly through stigmatization of and discrimination against those with SCT. Organizations, such as the American Society of Hematology (ASH), oppose the imposition of SCT testing and instead recommend universal precautions that would protect the entire student-athlete population without revealing student-athletes’ SCT statuses. This paper discusses these issues and offers recommendations, including genetic counseling, which would improve the current SCT screening program. It argues that implementation of universal precautions would ensure that the most ethically sound practices are afforded to every student-athlete.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aloe, A., Krishnamurti, L., & Kladny, B. (2011). Testing of collegiate athletes for sickle cell trait: what we, as genetic counselors should know. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 20, 337–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashley-Koch, A., Yang, Q., & Olney, R. (2000). Sickle hemoglobin (Hb S) allele and sickle cell disease: a huge review. American Journal of Epidemiology, 151, 839–845.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonham, V., Dover, G., & Lawrence, B. (2010). Screening student-athletes for sickle cell trait – a social and clinical experiment. The New England Journal of Medicine, 363, 997–999.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J., & Kark, J. (1994). Fatal rhabdomyolysis presenting as mild heat illness in military training. Military Medicine, 159, 160–163.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A., Parker, C., Jordan, L., Hulihan, M., Creary, M., Lloyd-Puryear, M., Goldsmith, J., & Atrash, H. (2011). Public health implications of sickle cell trait a report of the CDC meeting. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41, 435–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenbaum, D. (2012). Introducing personal genomics to college athletes: potentials and pitfalls. The American Journal of Bioethics, 12, 45–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, B., & West, C. (2012). Ethical issues in sports medicine. Sports Health, 4, 475–479.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grubs, R., Parker, S., & Hamilton, R. (2014). Subtle psychosocial sequelae of genetic test results. Current Genetic Medicine Reports, 2, 242–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, K., Asif, I., Klossner, D., & Drezner, J. (2011). Incidence of sudden cardiac death in National Collegiate Athletic Association athletes. Circulation, 123, 1594–1600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, S. (1997). Psychological aspects of genetic counseling: teaching and counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 6, 287–295.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klossner, D. (2013). NCAA Sports Medicine Handbook, 2013–2014. Retrieved from http://www.ncaapublications.com/p-4328-2013-14-ncaa-sports-medicine-handbook.aspx.

  • Lawrence, R., & Shah, G. (2014). Athletes’ perceptions of National Collegiate Athletic Association-mandated sickle cell trait screening: insight for academic institutions and college health professionals. Journal of American College Health, 62, 343–350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Natowicz, M., & Alper, J. (1991). Genetic screening: triumphs, problems, and controversies. Journal of Public Health Policy, 12, 475–491.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, S. (2012). Scaring athletes with sickle cell trait. The American Journal of Cardiology, 111, 149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarini, B., Brooks, M., & Bundy, D. (2012). A policy impact analysis of the mandatory NCAA sickle cell trait screening program. Health Services Research, 47, 446–461.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A. (2013). Sickle cell trait testing and athletic participation: a solution in search of a problem? Hematology, 2013, 632–637.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsaras, G., Owusu-Ansah, A., Boateng, F., & Amoateng-Adjepong, Y. (2009). Complications associated with sickle cell trait: a brief narrative review. The American Journal of Medicine, 122, 507–512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosalie Ferrari.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferrari, R., Parker, L.S., Grubs, R.E. et al. Sickle Cell Trait Screening of Collegiate Athletes: Ethical Reasons for Program Reform. J Genet Counsel 24, 873–877 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9849-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9849-1

Keywords

Navigation