Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reporting of Intimate Partner Violence among Male Couples: Cross-Sectional and Serial Dyadic Concordance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Intimate partner violence (IPV) in male couples is a public health concern, but the reliability of self-reported IPV data from gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) is understudied. Research in heterosexual couples finds IPV-underreporting can be differential between victims/perpetrators and by gender; it is unknown if GBMSM-data has similar limitations.

Methods

This study assessed interpartner agreement (percent agreement; kappa statistics) between self- and partner-reported IPV, and compared agreement between 2 recall periods (1-year; 3-month), 3 granularities (any IPV; IPV domain; IPV behaviors), and across 3 surveys (BL; Wave 1 (W1); Wave 2 (W2)) in a sample of 404 male couples in the U.S. (2016–2017). Longitudinal dyadic concordance-trends were assessed to determine if couples had consistently reliable data over time.

Results

Past-year IPV-victimization prevalence was 66.41% and perpetration, 64.42%; past 3-month IPV-victimization prevalence was 47.30% (W1) and 52.57% (W2), and perpetration, 46.30% (W1) and 46.30% (W2). Interpartner agreement was consistently low across recall periods and granularities. Observed agreement was higher for those who did not report IPV, compared to those who reported experiencing IPV. At an individual-level, interpartner agreement on any given survey was not significantly predictive of subsequent data reliability.

Conclusion

Researchers should be cognizant of the potential for unpredictable and unreliable IPV reports from GBMSM. Further research on IPV data quality in male couples is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison R. Walsh.

Ethics declarations

Financial Support

This work is supported by the National Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01HD078131. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical Standards

The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A

Appendix A

Frequency of agreement (Fa) and observed agreement (P0) between self-reported IPV victimization experiences and partner-reported perpetration-behaviors among 808 men in 404 same-sex couples collected at 3-month intervals, United States, April 2016-June 2018.*

  

Fa (P0)

  

1-year recall period

3-month recall period

  

Baseline (BL)

Wave 1 (W1)

Wave 2 (W2)

Any IPV

568/796 (71.36)

417/614 (67.92)

396/609 (65.02)

 

Did not experience

161/259 (62.16)

229/326 (70.25)

199/290 (68.62)

 

Victimized

407/517 (78.72)

188/288 (65.28)

197/319 (61.76)

Emotional IPV

556/796 (69.85)

469/650 (72.15)

454/642 (70.72)

 

Did not experience

301/404 (74.50)

352/428 (82.24)

337/409 (82.40)

 

Victimized

255/392 (65.05)

117/222 (52.70)

117/233 (50.21)

Called fat or ugly

684/792 (8636)

584/656 (89.02)

550/644 (85.40)

 

Did not experience

593/646 (91.80)

538/570 (94.39)

507/542 (93.54)

 

Victimized

91/146 (62.33)

46/86 (53.49)

43/102 (42.16)

Told to “act straight” around certain people

700/803 (87.17)

622/659 (94.39)

609/650 (93.69)

 

Did not experience

660/702 (94.02)

608/622 (97.75)

596/613 (97.23)

 

Victimized

40/101 (39.60)

14/37 (37.84)

13/37 (35.14)

Criticized clothing

565/792 (71.34)

484/661 (73.22)

475/649 (73.19)

 

Did not experience

380/471 (80.68)

404/480 (84.17)

392/460 (85.22)

 

Victimized

185/311 (59.49)

80/181 (44.20)

83/189 (43.92)

Physical/sexual IPV

645/789 (81.75)

548/645 (84.96)

523/624 (83.81)

 

Did not experience

549/608 (90.30)

512/554 (92.42)

470/507 (92.70)

 

Victimized

96/181 (53.04)

36/91 (39.56)

53/117 (45.30)

Destroyed or damaged personal property

693/798 (86.84)

612/666 (91.89)

585/643 (90.98)

 

Did not experience

657/691 (95.08)

602/622 (96.78)

569/583 (97.60)

 

Victimized

36/107 (33.64)

10/44 (22.73)

16/60 (26.67)

Punched, hit, or slapped

689/802 (85.91)

606/662 (91.54)

585/639 (91.55)

 

Did not experience

689/724 (95.17)

593/616 (96.27)

556/577 (96.36)

 

Victimized

47/78 (60.25)

13/46 (28.26)

29/62 (46.77)

Kicked

782/801 (97.63)

648/662 (97.89)

625/642 (97.35)

 

Did not experience

771/778 (99.10)

646/649 (99.54)

618/624 (99.04)

 

Victimized

11/23 (47.83)

2/13 (15.38)

7/18 (38.89)

Pushed or shoved

714/794 (89.92)

599/659 (90.90)

577/641 (90.02)

 

Did not experience

654/689 (94.92)

580/606 (95.71)

554/581 (95.35)

 

Victimized

60/105 (57.14)

19/53 (35.85)

23/60 (38.33)

Forced to do something sexual against will

791/804 (98.38)

656/661 (99.24)

628/643 (97.67)

 

Did not experience

789/793 (99.50)

654/656 (99.70)

625/629 (99.36)

 

Victimized

2/11 (18.18)

2/5 (40.00)

3/14 (21.43)

Raped

798/805 (99.13)

654/660 (99.09)

640/646 (99.07)

 

Did not experience

798/798 (100.00)

654/658 (99.39)

637/639 (99.69)

 

Victimized

0/5 (0)

0/2 (0)

3/7 (42.86)

Monitoring IPV

548/760 (72.11)

471/626 (75.24)

454/612 (74.18)

 

Did not experience

347/476 (72.90)

409/501 (81.64)

385/478 (80.54)

 

Victimized

201/284 (70.77)

62/125 (49.60)

69/134 (51.49)

Demanded access to cell phone

685/796 (86.06)

604/655 (92.21)

592/647 (91.50)

 

Did not experience

617/664 (92.92)

584/605 (96.53)

570/585 (97.44)

 

Victimized

68/132 (51.52)

20/50 (40.00)

22/62 (35.48)

Demanded access to email

755/802 (94.14)

631/656 (96.19)

623/643 (96.89)

 

Did not experience

733/752 (97.47)

625/634 (98.58)

614/622 (98.71)

 

Victimized

22/50 (44.00)

6/22 (27.27)

9/21 (42.86)

Read text messages without knowledge

581/752 (77.26)

511/629 (81.24)

496/618 (80.26)

 

Did not experience

427/547 (78.06)

470/547 (85.92)

447/529 (84.50)

 

Victimized

154/205 (75.12)

41/82 (50.00)

49/89 (55.06)

Read email without knowledge

616/749 (82.24)

573/631 (90.81)

536/613 (87.44)

 

Did not experience

556/645 (86.20)

562/602 (93.36)

523/576 (90.80)

 

Victimized

60/104 (57.69)

11/29 (37.93)

13/37 (35.14)

Repeatedly posted on social media

680/794 (85.64)

607/656 (92.53)

588/637 (92.31)

 

Did not experience

647/702 (92.17)

606/628 (96.50)

579/600 (96.50)

 

Victimized

33/92 (35.87)

1/28 (3.57)

9/37 (24.32)

Controlling IPV

676/790 (85.57)

578/649 (89.06)

576/634 (90.85)

 

Did not experience

632/669 (94.47)

568/590 (96.27)

561/569 (98.59)

 

Victimized

44/121 (36.36)

10/59 (16.95)

15/65 (23.08)

Prevented from seeing [victim’s] family

763/798 (95.61)

636/655 (97.10)

622/642 (96.88)

 

Did not experience

756/765 (98.82)

634/642 (98.75)

619/624 (99.20)

 

Victimized

7/33 (21.21)

2/13 (15.38)

3/18 (16.67)

Prevented from seeing [victim’s] friends

733/804 (91.17)

616/662 (93.05)

612/649 (94.30)

 

Did not experience

712/735 (96.87)

611/624 (97.92)

606/612 (99.02)

 

Victimized

21/69 (30.43)

5/38 (13.16)

6/37 (16.22)

Prevented from seeing [perpetrator’s] family

756/800 (94.50)

640/659 (97.12)

623/645 (96.59)

 

Did not experience

736/753 (97.74)

638/645 (98.91)

616/621 (99.19)

 

Victimized

20/47 (42.55)

2/14 (14.29)

7/24 (29.17)

Prevented from seeing [perpetrator’s] friends

747/801 (93.26)

584/656 (89.02)

625/650 (96.15)

 

Did not experience

738/753 (98.01)

538/570 (94.39)

616/622 (99.04)

 

Victimized

9/48 (18.75)

46/86 (53.49)

9/28 (32.14)

  1. *Counts may not add up to group totals due to missing data.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Walsh, A.R., Stephenson, R. Reporting of Intimate Partner Violence among Male Couples: Cross-Sectional and Serial Dyadic Concordance. J Fam Viol 38, 1325–1339 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00439-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00439-w

Keywords

Navigation