Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Defining success for survivors of domestic violence: Perspectives from survivors and service providers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Historically, most research looking to improve services for domestic violence (DV) survivors has been designed based on the existing state of services, rather than using direct input from survivors. Building on this research gap, this study seeks to understand what “success” looks like for a broader and diverse population of survivors and service providers. Specifically, this study explored how survivors of DV, and service providers define “success” for survivors of DV. The researchers purposefully chose to keep the definition of success vague to allow participants to define what success is for themselves. This methodology aligns with the field shifting toward a survivor centered lens. Research questions guiding the study were: (1) How do survivors of DV define success? (2) Do themes for survivor-defined success align with service provider-defined program success?

Methods

Interviews and focus groups were conducted with 53 DV survivors and 13 service providers in a Midwestern state. Our study was informed by the Appreciative Inquiry methodology. Data analysis was conducted using constant comparative analysis.

Results

Seven themes emerged from the data: (1) acknowledging the process, (2) safety, (3) recognizing abuse, (4) therapeutic outcomes, (5) identity, (6) healing, and (7) achievement. Our findings indicate that survivors and service providers agreed on the major themes that were discussed related to defining success for survivors.

Conclusion

These findings can inform programs and services of the outcomes that survivors find truly meaningful and explore how those align with current service provider expectations. The outcomes identified can also be used to develop measures that can assess the impact that programs have on survivors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beeble, M. L., Bybee, D., Sullivan, C. M., & Adams, A. E. (2009). Main, mediating, and moderating effects of social support on the well-being of survivors of intimate partner violence across 2 years. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(4), 718–729. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016140

  • Cattaneo, L. B., & Goodman, L. A. (2015). What is empowerment anyway? A model for domestic violence practice, research, and evaluation. Psychology of Violence, 5(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035137.

  • Cooperrider, D. L., & Suresh, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 1, 129–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePrince, A. N. & Gagnon, K. L. (2018). Understanding the consequences of sexual assault: What does it mean for prevention to be trauma informed?. In Orchowski, L.M., & Gidycz, C.A. (Eds.), Sexual assault risk reduction and resistance (pp. 15–35). Academic Press.

  • Emerson, R., Fretz, R., & Shaw, L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.

  • Flicker, S. M., Cerulli, C., Swogger, M. T., & Talbot, N. L. (2012). Depressive and posttraumatic symptoms among women seeking protection orders against intimate partners: Relations to coping strategies and perceived responses to abuse disclosure. Violence Against Women, 18(4), 420–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801212448897.

  • Fugate, M., Landis, L., Riordan, K., Naureckas, S., & Engel, B. (2005). Barriers to domestic violence help seeking: Implications for intervention. Violence Against Women, 77, 290–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L., & Epstein, D. (2005). Refocusing on women: A new direction for policy and research on intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(4), 479–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260504267838.

  • Goodman, L.A., Bennett Cattaneo, L.B., Thomas, K., Woulfe, J., Chong, S.K., & Smyth, K.F. (2014). Advancing domestic violence program evaluation: Development and validation of the Measure of Victim Empowerment Related to Safety (MOVERS). Psychology of Violence. http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038318.

  • Goodman, L. A., Thomas, K., Cattaneo, L. B., Heimel, D., Woulfe, J., & Chong, S. K. (2016). Survivor defined practice in domestic violence work: Measure development and preliminary evidence of link to empowerment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(1), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514555131.

  • Goodman, L. A., Epstein, D., & Sullivan, C. M. (2017). Beyond the RCT: Integrating rigor and relevance to evaluate the outcomes of domestic violence programs. American Journal of Evaluation, 39(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214017721008.

  • Hausman, A. J., Baker, C. N., Komaroff, E., Thomas, N., Geurra, T., Hohl, B. C., & Leff, S. S. (2013). Developing measures of community-relevant outcomes for violence prevention programs: A community-based participatory research approach to measurement. American Journal of Community Psychology, 52(3–4), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-013-9590-6.

  • Kulkarni, S., Herman-Smith, R., & Ross, T. C. (2015). Measuring intimate partner violence (IPV) service providers’ attitudes: The development of the survivor-defined advocacy scale (SDAS). Journal of Family Violence, 30(7), 911–921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-015-9719-5.

  • Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2008). Qualitative data analysis: A compendium of techniques and a framework for selection for school psychology research and beyond. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(4), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.23.4.587.

  • Liang, B., Goodman, L., Tummala-Narra, P., & Weintraub, S. (2005). A theoretical framework for understanding help-seeking processes among survivors of intimate partner violence. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36(1–2), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-005-6233-6.

  • Lipsky, S., Field, C. A., Caetano, R., & Larkin, G. L. (2005). Posttraumatic stress disorder symptomatology and comorbid depressive symptoms among abused women referred from emergency department care. Violence and Victims, 20(6), 645–659. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.20.6.645.

  • Lyon, E., Bradshaw, J., & Menard, A. (2012). Meeting survivors’ needs through non-residential domestic violence services & supports: Results of a multi-state study. National Institute of Justice. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/237328.pdf.

  • Melbin, A., Jordan, A., & Smith, K. F. (2014). How do survivors define success? A new project to address an overlooked question. The Full Frame Initiative. https://blueshieldcafoundation.org/sites/default/files/covers/How_Do_Survivors_Define_Success_FFI_Oct_2014_0.pdf.

  • Saleebey, D. (2006). The strengths perspective in social work practice. Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.

  • Sullivan, C.M. (2005). Interventions to address intimate partner violence: The current state of the field. In J.R. Lutzker (Ed.), Preventing violence: Research and evidence-based intervention strategies (pp. 195–212). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

  • Sullivan, C. M. (2006). Mission-focused management and survivor-centered services: A survival guide for executive directors of domestic violence victim service agencies. Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence.

  • Sullivan, C. M. (2011). Evaluating domestic violence support service programs: Waste of time, necessary evil, or opportunity for growth? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(4), 354–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.04.008.

  • Sullivan, C.M. (2012, updated January 2016). Examining the work of domestic violence programs within a “social and emotional well-being promotion” conceptual framework. National Resource Center on Domestic Violence. www.dvevidenceproject.org.

  • Vaughn, M. G., Salas-Wright, C. P., Cooper-Sadlo, S., Maynard, B. R., & Larson, M. (2015). Are immigrants more likely than native-born Americans to perpetrate intimate partner violence? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(11), 1888–1904. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514549053.

  • Westmarland, N., Kelly, L., & Chalder-Mills, J. (2010). Domestic violence perpetrator programmes: What counts as success? London Metropolitan University and Durham University. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/369591.

  • Whittemore, R., Chase, S.K., & Mandle, C.L. (2001). Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11(4), 522–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973201129119299.

  • Woods, S. J. (2005). Intimate partner violence and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in women: What we know and need to know. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(4), 394–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260504267882.

  • Zweig, J. M., & Burt, M. R. (2007). Predicting women’s perceptions of domestic violence and sexual assault agency helpfulness: What matters to program clients? Violence Against Women, 13(11), 1149–1178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801207307799.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cecilia Mengo.

Ethics declarations

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mengo, C., Casassa, K., Wolf, K.G. et al. Defining success for survivors of domestic violence: Perspectives from survivors and service providers. J Fam Viol 38, 463–476 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00394-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00394-6

Keywords

Navigation