Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Examining the Role of Child Protection Services in Domestic Violence Cases: Lessons Learned from Tragedies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Exposure to domestic violence (DV) reports account for a significant portion of child welfare cases. However, there is a lack of resources for specifically working with cases that present a high-risk for lethality. The present study examined the involvement of child protection services (CPS) prior to domestic homicide cases. A retrospective case analysis was conducted utilizing cases reviewed by a domestic violence death review committee in Ontario, Canada. The study also examined the recommendations made by the committee to the child welfare sector. Overall, less than one-quarter of the homicide cases with children in the family system had CPS involvement. There were no differences in the presence of CPS involvement in cases where children were killed compared to cases where children were not killed. CPS-involved cases had significantly more risk factors and the family was involved with significantly more agencies overall. Recommendations directed to the child welfare sector highlighted the need for enhanced ongoing service provision to promote safety and hold perpetrators accountable, specialized DV training, and increased cross-sector collaboration. The child protection sector plays a critical role in assessing and managing risk in DV cases and preventing tragedies. The findings stress the importance of multi-disciplinary collaborations, and specialized ongoing training in engaging perpetrators and managing risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alaggia, R., Jenney, A., Mazzuca, J., & Redmond, M. (2007). In whose best interest? A Canadian case study of the impact of child welfare policies in cases of domestic violence. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 7(4), 275–290.

  • Alaggia, R., Gadalla, T. M., Shlonsky, A., Jenney, A., & Daciuk, J. (2015). Does differential response make a difference: examining domestic violence cases in child protection services. Child and Family Social Work, 20, 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansara, D. L., & Hindin, M. J. (2010). Formal and informal help-seeking associated with women's and men’s experiences of intimate partner violence in Canada. Social Science & Medicine, 70(7), 1011–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bancroft, L., Silverman, J. G., & Ritchie, D. (2011). The batterer as parent: Addressing the impact of domestic violence on family dynamics. Sage Publications.

  • Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. (4th ed.): Boston, MA.

  • Bourassa, C., Lavergne, C., Damant, D., Lessard, G., & Turcotte, P. (2006). Awareness and detection of the co-occurrence of interparental violence and child abuse: child welfare worker’s perspective. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(11), 1312–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., & Tyson, D. (2012). An abominable crime: Filicide in the context of parental separation and divorce. Children Australia, 37(4), 151.

  • Bugeja, L., Dawson, M., McIntyre, S., & Walsh, C. (2015). Domestic/Family Violence Death Reviews: An international comparison. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 16, 179–187.

  • Caman, S., Howner, K., Kristiansson, M., & Sturup, J. (2016). Differentiating male and female intimate partner homicide perpetrators: a study of social, criminological and clinical factors. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 15(1), 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. C. (2004). Helping women understand their risk in situations of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(12), 1464–1477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Domestic Homicide Prevention Initiative. (2016). Canadian Domestic Homicide Prevention Initiative. http://www.cdhpi.ca.

  • Costin, L. B., Karger, H. J., & Stoesz, D. (1996). Child welfare. The politics of child abuse in America. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, M. L., & Mercado-Crespo, M. C. (2015). Co-occurrence of intimate partner violence and child maltreatment: service providers’ perceptions. Journal of Family Violence, 30(2), 255–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, M. (2001). An examination of declines in intimate partner homicide rates. Final Report. Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada.

  • Dawson, M. (2015). Canadian trends in filicide by gender of the accused, 1961–2011. Child Abuse & Neglect, 47, 162–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, M. (Ed.). (2017). Domestic homicides and death reviews: An international perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, M., Bunge, V., & Balde, T. (2009). National trends in intimate partner homicides: Explaining the decline, Canada, 1976-2001. Violence Against Women, 15(3), 276–306.

  • Douglas, H., & Walsh, T. (2010). Mothers, domestic violence, and child protection. Violence Against Women, 16, 489–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugan, L., Nagin, D. S., & Rosenfeld, R. (1999). Explaining the decline in intimate partner homicide: the effects of changing domesticity, women’s status, and domestic violence resources. Homicide Studies, 3, 187–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugan, L., Nagin, D. S., & Rosenfeld, R. (2003). Exposure reduction or retaliation? The effects of domestic violence resources on intimate-partner homicide. Law & Society Review, 37, 169–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edleson, J. L. (2004). Should childhood exposure to adult domestic violence be defined as child maltreatment under the law. Protecting children from domestic violence: Strategies for community intervention, 8-29.

  • Edleson, J. L., Ellerton, A. L., Seagren, E. A., Kirchberg, S. L., Schmidt, S. O., & Ambrose, A. T. (2007). Assessing child exposure to adult domestic violence. Children and Youth Services Review, 29(7), 961–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, C. P. (1997). Fatal families: The dynamics of intrafamilial homicide. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallon, B., & Van Wert, M. (2017). Subtypes of exposure to intimate partner violence investigated by child welfare authorities in Ontario in 2013. CWRP Information Sheet 185E. Toronto, ON: Canadian Child Welfare Research Portal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Famularo, R., Kinscherff, R., & Fenton, T. (1992). Parental substance abuse and the nature of child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 16(4), 475–483.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fantuzzo, J. W., & Fusco, R. A. (2007). Children’s direct exposure to types of domestic violence crime: a population-based investigation. Journal of Family Violence, 22(7), 543–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fantuzzo, J., DePaola, L. M., Lambert, L., Martino, T., Anderson, G., & Sutton, S. (1991). Effects of interparental violence on the psychological adjustment and competencies of young children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1991), 258–265.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fusco, R. A. (2013). “It’s hard enough to deal with all the abuse issues”: child welfare workers’ experiences with intimate partner violence on their caseloads. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(12), 1946–1953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L. H. A., Jaffe, P. G., & Campbell, M. (2013). Assessing children's risk for homicide in the context of domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 28(2), 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, S., Buckley, H., & Whelan, S. (2008). The impact of exposure to domestic violence on children and young people: A review of the literature. Child abuse & neglect, 32(8), 797–810.

  • Hughes, J., & Chau, S. (2013). Making complex decisions: child protection workers’ practices and interventions with families experiencing intimate partner violence. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(4), 611–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. (2012). A meta-study of filicide: Reconceptualizing child deaths by parents, Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Phoenix: Arizona State University.

  • Jaffe, P. G., & Juodis, M. (2006). Children as victims and witnesses of domestic homicide: Lessons learned from domestic violence death review committees. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 57(3), 13–28.

  • Jaffe, P. G., Campbell, M., Hamilton, L. H. A., & Juodis, M. (2012). Children in danger of domestic homicide. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36(1), 71–74.

  • Jaffe, P., Campbell, M., Reif, K., Fairbairn, J., & David, R. (2017). Children killed in the context of domestic violence: International perspectives from death review committees. In Domestic homicides and death reviews (pp. 317–343). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jenney, A., Mishna, F., Alaggia, R., & Scott, K. (2014). Doing the right thing? (re) considering risk assessment and safety planning in child protection work with domestic violence cases. Children and Youth Services Review, 47(1), 92–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kropp, P. R. (2008). Risk assessment and management of spousal assaulters and stalkers. In A. C. Baldry & F. W. Winkel (Eds.), Intimate partner violence prevention and intervention: The risk assessment and management approach. Hauppauge: Nova Science.

  • Lawrence, R. (2004). Understanding fatal assault of children: a typology and explanatory theory. Children and Youth Services Review, 26(9), 837–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessard, G., et al. (2010). Child custody issues and co-occurrence of intimate partner violence and child maltreatment: Controversies and points of agreement amongst practitioners. Child & Family Social Work, 15(4), 492–500.

  • Mandel, D. (2010). Child welfare and domestic violence: tackling the themes and thorny questions that stand in the way of collaboration and improvement of child welfare practice. Violence Against Women, 16(5), 530–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, L. G., Friend, C., Conroy, K., Fleck-Henderson, A., Krug, S., Magen, R. H., Thomas, R. L., & Trudeau, J. H. (2000). Child protection and domestic violence: training, practice, and policy issues. Children and Youth Services Review, 22(5), 315–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olszowy, L., Jaffe, P. G., Campbell, M., & Hamilton, L. H. A. (2013). Effectiveness of risk assessment tools in differentiating child homicides from other domestic homicide cases. Journal of Child Custody, 10(2), 185–206.

  • Ontario Domestic Violence Death Review Committee (DVDRC). (2019). Domestic violence death review committee 2018 annual report. Toronto: Office of the Chief Coroner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Ministry of Children and Youth Services. (2016). Ontario child protection tools manual: A companion to the Ontario child protection standards. Retrieved from Ministry of Children and Youth Services: http://www.children.gov.on.ca/htdocs/English/documents/childrensaid/Child-Protection-Tools-Manual-2016.pdf

  • Public Health Agency of Canada. (2010). Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect - 2008: Major Findings. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada.

  • Radford, L., Blacklock, N., & Iwi, K. (2006). Domestic violence risk assessment and safety planning in child protection – Assessing perpetrators. In C. Humphreys & N. Stanley (Eds.), Domestic violence and child protection: Directions for good practice (pp. 171–189). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

  • Reckdenwald, A. (2008). Examining changes in male and female intimate partner homicide over time, 1990–2000 (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Florida.

  • Rhodes, K. V., Cerulli, C., Dichter, M. E., Kothari, C. L., & Barg, F. K. (2010). “I didn’t want to put them through that”: the influence of children on victim decision-making in intimate partner violence cases. Journal of Family Violence., 25(5), 485–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shlonsky, A., & Friend, C. (2007). Double jeopardy: risk assessment in the context of child maltreatment and domestic violence. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 7(4), 253–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sillito, C. L., & Salari, S. (2011). Child outcomes and risk factors in U.S. homicide-suicide cases 1999–2004. Journal of Family Violence, 26(4), 285–297.

  • Stanley, N., & Humphreys, C. (2014). Multi-agency risk assessment and management for children and families experiencing domestic violence. Children and Youth Services Review, 47, 78–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, N., Miller, P., Richardson Foster, H., & Thomson, G. (2010). A stop–start response: social services’ interventions with children and families notified following domestic violence incidents. The British Journal of Social Work, 41(2), 296–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. (2015). Family violence in Canada: A statistical profile, 2013. Retrieved from Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/2016001/article/14303-eng.pdf.

  • Trocmé, N., Fallon, B., MacLaurin, B., & Neves, T. (2005). What is driving increasing child welfare caseloads in Ontario? Analysis of the 1993 and 1998 Ontario incidence studies. Child Welfare, 84(3), 341–362.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • zWathen, C. N., & MacMillan, H. L. (2013). Children's exposure to intimate partner violence: Impacts and interventions. Paediatrics & Child Health, 18(8), 419–422.

  • Websdale, N. (1999). Understanding domestic homicide. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Websdale, N. (2003). Reviewing domestic violence deaths. National Institute of Justice Journal, 250, 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, S., Buchanan, F., & Moulding, N. (2015). Mothering and domestic violence: Situating maternal protectiveness in gender. Affilia Journal of Women and Social World, 30(4), 533–545.

  • Wolfe, D. A., Crooks, C. V., Lee, V., McIntyre-Smith, A., & Jaffe, P. G. (2003). The effects of children's exposure to domestic violence: A meta-analysis and critique. Clinical child and family psychology review, 6(3), 171–187.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the Office of the Chief Coroner of Ontario and the Ontario Domestic Violence Death Review Committee for their work and support for the data contained in this research article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Olszowy.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Olszowy, L., Jaffe, P. & Saxton, M. Examining the Role of Child Protection Services in Domestic Violence Cases: Lessons Learned from Tragedies. J Fam Viol 36, 927–939 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00171-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00171-3

Keywords

Navigation