Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Psychometric Analyses of Stalking Measures from the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the psychometric properties of stalking victimization and related fear-based measures in the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS) to better understand the ability of these items to produce valid estimates and comparisons across gender groups. This analysis used data from 9086 women and 7421 men in the 2010 NISVS conducted by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Descriptive, reliability, and dimensionality statistics were examined for seven measures of stalking behaviors and four indicators of fear. The structure of each measure was then examined using item response theory-based methods. Results showed that the NISVS measures were effective at capturing information for a broad range of stalking victimization and fear levels. Item difficulties did vary by gender, particularly for the fear indicators. Some items were more difficult for men, while others were more difficult for women. In the end, differences canceled each other out, and no meaningful gender differences were found. The measures performed identically for women and men. This study provides confidence in our ability to use the NISVS questions to estimate the prevalence of stalking across gender groups. Results have important implications for selecting stalking behaviors and fear indicators to measure stalking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Black, M. C., Basile, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T., Chen, J., & Stevens, M. R. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2017). Notes on measurement theory for causal-formative indicators: A reply to Hardin. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 605–608. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000149.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, P. Q., Nobles, M. R., & Bouffard, L. A. (2017). Are college students really at a higher risk for stalking?: Exploring the generalizability of student samples in victimization research. Journal of Criminal Justice, 52, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.07.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Basile, K. C., Walters, M. L., Chen, J., & Merrick, M. T. (2014). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization--national intimate partner and sexual violence survey, United States, 2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Surveillance Summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002), 63(8), 1–18.

  • Buhi, E. R., Clayton, H., & Surrency, H. H. (2009). Stalking victimization among college women and subsequent help-seeking behaviors. Journal of American College Health, 57(4), 419–425. https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.57.4.419-426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2017). National Crime Victimization Survey, 2016: Technical Documentation (NCJ 251442). Washington, D.C.: Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cass, A. I. (2011). Defining stalking: The influence of legal factors, extralegal factors, and particular actions on judgments of college students. Western Criminology Review, 12(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cass, A. I., & Mallicoat, S. L. (2015). College student perceptions of victim action: Will targets of stalking report to police? American Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(2), 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-014-9252-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cass, A. I., & Rosay, A. B. (2012). College student perceptions of criminal justice system responses to stalking. Sex Roles, 66(5–6), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9934-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catalano, S. (2012). Stalking victimization in the United States – Revised. Department of Justice: Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. U.S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, R. P. (2012). Mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i06.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. E., Swan, S. C., & Gambone, L. J. (2012). Why doesn’t he just leave me alone? Persistent pursuit: A critical review of theories and evidence. Sex Roles, 66(5–6), 328–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9882-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, N. A., & Martin, P. Y. (2007). Women who are stalked: Questioning the fear standard. Violence Against Women, 13(7), 750–776. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801207302698.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists (multivariate applications books series). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falissard, B. (2012). psy: Various procedures used in psychometry. R package version 1.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psy

  • Fox, K. A., Nobles, M. R., & Piquero, A. R. (2009). Gender, crime victimization and fear of crime. Security Journal, 22(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2008.13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, K. A., Nobles, M. R., & Fisher, B. S. (2011). Method behind the madness: An examination of stalking measurements. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2010.12.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., & Su, Y. (2016). Arm: Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. R package version 1.9–3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=arm

  • Gu, G., & Lee, S. H. (2016). Childhood abuse experience and perception of stalking predict courtship stalking behaviors among college students. International Information Institute (Tokyo). Information, 19(12), 5879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J., & Rich, H. (2015). Partner covictimization and post-breakup stalking, pursuit, and violence: A retrospective study of college women. Journal of Family Violence, 30(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-014-9665-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz-Wise, S. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2012). Victimization experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sex Research, 49(2–3), 142–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.637247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, E. G., Geistman, J., Smith, B., Cluse-Tolar, T., & Jiang, S. (2013). Do men and women differ in their perceptions of stalking: An exploratory study among college students. Violence and Victims, 28(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.09-201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langenderfer-Magruder, L., Walls, N. E., Whitfield, D. L., Kattari, S. K., & Ramos, D. (2017). Stalking victimization in LGBTQ adults: A brief report. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517696871.

  • Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2012). Gender and stalking: Current intersections and future directions. Sex Roles, 66(5–6), 418–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0093-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyndon, A. E., Sinclair, H. C., MacArthur, J., Fay, B., Ratajack, E., & Collier, K. E. (2012). An introduction to issues of gender in stalking research. Sex Roles, 66(5–6), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0106-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, C. L., & Marsil, D. F. (2012). The prevalence of stalking among college students: The disparity between researcher- and self-identified victimization. Journal of American College Health, 60(2), 168–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2011.584335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ménard, K. S., & Pincus, A. L. (2012). Predicting overt and cyber stalking perpetration by male and female college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(11), 2183–2207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260511432144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ménard, K. S., & Pincus, A. L. (2014). Child maltreatment, personality pathology, and stalking victimization among male and female college students. Violence and Victims, 29(2), 300–316. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-12-00098r1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, R. K., Nelson, D. B., & Forke, C. M. (2016). Occurrence of stalking victimization among female and male undergraduate students. Journal of College Student Development, 57(2), 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2016.0015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterlind, S. J., & Everson, H. T. (2009). Differential item functioning (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, J. G. (2016). Why definitions matter. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(12), 2196–2226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128715615883.

  • Owens, J. G. (2017). A gender-biased definition: Unintended impacts of the fear requirement in stalking victimization. Crime & Delinquency, 63(11), 1339–1362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128715615883.

  • Patton, C. L., Nobles, M. R., & Fox, K. A. (2010). Look who’s stalking: Obsessive pursuit and attachment theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(3), 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.02.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyns, B. W., Henson, B., & Fisher, B. S. (2012). Stalking in the twilight zone: Extent of cyberstalking victimization and offending among college students. Deviant Behavior, 33(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2010.538364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosay, A. B. (2016a). Documentation for analysis of violence against American Indian and Alaska Native women and men – 2010 findings from the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS) by the National Institute of Justice (NCJ 250087). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

  • Rosay, A. B. (2016b). Violence against American Indian and Alaska Native women and men: 2010 findings from the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university consortium for political and social research [distributor]. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36140.v1.

  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J. A., Huebner, B. M., & Bynum, T. S. (2006). Fear of crime and criminal victimization: Gender-based contrasts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34(3), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. H., & Cooper, D. L. (2011). Campus stalking: Theoretical implications and responses. College Student Affairs Journal, 29(2), 165–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, L. P., Scott, A. J., & Campbell, A. M. (2016). Perceptions and experiences of intrusive behavior and stalking. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(7), 1388–1409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516651313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shorey, R. C., Cornelius, T. L., & Strauss, C. (2015). Stalking in college student dating relationships: A descriptive investigation. Journal of Family Violence, 30(7), 935–942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-015-9717-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. G., Chen, J., Basile, K. C., Gilbert, L. K., Merrick, M. T., Patel, N., Walling, M., & Jain, A. (2017). The National Intimate Partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010–2012 state report. Atlanta: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. G., Zhang, X., Basile, K. C., Merrick, M. T., Wang, J., Kresnow, M., & Chen, J. (2018). The National Intimate Partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2015 data brief – Updated release. Atlanta: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey (NCJ 181867). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Truman, J. L., & Mustaine, E. E. (2009). Strategies for college student stalking victims: Examining the information and recommendations available. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 34(1–2), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-008-9051-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Health, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, Alaska, USA

    André B. Rosay

  2. Orlando, USA

    Bethany L. Backes & Alex Wang

Authors
  1. André B. Rosay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bethany L. Backes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alex Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André B. Rosay.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rosay, A.B., Backes, B.L. & Wang, A. Psychometric Analyses of Stalking Measures from the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey. J Fam Viol 35, 717–728 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-019-00121-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-019-00121-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation