Abstract
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global health concern. Given the complexity of the act of violence coupled with the difficulty of stabilizing the perpetrator and victim, assessment and intervention continue to be substandard. The Duluth Model is the predominant intervention for perpetrators of IPV; however, it continues to be controversial and has received significant criticism due to its narrow scope. The objective of this article is to identify the components of the Duluth Model and compare to the advances in behavioral sciences in order to implement a change in treatment for perpetrators of IPV.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen-Collinson, J. (2009). A marked man: female-perpetrated intimate partner abuse. International Journal of Men’s Health, 8(1), 22–40. doi:10.3149/jmh.0801.22.
Barber, C. (2008). Domestic violence against men. Nursing Standard, 22(51), 35–39.
Barnett, O. W., Miller-Perrin, C. L., & Perrin, R. D. (2011). Family violence across the lifespan: An introduction (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Breiding, M. J., Basile, K. C., Smith, S. G., Black, M. C., & Mahendra, R. (2015). Intimate partner violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements. Atlanta: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Burge, S. K., Katerndahl, D. A., Wood, R. C., Becho, J., Ferrer, R. L., & Talamantes, M. (2015). Using complexity science to examine three dynamic patterns of intimate partner violence. Families, Systems & Health: The Journal of Collaborative Family Healthcare, 34(1), 4–14. doi:10.1037/fsh0000170.
Corvo, K., Dutton, D., & Chen, W. (2009). Do Duluth model interventions with perpetrators of domestic violence violate mental health professional ethics? Ethics & Behavior, 19(4), 323–340. doi:10.1080/10508420903035323.
Desmarais, S., Reeves, K., Nicholls, T., Telford, R., & Fiebert, M. (2012). Prevalence of physical violence in intimate relationships, Pt. 1: rates of male and female victimization. Partner Abuse, 3(2), 140–169. doi:10.1891/1946-6560.3.2.140.
Herman, K., Rotunda, R., Williamson, G., & Vodanovich, S. (2014). Outcomes from a Duluth model batterer intervention program at completion and long term follow-up. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 53(1), 1–18. doi:10.1080/10509674.2013.861316.
Kelly, J. B., & Johnson, M. P. (2008). Differentiation among types of intimate partner violence: research update and implications for intervention. Family Court Review, 46(3), 476–499. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00215.x.
Kropp, P. R., & Cook, A. N. (2014). Intimate partner violence, stalking, and femicide. In J. R. Meloy & J. Hoffmann (Eds.), International handbook of threat assessment (pp. 179–194). New York: Oxford University Press.
Mankowski, E. S., Haaken, J., & Silvergleid, C. S. (2002). Collateral damage: an analysis of the achievements and unintended consequences of batterer intervention programs and discourse. Journal of Family Violence, 17(2), 167–184. doi:10.1023/A:1015061517888.
Megargee, E. (1982). Psychological determinants and correlates of criminal violence. In M. Wolfgang & N. Weiner (Eds.), Criminal violence (pp. 81–170). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Meloy, J. R. (1988). The Psychopathic mind: Origins, dynamics, and treatment. Northvale: Jason Aronson.
Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. New York: Springer Publishing Company, Inc.
Pender, R. L. (2012). ASGW best practice guidelines: an evaluation of the Duluth model. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 37(3), 218–231. doi:10.1080/01933922.2011.632813.
Schrock, D. P., & Padavic, I. (2007). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity in a batterer intervention program. Gender & Society, 21(5), 625–649. doi:10.1177/0891243207304975.
Shuler, C. A. (2010). Male victims of intimate partner violence in the United States: an examination of the review of literature through the critical theoretical perspective. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 5(1), 163–173.
Stover, C. S., Meadows, A. L., & Kaufman, J. (2009). Interventions for intimate partner violence: review and implications for evidence-based practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(3), 223–233. doi:10.1037/a0012718.
World Health Organization. (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: Prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva: Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bohall, G., Bautista, MJ. & Musson, S. Intimate Partner Violence and the Duluth Model: An Examination of the Model and Recommendations for Future Research and Practice. J Fam Viol 31, 1029–1033 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9888-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9888-x