Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Interprofessional Education in Psychology Doctoral Programs, Internships, and Postdoctoral Training: A Survey of Training Directors

  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 26 July 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Interprofessional Education (IPE) is intended to prepare health professionals for teambased care. Little is known about IPE offerings for psychology trainees. The article reports on a survey of training directors (263) from graduate school, internship, and fellowship programs about IPE in a 39-item survey. Most programs have IPE activities across 17 types (e.g., classroom didactics, IP team care, Grand Rounds, simulations, etc.), though 34% reported no or poorly coordinated IPE. Barriers included limited funding/protected time and conflicting student schedules. Resources needed for implementing IPE included incorporating IPE into clinical settings, curricular materials, and evaluation tools. Only 15% felt institutional leadership considered IPE a high priority. Training directors need leadership engagement and support, protected time, and administrative support as well as faculty development for event design and facilitation skills. This study is an exploratory first step, more granular investigation of quality and quantity of IPE from training directors’ perspectives is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  • American Psychological Association. (1996). Guidelines and principles for accreditation programs in professional psychology (G & P). American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (2015). Standards of accreditation for health service psychology. Retrieved from http://apps.apa.org/AccredComment/attachments/Standards%20for%20Web.pdf

  • Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. (2017). 2017 ASPPB competencies expected of psychologists at the point of licensure. Retrieved January 19, 2020, from https://www.asppb.net/page/EPPPPart2-Skills

  • Belar, C. D. (2016). Interprofessional education and training. In J. C. Norcross, G. R. VandenBos, D. K. Freedheim, & L. F. Campbell (Eds.), APA handbook of clinical psychology: Education and profession (pp. 153–160). American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bodenheimer, T., & Sinsky, C. (2014). From triple to quadruple aim: Care of the patient requires care of the provider. Annals of Family Medicine, 12(6), 573–576. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1713

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, B. F. (March 2015). Interprofessional education and collaborative practice: Welcome to the “new” forty-year old field. The Advisor, 9–17.

  • Heath, O., & Holmqvist, M. (2017). Developing interprofessional competencies in psychology: A practical guide. Momentum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmqvist, M., Button, P., & Heath, O. (2019). Together we stand: The imperative for interprofessional education in professional psychology training. Canadian Psychology, 60, 255–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine. (1999). To err is human. National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/books/0309068371/html/

  • Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/books/0309072808/html

  • Institute of Medicine. (2015). Measuring the impact of interprofessional education on collaborative practice and patient outcomes. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/21726

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel. (2011). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: Report of an expert panel. Interprofessional Education Collaborative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel. (2016). Core competencies for Interprofessional collaborative practice: 2016 update. Washington D.C.: Interprofessional Education Collaborative.

  • Lamparyk, K., Williams, A. M., Robiner, W. N., Bruschwein, H. M., & Ward, W. L. (under review). Interprofessional education: Current state of psychology training.

  • Mikail, S. F., & Nicholson, I. R. (2019). The National Summit on the Future of Professional Psychology Training: Overview and recommendations. Canadian Psychology, 60(4), 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, T. Y., Bruschwein, H. M., & Ward, W. L. (under review). Interprofessional education: Psychology trainee experiences and perspectives on team skills. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Pearson Vue. (November, 2016). Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards Examination for Professional Practice in Psychology (EPPP) Job Task Analysis Report. Retrieved January 19, 2020, from https://www.asppb.net/page/EPPPPart2-Skills

  • Remington, T. L., Foulk, M. A., & Williams, B. C. (2006). Evaluation of evidence for Interprofessional education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 70, 66. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj700366

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Robiner, W. N. (2006). The mental health professions: Workforce Issues and challenges. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(5), 600–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2006.05.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rozensky, R. H., Grus, C. J., Goodie, J. L., Bonin, L., Carpenter, B. D., Miller, B. F., & McDaniel, S. H. (2018). A curriculum for an interprofessional seminar on integrated primary care: Developing competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice. Journal of Allied Health, 47(3), 61E-66E.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M., Blue, A., Aschenbrener, C. A., & Viggiano, T. R. (2011). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: Reforming health care by transforming health professionals’ education. Academic Medicine, 86(11), 1351. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182308e39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, W., Kirkpatrick, H., Zagoloff, A., Kessler, R., Robiner, W. N., & Rieck, C. (March 11, 2017). Interprofessional education: Sharing successes & lessons learned. In Presented at the 8th National Conference of the Association of Psychologists in Academic Health Centers, Detroit, MI.

  • Ward, W., Zagoloff, A., Rieck, C., & Robiner, W. (2018). Interprofessional education: Opportunities and challenges for psychology. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 25(3), 250–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-017-9538-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, M., & Kennedy, R. (2017). Interprofessional health sciences education: It’s time to overcome barriers and excuses. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 32(8), 858–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4069-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Retrieved from: https://www.who.int/hrh/resources/framework_action/en/

Download references

Funding

The authors have no funding for the project summarized in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wendy L. Ward.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Elizabeth Kalb, William N. Robiner, Heather Bruschwein, Amy Seay, Catherine Grus, and Wendy L. Ward have no disclosures to report.

Human and animal rights

This project was deemed not human subjects research by the corresponding author’s Institutional Review Board since no protected health information or personal identifying information was obtained.

Informed consent

Written informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Public Significance Statements

Interprofessional education is increasingly recognized as a means of preparing health professionals, including psychologists, to collaborate in team-based healthcare. Health professional training institutions are ramping up IPE activities to maximize their trainees’ readiness to function in collaborative care activities. It is important to better understand the scope and diversity of IPE activities for psychology trainees to ensure that the profession keeps pace with other health professions, to identify best practices for IPE within the psychology education and training paradigm, and to help programs recognize and surmount barriers to IPE.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalb, E., Robiner, W.N., Bruschwein, H. et al. Interprofessional Education in Psychology Doctoral Programs, Internships, and Postdoctoral Training: A Survey of Training Directors. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 30, 469–480 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-023-09968-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-023-09968-y

Keywords

Navigation