Skip to main content
Log in

Acceptability of the Stepped Care Model of Depression Treatment in Primary Care Patients and Providers

  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Primary care has become the first and only point of contact for a majority of individuals experiencing depressive symptoms. One alternative model of care that has been adopted in international primary care settings as an alternative to standard care is the stepped care model. Emerging evidence suggests that the stepped care model is at least as effective as standard care for depression; however, little is known about attitudes of patients and providers regarding this model, especially within the US. The current study utilized a cross-sectional survey to inquire about general attitudes towards the stepped care model, the individual steps, and the treatments offered within each step. We also examined the step that participants would prefer if prescribing or seeking help and the strength of those preferences. Descriptive and inferential statistics indicated that participants view the stepped care model as an acceptable form of treatment for depression and it is an improvement upon standard care. Results also indicated that our patient sample generally preferred self-help interventions over other treatment options, while most of our provider sample would prefer to treat patients in a manner consistent with the stepped care model. These results highlight the importance of collaboration and assessing preferences for treatment choices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boschen, M. J. (2009). Mobile telephones and psychotherapy: I capability and applicability. Research Forum: The Behavior Therapist, 32, 168–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broten, L. A., Naugle, A. E., Kalata, A. H., & Gaynor, S. T. (2011). Depression and a stepped care model. In W. T. O’Donohue & C. Draper (Eds.), Stepped care and e-health. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L. A., Gonzales, J. J., Gallo, J. J., Rost, K. M., Meredith, L. S., & Rubenstein, L. V., ...., & Ford, D. E. (2003). The acceptability of treatment for depression among African-American, hispanic, and white primary care patients. Medical Care, 41, 479–489.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, K. W., Rieckmann, N., Clemow, L., Schwartz, J. E., Shimbo, D., Medina, V., ...., & Burg, M. M. (2010). Enhanced depression care for patients with acute coronary syndrome and persistent depressive symptoms: Coronary psychosocial evaluation studies randomized controlled trial. Archives of Internal Medicine, 170, 600–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H., Soderlund, T., Cole, J., Gadol, E., Kute, M., Myers, M., & Weihing, J. (2004). Cognitions associated with attempts to empathize: How do we imagine the perspective of another? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1625–1635. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dwight-Johnson, M., Meredith, L. S., Hickey, S. C., & Wells, K. B. (2006). Influence of patient preference and primary care clinician proclivity for watchful waiting on receipt of depression treatment. General Hospital Psychiatry, 28, 379–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwight-Johnson, M., Sherbourne, C. D., Liao, D., & Wells, K. B. (2000). Treatment preferences among depressed primary care patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 15, 527–534.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ell, K., Xie, B., Kapetanovic, S., Quinn, D. I., Lee, P. J., Wells, A., & Chou, C. P. (2011). One-year follow-up of collaborative depression care for low-income, predominantly Hispanic patients with cancer. Psychiatric Services, 62, 162–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firth, N., Barkham, M., & Kellett, S. (2015). The clinical effectiveness of stepped care systems for depression in working age adults: A systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 170, 119–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franx, G., Oud, M., de Lange, J., Wensing, M., & Grol, R. (2012). Implementing a stepped care approach in primary care: Results of a qualitative study. Implementation Science, 7, 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Givens, J. L., Houston, T. K., Van Voorhees, B. W., Ford, D. E., & Cooper, L. A. (2007). Ethnicity and preferences for depression treatment. General Hospital Psychiatry, 29, 182–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, F. Y., Yeung, W., Ng, T. H., & Chan, C. S. (2016). The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of stepped care prevention and treatment for depressive and/or anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports (Nature Publisher Group), 6, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaycox, L. H., Asarnow, J. R., Sherbourne, C. D., Rea, M. M., LaBorde, A. P., & Wells, K. B. (2006). Adolescent primary care patients’ preferences for depression treatment. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 33, 198–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katon, W., Von Korff, M., Lin, E., Simon, G., Walker, E., & Unützer, J., ..., Ludman, E. (1999). Stepped collaborative care for primary care patients with persistent symptoms of depression: A randomized trial. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 1109–1115..

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R., & Stafford, D. (2008). Primary care is the de facto mental health system. In R. Kessler & D. Stafford (Eds.), Collaborative medicine case studies: Evidence in practice. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, B. M., Dimidjian, S., Rizvi, S. L. (2010). Treatment preference, engagement, and clinical improvement in pharmacotherapy versus psychotherapy for depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 799–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2010.04.003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C., Chaney, L. & Heagerty, F. H. (2005). The influence of patient preference on depression treatment in primary care. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 30, 164–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, S. C., & Olfson, M. (2010). National trends in the treatment for depression from 1998 to 2007. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67, 1265–1273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, R. K., Whitton, S. W., Peckham, A. D., Welge, J. A., & Otto, M. W. (2013). Patient preference for psychological vs. pharmacological treatment of psychiatric disorders: A meta-analytic review. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 74, 595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Mental Health. (2015). Depression (NIH Publication No. 15-3561). Bethesda: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, W. C., Strine, T. W., Pratt, L. A., Thompson, W., Ahluwalia, I., Dhingra, S. S., McKnight-Eily, L. R., Harrison, L., D’Angelo, D. V., Williams, L., Morrow, B., Gould, D., & Safran, M. A. (2011). Mental illness surveillance among adults in the United States. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report CDC Surveillance Summaries, 60, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sansone, R.A., & Sansone, L.A. (2012). Antidepressant adherence: Are patients taking their medications? Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience, 9, 41–46.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Scholle, S. H., Haskett, R. F., Hanusa, B. H., Pincus, H. A., & Kupfer, D. J. (2003). Addressing depression in obstetrics/gynecology practice. General Hospital Psychiatry, 25, 83–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scogin, F. R., Hanson, A., & Welsh, D. (2003). Self-administered treatment in stepped care models of depression treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59, 341–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, Z. V., Williams, M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2001). Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy For Depression: A new approach to preventing relapse, first edition. New York: Guilford Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, J. K. & Callahan, J. L. (2009). The impact of client treatment preferences on outcome: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65, 368–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swift, & Greenberg (2015). Incorporate preferences into the treatment decision-making process. In Premature termination in psychotherapy: Strategies for engaging clients and improving outcomes (pp. 79–92). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trangle, M., Gursky, J., Haight, R., Hardwig, J., Hinnenkamp, T., Kessler, D., Mack, N., & Myszkowski, M. (2016). Adult depression in primary care. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement: Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, D. J., Klijn, A. F., van Hout, H. P., van Marwijk, H. W., Beekman, A. T., & de Haan, M. (2004). Patients’ preferences in the treatment of depressive disorder in primary care. General Hospital Psychiatry, 26, 184–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Straten, A., Hill, J., Richards, D. A., & Cuijpers, P. (2015). Stepped care treatment delivery for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 45, 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Straten, A., Seekles, W., van’t Veer-Tazelaar, N. J., Beekman, A. T., & Cuijpers, P. (2010). Stepped care for depression in primary care: What should be offered and how? Medical Journal of Australia, 192, S36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van’t Veer-Tazelaar, P., Smit, F., van Hout, H., van Oppen, P., van der Horst, H., Beekman, A., & van Marwijk, H. (2010). Cost-effectiveness of a stepped care intervention to prevent depression and anxiety in late life: Randomised trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 196, 319–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • y Garcia, E. F., Franks, P., Jerant, A., Bell, R. A., & Kravitz, R. L. (2011). Depression treatment preferences of hispanic individuals: Exploring the influence of ethnicity, language, and explanatory models. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 24, 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jim A. Haugh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors Jim A. Haugh, Krista Herbert, Seo Choi, Joanna Petrides, Meagan Vermeulen, and Juliana D’Onofrio declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haugh, J.A., Herbert, K., Choi, S. et al. Acceptability of the Stepped Care Model of Depression Treatment in Primary Care Patients and Providers. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 26, 402–410 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-019-09599-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-019-09599-2

Keywords

Navigation