Skip to main content
Log in

Two-Track Differentiation Paradigm in Psychotherapy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the Two-Track Differentiation Paradigm, an updated therapeutic methodology within psychotherapy. The Two-Track Differentiation Paradigm is based on the assumption that patients habitually regard their problems as one-dimensional and thus tend to become rigid in their attitudes toward these problems. The paradigm suggests a psychotherapeutic process of enriched reframing called Differentiation. This Differentiation between patients’ negative and positive narratives and perceptions offers them more options and frees them to contend with their problems more effectively. Thus, with the Two-Track Differentiation Paradigm, cases of impasse and stuck psychotherapeutic situations are turned into cases of cooperation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck, A. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond (2nd ed., pp. 19–20). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Shazer, S. (1988). Clues: Investigating solutions in brief therapy. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1984). Meditations on first philosophy. In The philosophical writings of René Descartes in 1641 (Vol. 2, pp. 1–62) (J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Efran, J., Lukens, R., & Lukens, M. (1988). Constructivism: What’s in it for you? Family Therapy Networker, 12, 26–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, C. (1990). Handbook of hypnotic suggestions and metaphors. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaber, E., Trilling, F., & Kelso, E. B. (1997). The circle of change: An approach to difficult clinical interactions. Families, Systems & Health, 15, 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaffman, M. (1981). Monoideism in psychiatry: Theoretical and clinical implications. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 35(2), 235–243.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, D. (1988). Polarities and unity in human existence, an interdisciplinary perspective. Jerusalem: Carmel Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manicavasagar, V., Perichet, T., & Gordon, P. (2012). Cognitive predictors of change in cognitive behaviour therapy and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 40(2), 227–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson, J., & Konichezy, A. (2009). Out-of-illness experience: Hypnotically induced dissociation as a therapeutic resource in treating people with obstinate mental disorders. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 63(2), 133–146.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S., & Fishman, H. C. (1981). Family therapy techniques. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navon, S. (2005a). The illness/non-illness treatment model: Psychotherapy for physically ill patients and their families. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 33, 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navon, S. (2005b). Listening to Illness/Non-Illness motifs: A case of fibromyalgia. Families Systems & Health, 23, 358–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navon, S. (2014). The Illness/Non-Illness model: Hypnotherapy for physically III patients. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57(1), 68–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Navon, S. (2015). The dual-dialectical conceptualization in psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 69(1), 53–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Navon, S. (2016). The dual-dialectical conceptualization: A case of Crohn’s disease. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 26(4), 347–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omer, H. (1994). Critical interventions in psychotherapy: From impasse to turning point. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, F. (1996). Aristotle & Lukasiewicz on the principle of contradiction. Ames, IA: Modern Logic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P. (1978). The language of change. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waxman, D. (2005). Don’t just do something, stand there. Families Systems & Health, 23, 362–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaul Navon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Navon, S., Meyerson, J. & Lahav, Y. Two-Track Differentiation Paradigm in Psychotherapy. J Contemp Psychother 48, 27–32 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-017-9368-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-017-9368-5

Keywords

Navigation