Skip to main content
Log in

Sugammadex at both high and low doses does not affect the depth of anesthesia or hemodynamics: a randomized double blind trial

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that sugammadex decreases the anesthetic depth when administered to reverse the neuromuscular blockade produced by rocuronium/vecuronium. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of sugammadex alone on anesthetic depth and hemodynamics. Sixty patients scheduled for abdominal surgery participated in the study. Anesthesia was induced with thiopental/fentanyl and maintained with N2O/oxygen and sevoflurane concentrations adjusted to maintain Entropy and Bispectral Index (BIS) values between 40 and 50. Cis-atracurium 0.2 mg/kg was administered for neuromuscular blockade which was monitored with a TOF-Watch® SX acceleromyograph. State entropy (SE), response entropy (RE), Bispectral Index (BIS), systolic (SAP) and diastolic blood pressure (DAP), heart rate (HR), SpO2, end-tidal CO2 and sevoflurane concentrations were recorded every 3 min intraoperatively. Sugammadex 2 mg/kg (Group-2), 4 mg/kg (Group-4) or 16 mg/kg (Group-16) was given intravenously when a count of two responses of the train-of-four (TOF) or a post-tetanic count (PTC) 1-3 appeared or when no response at all (PTC = 0) was observed, respectively. The overall SE values, thus the primary outcome of the study, were 44 ± 11, 43 ± 10 and 43 ± 11 for Group-2, Group-4 and Group-16, respectively (p = 0.812). Also, the secondary endpoints, namely RE, BIS, SAP and DAP, HR and SpO2 did not differ between the three groups. Comparisons between Group-2 versus Group-4, Group-2 versus Group-16 and Group-4 versus Group-16 showed no differences (p > 0.05) for all the studied variables. Sugammadex alone at low, medium or high clinical doses has no effect on anesthetic depth as assessed by Entropy and BIS or on hemodynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jones RK, Caldwell JE, Brull SJ, Soto RG. Reversal of profound rocuronium-induced blockade with sugammadex. Anesthesiology. 2008;109:816–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aho AJ, Kamata K, Yli-Hankala A, Lyytikainen L-P, Kulkas A, Jantti V. Elevated BIS and Entropy values after sugammadex or neostigmine: an electroencephalographic or electromyographic phenomenon? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56:465–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dahaba AA, Bornemann H, Hopfgartner E, Ohran M, Kocher K, Liebmann M, Wilfinger G, Metzler H. Effect of sugammadex or neostigmine neuromuscular block reversal on bispectral index monitoring of propofol/remifentanil anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:602–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sparr HJ, Vermeyen KM, Beaufort AM, Rietbergen H, Proost JH, Saldien V, Velik-Salchner C, Wierda JMKH. Early reversal of profound rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex in a randomized multicenter study efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Anesthesiology. 2007;106:935–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Forbes AR, Cohen NH, Eger EI. Pancuronium reduces halothane requirement in man. Anesth Analg. 1979;58:497–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lanier WL, Iaizzo PA, Milde JH, Sharbrough FW. The cerebral and systemic effects of movement in response to a noxious stimulus in lightly anesthetized dogs. Possible modulation of cerebral function by muscle afferents. Anesthesiology. 1994;80:392–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Illman H, Antila H, Olkkola KT. Reversal of neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex does not affect EEG derived indices of depth of anesthesia. J Clin Monit Comput. 2010;24:371–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dahl V, Pendeville PE, Hollmann MW, Heier T, Abels EA, Blobner M. Safety and efficacy of sugammadex for the reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in cardiac (heart failure) patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009;26:874–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cammu G, Coart D, De Graeve K, Beelen R. Reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block with sugammadex in heart failure patients: a prospective observational study. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2012;63:69–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Musizza B, Ribaric S. Monitoring the depth of anaesthesia. Sensors. 2010;10:10896–935.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Vasella FC, Frascarolo P, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. Antagonism of neuromuscular blockade but not muscle relaxation affects depth of anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94:742–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ekman A, Fink R, Eriksson L, Brudin L, Sandin R, Sundman E. Neuromuscular block and the electroencephalogram during sevofurane anaesthesia. NeuroReport. 2007;18:1817–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Greif R, Greenwald S, Schweitzer E, Laciny S, Rajek A, Caldwell JE, Sessler DI. Muscle relaxation does not alter hypnotic level during propofol anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:604–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mrs. Aikaterini Dimitriou for helping in the statistical analysis of the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Argyro Fassoulaki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Registration: ClinTrials.gov NCT01301261.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fassoulaki, A., Chondrogiannis, K. & Staikou, C. Sugammadex at both high and low doses does not affect the depth of anesthesia or hemodynamics: a randomized double blind trial. J Clin Monit Comput 31, 297–302 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-016-9844-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-016-9844-6

Keywords

Navigation