Skip to main content
Log in

Intraoperative auditory evoked potential recordings are more reliable at signal detection from different sensor sites on the forehead compared to bispectral index

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bispectral index (BIS) and auditory evoked potential (AEP) monitoring require the attachment of forehead sensors, posing difficulties when the surgical field involves the forehead. This study analyzed the relationship between BIS values and AEP indices from different sites on the head to establish alternative sensor locations for AEP recording. Thirty patients scheduled for elective surgery under sevoflurane anesthesia were randomly assigned to the forehead, nose or mandible groups (n = 10 patients per group). AEP sensors were placed at the assigned position for each group and BIS sensors were placed on the forehead. BIS value and AEP index were simultaneously recorded from induction until emergence from general anesthesia. Relationships between BIS values and AEP indices were analyzed using a regression method and compared between groups using Pearson’s correlation coefficients. Square regression models better expressed the relationships than linear models in all groups. The z-transformed coefficient in the forehead group was the same as the nose group (p = 0.24) and significantly different in the mandible group (p = 0.0046). These findings suggest that AEPs can be accurately recorded from sensors placed on the nose. Nasal AEP might be useful for monitoring electrical activity in the brain during surgeries involving the forehead.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sigl JC, Chamoun NG. An introduction to bispectral analysis for the electroencephalogram. J Clin Monit. 1994;10:392–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pollock JE, Neal JM, Liu SS, Burkhead D, Polissar N. Sedation during spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:728–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Drummond JC. Monitoring depth of anesthesia: with emphasis on the application of the bispectral index and the middle latency auditory evoked response to the prevention of recall. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:876–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thornton C, Sharpe RM. Evoked responses in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1998;81:771–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mantzaridis H, Kenny GN. Auditory evoked potential index: a quantitative measure of changes in auditory evoked potentials during general anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1997;52:1030–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stoppe C, Peters D, Fahlenkamp AV, Cremer J, Rex S, Schälte G, Rossaint R, Coburn M. AepEX monitor for the measurement of hypnotic depth in patients undergoing balanced xenon anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:80–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:135–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwender D, Kaiser A, Klasing S, Peter K, Pöppel E. Midlatency auditory evoked potentials and explicit and implicit memory in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 1994;80:493–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lawley D. Tests of significance in canonical analysis. Biometrika. 1959;46:59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Konishi S. Normalizing transformations of some statistics in multivariate analysis. Biometrika. 1981;68:647–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Konishi S, Gupta AK. Testing the equality of several intraclass correlation coefficients. J Stat Plan Inference. 1989;21:93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gajraj RJ, Doi M, Mantzaridis H, Kenny GN. Analysis of the EEG bispectrum, auditory evoked potentials and the EEG power spectrum during repeated transitions from consciousness to unconsciousness. Br J Anaesth. 1998;80:46–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kurita T, Doi M, Katoh T, Sano H, Sato S, Mantzaridis H, Kenny GN. Auditory evoked potential index predicts the depth of sedation and movement in response to skin incision during sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:364–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Newton DE, Thornton C, Konieczko KM, Jordan C, Webster NR, Luff NP, Frith CD, Doré CJ. Auditory evoked response and awareness: a study in volunteers at sub-MAC concentrations of isoflurane. Br J Anaesth. 1992;69:122–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pandin P, Van Cutsem N, Tuna T, D’Hollander A. Bispectral index is a topographically dependent variable in patients receiving propofol anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2006;97:676–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Walter DO, Etevenon P, Pidoux B, Tortrat D, Guillou S. Computerized topo-EEG spectral maps: difficulties and perspectives. Neuropsychobiology. 1984;11:264–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hemmerling TM, Deschamps S, Michaud G, Trager G. An unusual site for bis monitoring. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:1264–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shiraishi T, Uchino H, Sagara T, Ishii N. A comparison of frontal and occipital bispectral index values obtained during neurosurgical procedures. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:1773–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nelson P, Nelson JA, Chen AJ, Kofke WA. An alternative position for the BIS-Vista montage in frontal approach neurosurgical cases. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2013;25:135–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wood CC, Wolpaw JR. Scalp distribution of human auditory evoked potentials. II. Evidence for overlapping sources and involvement of auditory cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1982;54:25–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cacace AT, Satya-Murti S, Wolpaw JR. Human middle-latency auditory evoked potentials: vertex and temporal components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990;77:6–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Liégeois-Chauvel C, Musolino A, Badier JM, Marquis P, Chauvel P. Evoked potentials recorded from the auditory cortex in man: evaluation and topography of the middle latency components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;92:204–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Heneghan CP, Thornton C, Navaratnarajah M, Jones JG. Effect of isoflurane on the auditory evoked response in man. Br J Anaesth. 1987;59:277–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Akay M, Daubenspeck JA. Respiratory related evoked responses to graduated pressure pulses using wavelet transform methods. Ann Biomed Eng. 2000;28:1126–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tsai S-W, Tsai C-L, Wu P-T, Wu C-Y, Liu C-L, Jou I-M. Intraoperative use of somatosensory-evoked potential in monitoring nerve roots. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;29:110–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Avidan MS, Zhang L, Burnside BA, Finkel KJ, Searleman AC, Selvidge JA, Saager L, Turner MS, Rao S, Bottros M, Hantler C, Jacobsohn E, Evers AS. Anesthesia awareness and the bispectral index. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1097–108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Avidan MS, Jacobsohn E, Glick D, Burnside BA, Zhang L, Villafranca A, Karl L, Kamal S, Torres B, O’Connor M, Evers AS, Gradwohl S, Lin N, Palanca BJ, Mashour GA. Prevention of intraoperative awareness in a high-risk surgical population. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:591–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tourtier JP, Le Moullec D, Auroy Y. Prevention of intraoperative awareness. New Engl J Med. 2011;365:2032–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author (S.S.) thanks the staff of the Department of Anesthesiology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, for their warm encouragement regarding the preparation of this manuscript.

Author contributions

Y.I., S.S. and T.H. contributed equally to this work. Y.I. collected, analyzed and reviewed the data, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. S.S. and T.H. designed the experiments and conducted the study. They also analyzed the data and reviewed and revised the manuscript. P.K.J. helped prepare the manuscript and jointly developed the structure and arguments for the paper. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Departmental resources were used for preparing disposable sensors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shigekazu Sugino.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ishioka, Y., Sugino, S., Hayase, T. et al. Intraoperative auditory evoked potential recordings are more reliable at signal detection from different sensor sites on the forehead compared to bispectral index. J Clin Monit Comput 31, 117–122 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9812-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9812-6

Keywords

Navigation