Skip to main content
Log in

Performance Appraisal Cynicism Among Managers: a Job Demands Resources Perspective

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the antecedents and consequences of manager’s performance appraisal cynicism (PA cynicism). Based on job demand-resources (JD-R) theory, we develop and test a model in which PA cynicism mediates the interactive effect of two appraisal-related resources (coworker support and performance appraisal experience) and an appraisal-related demand (number of direct reports) in predicting manager’s turnover intentions and leadership effectiveness. Survey data on performance appraisal-related demands and resources were obtained from school principals (in their role as managers) at time 1 and their PA cynicism, turnover intentions, and leadership effectiveness were collected six months later at time 2. Superiors rated principals’ leadership effectiveness. Appraisal-related demands moderate the relationship between coworker support and PA cynicism such that there was a negative relationship between coworker social support and PA cynicism when appraisal-related demands were high. Furthermore, we find that PA cynicism mediated the conditional indirect effects of coworker support on turnover intentions and leadership effectiveness. When managers are cynical about the PA process, they are more likely to contemplate leaving their organization and are rated as less effective leaders by their superiors. Coworker support decreases managers’ PA cynicism, especially for managers with a large number of direct reports. We examine PA cynicism from an underrepresented stakeholder in PA research, namely managers. Managers have a unique perspective on the PA process because they are both a recipient of appraisals and evaluate the performance of their direct reports.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We initially hypothesized full mediation in hypotheses 4a and 4b. Based on suggestions during the review process, we determined that partial mediation was more appropriate.

References

  • Abraham, R. (2000). Organizational cynicism: Bases and consequences. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 126(3), 269–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. (1997). Cynicism in the workplace: Some causes and effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(5), 449–469.

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, S., & Appelbaum, M. (2008). Stress-free performance appraisals: Turn your most painful management duty into a powerful motivational tool. Retrieved from http://zategusuno.jimdo.com/2014/08/22/stress-free-performance-appraisals-turn-your-most-painful-management-duty-into-a-powerful-motivational-tool-pdf-free/

  • Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., de Boer, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2003). Job demands and job resources as predictors of absence duration and frequency. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62(2), 341–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 389–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., Taris, T., Schaufeli, W. B., & Schreurs, P. (2003). A multi-group analysis of the job demands–resources model in four home care organizations. International Journal of Stress Management, 10(1), 16–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1995). The multifactor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–530.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bliese, P. D., & Hanges, P. J. (2004). Being both too liberal and too conservative: The perils of treating grouped data as though they were independent. Organizational Research Methods, 7(4), 400–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boren, J. P. (2014). The relationships between co-rumination, social support, stress, and burnout among working adults. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(1), 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, D. P., & Perrewé, P. L. (2001). The effect of item content overlap on organizational commitment questionnaire-turnover cognitions relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 161–173.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., Kulik, C. T., & Lim, V. (2016). Managerial tactics for communicating negative performance feedback. Personnel Review, 45(5), 969–987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brutus, S., Fletcher, C., & Baldry, C. (2009). The influence of independent self-construal on rater self-efficacy in performance appraisal. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(9), 1999–2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, Z. S., & Hochwarter, W. A. (2008). Perceived organizational support and performance: Relationships across levels of organizational cynicism. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(1), 54–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappelli, P., & Tavis, A. (2016). The performance management revolution. Harvard Business Review, 94(10), 58–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascio, W. F. (2006). Managing human resources: Productivity, quality of work life, profits (7th ed.). New York: Mc-Graw Hill/Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEB Inc. (2016). Performance management can be fixed: Driving lasting behavior change through experiential learning [White paper]. Retrieved October 15, 2016 from CEB Performance Impact Solutions: https://www.cebglobal.com/insights/performance-management.html.

  • Chiaburu, D. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2008). Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1082–1103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chiaburu, D. S., Peng, A. C., Oh, I.-S., Banks, G. C., & Lomeli, L. C. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of employee organizational cynicism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(2), 181–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. S., Bruch, H., & Vogel, B. (2006). Emotion as mediators of the relations between perceived supervision support and psychological hardiness on employee cynicism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 463–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. W., Brandes, P., & Dharwadkar (1998). Organizational cynicism. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 341–352.

  • Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2011). The job demands–resources model: Challenges for future research. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 37(2), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elicker, J. D., Levy, P. E., & Hall, R. J. (2006). The role of leader-member exchange in the performance appraisal process. Journal of Management, 32(4), 531–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, D., & Baron, R. A. (1997). Workplace aggression as a consequence of negative feedback. Management Communication Quarterly, 10(4), 433–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Wheeler, A. R. (2015). To invest or not? The role of coworker support and trust in daily reciprocal gain spirals of helping behavior. Journal of Management, 41(6), 1628–1650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. A., Newman, D. A., & Roth, P. L. (2006). How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. The Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 305–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General Psychology, 6, 307–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, S. J., Shore, D. B., & Cortina, J. M. (2017). Review and recommendations for integrating mediation and moderation. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 686–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalimo, R., & Taris, T. W. (2003). The effects of past and anticipated downsizing on survivor well-being: An equity perspective. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8(2), 91–109.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, D., & Mirvis, P. (1989). The cynical Americans. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeping, L. M., & Levy, P. E. (2000). Performance appraisal reactions: Measurement, modeling and method bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 708–723.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelloway, E. K. (2015). Using MPLUS for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K. J., Knight, A. P., Ziegert, J. C., Lim, B. C., & Saltz, J. L. (2011). When team members’ values differ: The moderating role of team leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114(1), 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lance, C. E., Hedge, J. W., & Alley, W. E. (1989). Joint relationships of task proficiency with aptitude, experience, and task difficulty: A cross-level, interactional study. Human Performance, 2(4), 249–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, P. E., & Williams, J. R. (2004). The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. Journal of Management, 30(6), 881–905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llorens, S., Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2007). Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs, and engagement exist? Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 825–841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, T. J., Mitchell, D. R., & Barbeite, F. G. (2002). Predictors of attitudes toward a 360-degree feedback system and involvement in post-feedback management development activity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(1), 87–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, C. D., Ruderman, M. N., Ohlott, P. J., & Morrow, J. E. (1994). Assessing the developmental components of managerial jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 544–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menguc, B., Auh, S., Fisher, M., & Haddad, A. (2013). To be engaged or not to be engaged: The antecedents and consequences of service employee engagement. Journal of Business Research, 66(11), 2163–2170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, R. F., & Brantner, T. M. (1992). What enhances or inhibits learning a new job? A basic career issue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(6), 926–940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, R. F., & Hock, R. R. (1986). Career building: Learning from cumulative work experience. In H. D. Associates (Ed.), Career development in organizations (pp. 236–273). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahrgang, J. D., Morgeson, F. P., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011). Safety at work: A meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 71–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pichler, S. (2012). The social context of performance appraisal and appraisal reactions: A meta-analysis. Human Resource Management, 51(5), 709–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reichers, A. E., Wanous, J. P., & Austin, J. T. (1997). Understanding and managing cynicism about organizational change. Academy of Management Executive, 11(1), 48–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberson, Q. M., & Stewart, M. M. (2006). Understanding the motivational effects of procedural and informational justice in feedback processes. British Journal of Psychology, 97(3), 281–298.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiró, J. M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediation of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1217–1227.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sardeshmukh, S. R., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2017). Integrating moderation and mediation: A structural equation modelling approach. Organization Research Methods, 20(4), 721–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Individual empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G. M., Kizilos, M. A., & Nason, S. W. (1997). A dimensional analysis of the relationship between psychological empowerment and effectiveness, satisfaction, and strain. Journal of Management, 23(5), 679–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steelman, L. A., & Rutkowski, K. A. (2004). Moderators of employee reactions to negative feedback. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(1), 6–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. S., Tracy, K. B., Renard, M. K., Harrison, J. K., & Carroll, S. J. (1995). Due process in performance appraisal—A quasi-experiment in procedural justice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 495–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesluk, P. E., & Jacobs, R. R. (1998). Toward and integrated model of work experience. Personnel Psychology, 51(2), 321–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tziner, A., Murphy, K., Cleveland, J. N., Yavo, A., & Hayoon, E. (2008). A new old question: Do contextual factors relate to rating behavior: An investigation with peer evaluations. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16(1), 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Cynicism about organizational change: Measurement, antecedents, and correlates. Group and Organization Management, 25(2), 132–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Austin, J. T. (2004). Cynicism about organizational change: An attribution perspective. Psychological Reports, 94(3), 1421–1434.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E., Pillai, R., Deptula, B., & Lowe, K. (2012). The effects of crisis, cynicism about change, and value congruence on perceptions of authentic leadership and attributed charisma in the 2008 presidential election. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 324–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. J., & Hazer, J. T. (1986). Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: A re-analysis using latent variable structural equation methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 219–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14(2), 121–141.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Brown.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown, M., Kraimer, M.L. & Bratton, V.K. Performance Appraisal Cynicism Among Managers: a Job Demands Resources Perspective. J Bus Psychol 35, 455–468 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-019-09631-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-019-09631-0

Keywords

Navigation