Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Relationship Between Employees’ Objective Internal and External Pay Standing and Their Job Performance: A Within-Person Analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Researchers have paid little attention to the relationship between employees’ objective internal and external pay standing and their job performance. Moreover, few studies have considered that employees’ objective pay standing is dynamic; that is, it changes over time. In this study, we analyze the relationship between changes in employees’ objective internal and external pay standing and their job performance.

Design/Methodology/Approach

We test the hypotheses using data for players in the National Basketball Association over a period of 12 seasons (n = 4830).

Findings

Decreases in employees’ objective internal and external pay standing are negatively related to their task performance. Furthermore, decreases in employees’ objective internal pay standing, but not in their external pay standing, are negatively related to their contextual performance.

Implications

Analyzing the relationship between changes in employees’ objective internal and external pay standing and their job performance adds to our understanding of the individual-level consequences of pay dispersion.

Originality/Value

This is one of the first studies to analyze the relationship between employees’ objective internal and external pay standing and their job performance. Moreover, this is one of the first studies that considers that employees’ objective internal and external pay standing changes, for example, because the external and internal labor markets change. The study contributes to research on employee compensation and salary, and to research on pay disparities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although the construct’s contextual performance and (organizational) citizenship behaviors are distinct, they capture similar behaviors (e.g., helping colleagues) (Motowidlo 2000). Therefore, we refer to both constructs.

  2. To check the robustness of the findings, we ran all the analyses with altered parameters (at least 200 min played per season). The results were similar.

  3. Please note: the NBA is an exclusively male competition.

  4. We are indebted to an anonymous reviewer for this suggestion.

  5. We are indebted to an anonymous reviewer for this suggestion.

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 67(5), 422–436.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequality in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, G. A., & Yellen, J. L. (1990). The fair wage-effort hypothesis and unemployment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105(2), 255–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, C. M., Reb, J., & Ang, D. (2012). More than just the mean: Moving to a dynamic view of performance-based compensation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 711–718. doi:10.1037/A0026927.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belogolovsky, E., Bamberger, P., Alterman, V., & Wagner, D. T. (2016). Looking for assistance in the dark: Pay secrecy, expertise perceptions, and efficacious help seeking among members of newly formed virtual work groups. Journal of Business and Psychology,. doi:10.1007/s10869-015-9427-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, S. L., Down, J., & Hill, C. W. L. (2002). Tacit knowledge as a source of competitive advantage in the National Basketball Association. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 13–31. doi:10.2307/3069282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berri, D. J. (2012). Measuring performance in the National Basketball Association. In L. H. Kahane & S. Shmanske (Eds.), The handbook of sports economics (pp. 94–117). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berri, D. J., Brook, S. L., & Schmidt, M. B. (2007). Does one simply need to score to score? International Journal of Sport Finance, 2(4), 190–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beus, J. M., Jarrett, S. M., Taylor, A. B., & Wiese, C. W. (2014). Adjusting to new work teams: Testing work experience as a multidimensional resource for newcomers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(4), 489–506. doi:10.1002/job.1903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beus, J. M., & Whitman, D. S. (2015). Almighty dollar or root of all evil? Testing the effects of money on workplace behavior. Journal of Management,. doi:10.1177/0149206314565241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, M. (1999). The performance effects of pay dispersion on individuals and organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, M., & Michel, J. G. (2002). The relationships among organizational context, pay dispersion, and managerial turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 33–42. doi:10.2307/3069283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosco, F. A., Aguinis, H., Singh, K., Field, J. G., & Pierce, C. A. (2015). Correlational effect size benchmarks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 431–449. doi:10.1037/a0038047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brick, I. E., Palmon, O., & Wald, J. K. (2006). CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: Evidence of cronyism? Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 403–423. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.08.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (2001). Unequal pay unequal responses? Pay referents and their implications for pay level satisfaction. Journal of Management Studies, 38(6), 879–896. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bygren, M. (2004). Pay reference standards and pay satisfaction: What do workers evaluate their pay against? Social Science Research, 33(2), 206–224. doi:10.1016/S0049-089x(03)00045-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. P., & Wiernik, B. M. (2015). The modeling and assessment of work performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 47–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. (2008). Research in industrial and organizational psychology from 1963 to 2007: Changes, choices, and trends. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1062–1081. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1062.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, A., Fehr, E., Herrmann, B., & Schneider, F. (2014). Social comparison and effort provision: Evidence from a field experiment. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12(4), 877–898. doi:10.1111/jeea.12079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83(2), 85–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2011). The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 583–619. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100356.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dalal, R. S., Bhave, D. P., & Fiset, J. (2014). Within-person variability in job performance: A theoretical review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1396–1436. doi:10.1177/0149206314532691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, D. V., Gordon, S., & Fink, C. (2012). The sporting life: Exploring organizations through the lens of sport. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 397–433. doi:10.1080/19416520.2012.678697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Della Torre, E., Pelagatti, M., & Solari, L. (2015). Internal and external equity in compensation systems, organizational absenteeism and the role of explained inequalities. Human Relations, 68(3), 409–440. doi:10.1177/0018726714528730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downes, P. E., & Choi, D. (2014). Employee reactions to pay dispersion: A typology of existing research. Human Resource Management Review, 24(1), 53–66. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.08.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dulebohn, J. H., & Werling, S. E. (2007). Compensation research past, present, and future. Human Resource Management Review, 17(2), 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1577–1613. doi:10.2307/256822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.12.2.121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, D. (2009). The bald truth. New York: Pocket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., Schaffner, M., Schmidt, S. L., & Torgler, B. (2013). Do employees care about their relative income position? Behavioral evidence focusing on performance in professional team sport. Social Science Quarterly, 94(4), 912–932. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gächter, S., & Thöni, C. (2010). Social comparison and performance: Experimental evidence on the fair wage-effort hypothesis. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 76(3), 531–543. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2010.08.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garbers, Y., & Konradt, U. (2014). The effect of financial incentives on performance: A quantitative review of individual and team-based financial incentives. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 102–137. doi:10.1111/joop.12039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilsdorf, K. F., & Sukhatme, V. A. (2008). Tournament incentives and match outcomes in women’s professional tennis. Applied Economics, 40(18), 2405–2412. doi:10.1080/00036840600949512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 561–568. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, N., & Shaw, J. D. (2014). Employee compensation: The neglected area of HRM research. Human Resource Management Review, 24(1), 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.08.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. M., Anseel, F., & Lievens, F. (2008). Keeping up with the Joneses: A field study of the relationships among upward, lateral, and downward comparisons and pay level satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 665–673. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.665.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, D. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23(6), 723–744. doi:10.1016/S0149-2063(97)90026-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, G. D., Mitra, A., Gupta, N., & Shaw, J. D. (1998). Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(5), 777–787. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.83.5.777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., Podsakoff, N. P., Shaw, J. C., & Rich, B. L. (2010). The relationship between pay and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(2), 157–167. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2010.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, E. B., Hebl, M. R., Morgan, W. B., & Ahmad, A. S. (2013). Field experiments on sensitive organizational topics. Organizational Research Methods, 16(4), 501–521. doi:10.1177/1094428112462608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leana, C. R., & Meuris, J. (2015). Living to work and working to live: Income as a driver of organizational behavior. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 55–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2004). The influence of violations of assumptions on multilevel parameter estimates and their standard errors. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 46(3), 427–440. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2003.08.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motowidlo, S. J. (2000). Some basic issues related to contextual performance and organizational citizenship behavior in human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 10(1), 115–126. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00042-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motowidlo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10(2), 71–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475–480. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Basketball Association. (2010). Highlights of the collective bargaining agreement between the National Basketball Association (NBA) and the National Basketball Players Association (NBPA). Retrieved from http://www.nba.com/.element/mp3/2.0/sect/podcastmp3/PDF/CBA101.pdf.

  • Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs. (2015). OFCCP final rule promotes pay transparency. Retrieved from https://www.dol.gov/ofccp/PayTransparency.html.

  • Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 775–802. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01781.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Langton, N. (1993). The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively—Evidence from college and university faculty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 382–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ployhart, R. E., & Ward, A.-K. (2011). The “quick start guide” for conducting and publishing longitudinal research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(4), 413–422. doi:10.1007/s10869-011-9209-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinones, M. A., Ford, J. K., & Teachout, M. S. (1995). The relationship between work experience and job performance: A conceptual and meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 887–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models-application and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rynes, S. L., Gerhart, B., & Minette, K. A. (2004). The importance of pay in employee motivation: Discrepancies between what people say and what they do. Human Resource Management, 43(4), 381–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, K., van Riemsdijk, M., & Groen, B. (2008). The gap between research and practice: a replication study on the HR professionals’ beliefs about effective human resource practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(10), 1976–1988. doi:10.1080/09585190802324304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo, J., Gamache, D. L., Devers, C. E., & Carpenter, M. A. (2015). The role of CEO relative standing in acquisition behavior and CEO pay. Strategic Management Journal, 36(12), 1877–1894. doi:10.1002/smj.2316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(4), 543–554. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9183-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J. D. (2014). Pay dispersion. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 521–544. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, T. H., Tashchian, A., & Jourdan, L. (2006). Effects of internal and external pay comparisons on work attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(10), 2578–2598. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00204.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieweke, J., & Zhao, B. (2015). The impact of team familiarity and team leader experience on team coordination errors: A panel analysis of professional basketball teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(3), 382–402. doi:10.1002/job.1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P., & Latham, G. P. (1996). Increasing citizenship behavior within a labor union: A test of organizational justice theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(2), 161–169. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.2.161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, G. L., & Nandkeolyar, A. K. (2007). Exploring how constraints created by other people influence intraindividual variation in objective performance measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1149–1158. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tai, K., Narayanan, J., & McAllister, D. J. (2012). Envy as pain: Rethinking the nature of envy and its implications for employees and organizations. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 107–129. doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmerman, T. A. (2000). Racial diversity, age diversity, interdependence, and team performance. Small Group Research, 31(5), 592–606. doi:10.1177/104649640003100505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevor, C. O., Reilly, G., & Gerhart, B. (2012). Reconsidering pay dispersion’s effect on the performance of interdependent work: Reconciling sorting and pay inequality. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 585–610. doi:10.5465/amj.2006.0127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevor, C. O., & Wazeter, D. L. (2006). Contingent view of reactions to objective pay conditions: Interdependence among pay structure characteristics and pay relative to internal and external referents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1260–1275. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Varela, O. E., & Landis, R. S. (2010). A general structure of job performance: Evidence from two studies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(4), 625–638. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9155-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, J. B., O’Reilly, C. A., & Pollock, T. G. (2006). Overpaid CEOs and underpaid managers: Fairness and executive compensation. Organization Science, 17(5), 527–544. doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T., Zhao, B., & Thornhill, S. (2015). Pay dispersion and organizational innovation: The mediation effects of employee participation and voluntary turnover. Human Relations, 68(7), 1155–1181. doi:10.1177/0018726715575359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, L., & Miyake, K. (1992). Social comparison in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(5), 760–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. L., McDaniel, M. A., & Nguyen, N. T. (2006). Meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of pay level satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 392–413. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zdrzalek, L. (2015). Wie viel verdient mein Kollege? [How much does my colleague earn?]. Die Zeit. Retrieved from http://www.zeit.de/karriere/2015-03/gehaltsvergleich-manuela-schwesig-gehalt-offenlegung.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Guest Editor Brian Lyons and the two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions that helped us to improve this paper. We further acknowledge the helpful comments from Benjamin Haarhaus on a previous version of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jost Sieweke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sieweke, J., Köllner, B. & Süß, S. The Relationship Between Employees’ Objective Internal and External Pay Standing and Their Job Performance: A Within-Person Analysis. J Bus Psychol 32, 533–546 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9457-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9457-6

Keywords

Navigation