Abstract
Pre-surgical psychological evaluations (PSPE) are required by many insurance companies and used to help identify risk factors that may compromise bariatric post-surgical outcomes. These evaluations, however, are not yet standardized. The present study investigated the utility of a semi-structured assessment, Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT), on post-surgical outcomes across 18 months. A total of 272 adult patients underwent a psychosocial evaluation and received bariatric surgery November 2017 to September 2020 at a Midwestern academic medical center. Average age at pre-surgical evaluation was 45.2 (SD = 10.7) years and 82.3% of patients were female (n = 224). With an a priori α of 0.05, multi-level modeling with weight as the outcome and regression with complications as the outcome were used. Higher SIPAT Patient Readiness, indicating difficulty with adhering to health behaviors and a reduced understanding of bariatric surgery, was associated with elevated patient weight at the 18-month follow-up (𝛽 = 0.129, p = 0.03). Higher SIPAT Social Support, was associated with patient weight at the 18-month follow-up, with reduced support associated with greater weight (𝛽 = 0.254, p = 0.004). Higher SIPAT Social Support also was associated with a greater risk of complications across the 18-month follow-up window (𝛽 = -0.108, p = 0.05). Patients with higher readiness to adhere to behavioral changes, and those reporting an intact social support system, generally weighed less at 18 months. The SIPAT may be considered as part of the standardized pre-surgical assessment, however, further research is required to elucidate its utility.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data is not available.
Code availability
Data analysis was conducted in R.
References
Alger-Mayer, S., Rosati, C., Polimeni, J. M., & Malone, M. (2009). Preoperative binge eating status and gastric bypass surgery: A long-term outcome study. Obesity Surgery, 19(2), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-008-9540-9.
Allison, K. C., Lundgren, J. D., O’Reardon, J. P., Martino, N. S., Sarwer, D. B., Wadden, T. A., Crosby, R., Engel, S., & Stunkard, A. J. (2008). The Night Eating Questionnaire (NEQ): Psychometric properties of a measure of severity of the Night Eating Syndrome. Eating Behaviors, 9(1), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2007.03.007.
Ambwani, S., Boeka, A. G., Brown, J. D., Byrne, T. K., Budak, A. R., Sarwer, D. B., Fabricatore, A. N., Morey, L. C., & O’Neil, P. M. (2013). Socially desirable responding by bariatric surgery candidates during psychological assessment. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 9(2), 300–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2011.06.019.
Averbukh, Y., Heshka, S., El-Shoreya, H., Flancbaum, L., Geliebter, A., Kamel, S., Pi-Sunyer, F. X., & Laferrère, B. (2003). Depression score predicts weight loss following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obesity Surgery, 13(6), 833–836. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089203322618605.
Barrash, J., Rodriguez, E. M., Scott, D. H., Mason, E. E., & Sines, J. O. (1987). The utility of MMPI subtypes for the prediction of weight loss after bariatric surgery. Minnesota Multiphasic personality inventory. - Abstract—Europe PMC. International Journal of Obesity, 11(2), 115–128.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
Bauchowitz, A. U., Gonder-Frederick, L. A., Olbrisch, M. E., Azabard, L., Ryee, M. Y., Woodson, M., Miller, A., & Schirmer, B. (2005). Psychosocial evaluation of bariatric surgery candidates: A survey of present practices. Psychosomatic medicine. Psychosomatic Medicine, 67(5), 825–832.
Benalcazar, D. A., & Cascella, M. (2022, February 5). Obesity surgery pre-op assessment and preparation—StatPearls—NCBI Bookshelf. StatPearls. https://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.proxy.kumc.edu/books/NBK546667/.
Bohn, M. J., Babor, T. F., & Kranzler, H. R. (1995). The Alcohol Use disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): Validation of a screening instrument for use in medical settings. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 56(4), 423–432. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.1995.56.423.
Cagliostro, M., Bromley, A., Ting, P., Donehey, J., Ferket, B., Parks, K., Palumbo, E., Mancini, D., Anyanwu, A., Pawale, A., Pinney, S., Moss, N., & Lala, A. (2019). Standardized use of the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation in LVAD patients. Journal of Cardiac Failure, 25(9), 735–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.06.006.
Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., Amntmann, D., Bode, R., Buysse, D., Choi, S., Cook, K., Devellis, R., DeWalt, D., Fries, J., Gershon, R., Hahn, E., Lai, J., Pilkonis, P., Revicki, D., Rose, M., Weinfurt, K., Hays, R., & PROMIS Cooperative Group. (2010). The patient-reported outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011.
Chen, G., Bell, C. S., Loughhead, P., Ibeche, B., Bynon, J. S., Hall, D. R., De Golovine, A., Edwards, A., & Dar, W. A. (2019). Exploration of the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation with psychosocial and medical outcomes in lidney and kidney–pancreas transplant recipients. Progress in Transplantation, 29(3), 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1526924819854480.
R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. In R Foundation for Statistical Computing. h ttp. www.R-project. org.
de Zwaan, M., Enderle, J., Wagner, S., Mühlhans, B., Ditzen, B., Gefeller, O., Mitchell, J. E., & Müller, A. (2011). Anxiety and depression in bariatric surgery patients: A prospective, follow-up study using structured clinical interviews. Journal of Affective Disorders, 133(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.03.025.
Dixon, J. B., Dixon, M. E., & O’Brien, P. E. (2003). Depression in association with severe obesity: Changes with weight loss. Archives of Internal Medicine, 163(17), 2058–2065. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.163.17.2058.
Fabricatore, A. N., Crerand, C. E., Wadden, T. A., Sarwer, D. B., & Krasucki, J. L. (2006). How do mental health professionals evaluate candidates for bariatric surgery? Survey results. Obesity Surgery, 16(5), 567–573. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089206776944986.
Fisher, D., Coleman, K. J., Arterburn, D. E., Fischer, H., Yamamoto, A., Young, D. R., Sherwood, N. E., Trinacty, C. M., & Lewis, K. H. (2017). Mental illness in bariatric surgery: A cohort study from the PORTAL network. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 25(5), 850–856. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21814.
Forbush, K. T., Wildes, J. E., Pollack, L. O., Dunbar, D., Luo, J., Patterson, K., Petruzzi, L., Pollpeter, M., Miller, H., Stone, A., Bright, A., & Watson, D. (2013). Development and validation of the Eating Pathology symptoms Inventory (EPSI). Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 859. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032639.
Goodpaster, K. P. S. (2017). The role of psychological testing in pre-surgical bariatric evaluations. Journal of Health Service Psychology, 43(2), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03544652.
Greenberg, I., Sogg, S., & Perna, F. M. (2009). Behavioral and psychological care in weight loss surgery: Best practice update. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 17(5), 880–884. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2008.571.
Heinberg, L. J., Ashton, K., & Windover, A. (2010). Moving beyond dichotomous psychological evaluation: The Cleveland Clinic behavioral rating system for weight loss surgery. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 6(2), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2009.10.004.
Ibrahim, A. M., Ghaferi, A. A., Thumma, J. R., & Dimick, J. B. (2017). Variation in outcomes at bariatric surgery centers of excellence. JAMA Surgery, 152(7), 629–636. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0542.
Kurland, A., Salcido, L., Osipov, L., Fowler, N., Safer, D., & Adler, S. (2016). The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for bariatric surgery: A preliminary analysis of validity and reliability. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 12(7), S133–S134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.08.245.
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13.
Maldonado, J. R., Dubois, H. C., David, E. E., Sher, Y., Lolak, S., Dyal, J., & Witten, D. (2012). The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT): A new tool for the psychosocial evaluation of pre-transplant candidates. Psychosomatics, 53(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psym.2011.12.012.
Maldonado, J. R., Sher, Y., Lolak, S., Swendsen, H., Skibola, D., Neri, E., David, E. E., Sullivan, C., & Standridge, K. (2015). The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation: A prospective study of medical and psychosocial outcomes. Psychosomatic Medicine, 77(9), 1018–1030. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000241.
Marek, R. J., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Windover, A., Tarescavage, A. M., Merrell, J., Ashton, K., Lavery, M., & Heinberg, L. J. (2013). Assessing psychosocial functioning of bariatric surgery candidates with the Minnesota Multiphasic personality Inventory-2 restructured form (MMPI-2-RF). Obesity Surgery, 23(11), 1864–1873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-1024-x.
Marek, R. J., Tarescavage, A. M., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Ashton, K., Rish, M., J., & Heinberg, L. J. (2015). Using presurgical psychological testing to predict 1-year appointment adherence and weight loss in bariatric surgery patients: Predictive validity and methodological considerations. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 11(5), 1171–1181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2015.03.020.
Marek, R. J., Heinberg, L. J., Lavery, M., Rish, M., J., & Ashton, K. (2016). A review of psychological assessment instruments for use in bariatric surgery evaluations. Psychological Assessment, 28, 1142–1157. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000286.
Masheb, R. M., White, M. A., Toth, C. M., Burke-Martindale, C. H., Rothschild, B., & Grilo, C. M. (2007). The prognostic significance of depressive symptoms for predicting quality of life 12 months after gastric bypass. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 48(3), 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2007.01.005.
Mechanick, J. I., Youdim, A., Jones, D. B., Garvey, T., Hurley, W., Molly, D. L., McMahon, M., Heinberg, L. J., Kushner, R., Adams, T. D., Shikora, S., Dixon, J. B., & Brethauer, S. (2013). Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient—2013 update: Cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 9(2), 159–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2012.12.010.
Mishkin, A. D., Shapiro, P. A., Reshef, R., Lopez-Pintado, S., & Mapara, M. Y. (2019). Standardized semi-structured psychosocial evaluation before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation predicts patient adherence to post-transplant regimen. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 25(11), 2222–2227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.06.019.
Morey, L. C. (2004). The personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J., & Chertkow, H. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.
Odom, J., Zalesin, K. C., Washington, T. L., Miller, W. W., Hakmeh, B., Zaremba, D. L., Altattan, M., Balasubramaniam, M., Gibbs, D. S., Krause, K. R., Chengelis, D. L., Franklin, B. A., & McCullough, P. A. (2010). Behavioral predictors of weight regain after bariatric surgery. Obesity Surgery, 20(3), 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9895-6.
Peacock, J. C., & Zizzi, S. J. (2011). An assessment of patient behavioral requirements pre- and post-surgery at accredited weight loss surgical centers. Obesity Surgery, 21(12), 1950–1957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0366-5.
Punt, S. E., Rhodes, A. C., Ilardi, S. S., & Hamilton, J. L. (2022). Use of the Stanford Integrative Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant as a pre-surgical psychological evaluation tool for bariatric surgery | SpringerLink. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-022-09850-3.
Scholtz, S., Bidlake, L., Morgan, J., Fiennes, A., El-Etar, A., Lacey, J. H., & McCluskey, S. (2007). Long-term outcomes following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: Postoperative psychological sequelae predict outcome at 5-year follow-up. Obesity Surgery, 17(9), 1220–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9212-1.
Tarescavage, A. M., Wygant, D. B., Boutacoff, L. I., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2013). Reliability, validity, and utility of the Minnesota Multiphasic personality Inventory–2–Restructured form (MMPI–2–RF) in assessments of bariatric surgery candidates. Psychological Assessment, 25, 1179–1194. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033694.
Thonney, B., Pataky, Z., Badel, S., Bobbioni-Harsch, E., & Golay, A. (2010). The relationship between weight loss and psychosocial functioning among bariatric surgery patients. The American Journal of Surgery, 199(2), 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.12.028.
Toussi, R., Fujioka, K., & Coleman, K. J. (2009). Pre- and postsurgery behavioral compliance, patient health, and postbariatric surgical weight loss. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 17(5), 996–1002. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2008.628.
Tsushima, W. T., Bridenstine, M. P., & Balfour, J. F. (2004). MMPI-2 scores in the outcome prediction of gastric bypass surgery. Obesity Surgery, 14(4), 528–532. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089204323013550.
Vandenbogaart, E., Doering, L., Chen, B., Saltzman, A., Chaker, T., Creaser, J. W., Rourke, D., Cheng, R. W., Fonarow, G. C., & Deng, M. (2017). Evaluation of the SIPAT instrument to assess psychosocial risk in heart transplant candidates: A retrospective single center study. Heart & Lung, 46(4), 273–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2017.04.005.
Wadden, T. A., & Sarwer, D. B. (2006). Behavioral assessment of candidates for bariatric surgery: A patient-oriented approach. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases: Official Journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery, 2(2), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2006.03.011.
Wing, R. R., & Jeffery, R. W. (1999). Benefits of recruiting participants with friends and increasing social support for weight loss and maintenance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 132–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.67.1.132.
Wolfe, B. L., & Terry, M. L. (2006). Expectations and outcomes with gastric bypass surgery. Obesity Surgery, 16(12), 1622–1629. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089206779319473.
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Stephanie Punt, Mariana Rincon Caicedo, Ashley Rhodes, Stephen Ilardi, and Jessica Hamilton. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Stephanie Punt and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
For this type of study (retrospective analysis) formal consent is not required.
Conflict of interest/Competing interests
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Statement of informed consent
Review was waived by the local Institutional Research Ethics Board in view of the retrospective nature of the study and the fact that all procedures were part of routine care within the context of a parent quality assurance project.
Statement of human and animal rights
This study was a retrospective data analysis and all procedures were part of routine clinical care.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Punt, S.E., Caicedo, M.R., Rhodes, A.C. et al. A semi-structured interview is associated with bariatric surgery outcomes. J Behav Med 47, 483–491 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-024-00471-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-024-00471-9