Abstract
This study employs a mixed methods approach, using quantitative analysis to discuss significant patterns, and qualitative analysis to provide descriptive accounts of homicide incidents. Seven hundred and five homicides that occurred in a northeastern city between January 1999 and December 2007 are examined to answer the following research question: Do the situated transactions of firearm homicides differ from those involving other weapons? The quantitative analyses found distinct patterns in offender intent, criminogenic tendencies, and situational attributes between firearm and other weapon homicides. The qualitative analysis revealed that firearms are most often utilized in homicides that can be understood as “doing crime,” where offenders and victims are engaged in a criminal lifestyle and firearms are an extension of this activity. Other weapons are associated with homicides concerned with “establishing moral order,” or defending values and ideals, between individuals who are intimate. The methodological and policy implication of these findings are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Various steps were taken by the lead investigator to ensure that the protocol was used correctly by researchers. First, researchers were trained by the lead investigators of the study prior to data collection. The training involved introducing and familiarizing the coders to the codebook and the protocol. The lead investigator then had the coders observe the data collection process before collecting data themselves. Once the training was completed the lead investigator continuously oversaw the data collection, and conducted checks of the data, to ensure that the researchers were following proper protocol.
There are no significant differences related to weapon between the included and excluded incidents (Chi square = 2.227, p < .136). Of the excluded incidents, 24% were committed with another type of weapon, and 76% with a firearm. Of the included cases 22% were committed with another weapon type, and 78% with a firearm.
The high percentage of unknowns is attributable to open investigation cases where an offender was not identified during the study period. Specifically, of the 705 incidents, 444 (63%) have been cleared with the arrest of a perpetrator, while 261 (37%) remain open.
The data collection period spanned from March 2000 through October 2008, 10 months after the end of the study period. Since not all cases were resolved at the time of initial data collection, researchers reexamined open cases every 6 months to assess if an offender was identified and the investigation closed.
The majority of the cases excluded from the qualitative analyses remain uncleared and the offender has not been identified (i.e., 64%, 261 incidents of the excluded narratives).
References
Auerbach, C., & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York City, NY: NYU Press.
Birk, M., & Mills, J. (2011). Data analysis in grounded theory. In M. Birks & J. Mills (Eds.), Grounded theory: A practical guide (1st ed., pp. 89–112). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Blumstein, A. (1995). Youth violence, firearms, and the illicit-drug industry. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 10–36.
Braga, A. A., Hureau, D. M., & Papachristos, A. V. (2014). Deterring gang-involved gun violence: Measuring the impact of Boston’s operation ceasefire on street gang behavior. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30, 113–139.
Branas, C. C., Richmond, T. S., Culhane, D. P., Ten Have, T. R., & Webe, D. J. (2009). Investigating the link between gun possession and gun assault. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 2034–2040.
Brookman, F. (2003). Confrontational and revenge homicides among men in England and Wales. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 36, 34–59.
Butts, J. A., Roman, C. G., Bostwick, L., & Porter, J. R. (2015). Cure violence: A public health model to reduce gun violence. Annual Review of Public Health, 36, 39–53.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. (2019). Web-based injury statistics query and reporting system (WISQARS). Available from: www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars
Charmaz, K. (1995). Between positivism and postmodernism: Implications for methods. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 17, 43–72.
Charmaz, K. (1999). Stories of suffering: Subjective tales and research narratives. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 362–382.
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist models. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 359–380). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Charmaz, K., & Bryant, A. (2011). Grounded theory and credibility. In D. Silverman’s (Ed.), Qualitative research (pp. 291–309). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3–21.
Corsaro, N., Pizarro, J. M., & Shafer, J. (2017). The influence of planned aggression on the journey to homicide: An examination across typology classifications. Homicide Studies, 21, 179–198.
Decker, S. H. (1996). Deviant homicide: A new look at the role of motives and victim-offender relationships. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33, 427–449.
DeCuir-Gunby, J. T., Marshall, P. L., & McCullough, A. W. (2010). Developing and using a codebook for the analysis of interview data: An example from a professional development research project. Field Work, 23, 136–155.
Friese, S. (2013). ATLAS.ti 7: User guide and reference. Scientific Software Development.
Glaser, B. S., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face interaction. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Hemenway, D. (2017). Reducing firearm violence. Crime & Delinquency, 46, 201–230.
Holloway, I. (2008). AZ of qualitative research in nursing and healthcare. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of crime: Moral and sensual attractions in doing evil. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Libby, N. E., & Corzine, J. (2007). Lethal weapons: Effects of firearm types on the outcome of violent encounters. Justice Research and Policy, 9, 113–137.
Luckenbill, D. F. (1977). Criminal homicide as a situated transaction. Social Problems, 25, 176–186.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Pampel, F. C. (2000). Logistic regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Pelletier, K. R., & Pizarro, J. M. (2019). Homicide and weapons: Examining the covariates of weapon choice. Homicide Studies, 1, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767918807252
Phillips, S., & Maume, M. O. (2007). Have gun will shoot? Weapon instrumentality, intent, and the violent escalation of conflict. Homicide Studies, 11, 272–294.
Pizarro, J. M. (2008). Reassessing the situational covariates of homicides is there a need to disaggregate? Homicide Studies, 12, 323–349.
Pizarro, J. M., & McGloin, J. M. (2006). Explaining gang homicides in Newark, New Jersey: Collective behavior or social disorganization? Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 195–207.
Polk, K. (1994). When men kill: Scenarios of masculine violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tedeschi, J. T., & Felson, R. B. (1994). Violence, aggression, and coercive actions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Testa, M., Livingston, J. A., & VanZile-Tamsen, C. (2011). Advancing the study of violence against women using mixed methods: Integrating qualitative methods into a quantitative research program. Violence Against Women, 17, 236–250.
Watkins, A. M., Huebner, B. M., & Decker, S. H. (2008). Patterns of gun acquisition, carrying, and use among juvenile and adult arrestees: Evidence from a high-crime city. Justice Quarterly, 25, 674–700.
Wells, W. (2002). The nature and circumstances of defensive gun use: A content analysis of interpersonal conflict situations involving criminal offenders. Justice Quarterly, 19, 127–157.
Wilkinson, D. L. (2003). Guns, violence, and identity among African American and Latino youth. El Paso, TX: LFB Scholarly Publishing.
Wilkinson, D. L. (2011). An emergent situational and transactional theory of urban youth violence. In B. Feld & D. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook on juvenile crime and juvenile justice (pp. 336–352). Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
Wilkinson, D. L., & Fagan, J. A. (1996). The role of firearms in violence scripts: The dynamics of gun events among adolescent males. Law and Contemporary Problems, 59, 55–90.
Zeoli, A. M., Pizarro, J. M., Grady, S. C., & Melde, C. (2014). Homicide as infectious disease: Using public health methods to investigate the diffusion of homicide. Justice Quarterly, 31, 609–632.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Jesenia M. Pizarro, Karen Holt, and Karissa R. Pelletier declares that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights and Informed consent
All procedures followed were in accordance with ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pizarro, J.M., Holt, K. & Pelletier, K.R. An examination of the situated transactions of firearm homicides. J Behav Med 42, 613–625 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-019-00050-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-019-00050-3