Abstract
Paraprofessionals play a critical role in the instruction of students with disabilities and yet they often receive inadequate training in using evidence-based teaching strategies. A promising avenue for improving paraprofessional training is distant bug-in-ear coaching (BIE), where a paraprofessional receives in-the-moment coaching on a teaching strategy from a coach at a different location. This study examined a BIE coaching package to support paraprofessionals in using incidental teaching for teaching self-advocacy skills to students with disabilities. The package included an initial individual didactic teaching session followed by distance BIE coaching. A multiple-baseline across participants design was used to assess the impact of the intervention on both the skills of the paraprofessionals and on student acquisition of self-advocacy statements. BIE coaching was associated with increases in both the accuracy and rate of incidental teaching trials and with use of self-advocacy statements by the students with disabilities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Artman-Meeker, K., Rosenberg, N., Badgett, N., Yang, X., & Penney, A. (2017). The effects of bug-in-ear coaching on pre-service behavior analysts’ use of functional communication training. Behavior Analysis in Practice,10(3), 228–241.
Barton, E. (2018). The use of email to coach early childhood teachers. Journal of Early Intervention,40(3), 212–228.
Brock, M. E., & Carter, E. W. (2013). A systematic review of paraprofessional-delivered educational practices to improve outcomes for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities,38(4), 211–221.
Carter, E., O’Rourke, L. O., Sisco, L. G., & Pelsue, D. (2009). Knowledge, responsibilities, and training needs of paraprofessionals in elementary and secondary schools. Remedial and Special Education,30(6), 344–359.
Charlop-Christy, M. H., & Carpenter, M. H. (2000). Modified incidental teaching sessions: A procedure for parents to increase spontaneous speech in their children with autism. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions,2, 98–112.
Cornelius, K. E., & Nagro, S. A. (2014). Evaluating the evidence base of performance feedback in preservice special education teacher training. Teacher Education and Special Education,37, 133–146.
Douglas, S. N., Chapin, S. E., & Nolan, J. F. (2016). Special education teachers’ experiences supporting and supervising paraeducators: Implications for special and general education settings. Teacher Education and Special Education,39(1), 60–74.
Fallon, L. M., Collier-Meek, M. A., Maggin, D. M., Sanetti, L. M., & Johnson, A. H. (2015). Is performance feedback for educators an evidence-based practice? A systematic review and evaluation based on single-case research. Exceptional Children,81, 227–246.
Fenske, E. C., Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (2001). Incidental teaching: A not-discrete-trial teaching procedure. In C. Maurice, G. Green, & R. M. Foxx (Eds.), Making a difference: Behavioral intervention for autism (pp. 75–82). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
Field, S., Martin, J., Miller, R., Ward, M., & Wehmeyer, M. (1998). Self-determination for persons with disabilities: A position statement of the Division on Career Development and Transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals,21, 113–128.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal,38(4), 915–945.
Giangreco, M. F., Broer, S. M., & Edelman, S. W. (2010). “That was then, this is now!” Paraprofessional supports for students with disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptionality,10, 47–64.
Goodman, J. I., Brady, M. P., Duffy, M. L., Scott, J., & Pollard, N. E. (2008). The effects of “bug-in-ear” supervision on special education teachers’ delivery of learn units. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities,23, 207–216.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Establishing the use of descriptive adjectives in the spontaneous speech of disadvantaged preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,1, 109–120.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1975). Incidental teaching of language in the preschool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,8(4), 411–420.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1982). How to use incidental teaching for elaborating language. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
Hemmeter, M. L., Snyder, P., Kinder, K., & Artman, K. (2011). Impact of performance feedback delivered via electronic mail on preschool teachers’ use of descriptive praise. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,26, 96–109.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).
Izzo, M., & Lamb, M. (2002). Self-determination and career development: Skills for successful transitions to postsecondary education and employment. A white paper for the Post-School Outcomes Network of the National Center on Secondary Education and Transition (NCSET) at the University of Hawaii at Manoa. Retrieved March 27, 2020 from http://www.ncset.hawaii.edu/publications/pdf/self_determination.pdf
Jamshidi, L., Heyvaert, M., Declercq, L., Fernandez-Castilla, B., Ferron, J. M., Moenaert, M., et al. (2019). Methodological quality of meta-analyses of single-case experimental studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities,79, 97–115.
Joyce, B. R., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through staff development (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Kim, S., Koegel, R. L., & Koegel, L. K. (2017). Training paraprofessionals to target socialization in students with ASD: Fidelity of implementation and social validity. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions,19(2), 102–114.
Kretlow, A. G., & Bartholomew, C. C. (2010). Using coaching to improve the fidelity of evidence-based practices: A review of studies. Teacher Education and Special Education,33(4), 279–299.
Kroeger, K. A., & Nelson, W. M. (2006). A language programme to increase the verbal production of a child dually diagnosed with down syndrome and autism. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,50, 101–108.
Ledford, J. R., & Gast, D. L. (Eds.). (2018). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Ledford, J. R., Zimmerman, K. N., Chazin, K. T., Patel, N. M., Morales, V. M., & Bennett, B. P. (2017). Coaching paraprofessionals to promote engagement and social interactions during small group activities. Journal of Behavioral Education,26, 410–432.
Maggin, D. M., Fallon, L. M., Sanetti, L. M. H., & Ruberto, L. M. (2017). Training paraeducators to implement a group contingency protocol: Direct and collateral effects. Behavioral Disorders,38, 18–37.
McDonnell, J., & Jameson, J. M. (2014). What are the roles of paraprofessionals in inclusive schools? In J. McLeskey, N. L. Waldron, F. Spooner, & R. Algozzine (Eds.), Handbook of effective inclusive schools: Research and practice (pp. 94–106). Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
McGee, G. G., Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (1985). The facilitative effects of incidental teaching on preposition use by autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,18, 17–31.
McGee, G. G., Morier, M. J., & Daly, T. (1999). An incidental teaching approach to early intervention for toddlers with autism. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps,24(3), 133–146.
Miranda-Linne, F., & Melin, L. (1992). Acquisition, generalization, and spontaneous use of color adjectives: A comparison of incidental teaching and traditional discrete-trial procedures for children with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities,13(3), 191–210.
Odom, S. L., Collet-Klingenberg, L., Rogers, S. J., & Hatton, D. D. (2010). Evidence-based practices in interventions for children and youth with autism spectrum disorders. Preventing School Failure,54, 275–282.
Ottley, J. R., & Hanline, M. F. (2014). Bug-in-ear coaching impacts on early childhood educators’ practices and associations with toddlers’ expressive communication. Journal of Early Intervention,36, 90–110.
Owens, T. L., Lo, Y., & Collins, B. C. (2019). Using tiered coaching and bug-in-ear technology to promote teacher implementation fidelity. The Journal of Special Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466919852706.
Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy,42, 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445511399147.
Powers, L. E., Geenen, S., Powers, J., Pommier-Satya, S., Turner, A., Dalton, L. D., et al. (2012). My life: Effects of a longitudinal, randomized study of self-determination enhancement on the transition outcomes of youth in foster care and special education. Children and Youth Services Review,34(11), 2179–2187.
Rock, M. L., Schumacker, R. E., Gregg, M., Howard, P. W., Gable, R. A., & Zigmond, N. (2014). How are they now? Longer term effects of eCoaching through online bug-in-ear technology. Teacher Education and Special Education,37, 161–181.
Scheeler, M. C., Morano, S., & Lee, D. L. (2018). Effects of immediate feedback using bug-in-ear with paraeducators working with students with autism. Teacher Education and Special Education,41(1), 24–38.
Scheeler, M. C., Ruhl, K. L., & McAfee, J. K. (2004). Providing performance feedback to teachers: A review. Teacher Education and Special Education,27, 396–407.
Schepis, M. M., Reid, D. H., Fitzgerald, J. R., Faw, G. D., van den Pol, R. A., & Welty, P. A. (1982). A program for increasing manual signing by autistic and profoundly retarded youth within the daily environment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,15, 363–379.
Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Rifenbark, G. G., & Little, T. D. (2015). Relationships between self-determination and postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education,48(4), 256–267.
Test, D. W., Fowler, C. H., Wood, W. M., Brewer, D. M., & Eddy, S. (2005). A conceptual framework of self-advocacy for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education,26(1), 43–54.
U.S. Department of Education. (2016). 38th annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Retrieved June 28, 2019 from https://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep/2016/parts-b-c/38th-arc-for-idea.pdf.
Vannest, K. J., Parker, R. I., Gonen, O., & Adiguzel, T. (2016). Single case research: Web based calculators for SCR analysis. (Version 2.0) [Web-based application]. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University. Retrieved Saturday 15th February 2020. Retrieved June 28, 2019 from www.singlecaseresearch.org.
Wacker, D. P., Lee, J. F., Padilla Dalmau, Y. C., Kopelman, T. G., Lindgren, S. D., Kuhle, J., et al. (2013). Conducting functional communication training via telehealth to reduce the problem behavior of young children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities,25(1), 35–48.
Wehmeyer, M. L., & Palmer, S. B. (2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three-years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities,38(2), 131–144.
Wong, C., Odom, S. L., Hume, K., Cox, A. W., Fettig, A., Kucharczyk, S., et al. (2014). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, Autism Evidence-Based Practice Review Group.
Wood, W. M., Fowler, C. H., Uphold, N., & Test, D. W. (2005). A review of self-determination interventions with individuals with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities,30(3), 121–146.
Funding
This study received no funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (Team D Education; IRB ID: Study 00001094) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Statement on the Welfare of Animals
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosenberg, N.E., Artman-Meeker, K., Kelly, E. et al. The Effects of a Bug-in-Ear Coaching Package on Implementation of Incidental Teaching by Paraprofessionals in a K-12 School. J Behav Educ 29, 409–432 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-020-09379-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-020-09379-1