Skip to main content
Log in

Increasing the Efficiency of Diagnostic Interviews for Childhood Anxiety Disorders Through Joint Child-Parent Administration

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Structured and semi-structured diagnostic interviews (SDIs) are widely used to gather diagnostic information and have important utility in both research and clinical settings. However, when youth are being assessed, SDIs increase the demands on time or personnel resources and often result in high rates of discordance between informants. In the current study, the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule (ADIS) was administered jointly to 89 youth and their parents. All 89 youth had also participated in a clinical evaluation prior to their enrollment in the study. A subset of these evaluations included the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID) while the remainder included unstructured interviews. The jointly administered ADIS was found to be reliably administered and demonstrated good convergent and divergent validity. The MINI-KID – selected due to its comprehensiveness, brief administration time, and sound psychometric properties – also demonstrated validity and agreement with the ADIS. Additionally, the inclusion of the MINI-KID in the clinical evaluations increased the specificity of diagnoses included in the medical record. The current study provides preliminary support for the joint, caregiver-child administration of the ADIS and the MINI-KID in both clinical and research settings. The use of these measures could reduce resource demands in research settings and increase the validity of diagnoses offered following intake sessions in clinical settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Of note, one patient was referred to a research project based on a phone call within primary care and thus did not receive a clinical evaluation prior to the ADIS nor have a clinical diagnosis.

References

  • Albano, A. M., & Silverman, W. K. (1996). Anxiety Disorders interview schedule for DSM-IV Child Version: clinical manual. USA: Graywind Publications Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, N., Foster, S., Emery, S., Berger, G., Walitza, S., & Häberling, I. (2020). How are discrepant parent–child reports integrated? A case of depressed adolescents. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1089/cap.2020.0116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A., & Barlow, D. H. (2014). Anxiety and related Disorders interview schedule for DSM-5 (ADIS-5) - adult and Lifetime Version: Clinician Manual. New York: NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological assessment, 6(4), 284–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comer, J. S., & Kendall, P. C. (2004). A symptom-level examination of parent–child agreement in the diagnosis of anxious youths. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 43(7), 878–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Los Reyes, A., Augenstein, T. M., Wang, M., Thomas, S. A., Drabick, D. A., Burgers, D. E., & Rabinowitz, J. (2015). The validity of the multi-informant approach to assessing child and adolescent mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 141(4), 858.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, L., Georgiades, K., Wang, L., Van Lieshout, R. J., MacMillan, H. L., Ferro, M. A., & Boyle, M. H. (2018). Psychometric evaluation of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric interview for children and adolescents (MINI-KID). Psychological Assessment, 30(7), 916.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • First, M. B., Williams, J. B., Benjamin, L. S., & Spitzer, R. L. (2016). SCID-5-PD: structured clinical interview for DSM-5® personality disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, W. K., Price, L. H., Rasmussen, S. A., Mazure, C., Delgado, P., Heninger, G. R., & Charney, D. S. (1989). The Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale: II. Validity. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46(11), 1012–1016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grills, A. E., & Ollendick, T. H. (2003). Multiple informant agreement and the anxiety disorders interview schedule for parents and children. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 42(1), 30–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBM Corp. Released 2020. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. Armonk, NY:IBM Corp.

  • Moses, K., Gayed, M., Chuah, S., & Wootton, B. M. (2020). The use of evidence-based assessment for anxiety disorders in an australian sample. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 75, 102279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., Ollendick, T., King, N., & Bogie, N. (2002). Three traditional and three new childhood anxiety questionnaires: their reliability and validity in a normal adolescent sample. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 40, 753–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muris, P., Schmidt, H., & Merckelbach, H. (2000). Correlations among two self-report questionnaires for measuring DSM-defined anxiety disorder symptoms in children: the screen for child anxiety related emotional Disorders and the Spence Children’s anxiety scale. Personality & Individual Differences, 28, 333–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nauta, M. H., Scholing, A., Rapee, R. M., Abbott, M., Spence, S. H., & Waters, A. (2004). A parent-report measure of children’s anxiety: psychometric properties and comparison with child-report in a clinic and normal sample. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42(7), 813e839. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00200-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ollendick, T. H., Halldorsdottir, T., Fraire, M. G., Austin, K. E., Noguchi, R. J., Lewis, K. M., Jarrett, M. A., Cunningham, N. R., Canavera, K., Allen, K. B., & Whitmore, M. J. (2015). Specific phobias in youth: a randomized controlled trial comparing one-session treatment to a parent-augmented one-session treatment. Behavior Therapy, 46(2), 141–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ollendick, T. H., Ryan, S. M., Capriola-Hall, N. N., Austin, K. E., & Fraire, M. (2018). Have phobias, will travel: addressing one barrier to the delivery of an evidence-based treatment. Behavior Therapy, 49(4), 594–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Safford, S. M., Kendall, P. C., Flannery-Schroeder, E., Webb, A., & Sommer, H. (2005). A longitudinal look at parent–child diagnostic agreement in youth treated for anxiety disorders. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34(4), 747–757.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, A. F., Ale, C. M., Nguyen, K., Gregg, M. S., Geske, J. R., & Whiteside, S. P. (2016). Use of evidence-based assessments for childhood anxiety disorders within a regional medical system. Psychological Services, 13(4), 411–418. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000091.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, A. F., Leffler, J. M., Harrison, N. L., Bieber, E. D., Kosmach, J. J., Sim, L. A., & Whiteside, S. P. H. (2019). The quality of assessments for childhood psychopathology within a regional medical center. Psychological Services, 16(4), 596–604. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, D. V., Sheehan, K. H., Shytle, R. D., Janavs, J., Bannon, Y., Rogers, J. E., & Wilkinson, B. (2010). Reliability and validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric interview for children and adolescents (MINI-KID). Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 71(3), 313–326. doi:https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.09m05305whi.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, S. H. (1998). A measure of anxiety symptoms among children. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 36, 545–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summerfeldt, L. J., & Antony, M. M. (2002). Structured and semistructured diagnostic interviews. In M. M. Antony, & D. H. Barlow (Eds.), Handbook of Assessment and Treatment Planning for Psychological Disorders (pp. 3–37). Guilford Press.

  • Walkup, J. T., Albano, A. M., Piacentini, J. C., Birmaher, B., Compton, S. N., Sherrill, J. T., & Kendall, P. C. (2008). Cognitive behavioral therapy, sertraline, or a combination in childhood anxiety. The New England Journal of Medicine, 359, 2753–2766.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, S. P. H. (2012). Expanding access to CBT for childhood anxiety disorders via smart phones. Mayo Clinic: National Institute of Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, S. P., Sattler, A. F., Hathaway, J., & Douglas, K. V. (2016). Use of evidence-based assessment for childhood anxiety disorders in community practice. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 39, 65–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.02.008.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, S. P. H., Ale, C. M., Young, B., Dammann, J., Tiede, M. S., & Biggs, B. K. (2015). The feasibility of improving CBT for childhood anxiety disorders through a dismantling study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 73, 83–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2015.07.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, S. P. H., Biggs, B. K., Tiede, M. S., Dammann, J. E., Hathaway, J. C., Blasi, M. E., & Vickers, K. (2019). An online- and mobile-based application to facilitate exposure for childhood anxiety disorders. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 26, 478–491.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. J., Piacentini, J. C., Bergman, R. L., McCracken, J., & Barrios, V. (2002). Concurrent validity of the anxiety disorders section of the anxiety Disorders interview schedule for DSM-IV: child and parent versions. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 31(3), 335–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This project was support by a grant from the National Institute for Mental Health, 1R34MH100468-01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen P. H. Whiteside.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Ethical Approval

The study was completed under the approval of the institutional review board. All participants (therapists and patients) provide informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Authors’ Note

This project was support by the National Institute for Mental Health under grant 1R34MH100468-01.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Radtke, S., Whiteside, S.P.H. & Ollendick, T.H. Increasing the Efficiency of Diagnostic Interviews for Childhood Anxiety Disorders Through Joint Child-Parent Administration. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 45, 160–169 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-022-10018-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-022-10018-4

Keywords

Navigation