Abstract
Perfectionistic self-presentation (PSP) is a transdiagnostic risk factor typically assessed using the Perfectionistic Self-Presentation Scale (PSPS). The PSPS consists of three subscales, Self-Promotion, Nondisplay of Imperfection, and Nondisclosure of Imperfection. Overlap among these factors and inconsistent evidence for discriminant validity suggests a need to psychometrically evaluate the PSPS to determine the dimensionality of this measure. The current study used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in a sample of community adults (N = 419; M age = 39.9 years; 67.1% female) to examine the factor structure of the PSPS. Model fit was compared for one-factor, three-factor, and bifactor models. The bifactor model, comprising a general PSP factor and orthogonal Self-Promotion, Nondisplay, and Nondisclosure factors had the best overall model fit. The general PSP factor was reliable and well-represented by its indicators. Additionally, the general PSP factor was related to several forms of psychopathology and related constructs (i.e., social anxiety, depression, negative affect, body dissatisfaction), whereas specific PSP factors were not related to outcome variables. Finally, the general PSP factor explained a large amount of the variance in PSPS scores, suggesting the measure is unidimensional. Findings support treating the PSPS total score as a unidimensional measure of PSP in research and intervention efforts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Material
By request.
Code Availability
By request.
References
Allan, N. P., Albanese, B. J., Short, N. A., Raines, A. M., & Schmidt, N. B. (2015). Support for the general and specific bifactor model factors of anxiety sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.003
Allan, N. P., Gros, D. F., Hom, M. A., Joiner, T. E., & Stecker, T. (2016). Suicidal ideation and interpersonal needs: Factor structure of a short version of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire in an at-risk military sample. Psychiatry, 79, 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.2016.1185893
Bentler, P. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.
Bentler, P. M. (2009). Alpha, dimension-free, and model-based internal consistency reliability. Psychometrika, 74, 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9100-1
Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149–167. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
Bonifay, W. E., Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., & Meijer, R. R. (2015). When are multidimensional data unidimensional enough for structural equation modeling? An evaluation of the DETECT multidimensionality index. Structural Equation Modeling, 22(4), 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.938596
Borroni, S., Bortolla, R., Lombardi, L. M. G., Somma, A., Maffei, C., & Fossati, A. (2016). The Italian version of Perfectionistic Self-Presentation Scale: Psychometric proprieties and its associations with pathological narcissism and adult attachment in an adult non clinical sample. Personality and Mental Health, 10, 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1328
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (Second Edi). Guilford Press.
Burnham, M. J., Le, Y. K., & Piedmont, R. L. (2018). Who is Mturk? Personal characteristics and sample consistency of these online workers. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 21, 934–944. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2018.1486394
Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia Social Phobia: Diagnosis, Assessment, and Treatment 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(97)00022-3
Cole, D. A., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Manifest variable path analysis: Potentially serious and misleading consequences due to uncorrected measurement error. Psychological Methods, 19, 300–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033805
Coppock, A. (2019). Generalizing from survey experiments conducted on Mechanical Turk: A replication approach. Political Science Research and Methods, 7, 613–628. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.10
Deemer, S. A., & Minke, K. M. (1999). An investigation of the factor structure of the teacher efficacy scale. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679909597624
DiStefano, C., & Motl, R. W. (2006). Further investigating method effects associated with negatively worded items on self-report surveys. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13, 440–464. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1303_6
Egan, S. J., Wade, T. D., & Shafran, R. (2011). Perfectionism as a transdiagnostic process: A clinical review. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.04.009
Flett, G. L., Hewitt, P. L., & Heisel, M. J. (2014). The destructiveness of perfectionism revisited: Implications for the assessment of suicide risk and the prevention of suicide. Review of General Psychology, 18, 156–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000011
Flett, G. L., Nepon, T., Hewitt, P. L., Molnar, D. S., & Zhao, W. (2016). Projecting perfection by hiding effort: Supplementing the perfectionistic self-presentation scale with a brief self-presentation measure. Self and Identity, 15, 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2015.1119188
Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A., & Sever, J. M. (2000). The Reputation QuotientSM: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. Journal of Brand Management, 7, 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2000.10
Forbush, K. T., Wildes, J. E., Pollack, L. O., Dunbar, D., Luo, J., Patterson, K., & Watson, D. (2013). Development and validation of the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI). Psychological Assessment, 25, 859–878. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032639
Gibbons, R. D., & Hedeker, D. R. (1992). Full-information item bi-factor analysis. Psychometrika, 57, 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295430
Greene, A. L., Eaton, N. R., Li, K., Forbes, M. K., Krueger, R. F., Markon, K. E., & Kotov, R. (2019). Are fit indices used to test psychopathology structure biased? A simulation study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128(7), 740–764. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000434
Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.). Structural equation modeling: Present and future—A Festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog, (pp. 195–216). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
Hewitt, P L, Flett, G. L., & Ediger, E. (1995). Perfectionism traits and perfectionistic self-presentation in eating disorder attitudes, characteristics, and symptoms. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 18, 317–326. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8580917
Hewitt, P. L., Habke, A. M., Lee-Baggley, D. L., Sherry, S. B., & Flett, G. L. (2008). The impact of perfectionistic self-presentation on the cognitive, affective, and physiological experience of a clinical interview. Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 71, 93–122. https://doi.org/10.1521/psyc.2008.71.2.93
Hewitt, P. L., Flett, G. L., Sherry, S. B., Habke, M., Parkin, M., Lam, R. W., & Stein, M. B. (2003). The interpersonal expression of perfection: Perfectionistic self-presentation and psychological distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1303–1325. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1303
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Huff, C., & Tingley, D. (2015). “Who are these people?” Evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of MTurk survey respondents. Research & Politics, 2, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015604648
Hughes, G. D. (2009). The impact of incorrect responses to reverse-coded survey items. Research in the Schools, 16, 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X12455170
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
Knight, R. G., Chisholm, B. J., Marsh, N. V., & Godfrey, H. P. (1988). Some normative, reliability, and factor analytic data for the revised UCLA Loneliness Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 203–206. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3360935
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R., & Williams, W. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 606–613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
Lee, D.-G., Suh, H., & Lee, H.-K. (2011). Factor structure of the Perfectionistic Self-Presentation Scale in Korea. Psychological Reports, 109, 990–1000. https://doi.org/10.2466/07.08.21.PR0.109.6.990-1000
Li, Z., Gooden, C. J., & Toland, M. D. (2016). Measurement invariance with categorical indicators. In Applied Quantitative and Psychometric Series.
Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.
Lo, A., Hunt, C., & Abbott, M. J. (2020). A systematic review of the psychometric properties of multidimensional trait perfectionism self-report measures. Behaviour Change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/bec.2020.2
Lynam, D. R., Hoyle, R. H., & Newman, J. P. (2006). The perils of partialling: Cautionary tales from aggression and psychopathy. Assessment, 13(3), 328–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191106290562
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
Mackinnon, S. P., Battista, S. R., Sherry, S. B., & Stewart, S. H. (2014). Perfectionistic self-presentation predicts social anxiety using daily diary methods. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 143–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.038
Mackinnon, S. P., & Sherry, S. B. (2012). Perfectionistic self-presentation mediates the relationship between perfectionistic concerns and subjective well-being: A three-wave longitudinal study. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2012.02.010
Martin, A., Rief, W., Klaiberg, A., & Braehler, E. (2006). Validity of the Brief Patient Health Questionnaire Mood Scale (PHQ-9) in the general population. General Hospital Psychiatry, 28, 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2005.07.003
McDonald, R. (1999). Test theory: A unified approach. Lawrence Erlbaum.
McGee, B. J., Hewitt, P. L., Sherry, S. B., Parkin, M., & Flett, G. L. (2005). Perfectionistic self-presentation, body image, and eating disorder symptoms. Body Image, 2, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.01.002
Melnick, S. A., & Gable, R. K. (1990). The use of negative item stems: A cautionary note. Educational Research Quarterly, 14, 31–36. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ429474
Morgan, G., Hodge, K., Wells, K., & Watkins, M. (2015). Are fit indices biased in favor of bi-factor models in cognitive ability research?: A comparison of fit in correlated factors, higher-order, and bi-factor models via monte carlo simulations. Journal of Intelligence, 3(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence3010002
Mortensen, K., & Hughes, T. L. (2018). Comparing Amazon’s Mechanical Turk platform to conventional data collection methods in the health and medical research literature. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 33, 533–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4246-0
Mushquash, A. R., & Sherry, S. B. (2012). Understanding the socially prescribed perfectionist’s cycle of self-defeat: A 7-day, 14-occasion daily diary study. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 700–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRP.2012.08.006
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2021). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
Nepon, T., Flett, G. L., Hewitt, P. L., & Molnar, D. S. (2011). Perfectionism, negative social feedback, and interpersonal rumination in depression and social anxiety. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 43, 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025032
Peters, L., Sunderland, M., Andrews, G., Rapee, R. M., & Mattick, R. P. (2012). Development of a short form Social Interaction Anxiety (SIAS) and Social Phobia Scale (SPS) using nonparametric item response theory: The SIAS-6 and the SPS-6. Psychological Assessment, 24, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024544
Pilotte, W. J., & Gable, R. K. (1990). The impact of positive and negative item stems on the validity of a computer anxiety scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 603–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164490503016
Rapee, R. M., & Heimberg, R. G. (1997). A cognitive-behavioral model of anxiety in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 741–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(97)00022-3
Reise, S. P. (2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(5), 667–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
Reise, S. P., Bonifay, W. E., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.725437
Reise, S. P., Moore, T. M., & Haviland, M. G. (2010). Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 544–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.496477
Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249
Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016) Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods 21(2) 137-150 10.1037/met0000045
Roxborough, H. M., Hewitt, P. L., Kaldas, J., Flett, G. L., Caelian, C. M., Sherry, S., & Sherry, D. L. (2012). Perfectionistic self-presentation, socially prescribed perfectionism, and suicide in youth: A test of the perfectionism social disconnection model. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 42, 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1943-278X.2012.00084.x
Shapiro, D. N., Chandler, J., & Mueller, P. A. (2013). Using mechanical turk to study clinical populations. Clinical Psychological Science, 1, 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702612469015
Sherry, S. B., Vriend, J. L., Hewitt, P. L., Sherry, D. L., Flett, G. L., & Wardrop, A. A. (2009). Perfectionism dimensions, appearance schemas, and body image disturbance in community members and university students. Body Image, 6, 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BODYIM.2008.12.002
Stone, A. A., Walentynowicz, M., Schneider, S., Junghaenel, D. U., & Wen, C. K. (2019). MTurk participants have substantially lower evaluative subjective well-being than other survey participants. Computers in Human Behavior, 94, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2018.12.042
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education Inc.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3397865
Watts, A. L., Poore, H. E., & Waldman, I. D. (2019). Riskier tests of the validity of the bifactor model of psychopathology. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(6), 1285–1303. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702619855035
Weems, G. H., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2001). The impact of midpoint responses and reverse coding on survey data. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 166–176. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/openview/f7c78553107401ba384087862bac7a07/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=34423
West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables. In Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, (pp. 56–75).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Kevin Saulnier and Nicholas Allan. Shelby Saulnier provided edits, formatted the manuscript, and formatted the references. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Kevin Saulnier and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
Kevin G. Saulnier, Shelby J. Saulnier and Nicholas P. Allan declare that there are no financial interests.
Experiment Participants
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Ohio University.
Consent to Participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saulnier, K.G., Saulnier, S.J. & Allan, N.P. A Psychometric Investigation of the Perfectionistic Self-Presentation Scale Using Bifactor Modeling: Evidence for the Unidimensional Structure of the Measure. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 44, 139–150 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-021-09920-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-021-09920-0